Indonesian Language Teachers' Perceptions of ChatGPT Use in Writing Instruction in the Digital Literacy Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/ajae.v5i3.16815Keywords:
Teacher Perception, Chatgpt, Writing Instruction, Digital Literacy, Generative Artificial IntelligenceAbstract
The emergence of generative artificial intelligence, particularly ChatGPT, has created both opportunities and challenges for writing instruction in secondary education. This study aims to: (1) describe Indonesian Language teachers’ understanding of ChatGPT as a tool for writing instruction; (2) analyze teachers’ perceptions of the Use of ChatGPT in writing instruction; and (3) explore strategies for the responsible use of ChatGPT to support students’ writing skills and digital literacy. This study employed a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with three Indonesian Language teachers, classroom observations, and analysis of instructional documents. Data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña. The findings indicate that teachers possess a functionally pragmatic understanding of ChatGPT and perceive it as a learning support tool that facilitates the pre-writing process, particularly in generating ideas, organizing outlines, and providing initial feedback. Teachers’ perceptions of ChatGPT were generally positive due to its potential to improve instructional efficiency; however, concerns remained regarding students’ cognitive dependency, academic integrity, limited digital literacy among teachers, and infrastructural constraints. Teachers developed several responsible-use strategies, including guided prompting, comparative writing, error analysis, and reflective journaling, to ensure that AI supports the development of critical thinking and independent writing skills. The findings contribute to the development of a responsible AI integration model for Indonesian language instruction at the secondary school level.
Downloads
References
Baskara, R., & Mukarto, F. X. (2023). Exploring the implications of ChatGPT for language learning in higher education. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v7i2.1387
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93–106.
Firat, M. (2023). How ChatGPT can transform autodidactic experiences and open education? The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(2), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1154864
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600
Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley.
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for EFL/ESL writing: Challenges, opportunities, and implications. RELC Journal, 54(2), 471–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231164427
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Nazir, A., & Nair, S. (2023). Teachers’ perception and attitude towards artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(5), 803–810. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.5.1878
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 364–389. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.23
Sari, D. P., & Wijaya, A. (2022). Hambatan dan peluang integrasi teknologi digital dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di sekolah menengah pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 11(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPBS.112.02
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
UNESCO. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator 4.4.2. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/ip51-global-framework-reference-digital-literacy-skills-2018-en.pdf
Ventayen, R. J. M. (2023). OpenAI ChatGPT generated results: Similarity index of artificial intelligence-based contents. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4332664
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hanis Nurwidati, Farida Nugrahani, Agata Margareti, Prih Haryati, Tubandi, Anom Wija Pratama

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

































