Legal Analysis of the Constitutional Court's Decision on the Revocation of Article 11 (Paragraph) 1, 2 of Law No. 36 of 2014 concerning Health Workers: Literature Study, Constitutional Court Decision No. 82/PUU-XIII/2015

Karel Batmanlusi

doi:10.55927/fjst.v3i1.7995

Authors

Karel Batmanlusi Cenderawasih University Papua

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/fjst.v3i1.7995

Keywords:

Health Workers, Medical Personnel, Judge’s Decision

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and find out the basis for the Constitutional Court judge’s decision No.82/PUU-XIII/2015, which granted the applicant’s request to revoke Article 11 paragraphs 1 and 2 of Law No. 36 of 2014 concerning Health Workers, that medical personnel, namely doctors, dentists, specialists, special dentists are not health workers, whereas the explanation of paragraph 2: health workers are people who devote themselves in the field of health and have knowledge, skills through education in the health sector which for certain types requires the authority to carry out health efforts. Testing of this law has ended in the repeal of that article. This research is a normative juridical research with descriptive analysis. Primary legal data sources are the judge’s decision No.82/PUU XIII/2015, secondary data are related laws, it is hoped that it will not cause confusion over the status and position of medical personnel. Therefore, the judge must be able to reflect on the meaning of each article which is the reason for the applicant to revoke it, and it is necessary to conduct socialization so that there is a new understanding of medical personnel not being classified as health workers and a strong rationale. The output of the research, is a new understanding of the community about medical personnel not Health workers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, A. (2007). Menguak Teori Hukum Legal theory Dan Teori Peradilan Judicialprudance. Kencana, Makasar, 2007, hlm. 48.

Amin, H. E. (2012). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Antara Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Konstitusi, 1(01), 1-15.

Fadjar, A. M. (2011). Hukum yang Berlandasakan UUD Negara RI TAhun 1945, makalah yang disampaikan dalam forum dialog “Perencanaan Pembangunan Hukum Nasional” yang diselenggarakan oleh badan pembinaan hukum nasional (BPHN), tanggal 22-24 November 2011, Jakarta, h. 3-4.

Ilham, M., Mz, I. U., & Renyaan, D. (2022). Era Digital: Influencer Dalam Sistem Politik Indonesia. Jurnal Ekologi Birokrasi, 10(1), 69-80.

Johansyah, J. (2021). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Bersifat Final Dan Mengikat (Binding).

Kemenag Tanggeran Selatan (n.d). Undang-Undang. Https://Tangselkota.Kemenag.Go.Id/05-Creative/Undang-Undang/ (Accessed January 28, 2024).

Oenthersa, A. (2014). Tenaga Kesehatan. http://repository.unika.ac.id/ (Accessed January 24, 2024).

Ohoiwutun, Y. INOVASI PELAYANAN ADMINDUK: Dinas Kependudukan & Pencatatan Sipil Kota Jayapura. wawasan Ilmu.

Pemerintah Indonesia (2000). Pembukaan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Lembaga Informasi Nasional Republik Indonesia.

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2000). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Republik, Indonesiai, Sekretariat Jenderal MPR RI 2020, Hal 71.

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2009). Undang Undang Nomor 36 tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan.

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Tenaga Kesehatan, No.36 tahun 2014. Hal. 4

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2015). Putusan Nomor 82/PUU-XIII/2015. Mahkama Konstitusi

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor. 36 Tahun 2014 tentang Tenaga Kesehatan.

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang Nomor 29 Tahun 2004, tentang Kedokteran, hal.22

Pemerintah Indonesia. (1996). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 1996 Tentang Tenaga Kesehatan

Siahaan, M. (2009). Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Konstitus, Jurnal Hukum No. 3 Vol. 16 Juli 2009: hal.3.

Smadmin. (2019). Apa yang dimaksud dengan hukum. https://hukum.unism.ac.id/2019/02/18/apa-yang-dimaksud-dengan-hukum/ (Accessed January 28, 2024).

Soekarto, S. (1984). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. (jakarta:UI Press, 1984), hal 20.

Tebay, V., Ohoiwutun, Y., & Muttaqin, M. Z. (2023). Empowerment Policy for Indigenous Papuan Traders as a Conflict Resolution Strategy. KnE Social Sciences.

Tim Hukum online. (2023). 15 Pengertian Hukum Menurut Para Ahli Hukum. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/advokat-berkualitas-harus-kuasai-kode-etik-lt65aa4ca341c26/ (Accessed January 28, 2024).