Strategies and Challenges for Economic Resilience in the Era of Asymmetric Warfare
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v3i6.9248Keywords:
Asymmetric Warfare, Economics, Technology InformationAbstract
The research, titled "Strategies and Challenges for Economic Resilience in the Era of Asymmetric Warfare," is motivated by the fact that technological developments and economic globalization promote economic growth in various countries, but as this infrastructure grows, it also creates vulnerabilities that can be exploited, especially in the era of asymmetric warfare. Asymmetric warfare in the economic sector is due to the fact that many aspects of the economy depend on information technology. Digital infrastructure, such as communications networks and information systems, is vulnerable to attacks. These attacks can be physical, such as sabotage of vital facilities, or digital, such as cyber-attacks on energy networks or financial systems, which are part of asymmetric warfare. This is what gives rise to the need for an economic defense strategy to face the challenges that exist in the era of asymmetric warfare. So, it is necessary to identify and analyze the role of the economy in facing current challenges.
Downloads
References
Bappenas (Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional). (2020). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (RPJMN) 2020-2024. Jakarta: Bappenas
Buchanan, Ben. (2016). The cybersecurity dilemma: network intrusions, trust, and fear in the international system. King’s College London (University of London).
Chandler, David, & Jon Coaffee. (Eds.). (2016). The Routledge Handbook of International Resilience. Routledge.
Chouliaraki, L. (2010). Post-humanitarianism: Humanitarian communication beyond a politics of pity. International Journal of Cultural Studies.
Davidoff, F. (2019). Understanding contexts: How explanatory theories can help. Implementation Science, 14(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0872-8
Enders, Walter & Todd Sandler. (2012). The Political Economy of Terrorism. Cambridge University Press.
H. Kaelani, (2012). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Interdisipliner Bidang Sosial, Budaya, Filsafat, Seni, Agama dan Humaniora, Yogyakarta : Penerbit Paradigma.
Haimes, Y. Y. (2009). On the Complex Definition of Risk: A Systems-Based Approach. Risk Analysis
Kompas. (2023) Perang Asimetris, Bentuk Perang Baru. Retrieved from https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2008/07/10/21091857/perang.asimetris.bentuk.perang.baru accessed on April 18th, 2023
Lewis, J. A. (2018). The Cybersecurity Dilemma: Hacking, Trust, and Fear Between Nations. Oxford University Press.
Linklater, S. B. dan A. (1996). Theories of International Relation.
Norris, F. H., et al (2008). Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and Strategy for Disaster Readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology.
Nye, J. S. (2011). The Future of Power. PublicAffairs.
Paul, Christopher & Miriam Matthews (2016). The Russian "Firehose of Falsehood" Propaganda Model. RAND Corporation.
Paula Smith. (2012). Teaching Controversial Issues in the Classroom: Key Issues and Debates. Continuum
Rothkopf, David. (2014). National Insecurity: American Leadership in an Age of Fear PublicAffairs.
Smith, P. (2011). Teaching Controversial Issues in the Classroom: Key Issues and Debates. Continuum.
Stallings, William. (2017). Network Security Essentials. Prentice Hall
Indrawan, R. M., & Widiyanto, B. (2016). Offset Policy in Building State Defense Independence. Jurnal Pertahanan, 6(2), 29–50.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Tickner, J. A. (1995). “Re-visioning Security”, in Ken Booth and Steve Smith. In International Relations Theory Today. Oxford.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Achmad Mirza Apriansyah, Mhd. Halkis, Rudy Sutanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
