Corporate Social Responsibility and Intellectual Capital and Their Influence on Annual Report Readability: A Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/ijabm.v2i6.7230Keywords:
Corporate Social Responsibility, Intellectual Capital, Annual Report Readability, Literature ReviewAbstract
This research aims to determine the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) performance, Intellectual Capital, and the readability of annual reports as a key communication tool between companies and stakeholders. This research uses a qualitative literature review approach by analyzing several previous studies related to this topic. The results of the analysis show that companies that are actively involved in CSR practices and have strong Intellectual Capital tend to present annual reports with a higher level of readability. This optimal readability has a positive impact on the understanding of various stakeholders, including investors and creditors, which in turn can support better decision-making. The implication is that companies can utilize CSR practices and Intellectual Capital development as a strategy to increase the readability of their annual reports. Therefore, increasing transparency, readability and clear disclosure of information in annual reports can contribute positively to a company's reputation and support long-term business growth. Recommendations for companies involve paying attention to the regulatory and disclosure reform initiatives that regulators have implemented to ensure disclosure is effective and affordable for all stakeholders
Downloads
References
Alvia, Liza., J. Hartono, S. Ali, and R. Nurhayati. 2019. Information Disclosure Readability, Cognitive Style, and Investment Decision Making : A Web Experimental Study. Vol. 135, no. Aicmbs, pp. 133–138, 2020.
Bacha, S., & Ajina, A. (2019). CSR performance and annual report readability: Evidence from France. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2019-0060
Ben‐Amar, W., & Belgacem, I. (2018). Do socially responsible firms provide more readable disclosures in annual reports? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 1009–1018. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1517
Clatworthy, M., & Jones, M. J. 2001. The Effect of Thematic Structure on the Variability of Annual Report Readability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(3), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570110399890
Courtis J. K. 1998. Annual Report Readability Variability: Tests of the Obfuscation Hypothesis. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2015-0216
Dalwai, T., Mohammadi, S. S., Chugh, G., & Salehi, M. (2023). Does intellectual capital and corporate governance have an impact on annual report readability? Evidence from an emerging market.
International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(9), 2402–2437. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-08-2020-0965
Dempsey, S. J., Harrison, D. M., Luchtenberg, K. F., & Seiler, M. J. 2012. Financial Opacity and Firm Performance: The Readability of REIT Annual Reports. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 45(2), 450–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-010-9263-2
Gu, S., & Dodoo, R. N. A. (2020). The Impact of Firm Performance on Annual Report Readability: Evidence from Listed Firms in Ghana. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 22(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v22i3.2097
Hassan, M.K., Abu Abbas, B. and Garas, S.N. 2019. Readability, Governance and Performance: a Test of the Obfuscation Hypothesis in Qatari Listed Firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society.Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 270-298. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-05-2018-0182
Lehavy, R., Li, F., & Merkley, K. (2011). The Effect of Annual Report Readability on Analyst Following and the Properties of their Earnings Forecasts. Accounting Review, 86, 1087–1115. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000043.
Li, Feng. 2008. Annual Report Readability, Current Earnings, and Persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economic, Vol. 45 Nos 2/3, pp. 221-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.02.003.
Lim, E. K., Chalmers, K., & Hanlon, D. 2018. The Influence of Business Strategy on Annual Report Readability. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 37(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2018.01.003.
Linsley and M. J. Lawrence. 2007. Risk reporting by the largest UK companies: Readability and lack of obfuscation. Accounting, Audit. Account. J., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 620–627. doi: 10.1108/09513570710762601.
Luo, J., Li, X., & Chen, H. 2018. Annual Report Readability and Corporate Agency Costs. China Journal of Accounting Research, 11(3), 187–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2018.04.001
Moghadam, H. M., Salehi, M., & Hajiha, Z. (2023). The relationship between intellectual capital and financial statements readability: The role of management characteristics. Journal of Facilities Management, 21(2), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-08-2021-0088
Moreno, A., & Casasola, A. (2016). A Readability Evolution of Narratives in Annual Reports: A Longitudinal Study of Two Spanish Companies. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 30(2), 202–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651915620233
Nazari et, all. 2017. Assessing Social and Environmental Performance Through Narrative Complexity in CSR Reports. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 166-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2017.05.002
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. 2016. Surat Edaran Nomor 30/SEOJK.04/2016 tentang Bentuk dan Isi Laporan Tahunan Emiten atau Perusahaan Publik. https://ojk.go.id/id/kanal/pasar-modal/regulasi/surat-edaran-ojk/Documents/SAL%20-%20SEOJK_Laporan%20Tahunan%20Emiten.pdf.
Schneider, T. E. (2008). Is there a relation between the cost of debt and environmental performance? An empirical investigation of the US Pulp and Paper Industry, 1994-2005.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Valentina Rani Novianri, Susi Sarumpaet, Usep Syaipudin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.