The Roles of Artificial Intelligence (AI) towards Students’ Communication Strategy in ESP Maritime English

Authors

  • Dyah Ratnaningsih Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Ahmad Munir Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Syafi’ul Anam Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ajae.v4i3.14743

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence (AI), Communication Strategy, ESP, Maritime English

Abstract

Globalization has boosted economic growth, making shipping the most vital mode of transportation and highlighting the need for competent, English-speaking seafarers. So, maritime academy students must be proficient in oral Maritime English (ME) to ensure clear communication and prevent mishaps. This study explored the roles of Artificial Intelligence (AI)  towards the communication strategies used by students. Using a mixed-methods design, data were collected through speaking activity observations and semi-structured interviews. Before using AI, students relied on strategies like topic avoidance, message abandonment, approximation, code-switching, and stalling. After AI integration, more effective strategies emerged, such as approximation, clarification-seeking, stalling, and self-correction. The roles of AI towards students’ communication strategy were helping them to avoid literal translation, rely less on others, eliminate message abandonment, and reduce stalling, leading to improved fluency, independence, and professional communication in maritime contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aresta, R. (2018). The Influence of Translation Techniques on the Accuracy and Acceptability of Translated Utterances that Flout the Maxim of Quality. Jurnal Humaniora, 30(2), 176.

Balthazard, P. A., Potter, R. E., & Warren, J. (2002). The effects of extraversion and expertise on virtual team interaction and performance. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002-Janua(January).

Bocanegra‐Valle, A. (2012). Maritime English. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, March.

Cantos, K. F., Varas Giler, R. C., & Castro Magayanes, I. E. (2023). Artificial Intelligence In Language Teaching And Learning. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(4), 5629–5638.

Damanik, J. Y. (2022). Language Learning Strategies Used by Indonesian Learners in IELTS. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(1), 62–77.

Duck, S. W., & McMahan, D. T. (2011). An overview of communication Strategy. The Basics of Communication: A Relational Perspective, 31(2).

Franceschi, D. (2014). The Features of Maritime English Discourse. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(2), 78–87.

Gomathi, R., Maheswaran, S., Mythili, M., Nandita, S., Sathesh, S., Murugesan, G., & Duraisamy, P. (2023). The Exploitation of Artificial Intelligence in Developing English Language Learner’s Communication Skills. 2023 14th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies, ICCCNT 2023, 06(01), 750–757.

Haryani, H., Mujiyanto, J., Hartono, R., & Yuliasri, I. (2022). English Communication Skill Used by Indonesian Seafarer on Radio Communication. English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings, 5(1), 627–634.

IMO. (2009). INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION MARITIME KNOWLEDGE CENTRE International Shipping and World Trade Facts and figures. Development, October, 1–37.

Masithoh, H., Fauziati, E., & Supriyadi, S. (2018). Communication Strategies Used by the Students on the Perspective of Language Proficiency. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 5(5), 21.

McGowan, N. A., & Sekaja, L. (2022). A diary study of the impression management strategies utilised by industrial and organisational psychology interns. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 48, 1–13.

Mohamed, O. I., & Alani, N. N. (2022). English for Specific Purposes: An Overview: Definitions, Characteristics and Development. English Language Teaching, 15(12), 28.

Nani I. Tiono, & Agatha Sylvia. (2004). the Types of Communication Strategies Used By Speaking Class Students With Different Communication Apprehension Levels in English Department of Petra Christian University, Surabaya. K@Ta, 6(1), 30–46.

Nasar, I., Uzer, Y., Aisyah, Ridayani, & Purwanto, M. B. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Smart Classrooms. Asian Journal of Applied Education (AJAE), 2(4), 547–556.

Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cambridge University Press.

Sale, J. E. M., & Thielke, S. (2018). Qualitative Research is a Fundamental Scientific Process. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 102, 129–133.

Tarabelsi, N., Aboud, F., & Fawzi Shamsi, A. (2024). Investigating Arab Students’ Communication Strategies in Speaking English as a Medium of Instruction. Arab World English Journal, 15(2), 261–273.

Trofimovich, P. (2005). Studying Speaking to Inform Second Language Learning (review). The Canadian Modern Language Review / La Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes, 62(2), 355–357.

UNCTAD. (2024). Review of Maritime Transport. United Nations Publications.

Viktorivna, K., Andrii Oleksandrovych, V., Iryna Oleksandrivna, K., & Nadia Oleksandrivna, K. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Language Learning: What Are We Afraid of. Arab World English Journal, 8, 262–273.

Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252(PA), 124167.

Ziarati, R. (2006). Safety at sea – applying Pareto analysis. September 2003.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-28

How to Cite

Ratnaningsih, D., Munir, A. ., & Anam, S. . (2025). The Roles of Artificial Intelligence (AI) towards Students’ Communication Strategy in ESP Maritime English. Asian Journal of Applied Education (AJAE), 4(3), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.55927/ajae.v4i3.14743

Issue

Section

Articles