The Relationship of Market Competition Intensity, Adoption of Financial and Non-financial Performance Measures to Company Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v4i1.12667Keywords:
Market Competition, Financial Performance Measures, Non-Financial Performance Measures, Company PerformanceAbstract
This study aims to examine the relationship between market competition intensity, adoption of financial and non-financial performance measures and company performance. The study was conducted at a manufacturing company in Batam. The variables in the study consist of independent and dependent variables. The independent variables are market competition intensity, financial and non-financial performance measures. The dependent variable is company performance. Data were collected using purposive random sampling method. The analysis method uses factor analysis (path analysis). The study resulted in market competition intensity having a positive relationship with company performance and was supported by previous research. Financial and non-financial performance had a positive relationship with company performance and was supported by previous research. The results of this study strengthen that market competition intensity has a positive relationship with company performance and the adoption of financial and non-financial performance measures has a positive relationship with company performance.
Downloads
References
Abdel-Maksoud, A., Dugdale, D., and Luther, R. (2005), Non-financial performance measurement in manufacturing companies‖, The British Accounting Review, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 261-97.
Al-Kassar, T., & Soileau, J. (2012). Design and Applied Mathematical Model of MeasuringFinancial Performance Evaluation: Jordan Results. Oil, Gas & Energy Quarterly, 60(3) 621-636.
Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (1990). Management Control Systems (9th ed.). Homewood: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
ANDERSON,E.W.;C.FORNELL;ANDR.T.RUST(1997) "Customer Satisfaction, Productivity, and Profitability: Differences betweenGoodsand Services." Marketing Science 2: 129-45.
BANKER,R.;C.POTTER;ANDD.SRINIVASAN (1998) "An Empirical Investigation of an Incentive Plan Based on Nonfinancial Performance Measures." Working paper. University of Texas at Dallas, Cornell University, and University of Pittsburgh.
Brancato, C. K. (1995). New Performance Measures. New York: New York Conference Board Report 1118-95 RR.
Bose, S., & Thomas, K. (2007). Applying the balanced scorecard for better performanceofintellectualcapital. JournalofIntellectualCapital, 8(4), 653- 665.
Bourne, M., & Others. (2000), Designing, Implementing and Updating Performance Measurement Systems. InternationalJournalofOperationsand Production Management, 20(7), 754-.
Chenhall, R.H., Morris, D., 1986. The impact of structure, environment, and interdependence on the perceived usefulness of management accounting systems. The Accounting Review LX1 (1), 16–35.
Chin, C. H., Lo, M. C., & Ramayah, T. (2013). Market orientation and organizational performance: The moderating role of service quality. SAGE Open, 3, 1-14.
Chow, C., & Steve, W. (1998). The Use and Usefulness of Nonfinancial Performance Measures. Management Accounting Quarterly, 7(3),1–8.
Crabtree, & DeBusk. (2008). The Effect of Adopting the Balanced Scorecard on Shareholders Returns. Advances in Accounting Incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 24, 8-15.
Cobbold, I., &Lawrie, G. (2002). The Development ofthe Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management Tool. 2GC Conference Paper. Retrievedv June 3, 2012.
Collis,J.,Holt,A.,&Hussey,R.(2012). Business Accounting: An Introduction to Financial and Management Accounting. Basing stoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Courtis, J.K. (1978). Modeling a Financial Ratios Categoric Framework. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 5 (4), 371-386.
Cross, K.F. and Lynch, R.L. (1988/89), ``The SMART way to sustain and define success'', National Productivity Review, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp.23-33.
Day, G. S. and Wensley, R., 1988. Assessing advantage: a framework diagnosing competitive superiority, Journal of Marketing, 1-20.
DeGeus, A. P., 1970., “Planning as Learning “, Harvard Business Review, 70-74 Drury,C. (2005). Management accounting for business.(3rded.). London: Thomson Learning.
Frambach, R., Prabhu, J., & Verhallen, T. (2003). The influence of business strategy on new product activity: The role of market orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20, 377-397.
Fisher, J. (1995). Use of Nonfinancial Performance Measures in S M Young, Readings in Management Accounting. Englewood Cliffs: NJ Prentice Hall.
Fitzgerald, L., Johnston, R., Brignall, T.J., Silvestro, R. and Voss, C. (1991), Performance Measurement inService Businesses, The CharteredInstituteof Management Accountants, London.
Ghalayini, A.M., Noble, J.S. and Crowe, T.J. (1997), “An integrated dynamic performance measurement system for improving manufacturing competitiveness”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 48.
Goldman, A., & Grinstein, A. (2010). Stages in the development of market orientation publication activity. European Journal of Marketing, 44, 1384- 1409.
Gordon, L.A., Narayanan, V.K, (1984). Managemen accounting systems, perceived enviroment uncertainty and organization structure: aempirical investigation. Accounting organizations and society 9 (1), 33-47.
Ghosh, S. dan Mukherjee, S. 2006. Measurement of Corporate Performance Through Balanced Scorecard: An Overview. Vidyasagar University Journal of Commerce, Vol1. 11.
Grawe, S., Chen, H., & Daugherty, P. (2009). The relationship between strategic orientation, service innovation on performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistic Management, 39, 282-300.
Grinstein, A. (2008). The effect of market orientation and its components on innovation consequences: A meta-analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 166-173.
Hayes, R.H. and Abernathy, W.J. (1980), ``Managing our way to economic decline'', Harvard Business Review, Vol. 62, pp. 95-101.
Hilman, H., & Kaliappen, N. (2014). Strategic role of customer orientation in differentiation strategy and organizational performance nexus: A Partial Least Square (PLS) approach. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering & Technology, 7, 4150-4156.
Hoque, Z., & James, W. (2000). Linking the balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: Impact on organizational performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 12, 1–17. https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kota_Batam
Ittner, C., & Larcker, D. (1998). Innovation in performance measurement: trends and research implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 6, 205-238.
Jagdev, H., Bradley, P. and Molloy, O. (1997), “A QFD based performance measurement tool”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 33, pp. 357-66.
Jin K. Han, Namwon Kim and Rajendra K.S, Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Inovation a Missing Link, 1998.
Kaliappen, N., & Hilman, H. (2013). Enhancing organizational performance through strategic alignment of cost leadership strategy and competitor orientation. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 18, 1411-1416.
Kai, C., & Fan, W. X. (2010, August). The effects of market orientation on performance in property service industry (Technological Innovation Project of Beijing Forestry University). International Conference on Management and Service Science (MASS), Wuhan, China.
Kanji, G.K. & Sa, P.M. (2002). Kanji‟s business scorecard, Total Quality Management.
Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review.
Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system, Harvard Business Review.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996a). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Deta Puspita , Sri Rahayu, Enggar Diah Puspa Arum, Wiralestari Wiralestari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.