Deconstructing Gender Roles in Pygmalion An Examination of Criticism and Transformation

Ishfaq Majeed Mir

doi:10.55927/fjst.v2i9.6141

Authors

Ishfaq Majeed Mir Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/fjst.v2i9.6141

Keywords:

Gender Roles, Deconstruction, Pygmalion, Feminism, Power Dynamics

Abstract

George Bernard Shaw's play "Pygmalion" has long been lauded for its astute commentary on social class and the transformative power of education. However, beneath its surface, the play also serves as a rich ground for the critique of traditional gender roles. The study delves into the nuanced examination of gender roles within the narrative, shedding light on the complex interplay between gender identity, societal expectations, and individual agency. Through a comprehensive analysis of the characters, especially Eliza Doolittle, and their relationships, this study explores how Shaw's work challenges and redefines traditional gender constructs. Furthermore, it highlights the ways in which "Pygmalion" engages with feminist themes, offering a fresh perspective on a classic text and its enduring relevance in the discourse surrounding gender and identity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfraih, I. A., & Elsadda, H. S. (2011). Representations of Gender Roles in George Bernard Shaw’s Pygmalion and Tawfiq al-Hakim’s Pygmalion: A Comparative Analysis (Doctoral dissertation).

Carter, S. (2011). Objects of Desire: Pygmalion, Myrrha, Adonis. In Ovidian Myth and Sexual Deviance in Early Modern English Literature (pp. 136-161). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Dvir, T., Eden, D., & Banjo, M. L. (1993). Pygmalion Effect Among Women and Men. Tel Aviv University.

Eck, S. (2013). Pygmalion’s Metamorphosis and Galatea’s Revenge: Feminist Revisions of Ovid’s Pygmalion Myth in British and American Literature since the 20th Century. GRIN Verlag.

Gallardo, B. C. (2001). “Why can´ t women talk like a man?": an investigation of gender in the play Pygmalion by Bernard Shaw.

Gherardi, S. (1995). Gender, symbolism and organizational cultures. Sage.

Hulcová, E. Neil LaBute’s the shape of things: A Gender Reversed Pygmalion.

Jaffar, N. Deciphering The Fairytale: Deconstruction Of Romance Through The Construction Of Self In Pygmalion.

Karakowsky, L., DeGama, N., & McBey, K. (2017). Deconstructing Higgins: gender bias in the Pygmalion phenomenon. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 32(1), 2-18.

Lovering, R. (2020). Sculpting Gender Relationships: Classical Idealization in" Pygmalion and Galatea"(1813-19). Revue YOU’RE Review (York Online Undergraduate Research).

Mohan, P. N., & Kumar, S. S. (2018). The Image of Super Woman: a Portrayal of Woman in Bernard Shaw's Pygmalion and the Millionaires. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 4(6), 1-6.

Slaney, H. (2017). George Bernard Shaw: Pygmalion. A Handbook to the Reception of Classical Mythology, 419-431.

Swadener, B. B., & Lubeck, S. (1995). The Social Construction of Children and. Children and families" at promise": Deconstructing the discourse of risk, 1.

Trojanová, Š. (2016). Voice of a Woman in Three Versions of Pygmalion: Sociolinguistic Analysis.

Wesonga, A. (2018). Gender Issues in Pygmalion and the Importance of Being Earnest. GRIN Verlag.

White, S. S., & Locke, E. A. (2000). Problems with the Pygmalion effect and some proposed solutions. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(3), 389-415.