The Application of Batak Simalungun Regional Culture in Office Buildings as A Strategy for Architectural Identity and Sustainability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/ajmee.v5i1.17039Keywords:
Regionalism Architecture, Local Culture, Office Buildings, Architectural Identity, SustainabilityAbstract
The evolution of modern office architecture frequently gravitates toward uniform typologies and a paucity of local identity, driven by the pervasive influence of globalization. This phenomenon has resulted in the erosion of regional character within the built environment. Consequently, preservation efforts directed at cultural heritage can be interpreted as a strategic instrument for reinforcing identity. Diverse indigenous wisdom functions not only as a framework for consolidating national identity and collective memory but also as a medium for sustaining the environment in which that culture flourishes. Cultural heritage serves as a communal signifier, distinguishing one society from another; a prominent manifestation of such identity is the historical architectural works dominant in the Simalungun region. This research aims to examine how the implementation of regional culture in office buildings can bolster local identity while simultaneously enhancing sustainability performance. The research methodology employs a qualitative-descriptive approach through a comprehensive literature review and building precedent analysis. The findings indicate that the application of regional elements can be manifested through the adaptation of form, indigenous materials, spatial configurations, ornamental motifs, and localized climatic responses. The integration of local cultural values into office design does not merely establish a robust architectural identity but also improves thermal comfort, energy efficiency, and the social attachment of users to the built structure
Downloads
References
Ching, F. D. K. (2014). Architecture: Form, Space, and Order (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Damanik, E. L. (2010). Ahap Simalungun: Tinjauan Sosiohistoris Dan Kultural [Ahap Simalungun: A Socio-historical and Cultural Review].
Frampton, K. (1983). Towards a Critical Regionalism: Six Points for an Architecture of Resistance. In H. Foster (Ed.), The AntiAesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture (pp. 16-30). Bay Press.
Friedman, J. (2000). Globalization, Class and Culture in Global Systems. Journal of WorldSystems Research, 6(3), 636-656. Special Issue:
Festschrift for Immanuel Wallerstein – Part II. Retrieved November 22, 2011, from http://jwsr.ucr.edu
Gall, A. (n.d.). Architect, Built Heritage Specialist, Heritage Design.
Koentjaraningrat. (1967). Beberapa Pokok Antropologi Sosial [Several Fundamental Points of Social Anthropology]. Dian Rakyat.
Koentjaraningrat. (1974). Kebudayaan, Mentalitas, dan Pembangunan [Culture, Mentality, and Development]. Gramedia.
Koentjaraningrat. (1995). Manusia dan Kebudayaan di Indonesia [Humans and Culture in Indonesia] (15th ed.).
Djambatan. Maran, R. R. (2000). Manusia & Kebudayaan Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Budaya Dasar [Humans & Culture in the Perspective of Basic Cultural
Science]. Rineka Cipta.
Siswanto. (1997). Arsitektur, Pembangunan dan Konservasi: Regionalisme dan Konservasi
{Architecture, Development, and Conservation: Regionalism and Conservation]. Jambatan.
Tzonis, A., & Lefaivre, L. (1981). The Grid and the Pathway. Architecture in Greece, 15, 164178.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jon Desron Damanik, Ricky Bakara, Asri Afriliany Surbakti, Nova Juliana, Marsedes Purba, Gallio Budianto, Sinta Siagian

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



















