Consumer Preferences and Decision-Making in Digital Payments: A Systematic Review Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

Authors

  • Nuriya Fadilah Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
  • Nurita Andriani Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ajma.v4i2.14295

Keywords:

Digital Payment, Consumer Decision, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), SLR

Abstract

The development of digital technology has driven the adoption of digital payments such as e-wallets, mobile banking, and QRIS. This study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to analyze the factors influencing consumer preferences and decision-making based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The findings indicate that Perceived Usefulness (PU), Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), Attitude Toward Use (ATU), and Behavioral Intention (BI) play a crucial role in the adoption of digital payments. Additionally, factors such as security, trust, economic incentives, and social influence also have a significant impact. Trust and security enhance user loyalty, while incentives and social influence accelerate adoption. Thus, while TAM remains relevant, external factors must be considered in the development of digital payment systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmeti, F., & Zeqiri, N. (2022). Switching From Cash to Cashless Payments: Consumer Behavior Evidence from Kosovo. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, 8(2), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.47305/JLIA2282061a

Aisyah, M., & Sesunan, Y. S. (2023). Decision making on the use of a shariah-based e-wallet by Indonesian consumers. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(4), 1739–1752. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.7.017

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Alaeddin, O., Rana, A., Zainudin, Z., & Kamarudin, F. (2018). From physical to digital: Investigating consumer behaviour of switching to mobile wallet. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 17(2), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2018.17.2.02

Alif, M. S., & Pratama, A. R. (2021). Analisis Kesadaran Keamanan di Kalangan Pengguna E-Wallet di Indonesia.

Bank Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 18/40/PBI/2016 tentang Penyelenggaraan Pemrosesan Transaksi Pembayaran. www.peraturan.go.id

Bank Indonesia. (2019). Peluncuran QRIS (Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard). https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/ruang-media/news-release/Pages/Bank-Indonesia-Terbitkan-Ketentuan-Pelaksanaan-QRIS.aspx

Belmonte, Z. J. A., Prasetyo, Y. T., Cahigas, M. M. L., Nadlifatin, R., & Gumasing, M. J. J. (2024). Factors influencing the intention to use e-wallet among generation Z and millennials in the Philippines: An extended technology acceptance model (TAM) approach. Acta Psychologica, 250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104526

Chandra, Y. U., Ernawaty, & Suryanto. (2017). Bank vs telecommunication E-Wallet: System analysis, purchase, and payment method of GO-mobile CIMB Niaga and T-Cash Telkomsel. 2017 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech.2017.8273531

Chohan, F., Aras, M., Indra, R., Wicaksono, A., & Winardi, F. (2022). Building Customer Loyalty in Digital Transaction Using QR Code: Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS). Journal of Distribution Science, 20(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.20.01.202201.1

Cong, M. V. H., Nguyen, C. H., Nhu, L. T., & Tran, T. T. (2024). A Study on The Impacts of Safety and Security on Consumer’s Intention to Use Electronic Wallets in Hanoi. Innovative Marketing, 20(4), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.20(4).2024.08

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Firdaus, T. M., & Lubis, M. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Popular Electronic Wallets in Indonesia in Daily Life Selection. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 362–368. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568834.3568865

Gomber, P., Koch, J.-A., & Siering, M. (2017). Digital Finance and FinTech: current research and future research directions. Journal of Business Economics, 87(5), 537–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0852-x

Hartati, Saluza, I., Iisnawati, & Teguh. (2024). The Utilization of Structural Equation Modelling to Determine Casuality on Consumer Decision Of E-Wallet. Barekeng, 18(4), 2113–2124. https://doi.org/10.30598/barekengvol18iss4pp2113-2124

Hashim, N. H., Chan, T. J., & Li, P. (2023). Factors affecting the adoption of e-wallets to enter cashless society: An integration approach. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(4), 1849–1860. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.7.007

Hidayat, D., Pangaribuan, C. H., Putra, O. P. B., & Taufiq, F. J. (2021). Expanding the technology acceptance model with the inclusion of trust and mobility to assess e-wallet user behavior: Evidence from OVO consumers in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 729(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/729/1/012050

Humphrey, D. (2004). Replacement of cash by cards in U.S. consumer payments. Journal of Economics and Business, 56, 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2003.09.001

Jiaxin Zhang, J., Luximon, Y., & Song, Y. (2019). The role of consumers’ perceived security, perceived control, interface design features, and conscientiousness in continuous use of mobile payment services. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236843

Kamal, I., Rizki, R. N., & Aulia, M. R. (2023). The Enthusiasm of Digital Payment Services and Millennial Consumer Behaviour in Indonesia. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i2.923

Karmaker, S., Oishi, M. E. F., Qasem, A., Sami, S. B. S., & Noor, J. (2025). Exploring influential factors of consumer purchase behavior on the adoption of digital payment apps in Bangladesh. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100587

Lee, Y. Y., Gan, C. L., & Liew, T. W. (2022). The Impacts of Mobile Wallet App Characteristics on Online Impulse Buying: A Moderated Mediation Model. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2767735

Leyesa, M., De Jesus, F. S., De Jesus, C., Quijano, A. G. A., & Agustin, N. (2024). Examining consumers attitude towards E-wallet utilization as a payment method using technology acceptance model: A perspective from young generations in Nueva Ecija, Philippines. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(4), 1157–1173. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i4.1490

Madhavedi, S., Hoo, W. C., Goh, K. W., Liau, C. H., Cheng, A. Y., & Pandey, R. K. (2024). Understanding the Dynamics of Cashless Payment System: The Effects of Technology Advancement, Security Concerns, and Competition on Merchant Adoption in Hyderabad, India. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(7), 1878–1893. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i7.4338

Meiryani, Soepriyanto, G., Elvani, A., Wahyuningtias, D., & Samukri. (2022). The Factors Affecting Consumer Behavior on Sustainable Use Intentions of Financial Technology Payments. Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 6(3), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv6i3p2

Mishra, V., Walsh, I., & Srivastava, A. (2021). Merchants’ adoption of mobile payment in emerging economies: the case of unorganised retailers in India. European Journal of Information Systems, 31, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1978338

Namahoot, K. S., & Jantasri, V. (2023). Integration of UTAUT model in Thailand cashless payment system adoption: the mediating role of perceived risk and trust. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 14(4), 634–658. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-07-2020-0102

Ng, D., Kauffman, R., Griffin, P., & Hedman, J. (2021). Can we classify cashless payment solution implementations at the country level? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 46, 101018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.101018

Nigam, A., Khan, F. S., Mazhar, S. S., Chaudhary, N., Haque, E., Ahmad Mir, M., & Ansari, M. S. (2024). Consumer perceptions and attitudes towards e-payment services offered by fintech companies: Evidence from India. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i11.7522

Nur, T. (2024). Generation Z’s Adoption of E-Wallet: Understanding factors and Implication for Consumptive Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoSEIT60086.2024.10497467

Pati, D., & Lorusso, L. N. (2018). How to Write a Systematic Review of the Literature. Health Environments Research and Design Journal, 11(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586717747384

Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1998). The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt. Marketing Science, 17(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.17.1.4

Sutticherchart, J., & Rakthin, S. (2023). Determinants of digital wallet adoption and super app: A review and research model. Management and Marketing, 18(3), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2023-0015

Thien, K., Nguyen, B., Tran, T. B., Thai, C. M., Duong, C., & Nguyen, T. K. (2024). Promoting Consumers’ Adoption of Buy-Now-Pay-Later Feature While Using E-wallet Application: The Case of Gen Z in Vietnam.

Wijayanti, D. (2020). The influence of the use of technology, trust and income on the use of e-wallet for Infaq at the Baiturrahman Grand Mosque Semarang. http://repository.iainkudus.ac.id/3557/

Zehra, F., Khan, F. S., Mazhar, S. S., Akhlaque, N., Haque, E., & Singh, A. (2024). Exploring Consumer Preferences and Behaviour Toward Digital Payment Gateways in India. International Journal of Experimental Research and Review, 41, 158–167. https://doi.org/10.52756/ijerr.2024.v41spl.013

Downloads

Published

2025-04-24

How to Cite

Fadilah, N., & Andriani, N. . (2025). Consumer Preferences and Decision-Making in Digital Payments: A Systematic Review Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Asian Journal of Management Analytics, 4(2), 531–546. https://doi.org/10.55927/ajma.v4i2.14295

Issue

Section

Articles