Preferences For Health Information and Participation in Decision Making: The Patients’ Perspectives for Hospital Improvement

Authors

  • Norhaynee D. Tamano College of Allied Health Sciences, University of the Visayas
  • Joan P. Bacarisas College of Allied Health Sciences, University of the Visayas
  • Resty L. Picardo College of Allied Health Sciences, University of the Visayas
  • Jake C. Napoles College of Allied Health Sciences, University of the Visayas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v3i4.8454

Keywords:

Generational In-patients, Preference for Health Information, Preference for Participation in decision-making

Abstract

Patients of varying generations demand varying approaches. Additionally, hailing from diverse indigenous cultures and religions, they have distinct historical backgrounds that shape their personal qualities. In healthcare, holistic care is critical, and it must meet the dynamism and constant change of the world, while also taking generational gaps into account as a major concern in healthcare. This quantitative research made use of the descriptive, comparative (non-causal) design to compare the differences in the perceptions on the preferences for health information and participation in decision making among generational in-patients in a government-retained hospital for the 2nd quarter of 2021. Findings of the study revealed that the respondents had a good preference on health information on diagnosis, treatment, laboratory tests, self-care, and psychosocial while they are only had a fair preference of health information on complimentary or alternative medicine and healthcare provider. The Generation Z scored the highest of the four generations while the Baby Boomers scored the lowest. The respondents had a poor preference for participation in decision making on their diagnosis and treatment. They had a fair preference for participation in decision making on their laboratory tests but they had a good preference for participation in decision making on their self-care, complimentary or alternative medicine, and healthcare provider. They had a very good preference for participation in decision making on the psychosocial factors. The Baby Boomers scored the highest of the four generations, while the Generation Z scored the lowest. There was a significant difference in the perceptions on preference on health information. The Generation Z had a better preference on health information as compared to the Baby Boomers. Further, there was a significant difference in the perceptions for participation on decision making. The Baby Boomers, the Generation X, and the Generation Y are much better in terms of the perception of preferences for participation in decision making over the Generation Z. With the findings, a multi-generational health information and decision-making enhancement plan was created.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelwadoud, M., Huang, J., Villalonga-Olives, E., dosReis, S., Jansky, L., Mullins, C. D., Kusinitz, M., Ovelmen, H., & Ju, J. (2024). Women’s health

information-seeking experiences and preferences for health

communications on FDA-regulated products: A qualitative study in

urban area. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public

Health, 21, 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21030321.

Becker, C., Gross, S., Gamp, M., Beck, K., Amacher, S. A., Mueller, J., Bohren, C.,

Blatter, R., Schaefert, R., Schuetz, P., Leuppi, J., Bassetti, S., & Hunziker, S. (2023). Patients’ preference for participation in medical decision-making: Secondary nalysis of the BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE Trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 38, 1180–1189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07775-z.

Birkeland, S., Bismark, M., Barry, M. J., et al. (2022). Is greater patient

involvement associated with higher satisfaction? Experimental evidence

from a vignette survey. BMJ Quality & Safety, 31, 86-93.

Chasiotis, A., Wedderhoff, O., Rosman, T., & Mayer, A.-K. (2020). Why do we

want health information? The goals associated with health information seeking (GAINS) questionnaire, Psychology & Health, 35(3), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1644336.

Clark, M. (2020). What different generations want in healthcare.

https://etactics.com/blog/generations-in-healthcare#conclusion.

Clarke, M. A., Moore, J. L., Steege, L. M., Koopman, R. J., Belden, J. L., Canfield,

S. M., Meadows, S. E., Elliott, S. G., & Kim, M. S. (2016). Health

information needs, sources, and barriers of primary care patients to

achieve patient-centered care: A literature review. Health Informatics

Journal, 992–1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458215602939.

Emana, D., Kitaba, M., Girma, T., lekassa, S., Regea, F., Dina, H., et al. (2023)

Patient engagement in decision making and associated factors among

outpatients with selected non-communicable chronic diseases in public

hospitals of West Shoa, Ethiopia. PLOS Global Public Health, 3(5),

e0000772. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000772.

Frey, B. (2018). The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and

evaluation (Vols. 1-4). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.

Galletta, M., Piazza, M. F., Meloni, S. L., Chessa, E., Piras, I., Arnetz, J. E., &

D'Aloja, E. (2022). Patient involvement in shared decision-making: Do

patient’s rate physicians and nurses differently? International Journal of

Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14229.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114229.

Gopal, S. (2021). Health care decisions by generation: How do patients differ?

https://rendia.com/resources/insights/health-care-decisions-generation-patients-differ/

Heath, S. (2016). Understanding generational differences in patient engagement.

While millennials may want more patient engagement through health IT,

members of the silent generation look for provider direction in their care.

https://patientengagementhit.com/news/understanding-generational-

differences-in-patient-engagement.

Integrated Healthcare Executive (2016). How generational factors impact patient

engagement. https://www.managedhealthcareconnect.com/article/how-generational-factors-impact-patient-engagement.

Kuosmanen, L., Hupli, M., Ahtiluoto, S., & Haavisto, E. (2021). Patient

participation in shared decision-making in palliative care - an integrative

review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(23-24), 3415–3428. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15866.

Makkar, N., Jain, K., Siddharth, V., & Sarkar, S. (2019). Patient involvement in

decision-making: An important parameter for better patient experience—

An observational study (STROBE compliant). Journal of Patient Experience,

-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373518790043.

McCombes, S. (2020). Descriptive research. Scribbr.

https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/descriptive-research/#:~:text=Descriptive%20research%20aims%20to%20accurately,a%20population%2C%20situation%20or%20phenomenon.&text=A%20descriptive%20research%20design%20can,investigate%20one%20or%20more%20variables.

Nuwagaba, J., Olum, R., Bananyiza, A., Wekha, G., Rutayisire, M., Agaba, K. K.,

Chekwech, G., Nabukalu, J., Nanyonjo, G. G., Namagembe, R., Nantongo, S., Lubwama, M., Besigye, I., & Kiguli, S. (2021). Patients’ involvement in decision-making during healthcare in a developing country: A cross-sectional study. Patient Prefer Adherence, 15, 1133-1140. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S302784.

Oedekoven, M., Herrmann, W. J., Ernsting, C., Schnitzer, S., Kanzler, M.,

Kuhlmey, A., & Gellert, P. (2019). Patients’ health literacy in relation to

the preference for a general practitioner as the source of health

information. BMC Family Practice, 20, 94.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0975-y.

Okezue, O. C., Agbo, E. C., John, J. N., & John, D. O. (2023). Patient involvement

in medical decisions: a survey of shared decision making during physical

therapy consultations. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 39(4), 878–886.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2022.2029653.

Petripin, A. (2020). King’s Theory of Goal Attainment. Nursing Theory.

https://nursing-theory.org/theories-and-models/king-theory-of-goal-

attainment.php

Ringdal, M., Chaboyer, W., Ulin, K., Bucknall, T., & Oxelmark, L. (2017). Patient

preferences for participation in patient care and safety activities in hospitals. BMC Nursing, 16, 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-017-0266-7

Siouta, E., Olsson, U., & Waldréus, N. (2023). Nurses’ perceptions of patient

involvement in shared decision-making in cardiovascular care. Heliyon,

(12), e22890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22890.

Rational Model of Decision Making. In: Farazmand A. (eds)

Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2474-1.

Varhol, R. J., Norman, R., Randall, S., Man Ying Lee, C., Trevenen, L., Boyd, J.

H., et al. (2023) Public preference on sharing health data to inform

research, health policy and clinical practice in Australia: A stated

preference experiment. PLoS ONE, 18(11), e0290528.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290528.

Xie, B., Wang, M., & Feldman, R. (2011). Preferences for health information and

decision-making: Development of the Health Information Wants (HIW) Questionnaire. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. 273-280. https://doi.org/10.1145/1940761.1940799.

Xie, B., Wang, M., Feldman, R., & Zhou, L. (2013). Internet use frequency and

patient-centered care: Measuring patient preferences for participation

using the health information wants questionnaire. Journal of Med Internet

Research, 15(7), e132. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2615.

Xie, B., Su, Z., Liu, Y., Wang, M., & Zhang, M. (2017). Health information

sources for different types of information used by Chinese patients with

cancer and their family caregivers. Health Expectations, 20, 665–674.

https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12498.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

Tamano, N. D. ., Bacarisas, J. P., Picardo, R. L. ., & Napoles, J. C. . (2024). Preferences For Health Information and Participation in Decision Making: The Patients’ Perspectives for Hospital Improvement. Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(4), 1219–1234. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v3i4.8454

Issue

Section

Articles