Tipologi Financial Technology Paylater: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

Herlina; Destriana Widyaningrum; Giovanny Theotista

doi:10.55927/fjmr.v2i1.2417

Authors

Herlina Universitas Bunda Mulia Jakarta
Destriana Widyaningrum Universitas Bunda Mulia Jakarta
Giovanny Theotista Universitas Bunda Mulia Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v2i1.2417

Keywords:

Paylater, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

Abstract

The use of paylater fintech is currently mushrooming among the public because it makes it easier for people to shop online. The typology of fintech paylaters is based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) method to determine the contribution of the magnitude of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) aspect in explaining the use of fintech paylaters. The study used a sample of 101 fintech paylater respondents who live in Jakarta and data analysis techniques used Tructural Equation Modeling (SEM-AMOS) with the First Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) technique. The results showed that the contribution of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) aspects in explaining the use of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) respectively, namely Perceived Usefulness of 93.7%, Attitude Toward Using of 93.7 %, Perceived Ease of Use of 92.20%, Behavioral Intention to Use of 78.5% and lastly Actual Use of 43.9%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aziz, M. N. A., & Kamaruddin, N. (2020). The Evolution Of The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The Interdisciplinary of Management, Economic and Social Research, 242.

Gupta, S., & Abbas, A. (2022). Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): A Bibliometric Analysis from Inception. Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy, October. https://doi.org/10.18080/jtde.v10n3.598

Hadianto, A. (2008). Kajian Tentang Perilaku Pengguna Sistem Informasi Dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). In Academia.

Herlina, & Widyaningrum, D. (2022). Menakar Kecenderungan Perilaku Impulse Buying Belanja Online Generasi Millenial pada Masa Covid-19. Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (FJMR), 1(3), 481–492.

Pamoro, G. J. (2022). The Principle of Balance E-Contracts in Paylater features in E Commerce. Notaire, 5(3), 377 394. https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v5i3.39755

Permana, L. G. P., Astawan, P. M. A. ., & Laskmi, K. W. (2022). Analisis Penggunaan Paylater dalam Transaksi Digital dengan Konstruk UTAUT 2. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 9(2), 84–91.

Putri, F. A., & Iriani, S. S. (2020). Pengaruh Kepercayaan dan Kemudahan terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Menggunakan Pinjaman Online Shopee PayLater. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 8(3), 818. https://doi.org/10.26740/jim.v8n3.p818-828

Rahayu, S. W., & Gani, I. A. (2022). Perlindungan data pribadi konsumen pada transaksi paylater. Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 5(1).

Rahayu, T. (2021). Analisis Akad Jual Beli E-Commerce Shopee Paylater dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Islam. Iqtishodiah, 3(2), 1 15. https://ejournal.ibntegal.ac.id/index.php/iqtishodiah

Sari, R. (2021). Pengaruh Penggunaan Paylater Terhadap Perilaku Impulse Buying Pengguna E-Commerce di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Bisnis Dan Investasi, 7(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.35313/jrbi.v7i1.2058

Solihin, A. M., Kosasih, A. D., Fajrussalam, H., Rahmawan, D. T., Azzahra, D. A., & Fitriyani, F. M. (2022). Analisis Transaksi Shopee Paylater Dalam Perpektif Hukum Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, 3(4), 284–288.

Waluyo, M. (2016). Mudah Cepat Tepat Penggunaan Tools Amos Dalam Aplikasi ( SEM ) (I. Basuki (ed.); Sugiarti,). UPN Veteran.