Effectiveness of Interactive Teaching Strategies in Enhancing Achievement in Calculus:  A Quasi-Experimental Research Design

Christopher R. Vergara; Nicole Dr.  Balasta; Vanessa N.  Regencia

doi:10.55927/ajae.v4i2.14201

Authors

Christopher R. Vergara Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology
Nicole Dr. Balasta Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology
Vanessa N. Regencia Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ajae.v4i2.14201

Keywords:

Interactive Teaching Strategies, Traditional Lecture-Based Instructional Methods, Achievement in Calculus, Quasi-Experimental Research Design

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of interactive teaching strategies in improving calculus achievement among second-year pre-service teachers, employing a quasi-experimental design. Forty students were purposively sampled and exposed to both traditional direct instruction and interactive pedagogies. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired and independent t-tests, and Cohen’s d to assess instructional impact. Findings indicate that while initial performance in calculus was low, both instructional approaches significantly enhanced student achievement. Direct instruction facilitated systematic skill acquisition, whereas interactive strategies promoted higher engagement and positive learning attitudes. Notably, the interactive approach demonstrated a stronger effect size, suggesting deeper conceptual understanding. The study concludes that a pedagogical blend of direct and interactive methods may offer optimal benefits by integrating structure with active student participation. These findings underscore the importance of responsive, evidence-based instructional design in mathematics education and highlight the transformative potential of interactive strategies in fostering calculus competence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alhaq, M., Nugraha, M. A., & Oding, O. (2022). Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning Model and Direct Instruction for Student Learning Achievement. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Agama Islam (JIPAI), 2(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.15575/jipai.v2i2.18743

Al-Makahleh, A. A. A. (2011). The Effect of Direct Instruction Strategy on Math Achievement of Primary 4th and 5th Grade Students with Learning Difficulties. International Education Studies, 4(4), 199-205.

Arjomandi, A., Seufert, J. H., O’Brien, M. J., & Anwar, S. (2018). Active teaching strategies and student engagement: A comparison of traditional and non-traditional business students.

Berry, J. W., & Chew, S. L. (2008). Improving learning through interventions of student-generated questions and concept maps. Teaching of Psychology, 35(4), 305-312.

Braun, B., Bremser, P., Duval, A. M., Lockwood, E., & White, D. (2017). What Does Active Learning Mean For Mathematicians? Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 64(02), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1090/noti1472

Connell, L. (2012). The Impact of Traditional Vs. Interactive Instruction. Education Masters. Paper 203.

Domondon, C. S., Pardo, C. G., & Rin, E. T. (2022). Analysis of difficulties of students in learning calculus. Science International (Lahore), 34(6), 1-4.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Giangan, B., & Gurat, M. (2022). Perception and Academic Performance of STEM Students in Learning Calculus. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 4(3), 293-298.

Hagman, J. E., Johnson, E., & Fosdick, B. K. (2017). Factors contributing to students and instructors experiencing a lack of time in college calculus. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0070-7

Hermawan, C.M., Rosfiani, O., Yulia, & Lutfiana, V. (2020). The Effectiveness Of Direct Instruction Model In Mathematics Subjects: A Classroom Action Research In Elementary School. International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research, 9 (04), ISSN 2277-8616.

Hetmanenko, L. (2024). The role of interactive learning in mathematics education: fostering student engagement and interest. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 6, 2024ss0733–2024ss0733. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024ss0733

Hill, J., & MacMillan, R. C. (2004). An effective, research-based instructional approach to meet the needs of all students: Direct instruction. The case for employing direct instruction in America’s schools.

Janelli, M., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2021). Effects of pre-tests and feedback on performance outcomes and persistence in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 161, 104076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104076

Jutin, N. T., & Maat, S. M. B. (2024). The effectiveness of gamification in teaching and learning mathematics: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(1).

Kamran, F., Kanwal, A., Afzal, A., & Rafiq, S. (2023). Impact of interactive teaching methods on students learning outcomes at university level. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 7(7), 89-105.

Kazmagambet, B., Ibraimova, Z., & Kaymak, S. (2020). The Effect Of Active Learning Method On Students’ Attitude Towards Mathematics. Proceedings of International Young Scholars Workshop, 9. https://doi.org/10.47344/iysw.v9i0.219

Kutbiddinova, R. A., Eromasova, A., & Romanova, M. A. (2016). The Use of Interactive Methods in the Educational Process of the Higher Education Institution. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(14), 6557-6572.

Marette, C. (2024). Active Learning vs. Lecture-based Learning. www.linkedin.com

Munna, A. S., & Kalam, M. A. (2021). Teaching and learning process to enhance teaching effectiveness: a literature review. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 4(1), 1-4.

Mutanga, M. B. (2024). Students’ Perspectives and Experiences in Project-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study. Trends in Higher Education, 3(4), 903-911. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu3040052

Oladayo, O., & Oladayo, C. (2012). Effects of Direct and Indirect Instructional Strategies on Students‟ Achievement in Mathematics. African Research Review, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v6i4.24

Roehl, A., Shweta Linga Reddy, & Gayla Jett Shannon. (2013). The Flipped Classroom: An Opportunity To Engage Millennial Students Through Active Learning Strategies. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.14307/jfcs105.2.12

Stockard, J. (2015). A brief summary of research on direct instruction.

Stockard, J., Wood, T. W., Coughlin, C., & Rasplica Khoury, C. (2018). The Effectiveness of Direct Instruction Curricula: A Meta-Analysis of a Half Century of Research. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 479–507. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317751919

Thomas, L. (2020). Quasi-Experimental design | definition, types & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/quasi-experimental-design/

Tokac, U., Novak, E., & Thompson, C. G. (2019). Effects of game‐based learning on students’ mathematics achievement: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12347

Yusufjanovna, U. M. (2023). Interactive Methods in Teaching Mathematics: Enhancing Engagement and Learning Outcomes. Journal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices, 21, 5-9.