Asset Recovery in Eradication Illicit Enrichment : Indonesia with the United States and South Korea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/fjst.v3i12.13068Keywords:
Asset Recovery, Illicit Enrichment, EradicationAbstract
This research discusses the importance of asset recovery in combating illicit enrichment in Indonesia, with a comparison to the United States and South Korea. Where the level of illicit enrichment has become crucial in this country. The study's goal is to examine asset recovery laws and practices and pinpoint ways that Indonesia might improve. The method used is a literature study with comparative analysis of regulations and practices in the three countries. The results show that Indonesia faces significant challenges in asset recovery, while the United States and South Korea have more comprehensive legal frameworks. The conclusion of this study recommends strengthening the legal system and passing an asset forfeiture bill to increase the effectiveness of corruption eradication in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Act on Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment.
Agustine, O. V. (2019). RUU Perampasan Aset sebagai peluang dan tantangan dalam pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia. “Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum”, 1(2).
Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. (2022). Hasil penyelarasan naskah akademik rancangan undang-undang tentang perampasan aset terkait dengan tindak pidana.
BBC News Indonesia. (2024). Mengapa RUU Perampasan Aset penting di tengah terungkapnya kekayaan fantastis pegawai pemerintah? Diakses pada 23 Oktober 2024, dari https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/c7287vzd8zko
Black’s Law Dictionary (2nd ed.).
Cassella, S. D. (n.d.). Civil asset recovery: The American experience. Diakses pada 11 Desember 2024, dari https://eucrim.eu/articles/civil-asset-recovery-american-experience/
Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000. Diakses pada 22 Oktober 2024, dari https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/house-bill/1658
Esther, J. (2022). Conflict of law culture consequence law transplantation in Indonesia money laundry regulation. Legal Brief, 11(5), 2844-2852.
Gray, L., et al. (2014). Few and far: The hard facts on stolen asset recovery. Washington, DC: The World Bank and the OECD.
Italian experience and framework on asset recovery in fighting and cracking down organized crime and corruption. Presentation by Italy at the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Addis Ababa.
Kementerian Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia. (2024). G20 dan pemberantasan korupsi. Diakses pada 8 Desember 2024, dari https://www.setneg.go.id/baca/index/g20_dan_pemberantasan_korupsi
Kompas.com. (2024). ICW: Kerugian negara akibat korupsi selama 2023 capai Rp 56 triliun. Diakses pada 7 November 2024, dari https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/10/15/11141271/icw-kerugian-negara-akibat-korupsi-selama-2023-capai-rp-56-triliun
Kurniawan, I. D. (2024). Non-conviction based asset forfeiture sebagai upaya mengoptimalkan pemulihan aset hasil korupsi. ARIMA: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 1(4), 349-354.
Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian hukum Jakarta: Kencana.
Nasution, B. (2017). Pengembalian aset hasil tindak pidana korupsi melalui civil forfeiture. Jurnal Antikorupsi.
Nurdin, T. A. (2024). Perbandingan pengaturan perampasan aset tindak pidana korupsi antara Indonesia dengan Amerika Serikat yang sudah menerapkan non-conviction based asset forfeiture. Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, 13.
Pakpahan, R. H., & Firdaus, A. (2019). Pembaharuan kebijakan hukum asset recovery: Antara ius constitutum dan ius constituendum. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16(3), 369-378.
Peraturan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2020 tentang perubahan kedua atas Peraturan Jaksa Agung Nomor PER-027/A/JA/10/2014 tentang pedoman pemulihan.
Prahassacitta, V. (2017). Tinjauan atas kebijakan hukum pidana terhadap penyuapan di sektor privat dalam hukum nasional Indonesia: Suatu perbandingan dengan Singapura, Malaysia dan Korea Selatan. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 47(4), 398.
Putra, D. A. K., & Prahassacitta, V. (2022). Tinjauan atas kriminalisasi illicit enrichment dalam tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. *Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan*, 52(2).
Setiawan, M. A., & Ali, M. (2021). When double intention ignored: A study of corruption judicial decisions. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 28(3), 459-480.
Suud, A. K. (2020). Optimization of the role of asset recovery center (PPA) of the attorney-general’s office of the Republic of Indonesia in asset recovery of corruption crime results. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 9(2), 211-231.
Tias, N. C., Arashka, M. K., Andhika, B. D., Rafi’I Nufus, & Fatkhuri, F. (2024). Urgensi pengesahan rancangan undang-undang (RUU) perampasan aset tindak pidana: Implementasi non-conviction based asset forfeiture di Indonesia. Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 8(8), 81-90.
Tickner, J., et al. (2017). Asset recovery. London: Law Business Research.
Transparency International. (2024). Corruption perceptions index. Diakses pada 22 Oktober 2024, dari https://www.transparency.org/en
Ubaidila, A.S. (2023). Kebijakan hukum pidana illicit enrichment dalam tindak pidana korupsi sebagai upaya pemulihan aset negara. Jambi: Universitas Jambi.
Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang perubahan atas Undang-undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi.
United Nations Convention Against Corruption.
Wibisana, A.W., & Hasbullah, H. (2024). Key factors to increase the role of the prosecutor’s stolen asset recovery agency in Indonesia: Opportunities and challenges. Beijing Law Review, 15(1), 319-353.
Widjajanti, E., & Candra, S. (2016). Pemikiran Romli Atmasasmita tentang pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.
World Economic Forum. (2024). Asset recovery: A powerful tool in the fight against global corruption. Diakses pada 17 November 2024, dari https://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/02/asset-recovery-corruption/.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jesella Ramayanti Nainggolan, July Esther, Debora Debora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





























