<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN"
  "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJAR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Indonesian Journal of Advanced Research</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2986-0768</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Formosa Publisher</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.55927/ijar.v4i7.14870</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Model Simulation of Holiday Session Traffic Flow at Three Ways Intersection in Indonesia</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name>
            <surname>Aryahito</surname>
            <given-names>Faqih Oki</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Swadaya Gunung Jati, Indonesia</aff>
          <email>faqihokiaryahito@gmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Wihardi</surname>
            <given-names>Rendy Yogista</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Swadaya Gunung Jati, Indonesia</aff>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Marunda</surname>
            <given-names>Muhammad Azka</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Swadaya Gunung Jati, Indonesia</aff>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Hariani</surname>
            <given-names>Mira Lestira</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Swadaya Gunung Jati, Indonesia</aff>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>23</day>
        <month>07</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>07</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd">
          <day>21</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>23</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <volume>4</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>1323</fpage>
      <lpage>1342</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Traffic density increases fluctuatively during holidays due to rising tourist activities, requiring seasonal traffic management. This study analyzes the impact using PKJI 2023 and PTV VISSIM modeling. At peak hour, the intersection shows a degree of saturation (DS) = 0.776 and average delay = 13.075 sec/MPH with LOS B. Projections for the next 5–10 years indicate DS = 1.10 and delay = 25.234 sec/MPH with LOS D. Of three modeled alternatives, the best is Alternative 2: diverting major north-south traffic to the east minor road, resulting in average speed = 23 km/h, delay = 14.075 sec/MP, queue length = 16.417 m, and LOS B.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Congestion</kwd>
        <kwd>Simulation Model</kwd>
        <kwd>Intersection</kwd>
        <kwd>PKJI 2023</kwd>
        <kwd>PTV VISSIM</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <permissions>
        <license>
          <ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
    </article-meta>
  </front>

  <body>

<sec>
  <title>INTRODUCTION</title>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>Traffic congestion escalates during holiday seasons due to
    increased tourist activity, necessitating seasonal traffic
    management. Unaddressed, this congestion negatively impacts the
    economy, as efficient transportation is vital for economic growth
    (Eddington &amp; Stationery Office Great Britain, 2006, in Khreis et
    al., 2016).</p>
    <p>A primary cause is holiday-induced traffic surges. Official
    holidays have a defined duration, but their impact on traffic
    patterns, emissions, and air pollution can linger (Xiang et al.,
    2024). Traffic volumes can increase by up to</p>
    <p>1.5 times normal levels during these periods, a globally observed
    phenomenon (Çolak et al., 2016; Liu &amp; Sharma, 2006; Bao et al.,
    2017).</p>
    <p>Rising interest in travel during holidays significantly impacts
    daily travel patterns (Liu et al., 2020). While some holidays might
    improve traffic performance on specific days (Ratnapradipa &amp;
    Zhu, 2020), holiday seasons often worsen congestion and accident
    rates. In Indonesia, specifically Christmas and New Year,
    consistently drive increased travel, leading to recurring
    intersection traffic problems annually (Yaqin &amp; Khasna,
    2024).</p>
  </disp-quote>
</sec>





<sec>
  <title>LITERATURE REVIEW</title>
  <sec id="intersection">
    <title>Intersection</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Road intersections are crucial for managing traffic flow but
      are often sources of congestion when volumes exceed capacity. For
      instance, the Karangploso tri-intersection in Malang Regency
      (Faradhika et al., 2025), an unsignalized intersection, showed
      suboptimal performance with a degree of saturation of 1.18 and a
      delay of 35.78 seconds/smp during peak hours, highlighting the
      need for intervention. Similarly, Fatmawati intersection (Iin
      Irawati et al., 2024) experienced peak flows up to 589.7 smp/h,
      with approach saturation degrees between 0.48 and 0.58, and a
      93-meter queue length, resulting in a Level of Service (LOS) C.
      These examples underscore the common challenge of maintaining
      efficient traffic flow at intersections.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="holiday-season">
    <title>Holiday Season</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The phenomenon of increased traffic volumes during special
      periods, such as national holidays and long holidays, underscores
      the fundamental limitations in the existing traffic management
      system. A study (Nugroho &amp; Setiawan 2023) showed a 41%
      reduction in capacity at the Lembang tourist area intersection
      during long holidays due to the absence of an adaptive traffic
      prioritization system. This data implies an urgent need for a
      predictive and contextual traffic management approach, not just a
      reactive one. Holiday periods are an integral part of people's
      mobility patterns that must be anticipated within the framework of
      long-term transportation policy.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="micro-simulation">
    <title>Micro Simulation</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Traffic modeling provides a safe, experimental space to
      simulate various vehicle movement scenarios and evaluate policy
      interventions without disrupting real traffic. Studies (Wang &amp;
      Liu, 2023) highlight its ability to replicate individual driver
      behavior in real-time, offering a more realistic</p>
      <p>picture than conventional models. Integrating predictive
      models, like the FD- Markov-LSTM model which showed over 35% RMSE
      reduction (Pan et al., 2023), is crucial for transportation
      planning. However, effective modeling relies on high-quality,
      representative data and integration into a policy framework
      prioritizing efficiency, safety, and sustainability.</p>
      <p>Various simulation software tools, including SUMO, AIMSUN,
      Paramics, VISSIM, and PTV VISSUM, use cellular automata to
      visualize traffic flows interactively. These visualizations are
      vital for identifying congestion points and adaptively testing
      management strategies (Trapeznikova et al., 2024).</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="ptv-vissim">
    <title>PTV VISSIM</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>PTV VISSIM offers significant academic and technical
      contributions to urban traffic and transportation engineering in
      Indonesia. Academically, it enables realistic microsimulations
      that capture local driver behavior, complementing empirical models
      like PKJI 2023. This study demonstrates VISSIM's adaptability to
      local conditions, supporting the development of context-specific
      driver behavior models, a current gap in Indonesian transportation
      studies (e.g., Mulyadi &amp; Adawiyah, 2024; Faradhika et al.,
      2025).</p>
      <p>Technically, VISSIM provides accurate, real-data based modeling
      validated by GEH &lt; 5 criteria, crucial for policy decisions. It
      facilitates long- term performance projections (5-10 years),
      essential for sustainable planning. Furthermore, VISSIM allows
      safe, detailed evaluation of alternative traffic schemes,
      identifying effective solutions like flow diversions that
      significantly improve traffic metrics. Its high contextual
      relevance to Indonesian conditions, including unsignalized
      intersections and aggressive driving, makes it an ideal
      evidence-based planning tool for developing countries.</p>
      <p>These findings are consistent with previous research,
      reinforcing VISSIM's role in providing accurate analyses for
      unsignalized intersections (Mulyadi &amp; Adawiyah, 2024),
      informing redesigns for peak traffic (Faradhika et al., 2025), and
      optimizing schemes to reduce congestion (Sun et al., 2024; Chen,
      2023). VISSIM also aids in developing safer solutions for
      challenging intersections where minor roads struggle to merge
      (Road et al., 2023). Thus, PTV VISSIM contributes significantly to
      both the methodology and data-driven policy application in
      Indonesian transportation engineering.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
</sec>





<sec>
  <title>METHODOLOGY</title>
  <p><inline-graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_3989bf9256bc47b1b441104fb11f12a6/media/image3.png" /><inline-graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_3989bf9256bc47b1b441104fb11f12a6/media/image4.png" /><inline-graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_3989bf9256bc47b1b441104fb11f12a6/media/image5.png" /><inline-graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_3989bf9256bc47b1b441104fb11f12a6/media/image6.png" /><inline-graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_3989bf9256bc47b1b441104fb11f12a6/media/image7.png" /><inline-graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_3989bf9256bc47b1b441104fb11f12a6/media/image8.png" /><inline-graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_3989bf9256bc47b1b441104fb11f12a6/media/image9.png" /><inline-graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_3989bf9256bc47b1b441104fb11f12a6/media/image10.png" /><inline-graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_3989bf9256bc47b1b441104fb11f12a6/media/image11.png" /><inline-graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_3989bf9256bc47b1b441104fb11f12a6/media/image12.png" /><inline-graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_3989bf9256bc47b1b441104fb11f12a6/media/image13.png" /><inline-graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_3989bf9256bc47b1b441104fb11f12a6/media/image14.png" /></p>
  <p>Figure 1. Research Flow</p>
  <sec id="data-collection">
    <title>Data Collection</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>This research requires data in the form of primary data and
      secondary data. Primary data is obtained from the results of
      surveys in the field for eight days from 06.00 - 18.00 WIB.
      Primary data needed in the research to be carried out are: traffic
      volume data, road geometric data, speed data, side obstacle data,
      and environmental conditions<italic>,</italic> while. Secondary
      data is obtained from journals, articles, and Indonesian Road
      Capacity Guidelines 2023 (PKJI 2023).</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="data-analysis">
    <title>Data Analysis</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The entire data analysis used Microsoft Excel 2019 software.
      Data analysis is carried out by calculating the survey data that
      has been obtained and then entered according to the intersection
      performance formula that refers to the Indonesian Road Capacity
      Guidelines (PKJI 2023). Furthermore, analysis</p>
      <p>will be carried out in various aspects, namely analyzing
      traffic volume, vehicle speed, side obstacles, and road capacity.
      Based on PKJI 2023, the calculation results of the main traffic
      parameters such as degree of saturation (DJ), delay (T) that
      occurs due to traffic flow, as well as queuing opportunities (Pa)
      and can determine the level of traffic service or LoS (Level of
      Service) at an intersection,</p>
      <p>Based on the Service Level Characteristics according to
      Ministerial Regulation No. 96/2015, it can be seen in Table 1.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 1. Service Level Based on Delay (T)</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 1. Service Level Based on Delay (T)</label>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="center">Service level</th>
            <th align="center">Average Vehicle Delay (seconds)</th>
            <th align="center">Notes.</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">A</td>
            <td align="center">&lt; 5.0</td>
            <td align="center">Very good</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">B</td>
            <td align="center">&gt; 5.1 - 15.0</td>
            <td align="center">Good.</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">C</td>
            <td align="center">&gt; 15.1 - 25.0</td>
            <td align="center">Maintain</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">D</td>
            <td align="center">&gt; 25.1 - 40.0</td>
            <td align="center">Less</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">E</td>
            <td align="center">&gt; 40.1 - 60.0</td>
            <td align="center">Bad</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">F</td>
            <td align="center">&gt; 60.1</td>
            <td align="center">Very Bad</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
  </sec>
  <sec id="vehicle-growth-rate-factor">
    <title>Vehicle Growth Rate Factor</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>From the data on vehicle growth in Kuningan Regency every year
      has increased, proving that the increase in vehicles every year
      will affect the volume of vehicles at the intersection. Steps to
      calculate the vehicle growth rate factor for each type of vehicle
      with the following equation.</p>
      <p>𝟏</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
</sec>
<sec id="cagr">
  <title>CAGR % =</title>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>𝐍𝐢<underline>𝐥</underline>𝐚𝐢</p>
    <p>( ) − 𝟏 × 𝟏𝟎𝟎</p>
    <p>𝐍𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐢𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟎</p>
    <p>The percentage increase in tourists or visitors can be calculated
    based on the following equation.</p>
  </disp-quote>
  <sec id="modeling">
    <title>Modeling</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p><bold>i =</bold>
      <sup>𝐲𝟐<underline>−</underline>𝐲<underline>𝟏</underline></sup> ×
      𝟏𝟎𝟎%</p>
      <p>𝐲𝟏</p>
      <p>This VISSIM traffic modeling aims to recommend effective
      traffic engineering solutions for Indonesian national holiday
      congestion. Using traffic and intersection geometric data, the
      simulation will propose optimal routes, providing local government
      with actionable strategies. The model accounts for real-world
      traffic variability to accurately predict intersection
      performance</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="research-location">
    <title>Research Location</title>
    <graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="vertopal_3989bf9256bc47b1b441104fb11f12a6/media/image15.jpeg" />
    <p>Fig. 1. Research Location</p>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>This research location is located at Kuningan Tugu Ikan,
      Ciperna highway, Sampora Village, Cilimus District, Kuningan
      Regency, West Java Province, Indonesia 45556. For locations at
      coordinates -6.8492488, 108.5081263. 5G25+872 Sampora, Kuningan
      Regency, West Java.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
</sec>





<sec>
  <title>RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</title>
  <sec id="road-geometry-condition">
    <title>Road Geometry Condition</title>
    <graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="vertopal_3989bf9256bc47b1b441104fb11f12a6/media/image16.jpeg" />
    <p>Fig. 2. Geometric Intersection</p>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Here's a concise description of the geometric characteristics
      for each arm of the intersection:</p>
      <p>Arm A (Cilimus Road from Cirebon): This arm features a 7-meter
      lane width (3.5 meters per lane), with a 1.85-meter right
      shoulder, a 1.5-meter left shoulder, and respective drainage
      widths of 0.6 meters and 3.3 meters.</p>
      <p>Arm B (Kuningan East Ring Road from the East): This arm is 14
      meters wide (7 meters per lane) and includes a 2-meter median. It
      also has a 2-meter shoulder, a 2-meter sidewalk on the left,
      0.6-meter drainage, and a 2.53-meter park on the right.</p>
      <p>Arm C (Cilimus Road towards the Government Center): This arm
      has a 7- meter lane width (3.5 meters per lane). It's equipped
      with 1.5-meter and 1.85- meter shoulders, a 2-meter sidewalk on
      the left, and 0.6-meter drainage on the right.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="intersection-environment">
    <title>Intersection Environment</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>From the observations at the research location, the
      intersection of Tugu Ikan Sampora, Ciperna – Cilimus highway and
      Kuningan east ring road is a triple intersection with intersection
      type 322. The type of intersection environment reviewed when
      viewed from the criteria in the PKJI 2023 table shows that the
      type of environment around the study area is included in the
      commercial environment.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="traffic-volume-q-total-and-capacity-c-of-intersection">
    <title>Traffic Volume (Q <sub>TOTAL</sub>) and Capacity (C) of
    Intersection</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The traffic volume data to be used in the calculation is the
      traffic volume during peak hours or the highest traffic volume
      that has been obtained. The survey was conducted for 8 days in
      December, before the Holiday season and during the National
      Holiday season in Indonesia. Based on the results of the survey
      that has been carried out, the traffic volume of the Kuningan Tugu
      Ikan three intersection, Ciperna highway, Sampora Village,
      Kuningan Regency, West Java, is as follows.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_3989bf9256bc47b1b441104fb11f12a6/media/image17.png" />
    <p>Fig. 3. Pre-Holiday Season Traffic Volume Chart (SMP/Hour)</p>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>From the traffic volume data before the Christmas and New Year
      holiday season at Tugu Ikan Intersection, Kuningan Regency, it was
      found that the peak hour was at 14.00 - 15.00 with a vehicle
      volume of 1914.2 SMP / hour.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_3989bf9256bc47b1b441104fb11f12a6/media/image18.png" />
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Fig. 4. Chart of Traffic Volume During Holiday Season
      (SMP/Hour)</p>
      <p>From the traffic volume data before the Christmas and New Year
      holiday season at the Tugu Ikan Three Intersection, Kuningan
      Regency, the peak hour was obtained at 14.00 - 15.00 with a
      vehicle volume of 2,125 smp / hour. From the traffic volume
      obtained, then the calculation of the intersection capacity is</p>
      <p>based on the factors in table 2. The following are the results
      of the calculation of the intersection capacity.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 2.Capacity Determination CorrectionFactor</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 2. Capacity Determination Correction Factor</label>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="center">No.</th>
            <th align="center">Factor</th>
            <th align="center">Value</th>
            <th align="center">Note</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">1</td>
            <td align="left">Base Capacity (C<sub>0</sub>)</td>
            <td align="center">2700</td>
            <td align="left">The three Tugu Ikan intersection has arms with 4 lanes on the minor road and 2 lanes on the major road. The intersection should be type 342 but there are limitations in the Standard set by PKJI 2023, therefore we use intersection type 322 which is close to the classification of the intersection type.</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">2</td>
            <td align="left">Average Approach Width Correction (F<sub>LP</sub>)</td>
            <td align="center">1.072</td>
            <td align="left">Calculated using LRP and the formula: FLP = 0.73 + 0.0760 x LRP (LRP=4.5)</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">3</td>
            <td align="left">Median Correction on Main Road (F<sub>M</sub>)</td>
            <td align="center">1</td>
            <td align="left">Determined by the table of Median Correction Factors on Main Roads and at intersections where there is no median on the main road.</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">4</td>
            <td align="left">City Size Correction (F<sub>UK</sub>)</td>
            <td align="center">1</td>
            <td align="left">Based on the Correction Factor table for the city area and population, Kuningan Regency is included in the large category with a population of 1,213,927 people.</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">5</td>
            <td align="left">Side Obstacle Correction (F<sub>HS</sub>)</td>
            <td align="center">0,930</td>
            <td align="left">Determined by commercial road environment type class, high side obstacle class, and 0.000 RKTB</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">6</td>
            <td align="left">Left Turn Flow Correction (F<sub>BKI</sub>)</td>
            <td align="center">1.173</td>
            <td align="left">Calculated using the equation FBKI = 0.84 + 1.61 RBKI (RBKI = 0.207)</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">7</td>
            <td align="left">Right Turn Flow Correction (F<sub>BKa</sub>)</td>
            <td align="center">0,893</td>
            <td align="left">Calculated using the equation FBKa = 1.09 - 0.922 RBKa (RBKa = 0.213)</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">8</td>
            <td align="left">Minor road flow correction (F<sub>Rmi</sub>)</td>
            <td align="center">0,972</td>
            <td align="left">Intersection type 322 and Rmi = 0.242. Calculated using the equation Fmi = 1.19 x Rmi^-2 - 1.19 x Rmi + 1.19</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
  </sec>
  <sec id="intersection-operational-performance">
    <title>Intersection Operational Performance</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Traffic performance at three intersections on holidays, then a
      quantitative analysis is carried out based on survey data in the
      field guided by PKJI 2023. presented in Table 3. below.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 3. Current Intersection Operational Performance</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 3. Current Intersection Operational Performance</label>
      <caption>
        <title>Existing Operational Performance Of The Intersection</title>
      </caption>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="center" rowspan="2">Time</th>
            <th align="center">Total traffic flow Qtott</th>
            <th align="center">Degree of Saturation</th>
            <th align="center">Traffic Junction Delays</th>
            <th align="center">Major Road Traffic Delays</th>
            <th align="center">Minor Cross Road Traffic Delay</th>
            <th align="center">Intersection Geometry Delay</th>
            <th align="center">Intersection Delay</th>
            <th align="center">Queue Opportunities</th>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th align="center">SMP/hour</th>
            <th align="center">Dj</th>
            <th align="center">TLL</th>
            <th align="center">TLLmi</th>
            <th align="center">TLLmi</th>
            <th align="center">TG</th>
            <th align="center">T=TLL +TG</th>
            <th align="center">Pa</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">Before The Holiday Season</td>
            <td align="center">1913</td>
            <td align="center">0,639</td>
            <td align="center">7,182</td>
            <td align="center">5,012</td>
            <td align="center">18,149</td>
            <td align="center">4,065</td>
            <td align="center">11,247</td>
            <td align="center">17-35%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">During The Holiday</td>
            <td align="center">2125</td>
            <td align="center">0,775</td>
            <td align="center">9,016</td>
            <td align="center">6,398</td>
            <td align="center">17,207</td>
            <td align="center">4,058</td>
            <td align="center">13,075</td>
            <td align="center">24-49%</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Before the holiday season, the intersection experienced a
      traffic flow of 1913 smp/hour and a degree of saturation (DJ) of
      0.639. The total intersection delay was 11.247 seconds/smp,
      resulting in a Level of Service (LOS) of D, with queuing
      probabilities between 17% and 35%. During the holiday season,
      traffic flow increased to 2125 smp/hour with a DJ of 0.775. The
      total intersection delay rose to 13.075 seconds/smp, maintaining
      an LOS of D, but with higher queuing probabilities ranging from
      24% to 49%. These findings align with Ministerial Regulation No.
      KM 96 of 2015.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="operational-performance-for-the-next-5---10-years">
    <title>Operational Performance for the Next 5 - 10 Years</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>To forecast future intersection performance over the next 5-10
      years, we're analyzing vehicle growth trends. This involves
      regressing historical data to determine annual growth rates for
      five vehicle types: Motorcycles (SM), Passenger Cars (MP), Medium
      Buses and Goods Trucks (KS), Large Buses (BB), and
      3-Axle/Double/Outboard Trucks (TB). Predicting transportation
      growth is crucial as traffic volume directly correlates with
      vehicle population increases. Kuningan Regency's consistent
      vehicle growth confirms its future impact on the Tugu Ikan
      Intersection's traffic. Specific growth rates are detailed in
      Table 4.</p>

    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 4. Vehicle Growth Per Year (i%) Kuningan Regency</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 4. Vehicle Growth Per Year (i%) Kuningan Regency</label>
      <caption>
        <title>Brass Vehicle Growth Data</title>
      </caption>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="center" rowspan="2">Year</th>
            <th align="center" colspan="6">Vehicle Type</th>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th align="center">KS</th>
            <th align="center">MP</th>
            <th align="center">BB</th>
            <th align="center">TB</th>
            <th align="center">SM</th>
            <th align="center">Total</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">2020</td>
            <td align="center">25707</td>
            <td align="center">25707</td>
            <td align="center">797</td>
            <td align="center">8556</td>
            <td align="center">301300</td>
            <td align="center">336360</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">2021</td>
            <td align="center">26843</td>
            <td align="center">26843</td>
            <td align="center">750</td>
            <td align="center">8698</td>
            <td align="center">303618</td>
            <td align="center">339909</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">2022</td>
            <td align="center">28238</td>
            <td align="center">28238</td>
            <td align="center">599</td>
            <td align="center">8926</td>
            <td align="center">307202</td>
            <td align="center">344965</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">2023</td>
            <td align="center">29525</td>
            <td align="center">29525</td>
            <td align="center">569</td>
            <td align="center">9079</td>
            <td align="center">313328</td>
            <td align="center">352501</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">2024</td>
            <td align="center">30168</td>
            <td align="center">30168</td>
            <td align="center">568</td>
            <td align="center">9084</td>
            <td align="center">313928</td>
            <td align="center">353748</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">CAGR</td>
            <td align="center">4,08%</td>
            <td align="center">4,08%</td>
            <td align="center">-8,12%</td>
            <td align="center">1,51%</td>
            <td align="center">1,03%</td>
            <td align="center"/>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center"/>
            <td align="center"/>
            <td align="center"/>
            <td align="center">0,52%</td>
            <td align="center"/>
            <td align="center"/>
            <td align="center"/>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The results of data analysis of the average growth percentage of
      Kuningan Regency vehicles is 0.52%. per year. After obtaining the
      percentage growth of each type of vehicle, the traffic volume is
      projected to determine the performance of the intersection for the
      next 5 to 10 years. This can be seen in table 5. The following.</p>
      <p></p>
      <p>Growth Rate of Each Type of Vehicle in Kuningan Regency</p>
      <p>2024 5-Year Projection 10-Year Projection</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 5. Growth Rate of Each Type of Motorized Vehicle in Kuningan Regency</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 5. Growth Rate of Each Type of Motorized Vehicle in Kuningan Regency</label>
      <caption>
        <title>Growth Rate of Each Type of Vehicle in Kuningan Regency</title>
      </caption>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" rowspan="2"></td>
            <td align="center" rowspan="2">2024</td>
            <th align="center" colspan="2">5-Year Projection</th>
            <th align="center" colspan="2">10-Year Projection</th>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th align="center">Vehicle/hour</th>
            <th align="center">Junior High/Hours</th>
            <th align="center">Vehicle/hour</th>
            <th align="center">Junior High/Hours</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">SM</td>
            <td align="center">1322</td>
            <td align="center">1391,618</td>
            <td align="center">278,324</td>
            <td align="center">1464,903</td>
            <td align="center">292,981</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">MP</td>
            <td align="center">1475</td>
            <td align="center">1801,611</td>
            <td align="center">1801,611</td>
            <td align="center">2200,543</td>
            <td align="center">2200,543</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">KS</td>
            <td align="center">178</td>
            <td align="center">217,415</td>
            <td align="center">391,346</td>
            <td align="center">265,557</td>
            <td align="center">478,003</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">BB</td>
            <td align="center">23</td>
            <td align="center">15,061</td>
            <td align="center">27,109</td>
            <td align="center">9,862</td>
            <td align="center">17,751</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">TB</td>
            <td align="center">13</td>
            <td align="center">14,010</td>
            <td align="center">25,219</td>
            <td align="center">15,099</td>
            <td align="center">27,179</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">KTB</td>
            <td align="center">0</td>
            <td align="center">0</td>
            <td align="center">0,000</td>
            <td align="center">0,000</td>
            <td align="center">0,000</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">Q Total</td>
            <td align="center">3011</td>
            <td align="center">3439,714</td>
            <td align="center">2523,608</td>
            <td align="center">3955,964</td>
            <td align="center">3016,456</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Traffic volume at the Kuningan intersection is projected to
      increase significantly across most vehicle types over the next
      decade. By 2029 (5-year projection), motorcycle volume is expected
      to rise from 1322 to 1391.618 vehicles/hour, passenger cars from
      1475 to 1801.611 vehicles/hour, medium vehicles from 178 to 217.415
      vehicles/hour, and large trucks from 13 to 14.010 vehicles/hour.
      Large bus volume, however, is projected to decrease from 23 to</p>
      <p>15.060 vehicles/hour. The total traffic volume (Q Total) in
      vehicles/hour for 2029 is projected at 3439.714, equivalent to
      2523.608 SMP/hour. Looking further to 2034 (10-year projection),
      motorcycle volume will reach 1469.903 vehicles/hour, passenger cars
      2200.543 vehicles/hour, medium vehicles 265.557 vehicles/hour, and
      large trucks 15.099 vehicles/hour. Large bus volume is projected to
      further decrease to 9.068 vehicles/hour. The overall Q Total for
      2034 is estimated at 3955.964 vehicles/hour, which translates to
      3016.456 SMP/hour. These figures highlight a substantial rise in
      overall traffic, particularly for private vehicles, posing future
      challenges for the intersection.</p>
      <p>The following are the results of the 5 - 10 year calculation
      obtained by the Degree of Saturation (D<sub>J)</sub>and the
      intersection level of service (LoS) delay, which can be seen in
      Table 6.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 6. Growth Rate of Each Type of Vehicle in Kuningan Regency</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 6. Growth Rate of Each Type of Vehicle in Kuningan Regency</label>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="center">Year To</th>
            <th align="center">Plan Year</th>
            <th align="center">Q (SMP/Hour)</th>
            <th align="center">Capacity (C) (SMP/Hour)</th>
            <th align="center">Degree of saturation (Dj)</th>
            <th align="center">Delay (T)</th>
            <th align="center">Service Level Based on Delay (T)</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">5</td>
            <td align="center">2029</td>
            <td align="center">2523,608</td>
            <td align="center">2739,8</td>
            <td align="center">0,92</td>
            <td align="center">16.213</td>
            <td align="center">C</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">10</td>
            <td align="center">2034</td>
            <td align="center">3016,456</td>
            <td align="center">2739,8</td>
            <td align="center">1,1</td>
            <td align="center">25.234</td>
            <td align="center">D</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Projections indicate a significant decline in the performance of
      Kuningan's Sampora Tugu Ikan Intersection over the next decade,
      leading to exacerbated congestion and economic disruption.</p>
      <p>By 2029 (5-year projection), Traffic Volume (Q Total) is expected
      to reach 2523.608 smp/hour, with a Degree of Saturation (DJ) of
      0.92. The intersection's service level, based on Ministerial
      Regulation No. 96 of 2015, is projected to be Category C
      (sufficient), with a delay of 16.213 seconds/smp. By 2034 (10-year
      projection), Traffic Volume is projected at 3016.456 smp/hour, with
      a DJ of 1.10. This indicates a Category D (low) service level, with
      delays increasing to 25.234 seconds/smp. This decline signifies that
      without intervention, the intersection will experience severe
      congestion, negatively impacting local activities and the
      economy.</p>
      <p>Therefore, immediate evaluation and implementation of effective
      traffic management solutions are crucial, especially during national
      holidays, to improve intersection performance.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="tourism-analysis">
    <title>Tourism Analysis</title>
    <graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_3989bf9256bc47b1b441104fb11f12a6/media/image19.png" />
    <p>Fig. 5. Tourism Traffic Chart of Kuningan Regency</p>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Kuningan Regency has experienced significant fluctuations in
      tourist numbers over recent years. While 2022 saw 3,434,925
      tourists, there was a dip to 2,785,126 in 2023, followed by a
      substantial increase to 3,824,519 tourists in 2024. A consistent
      and notable surge in tourism occurs every December, primarily
      driven by the Christmas and New Year holidays. Unlike other major
      holidays like Eid al-Fitr (Lebaran), which vary annually based on
      the Islamic calendar, Christmas and New Year fall on fixed
      Gregorian calendar dates. This predictability leads to a reliable
      annual increase in visitors to Kuningan</p>
      <p>Regency during this specific period.</p>
      <graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_3989bf9256bc47b1b441104fb11f12a6/media/image20.png" />
      <p>Fig. 6. Graph of Regency Percentage (%) Increase in the Number
      of Tourists per Month in Kuningan Regency in 2022 - 2023</p>
      <p>Data indicates a consistent average increase of 60.67% in
      vehicle volume during December, directly linked to the Christmas
      and New Year holiday season. This is evidenced by a significant
      jump in total traffic volume (Q Total) at the Kuningan Tugu Ikan
      Intersection: from 1914.2 SMP/hour before the holidays to 2125
      SMP/hour during.</p>
      <p>Overall, there's an 11% increase in vehicle volume during the
      holiday season compared to normal days at this intersection. This
      aligns with Kuningan's tourism data, which shows an average 9.02%
      annual surge in tourists over the last three years.</p>
      <p>This rise in tourist visits is a likely driver for the average
      1.02% annual increase in overall vehicle numbers in Kuningan over
      the past five years. The correlation strongly suggests that
      increased tourism activity, especially during holidays,
      contributes to higher vehicle volumes at the Kuningan Tugu Ikan
      Intersection.</p>
      <p><bold><italic>VISSIM PTV</italic> MODELING</bold></p>
      <p>From the results of the analysis using the PJKI 2023 method at
      the Three Tugu Ikan Intersection in Kuningan Regency, a DJ value
      of 0.776 was obtained and it was stated that the DJ value&gt; 0.75
      required an alternative solution to improve intersection
      performance. The use of PTV VISSIM software must be modeled when
      the intersection is in existing conditions in order to describe
      the situation at the research location. In Indonesia, driving
      behavior is calibrated to reflect the characteristics of
      Indonesian drivers.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 7. Driving Behavior for calibration.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 7. Driving Behavior for calibration.</label>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="center" rowspan="2">Calibration to</th>
            <th align="center" rowspan="2">Changed parameters</th>
            <th align="center" rowspan="2">Changed components</th>
            <th align="center" colspan="2">Value</th>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th align="center">Vissim default</th>
            <th align="center">After Calibration</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">1</td>
            <td align="left" rowspan="3">Model Following Car</td>
            <td align="left">Average Stopping Distance</td>
            <td align="center">2 m</td>
            <td align="center">0.6 m</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">2</td>
            <td align="left">Additive Part of Castor Safety</td>
            <td align="center">2 m</td>
            <td align="center">0.6 m</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">3</td>
            <td align="left">Multiplication Part of Safe Distance</td>
            <td align="center">3 m</td>
            <td align="center">1 m</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">4</td>
            <td align="left" rowspan="3">Lateral</td>
            <td align="left">Desired Position at Free Flow</td>
            <td align="center">Middle of the Line</td>
            <td align="center">Anything</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">5</td>
            <td align="left">Standing Distance</td>
            <td align="center">1 m</td>
            <td align="center">0.4 m</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center">6</td>
            <td align="left">Long Distance Driving</td>
            <td align="center">1 m</td>
            <td align="center">0.4 m</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Fig. 7. VISSIM Simulation Results Before and After Calibration.</p>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The GEH (Geoffery E. Havers) statistical test is a standard
      approach to comparing two sets of traffic volumes between summed
      and modeled data. The formula used is:</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p><bold>GEH = √(〖2(M-C)]^2/(M+C))</bold></p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 8. Evaluation Results between Existing Volume and VISSIM Volume After Calibration.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 8. Evaluation Results between Existing Volume and VISSIM Volume After Calibration.</label>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">No.</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">Arms</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">Volume (Vehicles/hour)</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">GEH</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">Similarity Percentage (%)</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">Note</th>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th align="center" valign="top">Field Volume</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top">Vissim Volume</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Raya Ciperna St.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">1314</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">1243</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">1.986</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">95</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">OK.</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Lkr. Sampora St.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">673</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">633</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">1.565</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">94</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">OK.</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Raya Cilimus St.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">1024</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">949</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">2.388</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">93</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">OK.</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Based on the data displayed, the difference is relatively small
      and still</p>
      <p>within the tolerance limit, namely the GEH value &lt; 5, with a
      conformity rate of more than 90%.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="ptv-vissim-modeling-results">
    <title>PTV VISSIM MODELING RESULTS</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Simulation results to evaluate traffic at three intersections
      without traffic signals include vehicle speed data, delay time,
      queue length, and level of service (LoS). After validation, it can
      be seen that the VISSIM modeling can be said to be valid so that an
      evaluation can be carried out to determine the</p>
      <p>performance of the Kuningan Regency Tugu Ikan Intersection. The
      following are the results of the VISSIM simulation:</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="vertopal_3989bf9256bc47b1b441104fb11f12a6/media/image23.jpeg" />
    <p>Fig. 8. VISSIM Simulation Results.</p>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 9. VISSIM Modeling Results for Volume, Speed, and Queue Length</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 9. VISSIM Modeling Results for Volume, Speed, and Queue Length.</label>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="center" valign="top">No.</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top">Arms</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top">Vissim Volume (Vehicles/hour)</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top">Speed (km/h)</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top">Tail Length (m)</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Raya Ciperna St.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">1243</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">22</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">0.000</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Lkr. Sampora St.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">633</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">28</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">18.960</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Raya Cilimus St.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">949</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">21</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">6.600</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="right" valign="top" colspan="2">Average</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
            <td align="center" valign="top">24</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">8.520</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 10. Results from VISSIM Modeling of Delay and Service Levels No. Arms</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 10. Results from VISSIM Modeling of Delay and Service Levels</label>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="center" valign="top">No.</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top">Arms</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top">Delay (Seconds)</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top">Intersection Delay</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top">Service Level</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Ciperna Highway - Cilimus Highway</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">4.6</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Raya Ciperna - Lkr. Sampora St.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">3.61</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Lkr. Sampora - Ciperna Highway</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">40.85</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">13.345</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">LoS B</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Lkr. Sampora - Cilimus Highway</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">0.42</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Cilimus Highway - Ciperna Highway</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">12.6</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Raya Cilimus St - Lkr. Sampora St.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">17.99</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>In the PKJI 2023 analysis results, the peak hour LoS is included
      in category D where category D approaches unstable flow and low
      speed, the difference is due to the parameters used in PTV VISSIM
      using the delay value while in PKJI 2023 using DJ where this is also
      regulated in the Minister of Transportation Regulation No. KM 96
      Year 2015: KM 96 Year 2015.</p>
      <p>Traffic performance conditions at the Tugu Ikan Three
      Intersection in the next 5 to 10 years are not expected to be the
      same as current conditions, given the growth in the number of
      vehicles and changes in community mobility patterns. Therefore, to
      predict and evaluate the performance of the intersection in the
      future, a simulation is carried out using VISSIM software based on
      data from the analysis of traffic volume projections and
      intersection performance parameters for the next 5 to 10 years. The
      following are the VISSIM simulation results for the next 10
      years:</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="vertopal_3989bf9256bc47b1b441104fb11f12a6/media/image24.jpeg" />
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Fig. 9. Results of Junction Performance Projections for the Next 10 Years</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p> Table 11. VISSIM Modeling Results for Volume, Speed, and Queue Length</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 11. VISSIM Modeling Results for Volume, Speed, and Queue Length in the Next 10 Years</label>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="center" valign="top">No.</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top">Arms</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top">Vissim Volume (Vehicles/hour)</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top">Speed (km/h)</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top">Tail Length (m)</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Raya Ciperna St.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">1699</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">20</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">0.870</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Lkr. Sampora St.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">901</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">12</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">72.540</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Raya Cilimus St.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">1298</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">18</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">26.150</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="right" valign="top" colspan="2">Average</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
            <td align="center" valign="top">17</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">33.187</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 12. VISSIM Delay and Service Level Modeling Results in the Next 10 Year</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 12. VISSIM Delay and Service Level Modeling Results in the Next 10 Years</label>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="center" valign="top">No.</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top">Arms</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top">Delay (Seconds)</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top">Intersection Delay</th>
            <th align="center" valign="top">Service Level</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Ciperna Highway - Cilimus Highway</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">5.03</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Raya Ciperna St - Lkr. Sampora St.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">4.54</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Lkr. Sampora - Ciperna Highway</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">111.3</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">31.698</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">LoS D</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Lkr. Sampora - Cilimus Highway</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">35.14</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Cilimus Highway - Ciperna Highway</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">12.92</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
            <td align="left" valign="top">Raya Cilimus St - Lkr. Sampora St.</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top">21.26</td>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
            <td align="center" valign="top"/>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>This supports that for the next 10 years the intersection will
      experience a decrease in intersection performance. If it is not
      immediately repaired, it will experience traffic spikes that can
      cause congestion that can disrupt activities in the Kuningan Regency
      area, so it is necessary to make traffic engineering efforts at the
      intersection. Alternative recommendations that will be applied to
      the Kuningan Regency Tugu Ikan Intersection are as follows.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <sec id="traffic-engineering-lane-diversion-based-on-percentage-of-tourist-attractions-alternative-1">
      <title>Traffic Engineering Lane Diversion Based on Percentage of
      Tourist Attractions (Alternative 1)</title>
      <disp-quote>
        <p>In Alternative Recommendation 1, Traffic Engineering Lane
        Diversion is applied by using Kuningan Regency Tourism data, where
        Tourism data is presented based on the number of intended tourist
        visitors based on the closest route to the tourist attraction.
        From this percentage, it is then applied to vehicle volume data
        both entering and exiting Kuningan Regency, then determining which
        route must be traveled based on the tourism data.</p>
      </disp-quote>
    </sec>
    <sec id="traffic-engineering-lane-diversion-alternative-2">
      <title>Traffic Engineering Lane Diversion (Alternative 2)</title>
      <disp-quote>
        <p>In this alternative, traffic engineering is applied to the
        Kuningan Three Tugu Ikan Intersection, where at the intersection a
        lane diversion is carried out from the main lane to the minor
        lane. Where the entire traffic flow from north to south (major) is
        diverted to the east (minor) where in the condition of the traffic
        field coming from the direction of Cirebon Regency or all traffic
        from the Ciperna Toll Road section towards Cilimus Road is
        diverted to the Kuningan Sampora East Ring Road.</p>
      </disp-quote>
    </sec>
    <sec id="traffic-engineering-addition-of-traffic-signal-devices-at-the-intersection-alternative-3">
      <title>Traffic Engineering Addition of Traffic Signal Devices at the Intersection (Alternative 3)</title>
      <disp-quote>
        <p>At the Three Tugu Ikan Kuningan Intersection has an
        intersection type of 322 and does not have an APILL, therefore the
        recommended alternative in this 3rd alternative, the intersection
        will be given an APILL (Traffic Signaling Device). The addition of
        this signal uses 2 phases with the following cycle times:</p>
        <p>The green light distribution is as follows:</p>
      </disp-quote>
      <disp-quote>
        <p>Table 13. Green Light Distribution</p>
      </disp-quote>
      <table-wrap>
        <label>Table 13. Green Light Distribution</label>
        <table>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2"/>
              <th align="center" valign="top" colspan="5">North - South (main)</th>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th align="center" valign="top"/>
              <th align="center" valign="top"/>
              <th align="center" valign="top"/>
              <th align="center" valign="top"/>
              <th align="center" valign="top"/>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td align="left" valign="top">Phase 1</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top" style="background-color: #008000; color: white;">55</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top" style="background-color: #FFFF00;">3</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top" style="background-color: #FF0000;">2</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top" style="background-color: #FF0000;">48</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top" style="background-color: #FF0000;">2</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">East (minor)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left" valign="top">Phase 2</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top" style="background-color: #FF0000;">58</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top" style="background-color: #FF0000;">2</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top" style="background-color: #008000; color: white;">45</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top" style="background-color: #FFFF00;">3</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top" style="background-color: #FF0000;">2</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
    </sec>
    <sec id="best-scenario-alternative-2">
      <title>Best Scenario (Alternative 2)</title>
      <disp-quote>
        <p>Table 14. VISSIM Modeling Results Volume, Speed, and Queue
        Length under Alternative 2 Best Scenario</p>
      </disp-quote>
      <table-wrap>
        <label>Table 14. VISSIM Modeling Results Volume, Speed, and Queue Length under Alternative 2 Best Scenario</label>
        <table>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">No.</th>
              <th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">Arms</th>
              <th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">Alternative 2</th>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th align="center" valign="top">Vissim Volume (Vehicles/hour)</th>
              <th align="center" valign="top">Speed (km/h)</th>
              <th align="center" valign="top">Queue Length (m)</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
              <td align="left" valign="top">Raya Ciperna St.</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top">1698</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top">19</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top">1.520</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
              <td align="left" valign="top">Lkr. Sampora St.</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top">901</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top">33</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top">0.530</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
              <td align="left" valign="top">Raya Cilimus St.</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top">1277</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top">16</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top">47.200</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="right" valign="top" colspan="2">Average</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top"/>
              <td align="center" valign="top">22.679</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top">16.417</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <disp-quote>
        <p>Table 15. VISSIM Modeling Results Delays and Level of Service
        in the Best Alternative Scenario 2</p>
      </disp-quote>
      <table-wrap>
        <label>Table 15. VISSIM Modeling Results Delays and Level of Service in the Best Alternative Scenario 2</label>
        <table>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">No.</th>
              <th align="center" valign="top" rowspan="2">Arms</th>
              <th align="center" valign="top" colspan="3">Alternative 2</th>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th align="center" valign="top">Delay (Seconds)</th>
              <th align="center" valign="top">Intersection Delay</th>
              <th align="center" valign="top">Service Level</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
              <td align="left" valign="top">Ciperna Highway - Cilimus Highway</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top">0</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top"/>
              <td align="center" valign="top"/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
              <td align="left" valign="top">Ciperna St - Sampora St.</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top">6.01</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top"/>
              <td align="center" valign="top"/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
              <td align="left" valign="top">Lkr. Sampora - Ciperna Highway</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top">11.1</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top">14.075</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top">LoS B</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
              <td align="left" valign="top">Lkr. Sampora - Cilimus Highway</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top">0.66</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top"/>
              <td align="center" valign="top"/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
              <td align="left" valign="top">Cilimus Highway - Ciperna Highway</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top">19.99</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top"/>
              <td align="center" valign="top"/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="top">6</td>
              <td align="left" valign="top">Cilimus St - Lkr. Sampora St.</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top">46.69</td>
              <td align="center" valign="top"/>
              <td align="center" valign="top"/>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
    </sec>
  </sec>  
</sec>




<sec>
  <title>CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS</title>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>Observations at the Kuningan Three Tugu Ikan Intersection
    (unsignalized) reveal significant traffic challenges, particularly
    during holiday seasons.</p>
    <p>Current and Projected Conditions:</p>
  </disp-quote>
  <list list-type="bullet">
    <list-item>
      <p>Normal Peak (Dec 14, 2024, 2-3 PM): Traffic Volume (Q Total) =
      1913.2 smp/hour, Degree of Saturation (DJ) = 0.639, Delay (T) =
      11.247 seconds/SMP, LOS B.</p>
    </list-item>
    <list-item>
      <p>Holiday Peak (Dec 28, 2024, 2-3 PM): Q Total = 2125 smp/hour,
      DJ = 0.776, Delay = 13.075 seconds/SMP, LOS B. This increase is
      largely driven by a 60.67% average surge in tourist visits to
      Kuningan Regency during December over the past three years.</p>
    </list-item>
    <list-item>
      <p>5-Year Projection (2029): Q Total = 2523.608 smp/hour, DJ =
      0.92, Delay =</p>
    </list-item>
  </list>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>16.213 seconds/SMP, LOS C.</p>
  </disp-quote>
  <list list-type="bullet">
    <list-item>
      <p>10-Year Projection (2034): Q Total = 3016.456 smp/hour, DJ =
      1.10, Delay =</p>
    </list-item>
  </list>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>25.234 seconds/SMP, LOS D. These projections indicate a severe
    decline in service level, exacerbating congestion.</p>
    <p>Proposed Traffic Engineering Alternatives (via PTV VISSIM):</p>
  </disp-quote>
  <list list-type="bullet">
    <list-item>
      <p>Alternative 1 (Lane Diversion based on Tourism Routes): Average
      intersection speed = 18 Km/hour, Delay = 25.925 seconds, Queue
      Length = 32 meters, LOS D. This alternative significantly reduces
      queue length.</p>
    </list-item>
    <list-item>
      <p>Alternative 2 (Diversion of Cirebon/Ciperna traffic to Kuningan
      Sampora East Ring Road): Average intersection speed = 23 Km/hour,
      Delay = 14.075 seconds, Queue Length = 16.417 meters, LOS B. This
      alternative positively impacts intersection performance by
      significantly reducing both queue lengths and delays.</p>
    </list-item>
    <list-item>
      <p>Alternative 3 (APILL Installation): This option showed negative
      impacts, increasing queue length to 77.260 meters, causing delays
      of 36.347 seconds, reducing speed on Jl. Lingkar Sampora to 12
      Km/hour, and resulting in LOS D.</p>
    </list-item>
  </list>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>Based on PTV VISSIM modeling, Alternative 2 is the recommended
    solution. This involves diverting all traffic from Jl. Raya Ciperna
    to turn left towards the Kuningan Sampora East Ring Road,
    effectively mitigating future congestion at the Kuningan Three Tugu
    Ikan Intersection.</p>
  </disp-quote>
</sec>




<sec>
  <title>ADVANCED RESEARCH</title>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>This research on three-way intersection traffic during holidays
    has limitations, suggesting key areas for future study:</p>
  </disp-quote>
  <list list-type="order">
    <list-item>
      <p>Enhanced Model Validation: Future work needs more
      comprehensive, real-time field data (e.g., traffic volume, speed,
      queues across varied conditions) and remote sensing technologies
      for precise model calibration and validation.</p>
    </list-item>
    <list-item>
      <p>Expanded Scenario Analysis: Explore a wider range of traffic
      engineering solutions, including optimizing traffic signal phasing
      and implementing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS).</p>
    </list-item>
    <list-item>
      <p>Integrated Impact Assessment: Incorporate environmental (e.g.,
      emissions, noise) and economic (e.g., operating costs, time
      losses) analyses to provide a holistic cost-benefit view of
      interventions.</p>
    </list-item>
  </list>
</sec>




<sec>
  <title>ACKNOWLEDGMENTS</title>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>We extend our profound appreciation for the substantive
    collaboration that underpinned the development of this article. The
    team's dedication, expertise, and synergy were essential foundations
    in integrating ideas, data, and narrative, culminating in a work
    ready for dissemination. Collective contributions, encompassing
    constructive input and moral support, have enriched the quality and
    analytical depth we aimed for. The commitment and intellectual
    integrity of each team member were the primary determinants for the
    realization of this publication</p>
  </disp-quote>
</sec>





<sec>
<title>REFERENCES</title>
<ref-list>

<ref id="ref1">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Bindzar</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Saderova</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Sofranko</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Kacmary</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Brodny</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Tutak</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>A case study: Simulation traffic model as a tool to assess one-way vs. two-way traffic on urban roads around the city center</article-title>
    <source>Applied Sciences (Switzerland)</source>
    <year>2021</year>
    <volume>11</volume>
    <issue>11</issue>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/app11115018</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref2">
  <element-citation publication-type="report">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Optimal Design of Intersection Signal Control Based on VISSIM Simulation</article-title>
    <year>2023</year>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref3">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Çolak</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Lima</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Gonza</surname><given-names>M. C.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Understanding congested travel in urban areas</article-title>
    <year>2016</year>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms10793</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref4">
  <element-citation publication-type="book">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Eddington</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>The Eddington transport study: main report: transport’s role in sustaining the UK’s productivity and competiveness</article-title>
    <source>Stationery Office (Great Britain)</source>
    <year>2006</year>
    <comment>Issue December</comment>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref5">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Faradhika</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Syahputra</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Rachmawati</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Ingsih</surname><given-names>I. S.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Evaluasi Kinerja Simpang Tiga Tak Bersinyal Karangploso - Pendem Kabupaten Malang dengan Software VISSIM dan Menggunakan Metode PKJI 2023</article-title>
    <source></source>
    <year>2025</year>
    <volume>15</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref6">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Flaah</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Ajam</surname><given-names>H. K. K.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Simulation and Evaluating of Traffic Flow for Hillah City Using VISSIM and GIS Programs</article-title>
    <source>IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science</source>
    <year>2024</year>
    <volume>1374</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1755-1315/1374/1/012009</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref7">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Irawati</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Anggraini</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Wanto</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Analisis Tingkat Layanan Kinerja Simpang Bersinyal pada Kawasan Komersial</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Civil Engineering Building and Transportation</source>
    <year>2024</year>
    <volume>8</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>129</fpage>
    <lpage>137</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31289/jcebt.v8i1.11564</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref8">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Analysis of Urban Congestion Traceability: The Role of the Built Environment</article-title>
    <source>Land</source>
    <year>2024</year>
    <volume>13</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/land13020255</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref9">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Exploring travel patterns during the holiday season—a case study of Shenzhen metro system during the Chinese Spring Festival</article-title>
    <source>ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information</source>
    <year>2020</year>
    <volume>9</volume>
    <issue>11</issue>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijgi9110651</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref10">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Mariadi</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Silitonga</surname><given-names>S. P.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Sipil</surname><given-names>J. T.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Raya</surname><given-names>U. P.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Raya</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Analisi kinerja simpang tiga Jalan Garuda - Jalan Tjlik</article-title>
    <source></source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <volume>4</volume>
    <fpage>21</fpage>
    <lpage>28</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref11">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Hariani</surname><given-names>M. L.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Firdaus</surname><given-names>A. F.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Jurnal Konstruksi Dan Infrastruktur Teknik Sipil Dan Perencanaan</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Konstruksi Dan Infrastruktur</source>
    <year>2022</year>
    <volume>X</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>1</fpage>
    <lpage>6</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref12">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Nugroho</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Setiawan</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Analisis Kapasitas Simpang Tiga pada Musim Liburan Panjang</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Teknik Sipil Indonesia</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <volume>29</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>12</fpage>
    <lpage>25</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref13">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Ratnapradipa</surname><given-names>K. L.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Increased motor vehicle fatalities Tuesday through Thursday during the US Thanksgiving holiday (1980–2018)</article-title>
    <source>Preventive Medicine Reports</source>
    <year>2020</year>
    <volume>20</volume>
    <fpage>101245</fpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101245</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref14">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Sandhyavitri</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Maulana</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Ikhsan</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Putra</surname><given-names>A. I.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Husaini</surname><given-names>R. R.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Restuhadi</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Simulation modelling of traffic flows in the central business district using PTV VISSIM in Pekanbaru, Indonesia</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Physics: Conference Series</source>
    <year>2021</year>
    <volume>2049</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1742-6596/2049/1/012096</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref15">
  <element-citation publication-type="report">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Shao</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Optimization strategy of signal timing at level crossing based on real-time queue length</article-title>
    <year>2024</year>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref16">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Xiang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Ghaffarpasand</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Pope</surname><given-names>F. D.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Assessing the Impact of Calendar Events upon Urban Vehicle Behaviour and Emissions Using Telematics Data</article-title>
    <source>Smart Cities</source>
    <year>2024</year>
    <volume>7</volume>
    <issue>6</issue>
    <fpage>3071</fpage>
    <lpage>3094</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/smartcities7060120</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref17">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Yaqin</surname><given-names>’Alamul</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Khasna</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>National Holidays and Collective Leave for Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha Within the Framework of Religious Moderation in Indonesia</article-title>
    <source>Kawanua International Journal of Multicultural Studies</source>
    <year>2024</year>
    <volume>5</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>37</fpage>
    <lpage>55</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.30984/kijms.v5i1.1000</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref18">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Khreis</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Warsow</surname><given-names>K. M.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Verlinghieri</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Guzman</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Pellecuer</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Ferreira</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Nieuwenhuijsen</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>The health impacts of traffic-related exposures in urban areas: Understanding real effects, underlying driving forces and co-producing future directions</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Transport &amp; Health</source>
    <year>2016</year>
    <volume>3</volume>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <fpage>249</fpage>
    <lpage>267</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

</ref-list>
</sec>
</body>
</article>
