Judicial Analysis of Law Enforcement Against Corruption In The Procurement of Goods and Services For Government Interest
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/fjst.v3i12.13122Keywords:
Law Enforcement, Corruption Crime, Procurement of Goods and ServicesAbstract
This study aims to Corruption in the procurement of goods and services is one of the most common corruption offences, ranking second only to gratuities/bribes. This is based on the World Bank (World Bank), every year more than 10 billion US dollars or around 85 trillion rupiah of the central government budget, both for routine expenditure and development projects, are spent through the procurement of goods and services. The purpose of this study is to find out the effectiveness of legal regulation of corruption offences in the procurement of goods and services for the benefit of the government and to find out to Overcome Obstacles in Law Enforcement of Corruption in the Procurement of Goods and Services for Government Interests so that Corruption Cases Can Decrease. The method used is a qualitative research method with descriptive analysis through legislative, case and conceptual approaches. The result of this research is that the formulation of minimum criminal punishment in Law Number 20 Year 2021 has shortcomings, namely not formulating sentencing guidelines to apply this minimum criminal punishment and efforts to overcome obstacles in law enforcement of corruption in the Procurement of Goods and Services so that the number of cases of Procurement of Goods and Services in the following year can decrease, including The principle of procurement must be carried out in tandem with enforcing integrity and increasing the professionalism of procurement human resources
Downloads
References
Amiruddin (2010). Korupsi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa. Genta Publishing.
Yogyakarta.
Sutedi,Adrian (2008). Aspek Hukum Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa dan Berbagai
Permasalahannya. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.
Sugiyono (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D. IKAPI. Bandung.
Kaufmann, D (2005). Six Questions on the Cost of Corruption with World Bank
Institute Global Governance Director Daniel Kaufmann. in: News: The World Bank. Washington, D.C.
Masudin, I. Aprilia, G. D., Nugraha, A., & Restuputri, D. P (2021). Impact of E-
Procurement Adoption on Company Performance : Evidence from Indonesian Manufacturing Industry. Logistics. 5(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5010016
Jap, S (2015). Online Reverse Auctions: Issues, Themes and Prospects for the
Future. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 30. 506–525.
Wibowo, R (2015). Mencegah Korupsi Pengadaan Barang Jasa (Apa yang Sudah dan
yang Masih Harus Dilakukan?). Integritas, 37-60
Esther,July,dkk (2018). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Komite Sekolah Yang
Menyalahgunakan Wewenang Sehingga Terjadinya Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama (Studi Putusan Nomor : 25/Pid.sus-TPK/2017/PN. Mdn). Jurnal Hukum PATIK.
Peraturan Presiden (Perpres) Nomor 12 Tahun 2021 tentang Pengadaan
Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah
Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang
Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Keppres Nomor 18 Tahun 2000 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Pengadaan
Barang/ Jasa Instansi Pemerintah
ACLC KPK. Mencegah Korupsi Pada Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa.
Humas BPHN. Publikasi dan Data Statistik.
https://www.kpk.go.id/id/publikasi-data/statistik/penindakan-2.
Humas BPHN. Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia Turun Lagi, Penegakan
Hukum Tipikor Perlu Dikaji Ulang. https://bphn.go.id/publikasi/berita/2023031603084646
Itjen KKP (2019). Manajemen Risiko dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa di Lingkungan
KKP. Jakarta. Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yanti Tiara Br Siahaan, July Esther, Debora Debora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





























