Innovative Assessment Frameworks for Measuring Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Science Education

Ahmad Sofyan

doi:10.55927/ajae.v5i1.16063

Authors

Ahmad Sofyan UIN Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ajae.v5i1.16063

Keywords:

Innovative Assessment, Higher-Order Thinking Skills, Science Education, HOTS Assessment, Junior High School

Abstract

Science education requires assessment systems that go beyond measuring conceptual mastery to effectively evaluate students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). However, school assessments remain dominated by low-level cognitive instruments, limiting HOTS development. This study aims to develop and test the effectiveness of an innovative assessment framework for measuring HOTS in science learning. Using a research and development approach, the study involved needs analysis, design, development, expert validation, and effectiveness testing through a quasi-experimental design. The participants were 60 eighth-grade students from a state junior high school in DKI Jakarta during the 2025/2026 academic year, divided into experimental and control groups. Data were collected using HOTS tests, student response questionnaires, and expert validation sheets, and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The results indicate that the developed assessment framework is highly valid and practical and significantly improves students’ HOTS compared to conventional assessments. This study contributes theoretically to the advancement of science education evaluation models and practically offers an effective assessment alternative to support HOTS-oriented learning at the junior high school level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2020). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Pearson.

Bennett, R. E. (2020). The changing nature of educational assessment. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 370–407.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2021). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(5), 551–575.

Branch, R. M., & Kopcha, T. J. (2020). Instructional design models. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (4th ed., pp. 77–87). Pearson.

Brookhart, S. M. (2022). Assessing higher-order thinking skills in classroom practice. Educational Assessment, 27(1), 1–15.

Carless, D. (2022). Feedback literacy and student engagement. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(6), 1735–1748.

Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2021). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Pearson.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140.

Dawson, P., & Henderson, M. (2023). Assessment design for learning in science education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 78, 101257.

DeLuca, C., Chapman-Chin, A. E., LaPointe-McEwan, D., & Klinger, D. A. (2022). Student perspectives on assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 29(3), 367–389.

Delgado, F. J., & Luna, M. J. (2022). Designing assessments for higher-order thinking in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 44(9), 1389–1406.

Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2021). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 10(2), 58–60.

Field, A. (2020). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Heong, Y. M., Othman, W. D., Yunos, J., Kiong, T. T., Hassan, R., & Mohamad, M. M. (2021). The level of higher-order thinking skills among science students. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 1–16.

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2020). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (7th ed.). Sage Publications.

Kurniati, D., Harimukti, R., & Jamil, N. A. (2021). Kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa SMP dalam pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(2), 256–265.

Lakens, D. (2022). Sample size justification. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), 33267.

Mislevy, R. J., & Haertel, G. D. (2021). Implications of evidence-centered design for educational assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 40(2), 34–45.

Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kalman, H. K., & Kemp, J. E. (2021). Designing effective instruction (8th ed.). Wiley.

Nguyen, T. H., & Pham, T. H. (2024). Innovative assessment frameworks and students’ higher-order thinking skills. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 36(1), 45–63.

Nicol, D., Serbati, A., & Tracchi, S. (2021). Designing assessment to improve student learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(6), 864–880.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Beyond academic learning: First results from the survey of social and emotional skills. OECD Publishing.

Panadero, E. (2021). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 664300.

Pellegrino, J. W. (2020). Assessment as a tool for learning. Routledge.

Pellegrino, J. W., Wilson, M. R., Koenig, J. A., & Beatty, A. S. (2020). Developing assessments for the next generation science standards. National Academies Press.

Rahman, A., Widodo, A., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2022). Comparative study of HOTS-based and conventional assessment in junior high school science learning. Journal of Science Education Research, 6(1), 45–56.

Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2021). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Routledge.

Rogers, G., & McTighe, J. (2022). Valid assessment design for deep learning. Assessment Update, 34(3), 1–15.

Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2023). Variables associated with achievement in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 1–34.

Smith, J. A., Brown, T. L., & Nguyen, P. T. (2024). Rethinking assessment practices in science education: A global review. International Journal of Science Education, 46(3), 421–440.

Suryani, N., & Widyastuti, E. (2022). Praktik asesmen IPA berbasis HOTS di sekolah menengah pertama. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 63–73.

Taber, K. S. (2021). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments. Research in Science Education, 51(3), 1–24.

Torrance, H. (2021). Educational assessment and the future of learning. Oxford Review of Education, 47(1), 1–18.

Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2021). Designing learning environments for conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 72, 101443.

Widana, I. W., & Septiari, L. K. (2023). Pengembangan instrumen asesmen HOTS dalam pembelajaran sains. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 27(1), 89–101.

Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2023). Higher order thinking in science classrooms: Students’ learning and teachers’ professional development. Studies in Science Education, 59(1), 1–41.