<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN"
  "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJMA</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Asian Journal of Management and Accounting</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2963-4547</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Formosa Publisher</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.55927/ajma.v4i3.14834</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The Effect of Work-Life Balance and Work Environment on Organizational Commitment with Job Satisfaction as a Mediator at Ananda Purwokerto Hospital</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Tiarto</surname>
            <given-names>Ahlan Gema</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto</aff>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name>
            <surname>Widhiandono</surname>
            <given-names>Hengky</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto</aff>
          <email>hengkywindhiandono@ump.ac.id</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Suyoto</surname>
            <given-names></given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto</aff>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Innayah</surname>
            <given-names>Maulida Nurul</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto</aff>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>21</day>
        <month>07</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>02</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd">
          <day>18</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>20</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <volume>4</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>907</fpage>
      <lpage>924</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>This study investigates the influence of work-life balance and work environment on organizational commitment, with job satisfaction as a mediating variable, at Ananda Purwokerto General Hospital. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected from 130 healthcare workers selected through accidental sampling. The Slovin formula with a 5% margin of error was used to determine the sample size. Data analysis was conducted using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with the Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach via SmartPLS 4.0 software. The results show that work-life balance and work environment both have a positive and significant effect on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Moreover, job satisfaction significantly influences organizational commitment and mediates the relationship between work-life balance, work environment, and organizational commitment.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Work-Life Balance</kwd>
        <kwd>Work Environment</kwd>
        <kwd>Job Satisfaction</kwd>
        <kwd>Organizational Commitment</kwd>
        <kwd>SmartPLS</kwd>
        <kwd>Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <permissions>
        <license>
          <ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
    </article-meta>
  </front>

  <body>

<sec>
  <title>INTRODUCTION</title>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>Hospitals serve as integral institutions within the healthcare
    system, playing a vital role in delivering medical services to the
    broader community. The World Health Organization (WHO) highlights
    that hospitals enhance healthcare systems by efficiently organizing
    and utilizing their resources to meet the needs of the population,
    ultimately improving system performance and responding to increasing
    healthcare demands (Nafisya <italic>et al</italic>., 2025).</p>
    <p>Within the healthcare setting, organizational commitment among
    hospital staff plays an important and critical role in ensuring the
    consistent delivery of high-quality services. It encompasses the
    level of emotional attachment, loyalty, and active engagement that
    employees demonstrate toward their organization. Organizational
    commitment reflects an individual's readiness to contribute to the
    institution, remain within it, and work toward its goals (Dihaq et
    al., 2022). Meyer and Allen (1991), as referenced by Choeriyah &amp;
    Ayu Tuty Utami (2023), classify this commitment into three distinct
    components: affective commitment, which pertains to an emotional
    connection with the organization; continuance commitment, which
    involves an awareness of the potential costs of leaving; and
    normative commitment, which relates to a perceived moral obligation
    to stay. An organizational strong sense commitment is commonly
    linked to higher levels of job satisfaction, enhanced performance,
    and reduced turnover intentions.</p>
    <p>Ananda Purwokerto General Hospital, a prominent private
    healthcare institution in Central Java, is currently facing
    significant human resource challenges. Given its responsibility to
    provide critical medical services to the community, the hospital
    requires a dedicated and committed workforce. Nevertheless, factors
    such as work-life balance, the compatibility between professional
    and personal responsibilities, and the overall quality of the work
    environment present challenges that must be carefully examined and
    addressed.</p>
    <p>Table 1. Turnover Rate General Hospital Ananda Purwokerto</p>
  </disp-quote>
  <table-wrap>
    <label>Table 1. Turnover Rate General Hospital Ananda Purwokerto</label>
    <caption>
      <title><italic>Source: Amarta &amp; Mukhroji. (2024)</italic></title>
    </caption>
    <table>
      <thead>
        <tr>
          <th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Year</th>
          <th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Number Of Employee Exits</th>
          <th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Turnover Rate</th>
          <th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Turnover Rate Limit</th>
        </tr>
      </thead>
      <tbody>
        <tr>
          <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2021</td>
          <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">232</td>
          <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">32</td>
          <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">15%</td>
          <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10%</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2022</td>
          <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">260</td>
          <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">42</td>
          <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">17%</td>
          <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10%</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2023</td>
          <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">292</td>
          <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">51</td>
          <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">18%</td>
          <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10%</td>
        </tr>
      </tbody>
    </table>
  </table-wrap>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>According to a study by Amarta and Mukhroji (2024), one of the
    main challenges faced by Ananda Purwokerto General Hospital is the
    high employee turnover rate. This issue is often linked to poor
    work-life balance, unsatisfactory working conditions, and limited
    support for a healthy and positive work environment. Consequently,
    examining how work-life balance and the work environment impact
    organizational commitment—particularly with job satisfaction as a
    mediating factor—is highly relevant in the context of this hospital.
    As the demand for high-quality healthcare services and efficient
    human resource management continues to rise, hospitals must adopt
    adaptive, evidence-</p>
    <p>based management strategies. Identifying the key drivers of
    employee commitment is essential in fostering a more productive,
    supportive, and balanced workplace. By analyzing the
    interrelationship among work-life balance, work environment, and job
    satisfaction, Ananda Purwokerto General Hospital can formulate more
    effective human resource policies to retain competent and committed
    personnel.</p>
    <p>Organizational commitment is a psychological condition that
    represents the bond between an employee and the organization,
    influencing the individual’s decision to remain within the
    organization (Allen &amp; Meyer, 1991). Studies by Anggreni and
    Budiani (2021), Surya and Riana (2023), and Choeriyah and Ayu Tuty
    Utami (2023) emphasizes that a better work-life balance can increase
    job satisfaction, which in turn strengthens organizational
    commitment. Husniati <italic>et al</italic>. (2023) defining
    work-life balance as a state of proportion between the two demands
    that individuals face in their work life and personal life.
    Employees who perceive sufficient time for personal and family needs
    tend to be more engaged and productive. In contrast, an imbalance
    can result in stress, burnout, and diminished commitment to the
    organization. Therefore, hospitals should implement supportive
    measures such as flexible working hours and employee wellness
    programs to enhance retention and employee engagement (Azriel &amp;
    Ariani, 2025).</p>
    <p>The relationship between work-life balance and organizational
    commitment has been extensively examined in the literature, with
    most studies identifying a significant and positive correlation
    (Surya &amp; Riana, 2023; Dihaq et al., 2022; Ade et al., 2024).
    However, contrasting evidence is provided by Yusnita et al. (2022),
    who found no statistically significant relationship between the two
    variables. Beyond its association with organizational commitment,
    work-life balance is also widely acknowledged as a crucial factor
    influencing job satisfaction. In healthcare settings, when
    institutions promote environments that support employees in
    balancing their professional and personal lives, job satisfaction is
    likely to improve—thereby potentially reinforcing their
    organizational commitment. This positive linkage between work-life
    balance and job satisfaction has been validated in various studies
    (Latupapua et al., 2021; Surya &amp; Riana, 2023; Nurhalizah &amp;
    Jufrizen, 2024), although conflicting findings have been reported by
    Maharani et al. (2023), who observed no significant
    relationship.</p>
    <p>Organizational commitment is also influenced by the overall
    quality of the work environment. As cited by Nitisemito (2016) in
    Fitria &amp; Chalil (2023), the work environment encompasses all
    external factors surrounding employees— ranging from the physical
    setting and work procedures to organizational structures, whether
    individual or team-based—that collectively impact employee
    performance and productivity. A work environment that is perceived
    as supportive, secure, and comfortable contributes to stronger
    emotional ties between employees and the organization, while also
    enhancing job satisfaction, as evidenced in studies by Budianto et
    al. (2024), Ghania et al. (2024), Baru et al. (2023), Priyatno &amp;
    Rijanti (2024), and Anggela &amp; Damingun (2024). Conversely,
    environments marked by high stress levels or insufficient support
    tend to</p>
    <p>diminish both job satisfaction and organizational commitment.
    Robbins &amp; Judge (2023) note that the work environment serves as
    a critical reference point in shaping employee dedication and
    professional conduct. Therefore, fostering a positive work
    environment is imperative for maintaining and strengthening
    organizational commitment.</p>
    <p>Research examining the influence of the work environment on
    organizational commitment has produced varying outcomes. While
    several studies have identified a positive correlation (Daslim et
    al., 2023; Budianto et al., 2024), others, such as Santoni et al.
    (2021), have reported a negative relationship. Generally, a
    supportive and well-structured work environment fosters higher
    levels of employee satisfaction and organizational loyalty, thereby
    reinforcing commitment to the organization. According to Robbins
    &amp; Judge (2015), as cited in Widhiandono et al. (2022), job
    satisfaction represents a favorable emotional reaction to one’s work
    and serves as a critical factor in shaping employee behavior and
    overall performance in the workplace. Likewise, job satisfaction is
    often shaped by the work environment, as confirmed by Nurhalizah
    &amp; Jufrizen (2024), Anggela &amp; Damingun (2024), and Fahlefi
    (2023), though others such as Pragusti &amp; Hidayat (2023) found no
    significant connection.</p>
    <p>Job satisfaction also acted as a mediating variable for work-life
    balance, organizational work environment, and organizational
    commitment. Nurhalizah &amp; Jufrizen (2024), Fahlefi (2023), and
    Santoni et al. (2021) support the view that workers who are
    job-satisfied are more likely to display greater degrees of
    commitment to their particular organizations. Job satisfaction is
    thus a critical factor in all working spaces.</p>
    <p>This study extends the work of Alfianto &amp; Hadi (2024), which
    examines the effect of work-life balance on organizational
    commitment mediated by job satisfaction, with a focus on employees
    of a state-owned bank in Sidoarjo Regency. Building upon their
    model, the present research incorporates the work environment as an
    additional independent variable and applies the framework in a
    different organizational setting—specifically, among healthcare
    professionals at a public hospital in Purwokerto. The main objective
    is to examine the influence of work-life balance and the work
    environment on organizational commitment, while also assessing the
    mediating role of job satisfaction. The results are expected to
    provide valuable insights for hospital administrators in formulating
    strategies to enhance employee commitment, thereby contributing to
    improved healthcare service delivery for the community.</p>
  </disp-quote>
</sec>












<sec>
  <title>LITERATURE REVIEW</title>
  <sec id="social-exchange-theory">
    <title>Social Exchange Theory</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Social Exchange Theory (SET), originally proposed by Blau
      (1964) in <italic>Exchange and Power in Social Life</italic>,
      posits that the relationship between employees and organizations
      is governed by the norm of reciprocity, where mutual benefits
      drive continued interaction. Within the workplace context,
      particularly regarding work-life balance and the work environment,
      SET provides a framework to understand how employees interpret
      organizational support. When employees perceive that their
      organization values their well-being— through practices that
      promote work-life balance and a positive work</p>
      <p>environment—they are more likely to experience higher levels of
      job satisfaction. In turn, this job satisfaction serves as a
      mediating factor that strengthens their commitment to the
      organization.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="the-effect-of-work-life-balance-on-organizational-commitment">
    <title>The effect of work-life balance on organizational
    commitment</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Work-life balance (WLB) is recognized as a strategic factor in
      enhancing employee commitment to the organization, particularly
      through the lens of reciprocal relationships as outlined in Social
      Exchange Theory (Alhawary et al., 2021). According to Blau (1964),
      when organizations support employees in achieving equilibrium
      between professional and personal responsibilities—such as by
      offering flexible working hours, sufficient leave, and attending
      to individual needs—employees are more likely to feel appreciated.
      This perception of organizational support fosters increased
      motivation, leading to stronger loyalty and organizational
      commitment. Empirical studies have confirmed a positive and
      significant association between work-life balance and
      organizational commitment (Anggreni &amp; Budiani, 2021; Surya
      &amp; Riana, 2023).</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="hypothesis-1-the-effect-of-work-life-balance-on-organizational-commitment">
    <title>Hypothesis 1: The effect of Work-Life Balance on
    Organizational Commitment</title>
    <sec id="the-effect-of-work-life-balance-on-job-satisfaction">
      <title>The effect of work-life balance on job satisfaction</title>
      <disp-quote>
        <p>Work-life balance represents an individual's ability to
        effectively manage professional obligations in conjunction with
        personal and family responsibilities. Organizations hold a
        pivotal role in creating conditions that facilitate this
        balance, given its substantial impact on employee job
        satisfaction (Wahyudin et al., 2025). The implementation of
        work-life balance strategies aims to increase employee
        satisfaction, which in turn can increase motivation and
        strengthen organizational commitment (Kasbuntoro et al., 2021).
        The existence of a positive and significant association between
        work-life balance and job satisfaction has been substantiated by
        empirical evidence from multiple studies, including those
        conducted by Latupapua et al. (2021), Surya and Riana (2023),
        and Nurhalizah and Jufrizen (2024).</p>
      </disp-quote>
    </sec>
  </sec>
  <sec id="hypothesis-2-the-effect-of-work-life-balance-on-job-satisfaction">
    <title>Hypothesis 2: The effect of Work-Life Balance on Job
    Satisfaction</title>
    <sec id="the-effect-of-work-environment-on-organizational-commitment">
      <title>The effect of Work Environment on Organizational
      Commitment</title>
      <disp-quote>
        <p>A supportive and conducive work environment plays a crucial
        role in fostering strong interpersonal relationships among
        employees within an organization. Consequently, it is essential
        for companies to establish a comfortable and encouraging
        workplace atmosphere to sustain employee commitment and promote
        continued productivity in fulfilling their responsibilities
        (Nurkholifa &amp; Budiono, 2022). Empirical findings by Daslim
        et al. (2023), Budianto et al. (2024), and Baru et al. (2023)
        further affirm that a positive work environment significantly
        contributes to enhancing organizational commitment.</p>
      </disp-quote>
    </sec>
  </sec>
  <sec id="hypothesis-3-the-effect-of-work-environment-on-organizational-commitment">
    <title>Hypothesis 3: The effect of Work Environment on
    Organizational Commitment</title>
  </sec>
  <sec id="section">
    <title></title>
    <sec id="the-effect-of-work-environment-on-job-satisfaction">
      <title>The effect of Work Environment on Job Satisfaction</title>
      <disp-quote>
        <p>To enhance job satisfaction, it is essential to cultivate a
        work environment that is engaging, safe, and supportive—both in
        terms of leadership and peer relationships. Organizations must
        also ensure the provision of adequate facilities, uphold
        fairness in job placement, and promote equality across all
        levels of staff. Beyond work-related factors, attention to
        employees' personal well-being is equally important. This is
        particularly vital in hospitals, which, as professional
        healthcare institutions, are expected to continuously evolve in
        delivering high- quality services aligned with ongoing
        advancements in science, technology, and societal needs (Berutu
        et al., 2024). Research by Nurhalizah and Jufrizen (2024),
        Anggela and Damingun (2024), and Fahlefi (2023) has confirmed
        that the work environment significantly influences job
        satisfaction, as it is a critical factor in shaping employees'
        overall workplace experience.</p>
      </disp-quote>
    </sec>
  </sec>
  <sec id="hypothesis-4-the-effect-of-work-environment-on-job-satisfaction">
    <title>Hypothesis 4: The effect of Work Environment on Job
    Satisfaction</title>
    <sec id="the-effect-of-job-satisfaction-on-organizational-commitment">
      <title>The effect of Job Satisfaction on Organizational
      Commitment</title>
      <disp-quote>
        <p>To foster employee job satisfaction, organizations must
        provide autonomy in performing tasks, offer diverse job
        responsibilities, and deliver meaningful feedback regarding work
        outcomes. These elements contribute to a more fulfilling work
        experience, ultimately leading to increased employee happiness.
        Consequently, if an organization aims to enhance performance and
        cultivate a highly committed workforce, it must ensure that the
        fundamental drivers of job satisfaction are adequately
        addressed. Satisfied employees are more likely to invest their
        energy and dedication into their roles (Nurhalizah &amp;
        Jufrizen, 2024). Empirical studies by Dengo et al. (2023), Dihaq
        et al. (2022), and Latupapua et al. (2021) support the view that
        job satisfaction exerts a positive and significant influence on
        organizational commitment.</p>
      </disp-quote>
    </sec>
  </sec>
  <sec id="hypothesis-5-the-effect-of-job-satisfaction-on-organizational-commitment">
    <title>Hypothesis 5: The Effect of Job Satisfaction on
    Organizational Commitment</title>
    <sec id="job-satisfaction-mediates-the-influence-of-work-life-balance-on-organizational-commitment">
      <title>Job satisfaction mediates the influence of work-life
      balance on organizational commitment</title>
      <disp-quote>
        <p>Latupapua et al. (2021) emphasizes the critical function of
        job satisfaction as a mediating variable in the relationship
        between work-life balance and organizational commitment. When
        employees derive satisfaction from successfully managing their
        professional and personal roles, they tend to exhibit heightened
        loyalty and a deeper emotional attachment to their organization.
        This suggests that job satisfaction serves as a psychological
        conduit through which work-life balance translates into stronger
        organizational commitment. Supporting evidence has been provided
        by Sari and Seniati (2020) as well as Surya and Riana (2023),
        who also found that job satisfaction mediates the influence of
        work-life balance on organizational commitment. Similarly,
        Yusnita et al. (2022) validated the mediating role of job
        satisfaction in this dynamic. Taken together, these studies
        highlight the dual function of job satisfaction—both as a
        consequence of work-life balance and as a reinforcing element
        that enhances employees’ organizational commitment.</p>
      </disp-quote>
    </sec>
  </sec>
  <sec id="hypothesis-6-job-satisfaction-mediates-the-influence-of-work-life-balance-on-organizational-commitment">
    <title>Hypothesis 6: Job satisfaction mediates the influence of
    work-life balance on organizational commitment</title>
  </sec>
  <sec id="section-1">
    <title></title>
    <sec id="job-satisfaction-mediates-the-influence-of-work-environment-on-organizational-commitment">
      <title>Job satisfaction mediates the influence of work environment
      on organizational commitment</title>
      <disp-quote>
        <p>The work environment encompasses the physical and social
        conditions in which employees carry out their daily
        responsibilities, including the availability of appropriate
        facilities and resources needed for effective job performance. A
        supportive and well-structured environment not only fosters
        optimal productivity but also prioritizes employee health,
        safety, and overall comfort (Nurhalizah &amp; Jufrizen, 2024).
        While the attributes of an ideal workplace may vary depending on
        the specific nature of the job, the importance of a positive and
        accommodating work setting is universally recognized across both
        public and private sectors. When employees perceive their work
        environment as favorable, it often contributes to greater job
        satisfaction, which subsequently enhances their organizational
        commitment (Fitria &amp; Chalil, 2023). Empirical studies by
        Nurhalizah and Jufrizen (2024), Fahlefi (2023), Santoni et al.
        (2021), and Priyatno and Rijanti (2024) consistently demonstrate
        that job satisfaction mediates the effect of the work
        environment on employees’ commitment to their organization.</p>
        <p><bold>Hypothesis 7: Job satisfaction mediates the influence
        of work environment on organizational commitment</bold></p>
      </disp-quote>
      <graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="vertopal_96334038c32c44e69bfc93a2a6f70780/media/image3.jpeg" />
      <disp-quote>
        <p><bold>Figure 1. Conceptual framework</bold></p>
      </disp-quote>
    </sec>
  </sec>
</sec>














<sec>
  <title>METHODOLOGY</title>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>This research employs a quantitative approach aimed at analyzing
    the relationships among variables using Structural Equation Modeling
    (SEM) with the Partial Least Squares (PLS) technique, implemented
    through SmartPLS version 4.0. The analysis consists of two main
    stages: the outer model assessment, which examines the validity and
    reliability of the relationships between latent constructs and their
    respective indicators; and the inner model assessment, which
    evaluates the structural relationships among latent variables in
    accordance with the proposed hypotheses. Variable indicators of
    commitment according to Alfianto &amp; Hadi (2024) include: (1)
    continuous commitment, related to employee responses regarding the
    losses incurred if they decide to leave the company; (2) normative
    commitment, related to an employee's moral feelings regarding
    their</p>
    <p>obligations to the company; (3) affective commitment, related to
    an employee's emotional involvement in the company.</p>
    <p>The variable indicator of work-life balance, which is maintaining
    a balance between work and personal life, having a social life
    outside of work, engaging in leisure activities outside of work
    (hobbies), and fulfilling responsibilities to family and company
    (Alfianto &amp; Hadi, 2024). Meanwhile, according to Yuliantini
    &amp; Santoso (2020), the indicators for the work environment
    variable are: (1) office facilities; (2) working conditions; (3)
    relationships among colleagues; and (4) relationships between
    employees and management.</p>
    <p>According to Alfianto &amp; Hadi (2024), indicators of job
    satisfaction include:</p>
    <p>(1) satisfaction with the job itself; (2) satisfaction with the
    organization; (3) social relationships between employees and
    coworkers.</p>
  </disp-quote>
</sec>













<sec>
  <title>RESEARCH RESULT</title>
  <sec id="respondent-demographics">
    <title>Respondent Demographics</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 2. Respondent Demographics</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 2. Respondent Demographics</label>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Characteristics</th>
            <th align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Category</th>
            <th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Frequency</th>
            <th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Percentage</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2" colspan="1">Gender</td>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Male</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">20</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">15,4%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Female</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">110</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">84,6%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="5" colspan="1">Age</td>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&lt;20</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0,8%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">20-30</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">87</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">66,9%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">30-40</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">40</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">30,8%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">40-50</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,5%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">130</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">100%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="8" colspan="1">Work Unit</td>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Midwife</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">28</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">21,5%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Nurse</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">77</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">59,2%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">General Practitioner</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">13</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10,0%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Physiotherapy</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,3%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Speech Therapy</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0,8%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Occupational therapy</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0,8%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Nutrisionist</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0,8%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Health Analysis</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,6%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="4" colspan="1">Education</td>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Diploma</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">69</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">53,1%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Bachelor's Degree</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">56</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">43,1%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">High School</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,8%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Diploma/Equivalent</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">130</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">100%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="3" colspan="1">Length of Service</td>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&lt;1 Year</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">17</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">13,1%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1-10 Years</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">98</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">75,4%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10-20 Years</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">15</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">11,5%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"></td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">130</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">100%</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>This study involved 130 respondents, predominantly women (110
      people, or 84.6%) and a small number of men (15.4%). The majority
      of respondents were aged 20–30 years (66.9%), followed by those
      aged 30–40 years (30.8%). Based on job roles, the majority were
      nurses (59.2%), followed by midwives (21.5%) and general
      practitioners (10%). The respondents' highest level of education
      was predominantly a diploma (53.1%), followed by a bachelor's
      degree (43.1%), and high school/equivalent (3.8%). In terms of
      years of work experience, the majority had worked for 1–10 years
      (75.4%), while others had worked for less than 1 year (13.1%) or
      10–20 years (11.5%).</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="outer-loadings">
    <title>Outer Loadings</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 3. Outer Loadings</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 3. Outer Loadings</label>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Expression in the Scale (Items)</th>
            <th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">LF</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="2">
              <bold>Work Life Balance</bold>
            </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(WLB3) I was able to balance my work with my personal life.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.735</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(WLB4) Doing work is like part of my daily activities.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.776</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(WLB5) I have a strong connection with my current job.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.816</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(WLB6) I think that the assigned tasks need to be completed immediately.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.833</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(WLB8) I strive to always take part in tasks.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.763</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="2">
              <bold>Work Environment</bold>
            </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(WE1) I feel comfortable using the hospital facilities provided.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.859</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(WE2) I feel safe and comfortable working in this hospital environment.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.901</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(WE4) I feel that the leaders of this hospital are open to listening to suggestions or complaints.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.855</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="2">
              <bold>Job Satisfaction</bold>
            </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(JS1) Compared to the many types of work, my job is more interesting to do.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.841</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(JS2) I feel satisfied with the activities at work that I do.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.855</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(JS3) I am satisfied with the facilities provided by the company.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.861</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(JS4) I feel satisfied with the form of attention from management to employees in doing work, such as providing direction and motivation to work.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.885</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(JS5) I am satisfied with the work climate at the company.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.817</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="2">
              <bold>Organizational Commitment</bold>
            </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(OG1) It would require considerable personal sacrifice for me to leave the Company.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.782</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(OG2) I stay with this company because I do not believe other companies can provide greater benefits.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.878</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(OG3) It's hard for me to leave this Company.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.903</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(OG4) I would feel guilty if I left the company.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.908</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(OG5) I will not leave the Company because I feel I have a moral obligation.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.884</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(OG6) The Company's problems are also my problems.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.792</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(OG7) I feel emotionally attached to the company.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.797</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle">(OG8) I will spend the rest of my career at this company.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle">0.896</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Based on the results of the outer loading analysis, there were
      several indicators with values less than 0.7. These indicators,
      namely variables wlb 1, wlb 2, wlb 7, lk 3, and kk 6, were removed
      from the model because they did not meet the convergent validity
      criteria. After removal, all remaining indicators showed outer
      loading values above 0.7, indicating that these indicators are
      valid in representing the measured construct.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="construct-validity-and-reliability">
    <title>Construct Validity and Reliability</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The validity and reliability test results in Table 4 are
      considered valid if the composite reliability (CR) is at least
      0.70, Cronbach's alpha is ≥ 0.70, and the average extracted value
      (AVE) is ≥ 0.50 (Hair et al., 2021). The test results indicate
      that all variables are valid and reliable, as the average variance
      extracted (AVE) is ≥ 0.50, composite reliability is ≥ 0.70, and
      Cronbach’s alpha is ≥ 0.70.</p>
      <p>Table 4. Construct Validity and Reliability</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 4. Construct Validity and Reliability</label>
      <caption>
        <title><italic>Source: PLS data processing results (2025)</italic></title>
      </caption>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
            <th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Cronbach’s Alpha</th>
            <th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">rho_A</th>
            <th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">CR</th>
            <th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">AVE</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">KK</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.906</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.908</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.930</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.726</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">KO</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.948</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.952</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.956</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.734</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">LK</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.842</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.845</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.905</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.760</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">WLB</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.844</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.848</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.889</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.617</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
  </sec>
  <sec id="uji-r-square">
    <title>Uji R-square</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 5. R Square Test</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 5. R Square Test</label>
      <caption>
        <title><italic>Source: PLS data processing results (2025)</italic></title>
      </caption>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
            <th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">R-Square</th>
            <th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">R-Square Adjusted</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">KK</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.637</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.631</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">KO</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.662</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.654</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The analysis results show that the R-square value for the KK
      (Job Satisfaction) variable is 0.637, which means that 63.7% of
      the variation in the KK variable can be explained by the
      independent variables in the model. Meanwhile, the R-square value
      for the KO (Organizational Commitment) variable is 0.662,
      indicating that 66.2% of the variation in KO can be explained by
      the predictor variables included in the model. The remaining 36.3%
      and 33.8%, respectively,</p>
      <p>are explained by factors outside the scope of this study. Based
      on Chin's (1998) criteria, an R-square value between 0.33 and 0.67
      falls into the moderate category, so it can be concluded that this
      model has sufficient explanatory power.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="hypothesis-test-results">
    <title>Hypothesis Test Results</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Based on the results of hypothesis testing using Partial Least
      Square (PLS), the following results were obtained:</p>
      <p>Table 6. Partial Least Square (PLS)</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 6. Partial Least Square (PLS)</label>
      <caption>
        <title><italic>Source: PLS data processing results (2025)</italic></title>
      </caption>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Hypothesis</th>
            <th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Path Coefficients (β)</th>
            <th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">T Statistic</th>
            <th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">P Values</th>
            <th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Conclusion</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">WLB → KO</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">H1</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.155</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.152</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.016</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Accepted</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">WLB → KK</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">H2</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.342</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5.371</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.000</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Accepted</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">LK → KO</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">H3</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.333</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.514</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.000</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Accepted</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">LK → KK</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">H4</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.543</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8.636</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.000</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Accepted</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">KK → KO</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">H5</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.415</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5.040</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.000</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Accepted</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">WLB → KK → KO</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">H6</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.142</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.223</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.001</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Accepted</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">LK → KK → KO</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">H7</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.225</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.578</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.000</td>
            <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Accepted</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Based on the analysis presented in Table 6, all variables
      demonstrate positive relationships, as indicated by the positive
      values in the original sample estimates. Hypotheses were accepted
      if the p-values were less than 0.05 and the t-statistics exceeded
      1.96. The findings reveal that work-life balance has a significant
      and positive effect on organizational commitment, supporting
      Hypothesis 1. Similarly, work-life balance also significantly
      enhances job satisfaction, confirming Hypothesis 2. The analysis
      using PLS indicates that the work environment significantly and
      positively influences organizational commitment, validating
      Hypothesis 3. Hypothesis 4 is also supported, showing that the
      work environment significantly contributes to job satisfaction
      among healthcare workers. Furthermore, job satisfaction exerts a
      significant positive impact on organizational commitment,
      affirming Hypothesis 5. The mediating role of job satisfaction in
      the relationship between work-life balance and organizational
      commitment is supported, thereby confirming Hypothesis 6. Finally,
      the results also demonstrate that job satisfaction mediates the
      effect of the work environment on organizational commitment,
      leading to the acceptance of Hypothesis 7.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
</sec>










<sec>
  <title>DISCUSSION</title>
  <sec id="the-effect-of-work-life-balance-on-organizational-commitment-1">
    <title>The Effect of Work-Life Balance on Organizational
    Commitment</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The concept of work-life balance has been found to exert a
      significant and positive impact on the organizational commitment
      of healthcare workers at Ananda Purwokerto General Hospital
      (Anggreni &amp; Budiani, 2021; Surya &amp; Riana, 2023; Choeriyah
      &amp; Ayu Tuty Utami, 2023). These results suggest that when
      employees are able to successfully navigate the demands of
      their</p>
      <p>professional responsibilities alongside personal obligations,
      their allegiance to the organization is likely to be enhanced.
      Achieving this balance tends to foster stronger emotional
      connections and a heightened sense of loyalty toward the
      workplace. This alignment also signals the organization's
      recognition of employees’ personal well-being, which, through the
      lens of Social Exchange Theory, cultivates a perceived obligation
      to reciprocate. Consequently, employees are more inclined to
      demonstrate greater commitment and active participation. These
      dynamics underscore the notion that organizational commitment is
      largely shaped through reciprocal exchanges grounded in mutual
      support and shared benefit.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="the-effect-of-work-life-balance-on-job-satisfaction-1">
    <title>The Effect of work-life balance on job satisfaction</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The findings reveal that work-life balance exerts a significant
      and positive influence on job satisfaction among healthcare
      professionals at Ananda Purwokerto General Hospital. This result
      aligns with prior research conducted by Latupapua et al. (2021),
      Surya and Riana (2023), and Nurhalizah and Jufrizen (2024), which
      demonstrates that employees who successfully balance professional
      responsibilities with personal life are more likely to report
      higher levels of job satisfaction. When individuals feel that
      their personal time is acknowledged and not adversely affected by
      work-related pressures, their satisfaction with their job tends to
      increase. To cultivate such satisfaction, organizations can
      implement supportive practices such as flexible working
      arrangements, sufficient leave entitlements, and programs that
      promote employee well-being.</p>
      <p>Viewed through the lens of Social Exchange Theory,
      organizational efforts to promote work-life balance—through
      family-friendly policies and flexible arrangements—are interpreted
      as expressions of support for employees’ personal welfare. This
      perceived support motivates employees to reciprocate with positive
      workplace attitudes, including enhanced job satisfaction. The
      observed positive association underscores the reciprocal nature of
      employee– organization relationships as posited by the theory.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="the-effect-of-work-environment-on-organizational-commitment-1">
    <title>The Effect of work environment on organizational
    commitment</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The results of the analysis indicate that the work climate has
      a positive and significant influence on healthcare personnel's
      organizational commitment at Ananda Purwokerto General Hospital.
      The result is in agreement with the findings of other researchers
      like Daslim et al. (2023), Budianto et al. (2024), and Baru et al.
      (2023). A well-defined work environment—both in tangible terms
      (e.g., infrastructure and ergonomic arrangement) and intangible
      terms (e.g., support from management and peers)—has been found to
      increase employees' commitment. This indicates that an encouraging
      and well-kept environment can create a more intense emotional
      attachment between employees and the organization.</p>
      <p>An ideal work environment can be explained through the vehicle
      of Social Exchange Theory as a type of social investment on the
      part of the organization. When the work environment is seen as
      safe, comfortable, and supportive by the workers, it is most
      likely to generate greater levels of commitment in turn. This</p>
      <p>explanation is in line with the main principle of Social
      Exchange Theory, which focuses on voluntary transactions that are
      mutually beneficial for the organization and its members.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="the-effect-of-work-environment-on-job-satisfaction-1">
    <title>The Effect of Work Environment on Job Satisfaction</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The findings of the analysis indicate that the work environment
      has a positive and significant effect on the job satisfaction
      levels of healthcare professionals in Ananda Purwokerto General
      Hospital. The result corroborates the research by Nurhalizah &amp;
      Jufrizen (2024), Anggela &amp; Damingun (2024), and Fahlefi
      (2023), which established that a positive work environment is
      associated with better job satisfaction. The employees are more
      likely to experience heightened levels of gratitude, security, and
      inspiration when working within surroundings that are supportive
      and caring.</p>
      <p>A secure, cozy, and physically as well as socially supporting
      workplace is evidence of the organization's interest in employees'
      well-being. According to the postulates of Social Exchange Theory,
      such support is considered a valuable resource provided by the
      organization. Thus, employees who believe they are being treated
      nicely will foster greater job satisfaction. The hypothesis's
      positive influences follow next and are in line with the
      reciprocity belief underpinning Social Exchange Theory.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="the-effect-of-job-satisfaction-on-organizational-commitment-1">
    <title>The Effect of Job Satisfaction on Organizational
    Commitment</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The analysis results confirm that job satisfaction positively
      and significantly influences organizational commitment in
      healthcare employees in Ananda Purwokerto General Hospital. The
      result is in line with existing literature by Dengo et al. (2023),
      Dihaq et al. (2022), and Latupapua et al. (2021) that highlights
      job satisfaction as a fundamental driver of organizational
      commitment. Employees with greater levels of job satisfaction
      demonstrate greater willingness to contribute, stay within the
      organization, and uphold its inherent values. Hence, effective
      management of job satisfaction is a strategic move in the arena of
      human resource development.</p>
      <p>Consistent with Social Exchange Theory, when employees believe
      their firm has treated them well and favorably—evidenced by
      rewarding work conditions—their affective commitment is most
      likely to follow. This commitment is the strong emotional bond and
      sincere intention to remain with the company. Thus, the positive
      correlation between organizational commitment and job satisfaction
      depicts the reciprocity theory as established in Social Exchange
      Theory, wherein job satisfaction represents the symbolic gesture
      of reciprocation by employees in return for positive treatment
      from the organization.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="job-satisfaction-mediates-the-effect-of-work-life-balance-on-organizational-commitment">
    <title>Job Satisfaction mediates the effect of Work-life Balance on
    Organizational Commitment</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The analysis affirms that job satisfaction serves as a
      mediating variable in the relationship between work-life balance
      and organizational commitment among healthcare personnel at Ananda
      Purwokerto General Hospital. This</p>
      <p>finding aligns with previous studies by Sari &amp; Seniati
      (2020) and Surya &amp; Riana (2023), which similarly recognized
      the mediating role of job satisfaction in this context. From the
      perspective of Social Exchange Theory, a well-supported work- life
      balance signals organizational concern for employees’ well-being,
      thereby enhancing their job satisfaction. In turn, this
      satisfaction fosters a reciprocal increase in employees’
      commitment to the organization. Accordingly, job satisfaction
      emerges as a crucial psychological pathway through which
      supportive work-life balance initiatives translate into greater
      employee loyalty and organizational engagement.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="job-satisfaction-mediates-the-effect-of-work-environment-on-organizational-commitment">
    <title>Job Satisfaction mediates the effect of Work Environment on
    Organizational Commitment</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The analysis indicates that the work environment exerts both
      direct and indirect positive effects on organizational commitment
      among employees at Ananda Purwokerto General Hospital, with job
      satisfaction acting as a mediating factor. This outcome is
      consistent with the findings of Nurhalizah &amp; Jufrizen (2024),
      Fahlefi (2023), Santoni et al. (2021), and Priyatno &amp; Rijanti
      (2024), who also identified job satisfaction as a mediator in the
      relationship between work environment and organizational
      commitment. A constructive and supportive work environment
      cultivates a sense of value and recognition among employees,
      thereby improving their job satisfaction. Grounded in Social
      Exchange Theory, this satisfaction represents an emotional
      reaction to favorable organizational conditions, which motivates
      employees to reciprocate with heightened commitment. Consequently,
      organizational culture and workplace climate are critical in
      fostering sustained organizational commitment through the
      enhancement of job satisfaction.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
</sec>









<sec>
  <title>CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS</title>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>The research findings demonstrate that both Work-Life Balance and
    Work Environment exert a positive and significant effect on Job
    Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment, both directly and
    indirectly through Job Satisfaction as a mediating variable. This
    suggests that when employees perceive a balanced work-life dynamic
    and a supportive work environment, their satisfaction and commitment
    to the organization are likely to increase. Consequently, healthcare
    institutions are advised to enhance work-life balance initiatives
    and cultivate a positive work environment to strengthen employee
    satisfaction and commitment. Additionally, Job Satisfaction should
    be a focal point in human resource strategies, given its mediating
    role in fostering organizational commitment. Future studies are
    encouraged to broaden the model by incorporating variables such as
    leadership style, organizational culture, or employee engagement to
    gain a more holistic view of the determinants of organizational
    commitment.</p>
  </disp-quote>
</sec>




<sec>
  <title>ADVANCED RESEARCH</title>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>This study has several limitations, including the limited number
    of respondents and the scope of variables that only include
    work-life balance, work environment, and job satisfaction on
    organizational commitment. For this reason,</p>
    <p>further research is recommended to expand the number and scope of
    respondents so that the results are more representative. This
    limitation allows for future research to be able to expand the scope
    of the population and sample, and explore other variables that can
    provide a deeper understanding of overall organizational
    commitment.</p>
  </disp-quote>
</sec>




<sec>
  <title>ACKNOWLEDGMENT</title>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the
    management and all healthcare professionals at Ananda Purwokerto
    General Hospital for their valuable participation and support
    throughout the course of this study. The authors also extend their
    appreciation to everyone who contributed to the data collection and
    analysis processes, whose assistance was instrumental in the
    successful completion of this research.</p>
  </disp-quote>
</sec>












<sec>
<title>REFERENCES</title>
<ref-list>

<ref id="ref1">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Ade</surname><given-names>F. S.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Okfrima</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Yanuar</surname><given-names>P. N.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Hubungan Work Life Balance dengan Komitmen Organisasi Pegawai</article-title>
    <source>Psyche 165 Journal</source>
    <year>2024</year>
    <volume>17</volume>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <fpage>390</fpage>
    <lpage>395</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.35134/jpsy165.v17i4.490</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref2">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Alfianto</surname><given-names>R. S.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Hadi</surname><given-names>H. K.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh work-life balance terhadap komitmen organisasi melalui kepuasan kerja</article-title>
    <source></source>
    <year>2024</year>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref3">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Amarta</surname><given-names>M. Z.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Mukhroji</surname><given-names></given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan, Stres Kerja, Lingkungan Kerja, Kepuasan Kerja, Dan Work-Life Balance Terhadap Turnover Intention Di Rumah Sakit Ananda Purwokerto</article-title>
    <source>Neraca Manajemen, Ekonomi</source>
    <year>2024</year>
    <volume>9</volume>
    <issue>10</issue>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.8734/mnmae.v1i2.359</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref4">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Anggela</surname><given-names>S. P.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Damingun</surname><given-names>T. K.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja dan Komunikasi Interpersonal Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Pegawai di Kantor Dinas Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Provinsi Kalimantan Timur</article-title>
    <source>Al-Kharaj: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan &amp; Bisnis Syariah</source>
    <year>2024</year>
    <volume>6</volume>
    <issue>9</issue>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.47467/alkharaj.v6i9.4189</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref5">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Anggreni</surname><given-names>A. S.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Budiani</surname><given-names>M. S.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Hubungan Antara Work-Life Balance Dengan Komitmen Organisasi Pada Pegawai Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI) Cabang Trenggalek</article-title>
    <source></source>
    <year>2021</year>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref6">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Azriel</surname><given-names>M. N.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Ariani</surname><given-names>D. W.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh Person-Job Fit, Work-Life Balance, dan Kondisi Kerja Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi pada Karyawan RSUD Dr. Harjono Ponorogo</article-title>
    <source>Jamparing</source>
    <year>2025</year>
    <volume>3</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.57235/jamparing.v3i1.5437</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref7">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Baru</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Musa</surname><given-names>C. I.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Dipoatmodjo</surname><given-names>T. S.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Musa</surname><given-names>M. I.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Haerudin</surname><given-names>M. I. M.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Dan Kompensasi Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Karyawan PT. Vale Tbk Disorowako</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Ekonomi | JIMBE</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <volume>1</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref8">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Berutu</surname><given-names>M. N. F. K.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Cindy</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Agus</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja dan Fasilitas Kerja terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan Rumah Sakit Amalia Bontang</article-title>
    <source>Economic Reviews Journal</source>
    <year>2024</year>
    <volume>3</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>883</fpage>
    <lpage>892</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.56709/mrj.v3i2.203</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref9">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Budianto</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Indaryani</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Suroso</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja dan Gaya Kepemimpinant terhadap Komitmen Organisasi melalui Motivasi Kerja sebagai Variabel Intervening pada Karyawan Bagian Produksi PT. Handal Sukses Karya Jepara</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Studi Manajemen Bisnis</source>
    <year>2024</year>
    <volume>4</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>35</fpage>
    <lpage>52</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24176/jsmb.v4i2.12840</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref10">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Choeriyah</surname><given-names>A. N.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Utami</surname><given-names>Ayu Tuty</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh Work Life Balance terhadap Komitmen Organisasi pada Dosen Hybrid Working</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Riset Psikologi</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <fpage>9</fpage>
    <lpage>16</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29313/jrp.v3i1.1800</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref11">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Daslim</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Syawaluddin</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Okta</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Goh</surname><given-names>T. S.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Pada PT. Tahta Sukses Abadi Medan</article-title>
    <source>Jesya</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <volume>6</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>136</fpage>
    <lpage>146</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36778/jesya.v6i1.893</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref12">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Dengo</surname><given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Canon</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Sudirman</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Ilato</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Mahmud</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Pada Karyawan PT. Mega Finance Cabang Gorontalo</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Economic and Business Education</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <volume>1</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>148</fpage>
    <lpage>158</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37479/jebe.v1i1.18724</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref13">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Dihaq</surname><given-names>R. F.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Tentama</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Bashori</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh Work-Life Balance, Kepuasan Kerja, Dan Efikasi Diri Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Pada Perawat RSUD Generasi Y</article-title>
    <source>PSYCHE: Jurnal Psikologi</source>
    <year>2022</year>
    <volume>4</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>16</fpage>
    <lpage>30</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36269/psyche.v4i1.505</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref14">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Fahlefi</surname><given-names>M. R.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Melalui Kepuasan Kerja Di PT Solusindo Kreasi Jayatech</article-title>
    <source>JURMA: Jurnal Riset Manajemen</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <volume>1</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>127</fpage>
    <lpage>138</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref15">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Fitria</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Chalil</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja dan Kompensasi Non-Finansial Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi yang Dimediasi oleh Kepuasan Kerja pada Pegawai BPS Provinsi Aceh</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Manajemen</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <volume>8</volume>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <fpage>520</fpage>
    <lpage>534</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref16">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Ghania</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Endang</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Karir</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Organisasi</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh Komunikasi Kerja, Lingkungan Kerja, Dan Pengembangan Karir Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Karyawan PT. Tunas Segar Indah</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Manajemen</source>
    <year>2024</year>
    <volume>11</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>77</fpage>
    <lpage>85</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37817/jurnalmanajemen.v11i1</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref17">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Husniati</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Supriadi</surname><given-names>Y. N.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>The Work Life Balance and Job Embeddedness on Turnover Intention: The Role of Organizational Commitment as Intervening</article-title>
    <source>Quality - Access to Success</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <volume>25</volume>
    <issue>198</issue>
    <fpage>160</fpage>
    <lpage>166</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.47750/QAS/25.198.17</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref18">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Latupapua</surname><given-names>C. V.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Risambessy</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Tahanora</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh Work Life Balance Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Dengan Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Variabel Mediasi Pada Karyawan Yang Sudah Menikah</article-title>
    <source>Manis: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis</source>
    <year>2021</year>
    <volume>5</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>52</fpage>
    <lpage>64</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.30598/manis.5.1.52-64</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref19">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Maharani</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Kinanti</surname><given-names>A. D.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Yogiswara</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Syahputri</surname><given-names>D. A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Farisandy</surname><given-names>E. D.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh Work-Life Balance terhadap Kepuasan Kerja pada Karyawan di Bintaro</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Psikologi Perseptual</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <volume>8</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="uri">http://jurnal.umk.ac.id/index.php/perseptual</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref20">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Nafisya</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Widhiandono</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Purwidianti</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Bagis</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Work Environment and Career Development as Determinants of Nurse Loyalty: The Impact of Job Satisfaction as Mediation</article-title>
    <source>Asian Journal of Applied Business and Management (AJABM)</source>
    <year>2025</year>
    <volume>4</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>101</fpage>
    <lpage>120</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.55927/ajabm.v4i1.62</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref21">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Nurhalizah</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Jufrizen</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh Etika Kerja Dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Melalui Kepuasan Kerja Pada Kantor Walikota Medan</article-title>
    <source>Jesya</source>
    <year>2024</year>
    <volume>7</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>119</fpage>
    <lpage>134</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36778/jesya.v7i1.1359</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref22">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Nurkholifa</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Budiono</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Peran Mediasi Komitmen Organisasi Pada Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen</source>
    <year>2022</year>
    <volume>10</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>329</fpage>
    <lpage>343</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26740/jim.v10n1.p329-343</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref23">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Pragusti</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Hidayat</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja dan Stres Kerja terhadap Kepuasan Kerja yang Berimplikasi pada Loyalitas Karyawan</article-title>
    <source>JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <volume>6</volume>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <fpage>2580</fpage>
    <lpage>2586</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.54371/jiip.v6i4.1722</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref24">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Priyatno</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Rijanti</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Commitment With Job Satisfaction As A Mediating Variable: A Study Of Employees At Perumda Tirta Moedal In Semarang City</article-title>
    <source></source>
    <year>2024</year>
    <volume>5</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>8546</fpage>
    <lpage>8569</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref25">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Putri</surname><given-names>S. W.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Frianto</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh Work Life Balance Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Melalui Komitmen Organisasi</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <volume>11</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref26">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Santoni</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Heryono</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Sudirman</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Endri</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi: Peran Mediasi Kepuasan Kerja</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis Dan Manajemen</source>
    <year>2021</year>
    <volume>7</volume>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <fpage>796</fpage>
    <lpage>805</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17358/jabm.7.3.796</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref27">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Sari</surname><given-names>R. L.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Seniati</surname><given-names>A. N. L.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>The Role of Job Satisfaction as Mediator Between Work-life Balance and Organizational Commitment among Lecturers</article-title>
    <source>Psychology and Education</source>
    <year>2020</year>
    <volume>57</volume>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="uri">www.psychologyandeducation.net</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref28">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Surya</surname><given-names>I. B. K.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Riana</surname><given-names>I. G.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Peran Kepuasan Kerja Memediasi Work Life Balance dengan Komitmen Organisasional Generasi Milenial Pada Hotel Non-Bintang</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Dan Humaniora</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <volume>9</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>1</fpage>
    <lpage>6</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29303/jseh.v9i1.150</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref29">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Wahyudin</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Fitriati</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Darmawan</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Rachmawati</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh Work Life Balance dan Motivasi Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan dengan Kepuasan Kerja sebagai Variabel Intervening</article-title>
    <source></source>
    <year>2025</year>
    <volume>6</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>110</fpage>
    <lpage>131</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37631/ebisma.v6i1.1802</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref30">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Widhiandono</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Darmawan</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Abd Razak</surname><given-names>A. Z. A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Ab Wahid</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>The mediating effect of organizational commitment on the relationship between personality, job satisfaction and job performance of pharmacists</article-title>
    <source>International Business Education Journal</source>
    <year>2022</year>
    <volume>15</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>111</fpage>
    <lpage>125</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37134/ibej.Vol15.2.9.2022</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref31">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Yuliantini</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Santoso</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh lingkungan kerja, motivasi kerja, dan disiplin kerja terhadap kepuasan kerja Karyawan PT Travelmart Jakarta Pusat</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Manajemen Oikonomia</source>
    <year>2020</year>
    <volume>16</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>29</fpage>
    <lpage>44</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.47313/oikonomia.v16i2.1153</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref32">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Yusnita</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Gursida</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Herlina</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>The Role of Work-Life Balance and Job Satisfaction as Predictors of Organizational Commitment</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Economia</source>
    <year>2022</year>
    <volume>18</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>103</fpage>
    <lpage>114</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21831/economia.v18i1.40236</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

</ref-list>
</sec>
</body>
</article>
