Value Conflict: Government Interests vs. User Satisfaction in E-Government

Authors

  • Mutahira Nur Insirat Accounting Study Program, Hasanuddin University
  • Haliah Haliah Faculty of Economics and Business, Hasanuddin University
  • Nirwana Nirwana Faculty of Economics and Business, Hasanuddin University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/fjst.v3i10.11830

Keywords:

E-Government, Value Conflict, Government Interest, User Satisfaction

Abstract

This research explores the value conflict between government interests and user satisfaction in the context of e-government. Using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach, this research analyzes how user-oriented approaches can clash with established public values. The findings show that legal accountability is often prioritized by the government, overriding users' needs for more efficient and accessible services. In addition, the government's inability to accommodate inclusive user engagement, especially in digitally-disenfranchised societies, adds to the complexity of the problem. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of a more collaborative approach in the design of government digital services that are not only efficient, but also able to increase inclusivity and public trust. For future research, it is recommended to focus on reducing the digital divide, improving accessibility, and exploring new technologies such as artificial intelligence and blockchain to support accountability and user satisfaction simultaneously.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andersen, L. B., Jørgensen, T. B., Kjeldsen, A. M., Pedersen, L. H., & Vrangbæk, K. (2012). Public Values and Public Service Motivation.

Aschhoff, N., & Vogel, R. (2018). Value conflicts in co-production: governing public values in multi-actor settings. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(7), 775-793.

Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and program for research. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 119-128.

Bason, C., & Austin, R. D. (2022). Design in the public sector: Toward a human centred model of public governance. Public Management Review, 24(11), 1727-1757.

Berg, J., Lindholm, J., & Högväg, J. (2021). How do we know that it works? Designing a digital democratic innovation with the help of user-centered design. Information Polity, 26(3), 221-235.

Bokayev, B., Davletbayeva, Zh., Amirova, A., Rysbekova, Zh., Torebekova, Z., & Jussupova, G. (2021). Transforming E-government in Kazakhstan: A Citizen-Centric Approach.

Canato, A., Ravasi, D., & Phillips, N. (2013). Coerced Practice Implementation in Cases of Low Cultural Fit: Cultural Change and Practice Adaptation During the Implementation of Six Sigma at 3M.

Clark, J. K. (2020). Public Values and Public Participation: A Case of Collaborative Governance of a Planning Process.

Cordella, A., & Bonina, C. M. (2012). A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 512-520.

Costa, A., Castro Caldas, J., Coelho, R., De, M., Ferreiro, F., & Gonçalves, V. (2016). The Building of a Dam: Value Conflicts in Public Decision-Making. Environmental Values, 25, 215-234.

David, N. (2018). Democratizing Government: What We Know About E-Government and Civic Engagement. International E-Government Development: Policy, Implementation and Best Practice, 73-96.

Dawes, S. S. (2009). Governance in the digital age: A research and action framework for an uncertain future. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 257-264.

de Graaf, G., Huberts, L., & Smulders, R. (2014). Coping With Public Value Conflicts.

Dwivedi, Y., Williams, M., Mitra, A., Niranjan, S., & Weerakkody, V. (2011). Understanding Advances In Web Technologies: Evolution From Web 2.0 To Web 3.0. ECIS 2011 Proceedings.

Ghosh Roy, S., & Upadhyay, P. (2017). Does e-readiness of citizens ensure better adoption of government's digital initiatives? A case based study. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30(1), 65-81.

Grube, D. (2013). In Search of Society? The Limitations of Citizen-Centred Governance. The Political Quarterly, 84(3), 371-379.

Gupta, K. P., Bhaskar, P., & Singh, S. (2016). Critical Factors Influencing E-Government Adoption in India: An Investigation of the Citizens' Perspectives.

H. Moore, M. (1997). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government.

Haliah, Syamsuddin, Fatmawati, Ratna Sari Dewi, A., Alief Fahdal Imran Oemar, M., Arisanty Razak, L., & Althoofian Mallaheri Imran, M. (2024). Fraud Prevention, Politics, Information Technology, Information Quality of Financial Statements in Village Government.

Hashim, K. F., Hashim, N. L., Ismail, S., Miniaoui, S., & Atalla, S. (2020). Citizen Readiness to Adopt the New Emerging Technologies in Dubai Smart Government Services. 2020 6th International Conference on Science in Information Technology: Embracing Industry 4.0: Towards Innovation in Disaster Management, ICSITech 2020, 1-5.

Ingrams, A. (2019). Public Values in the Age of Big Data: A Public Information Perspective. Policy & Internet, 11(2), 128-148.

Kassen, M. (2021). Understanding decentralized civic engagement: Focus on peer-to-peer and blockchain-driven perspectives on e-participation. Technology in Society, 66, 101650.

König, P. D. (2021). Citizen-centered data governance in the smart city: From ethics to accountability. Sustainable Cities and Society, 75, 103308.

Kotamraju, N. P., & Van Der Geest, T. M. (2012). The tension between user-centred design and e-government services. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(3), 261-273.

Kyakulumbye, S., Pather, S., & Jantjies, M. (2019). Towards design of citizen centric e-government projects in developing country context: the design-reality gap in Uganda. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 7(4).

Larsson, K. K. (2021). Digitization or equality: When government automation covers some, but not all citizens. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101547.

Leidner, D. E., & Kayworth, T. (2006). Review: A review of culture in information systems research: Toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 30(2), 357-399.

Liva, G., Codagnone, C., Misuraca, G., Gineikyte, V., & Barcevicius, E. (2020). Exploring digital government transformation: A literature review. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 502-509.

Lukes, S. (2014). SEVEN. Making Sense of Moral Conflict. Liberalism and the Moral Life, 127-142.

Madan, R., & Ashok, M. (2023). AI adoption and diffusion in public administration: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101774.

Mariën, I., & Prodnik, J. A. (2014). Digital inclusion and user (dis)empowerment: A critical perspective. Info, 16(6), 35-47.

Mossey, S., Manoharan, A. P., & Bennett, L. V. (2022). Exploring Citizen-Centric E-Government Using a Democratic Theories Framework.

Nirwana, & Darmawaty. (2023). The Effect of Good Governance on the Financial Statements Quality. Attestation: Scientific Journal of Accounting, 6(1), 1-12.

OECD. (2019). Government at a Glance Southeast Asia 2019. Government at a Glance Southeast Asia 2019.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372.

Park, S., & Humphry, J. (2019). Exclusion by design: intersections of social, digital and data exclusion. Information, Communication & Society, 22(7), 934-953.

Robinson, J. P., Dimaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2003). New Social Survey Perspectives On The Digital Divide. 1, 1-22.

Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership Third Edition.

Sevaldson, B. (2018). Beyond user centric design.

Sorn-in, K., Tuamsuk, K., & Chaopanon, W. (2015). Factors affecting the development of e-government using a citizen-centric approach. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 6(3), 206-222.

van der Wal, Z., & van Hout, E. T. J. (2009). Is Public Value Pluralism Paramount? The Intrinsic Multiplicity and Hybridity of Public Values. Intl Journal of Public Administration, 32(3-4), 220-231.

Weigl, L., Amard, A., Marxen, H., Roth, T., & Zavolokina, L. (2022). User-centricity and Public Values in eGovernment: Friend or Foe? Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS).

Zavolokina, L., Sprenkamp, K., & Schenk, B. (2023). Citizens' Expectations about Achieving Public Value and the Role of Digital Technologies: It Takes Three to Tango!

Zucker, L. G. (1977). The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence. American Sociological Review, 42(5), 726.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-18

How to Cite

Insirat, M. N., Haliah, H., & Nirwana, N. (2024). Value Conflict: Government Interests vs. User Satisfaction in E-Government. Formosa Journal of Science and Technology, 3(10), 2337–2352. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjst.v3i10.11830