The Urgency of Philosophy of Science for Doctoral Students of Law

Authors

  • Vicki Dwi Purnomo Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang
  • Heri Santoso Universitas Gajah Mada
  • Edy Lisdiyono Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ajae.v3i4.11948

Keywords:

Philosophy of Science, Legal Science, Doctoral Student, Legal Research, Epistemology

Abstract

Philosophy of science plays a very important role for doctoral students in law, because it provides a critical, reflective, and in-depth foundation for thinking in conducting advanced legal research. This article discusses the urgency of philosophy of science for doctoral students in law from several main aspects, including epistemological and ontological foundations, development of theoretical frameworks, critical evaluation of scientific methods, and improvement of legal reasoning skills. Philosophy of science also provides ethical guidance in research and helps students understand the relationship between law and other disciplines, such as sociology and politics. Through a deeper understanding of philosophy of science, doctoral students in law can compile more comprehensive, relevant, and impactful research, and make significant contributions to the development of legal science in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Budi, RA (2021). Philosophy of science and development of legal science in Indonesia . Jakarta: Indonesian Law Publisher.

Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Kelsen, H. (1967). Pure theory of law. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper & Row.

Prawiro, S. (2018). Legal research methodology . Yogyakarta: Publisher of Gadjah Mada University.

Soekanto, S. (2016). Introduction to legal research . Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Waluchow, W. (1994). A common law theory of judicial review: The living tree . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wibowo, H. (2019). Philosophy of law and human rights: A critical study . Malang: UMM Press.

Zolo, D. (2002). The rule of reasons: Three models of law and justice . London: Zed Books.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-28

How to Cite

Purnomo, V. D., Heri Santoso, & Edy Lisdiyono. (2024). The Urgency of Philosophy of Science for Doctoral Students of Law. Asian Journal of Applied Education (AJAE), 3(4), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.55927/ajae.v3i4.11948