Reimagining ChatGPT Integration in Higher Education: Student Usage, Ethical Concerns, and Institutional Responsibilities

Zohaib Hassan  Sain; Chanda Chansa  Thelma; Shahzadi Hina  Sain

doi:10.55927/ajns.v3i4.14235

Authors

Zohaib Hassan Sain Superior University
Chanda Chansa Thelma Chreso University
Shahzadi Hina Sain Beaconhouse Head Office

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ajns.v3i4.14235

Keywords:

Academic integrity, Artificial intelligence (AI), ChatGPT, Higher education, Student perceptions

Abstract

This study explores the integration of ChatGPT in higher education, focusing on student usage, perceived benefits, and ethical concerns. Using a mixed-methods approach, data were collected from 180 university students through surveys and interviews. Findings reveal that ChatGPT is widely used for research, assignments, and exam preparation, enhancing learning efficiency and personalized support. However, concerns regarding plagiarism, over-reliance, and data privacy persist. The study emphasizes the need for clear institutional guidelines and ethical frameworks to support responsible AI use. It offers practical insights for educators and policymakers aiming to balance technological advancement with academic integrity in digital learning environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., et al. (2024). Knowledge, attitudes, and perceived ethics regarding the use of ChatGPT among Generation Z university students. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1), 10.

Adel, A., Ahsan, A., & Davison, C. (2024). ChatGPT Promises and Challenges in Education: Computational and Ethical Perspectives. Education Sciences, 14(8), 814.

Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Sadallah, M., & Bouteraa, M. (2023). Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance. Technology in Society, 75, 102370.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dwivedi, Y. K., et al. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on generative AI. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.

Espartinez, A. S. (2024). Exploring student and teacher perceptions of ChatGPT use in higher education: A Q-Methodology study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100264.

Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Patros, P., Wu, H., Kaur, R., & Kaur, K. (2024). Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: Emerging Era of AI Chatbots. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 4, 19–23.

Kamalov, F., et al. (2023). New era of artificial intelligence in education: Towards a sustainable multifaceted revolution. Sustainability, 15(16), 12451.

Klimova, B., & De Campos, V. P. L. (2024). University undergraduates’ perceptions on the use of ChatGPT for academic purposes: Evidence from a university in the Czech Republic. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2373512.

Marzuki, W., et al. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2236469.

Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Impact of the Implementation of ChatGPT in Education: A Systematic Review. Computers, 12(8), 153.

Rajabi, P., et al. (2024). Unleashing ChatGPT’s impact in higher education: Student and faculty perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(2), 100090.

Shabbir, A., et al. (2024). Beyond boundaries: Navigating the positive potential of ChatGPT, empowering education in underdeveloped corners of the world. Heliyon, 10(16), e35845.