The Conflict between the Objectives of Restorative Justice and its Implementation in Marriage Cases of Rape Victims and Perpetrators in Indonesia

Karina Permata; Serla Yolanda Azahra; Asmak Ul Hosnah

doi:10.55927/fjmr.v3i11.11865

Authors

Karina Permata Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pakuan Bogor
Serla Yolanda Azahra Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pakuan Bogor
Asmak Ul Hosnah Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pakuan Bogor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v3i11.11865

Keywords:

Restorative Justice, Sexual Violence, Rape

Abstract

This research aims to examine the conflict between the goals of restorative justice and its implementation in marriage cases involving rape victims and perpetrators in Indonesia. Using a desk-based research method, this study analyzes legal frameworks, case studies, and relevant literature to understand the dynamics of restorative justice in this context. The results show that many sexual violence cases are inadequately resolved, with a significant percentage of victims not receiving satisfactory outcomes, often leading to forced marriages or financial compensation instead of justice. This research concludes that restorative justice practices should not be applied to rape cases and law enforcement officials must understand the concept and purpose of restorative justice in implementing it. Law enforcement in rape cases should prioritize recovery and justice for victims.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cortina, L. M., & Areguin, M. A. (2021). Putting people down and pushing them out: Sexual harassment in the workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8(1), 285-309.

Feeley, M. M. (1973). Two models of the criminal justice system: An organizational perspective. Law & Society Review, 7(3), 407-425.

Hosnah, A. U., Antoni, H., & Yofany, R. (2023). Law Enforcement Against Perpetrators of Defamation Through Social Media Based on the ITE Law. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 10(4), 362-372.

Maharani, M., & Wicaksana, D. A. (2022, November 7). Menikahkan korban dengan pelaku bukan solusi: Bagaimana pendekatan keadilan restoratif sangat merugikan korban kekerasan seksual. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/menikahkan-korban-dengan-pelaku-bukan-solusi-bagaimana-pendekatan-keadilan-restoratif-sangat-merugikan-korban-kekerasan-seksual-193853.

Mudzakkir, T. K. B. (2008). Perencanaan Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Bidang Hukum Pidana dan Sistem Pemidanaan (Politik Hukum dan Pemidanaan). Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia.

Ningrum, A. M., Sulistyowati, H., & Arsetyo, Y. I. C. (2023). Pelaksanaan Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Di Kejaksaan Negeri Sragen. Justicia Journal, 12(2), 164-176.

Nurisman, E. (2022). Risalah Tantangan Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Pasca Lahirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4(2), 170-196.

Saefudin, Y., Wahidah, F. R. N., Susanti, R., Adi, L. K., & Putri, P. M. (2023). Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual dan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Korban Kekerasan Seksual di Indonesia. Kosmik Hukum, 23(1), 24-33.

Safitri, S. S., Ardiansah, M. D., & Prasetyo, A. (2023). Quo Vadis Keadilan Restoratif pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual (Studi Terhadap Pasal 23 UU TPKS). Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains, 2(01), 29-44.

Santoso, A. P. A., & Rezi, A. (2021). Pengantar Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta, Pustakabarupress.

Syahputra, A. A. (2023). Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Kasus Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak Di Kota Medan (Studi Di Polrestabes Medan) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Medan Area).