<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN"
  "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJAR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Indonesian Journal of Advanced Research</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2986-0768</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Formosa Publisher</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.55927/ijar.v4i8.14980</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Topic Continuity in Song Lyrics: A Quantitative Discourse Analysis of “Perfect” by Simple Plan</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name>
            <surname>Deliana</surname>
            <given-names></given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>Department of English, Faculty of Cultural Science, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia</aff>
          <email>deliana413@gmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Simanjuntak</surname>
            <given-names>Ivan Fernando</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>Department of English, Faculty of Cultural Science, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia</aff>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Ilma</surname>
            <given-names>Dzikri</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>Department of English, Faculty of Cultural Science, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia</aff>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>17</day>
        <month>08</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>01</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd">
          <day>15</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>17</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <volume>4</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>1781</fpage>
      <lpage>1792</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>This study investigates topic continuity and referential cohesion in the song “Perfect” by Simple Plan using Givón’s quantitative model. The objective is to analyze how various types of anaphoric references, including zero anaphora, definite pronouns, third-person pronouns, and possessive pronouns, function to maintain coherence and convey emotional meaning within the lyrics. Employing a qualitative descriptive design supported by quantitative analysis, the research examines the referential distance (JR), potential interference (PI), and topic continuity (TC) in each clause of the song. The data consist of all anaphoric expressions identified in the lyrics, collected through close reading and clause segmentation. The findings reveal that the song heavily relies on first and second person pronouns to construct an intimate and emotionally charged discourse. Zero anaphora is used selectively to create immediacy, while third-person and possessive pronouns support abstract and personal references. The absence of indefinite pronouns reflects the song’s focus on specific interpersonal conflict. These results suggest that Givón’s model is applicable to expressive, non-traditional texts such as song lyrics. The study contributes to the field of stylistics and discourse analysis by demonstrating how referential cohesion shapes meaning in emotionally driven narratives.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Topic Continuity</kwd>
        <kwd>Discourse Analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>Song Lyrics</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <permissions>
        <license>
          <ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
          <license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
    </article-meta>
  </front>

  <body>

<sec>
  <title>INTRODUCTION</title>
  <p>Effective communication in any language depends heavily on
  discourse coherence, with maintaining topic continuity playing a
  crucial role in helping audiences understand the intended message.
  Coherence in a text reflects the underlying social order and is
  shaped, recognized, or contested by individuals situated within social
  contexts, where power dynamics influence how coherence is attributed
  (Gee &amp; Handford, 2012). As a field of linguistic inquiry,
  discourse analysis has extensively explored how topics are introduced,
  maintained, and shifted across various spoken and written genres,
  including news reports, academic writing, and everyday conversations.
  These studies have developed theoretical frameworks and quantitative
  measures to explain how topic continuity contributes significantly to
  overall textual cohesion.</p>
  <p>Textual cohesion itself is a key mechanism that connects different
  parts of a text, ensuring smooth transitions and logical flow. It
  operates through lexicogrammatical devices such as reference,
  substitution, ellipsis, conjunction, and lexical cohesion, which
  together bind sentences and clauses without changing the underlying
  grammatical structure. (Matthiessen et al., 2010) emphasize that
  textual cohesion is not only central to systemic functional
  linguistics but also recognized across different linguistic theories
  as essential for creating unified and comprehensible discourse.</p>
  <p>Among these cohesion devices, anaphoric reference - a type of
  endophoric reference that points back to elements already introduced
  in the unfolding text - plays a particularly crucial role in
  maintaining textual cohesion and continuity (Halliday &amp;
  Matthiessen, 2004). However, despite the extensive research in
  discourse analysis on many text types, certain genres - especially
  those from popular culture such as song lyrics - have received
  comparatively less scholarly attention. Song lyrics combine poetic
  creativity with narrative expression, and their unique constraints -
  such as rhythm, rhyme, and repetition - affect how topics are
  structured and developed. This distinctiveness calls for deeper
  linguistic study on how coherence and topic continuity are preserved
  in lyrics.</p>
  <p>The song Perfect a song by Simple Plan, co-written with composer
  Arnold Lanni, provides a rich case for this study. It expresses the
  struggle of not meeting parental expectations. Drummer Chuck Comeau
  explained that the song reflects his desire to tell his parents he
  cannot be perfect, particularly because of their lack of support for
  his music career. Through the song, Comeau aims to show that despite
  imperfections, he has found success. Bassist and backing vocalist
  David Desrosiers also related the song to his personal experiences
  before performing its acoustic version. Additionally, Comeau described
  the 2016 song Problem Child as a &quot;part two of Perfect,&quot;
  portraying his brother’s support for his music career (Wikipedia
  contributors, 2025). This personal and emotional background enhances
  the importance of maintaining clear topical coherence in the lyrics to
  effectively convey the intended narrative.</p>
  <p>Perfect offers an excellent opportunity to study how lyrical
  discourse manages topic continuity through an emotional dialogue
  marked by personal struggle and relational tension. The song’s
  shifting perspectives and frequent use of pronouns and referential
  expressions raise questions about the linguistic</p>
  <p>strategies used to maintain topical progression amid lyrical
  repetition and poetic form. This dynamic reflects the concept of
  instantiated selves in interaction, where self-representations may
  change but remain anchored by a stable continuity that allows multiple
  identities to be understood as one coherent self. Similarly, despite
  thematic shifts within the song, the topic stays coherent and
  recognizable, demonstrating how lyrical discourse achieves both
  cohesion and emotional impact (Van Dijk, 2008).</p>
  <p>According to Givón (as cited in Deliana, 2010, cited in (Siregar et
  al., 2019)), discourse continuity can be divided into three types:
  thematic continuity, action continuity, and topic/participant
  continuity. Topic continuity is considered the most accessible and
  statistically significant in thematic paragraphs. To measure this,
  Givón proposed nine topic forms in English, from zero anaphora to
  referential indefinite noun phrases. This study focuses on measuring
  topic continuity in Perfect using three key parameters from Givón’s
  model: referential distance, potential interference, and topic
  persistence. By analyzing how topics are maintained and reintroduced
  throughout the song, the research quantitatively assesses lyrical
  cohesion. However, the study does not include detailed identification
  of specific topic forms such as zero anaphora or dislocation, limiting
  the scope to quantitative evaluation rather than qualitative
  investigation of linguistic strategies.</p>
  <p>Therefore, this research aims to explore how topic continuity is
  manifested and maintained throughout the lyrics of Perfect by Simple
  Plan, focusing on linguistic strategies that preserve coherence and
  topical flow. By examining parameters such as referential distance,
  potential interference, and topic persistence, the study seeks to
  deepen understanding of how lyrical discourse constructs meaning and
  emotional resonance. This inquiry will contribute to expanding
  discourse analytic frameworks into popular music lyrics and enhance
  appreciation of language use in contemporary cultural texts.</p>
</sec>





<sec>
  <title>LITERATURE REVIEW</title>
  <p>Givon (1987) defines topic continuity as the linguistic management
  of a main topic across a sequence of clauses or sentences, ensuring
  the discourse remains coherent and cohesive. Rather than simply
  repeating words, topic continuity involves how references to the topic
  are maintained so that listeners or readers can easily track and
  understand the flow of information. Givon proposes a quantitative
  model to measure topic continuity based on three key parameters:
  referential distance (the gap between mentions of the same topic,
  where shorter distances indicate stronger continuity), potential
  interference (the presence of intervening topics that may disrupt
  continuity), and topic persistence (how long a topic is continuously
  maintained without interruption).</p>
  <p>Additionally, Givon outlines a hierarchy of topical referential
  forms, ranging from implicit references such as zero anaphora
  (ellipsis) to explicit ones like indefinite noun phrases. Forms that
  are more implicit generally indicate higher topic continuity, as they
  allow the discourse to flow smoothly without requiring explicit
  restatement. This framework emphasizes the crucial role of topic
  continuity in facilitating audience comprehension by maintaining
  discourse</p>
  <p>cohesion and coherence - concepts that align closely with this
  study’s focus on how topic continuity supports understanding and
  emotional resonance within lyrical discourse.</p>
  <p>Furthermore, Hasan’s definition states that “a text boundary is
  established semantically and in the lexicogrammar by cohesion: if a
  sentence is accessible from another, later sentence by some cohesive
  relation then it can be concluded that the two fall within the same
  text” (as cited in Halliday M.A.K &amp; Webster 2003). This concept of
  cohesion and text boundaries provides a useful framework for analyzing
  lyrical texts, where maintaining coherence is often challenged by the
  artistic and emotive nature of songs. Unlike prose, song lyrics
  frequently use repetition, perspective shifts, and poetic devices that
  complicate topic tracking. Applying Givon’s framework allows for a
  systematic study of how lyrics maintain coherence despite these
  features, revealing linguistic strategies that enhance listener
  engagement and understanding.</p>
  <p>In analyzing such complex linguistic structures, understanding the
  fundamental syntactic unit - the clause - is essential. A clause is
  defined as a syntactic unit that sits above the phrase level and below
  the sentence level, composed of a sequence of words arranged
  predicatively (Chaer, 2009). Within this structure, key components
  such as subjects, objects, and other grammatical elements collaborate
  to form meaning. Recognizing how clauses function within lyrics helps
  clarify how topics are introduced and maintained, thereby supporting
  the overall coherence and cohesion necessary for effective lyrical
  discourse analysis. Furthermore, understanding discourse as a
  strategic act within ongoing social interaction requires the listener
  to infer the speaker’s intentions, goals, desires, beliefs, attitudes,
  emotions, and personality (Van Dijk T. A. &amp; Walter, 1986).</p>
  <p>The exploring the linguistic features of song lyrics, previous
  research has highlighted the importance of various language aspects -
  such as grammar, vocabulary, and discourse structures - in shaping
  meaning and coherence. Songs, as a unique form of textual and oral
  expression, combine poetic creativity with narrative elements, making
  them rich sites for linguistic analysis. Understanding how language
  functions within lyrics not only sheds light on artistic expression
  but also reveals how cultural values and personal experiences are
  communicated to listeners. Building on this foundation, the current
  study focuses specifically on the concept of topic continuity to
  examine how lyrical discourse maintains coherence and guides listener
  comprehension throughout a song.</p>
  <p>Several recent studies have explored various linguistic aspects of
  song lyrics to better understand how language functions to create
  meaning and coherence in musical discourse. For example, Hutajulu et
  al. (2023) analyzed the contextual, grammatical, and lexical features
  of Michael Jackson’s Heal The World. Their findings reveal that the
  songwriter’s personal experiences are closely reflected in the lyrics,
  while grammatical elements such as pronouns (“you” and “me”) and
  frequent conjunctions contribute significantly to the cohesion and
  coherence of the song. The strategic repetition of the phrase “Heal
  The World” serves to emphasize the song’s central message and engage
  listeners emotionally, encouraging collective responsibility for
  peace.</p>
  <p>Similarly, Erna, Zasrianita, F., &amp; Wediasti (2024) investigated
  the functions of language in the Rejang regional song Anak Kunang
  using the theories of Chaer and Agustina as well as Jakobson. Their
  qualitative descriptive analysis identified multiple language
  functions including personal, directive, phatic, referential, and
  metalingual, demonstrating that the song operates beyond entertainment
  to communicate social and cultural values embedded in the Rejang
  community. This study highlights the role of language in reinforcing
  social bonds and expressing cultural identity through musical texts,
  emphasizing the multifunctional nature of song lyrics in
  discourse.</p>
  <p>While these studies focus on broader linguistic and functional
  dimensions of song lyrics, the present research narrows its focus
  specifically on topic continuity within Simple Plan’s Perfect. By
  applying Givón’s (1983) quantitative framework - which measures
  referential distance, potential interference, and topic persistence -
  this study examines how topics are introduced, maintained, and shifted
  throughout the lyrics to ensure discourse coherence. This approach
  provides a detailed insight into the management of topical flow,
  filling a gap in the study of lyrical discourse by emphasizing the
  structural strategies that sustain narrative progression and emotional
  resonance in popular music.</p>
  <p>In addition, research across various text genres has investigated
  topic continuity using diverse theoretical frameworks and
  methodologies to better understand how topics are maintained and
  support discourse coherence. For instance, (Siregar et al., 2019)
  applied Givón’s topic continuity theory to analyze news discourse from
  okezone.com, revealing that moderate referential distance and topic
  persistence, combined with low potential interference, effectively
  uphold the flow and coherence of the text. Such quantitative analyses
  underscore the fundamental role of topic continuity in sustaining
  clear communication across different types of discourse.</p>
  <p>Building on this, Zein, T. T &amp; Prayogo (2022) conducted a
  quantitative- descriptive study of topic continuity in the Malay folk
  tale Batu Batangkup. By examining grammatical devices such as zero
  anaphora and various pronouns and noun phrases, they found that zero
  anaphora most effectively sustains topic flow, whereas definite noun
  phrases contribute least to continuity. Their findings deepen the
  understanding of how specific linguistic forms function in narrative
  coherence, emphasizing the hierarchical nature of grammatical devices
  in maintaining topics.</p>
  <p>Complementing these insights, Moya Guijarro (2006) compared topic
  continuity strategies in two distinct subgenres: news items and
  tourist brochures. The study revealed that news texts favor active
  voice and anaphoric proforms to keep topics cohesive, while tourist
  brochures rely more on nominal expressions like definites and
  possessives. These differing linguistic strategies reflect the
  distinct communicative goals of each genre, demonstrating how topic
  continuity adapts to context and purpose.</p>
  <p>Additionally, Wahyu (2022) addressed complexity in topic continuity
  analysis by focusing exclusively on the theme within clauses,
  excluding the rheme, based on Systemic Functional Linguistics.
  Applying Leong’s method to a news article about waste management in
  Jakarta, the study identified three</p>
  <p>equally dominant topics and a high Topic Development Index,
  underscoring the significance of thematic consistency for effective
  topic maintenance.</p>
  <p>Collectively, these studies provide a solid theoretical foundation
  for the analysis of topic continuity across diverse discourse
  contexts. Identification refers to the linguistic mechanisms used to
  introduce and consistently track participants within a discourse to
  maintain referential cohesion (Deborah et al., 2001). Building upon
  these established frameworks, the present research employs Givon’s
  quantitative model to examine the management of topic continuity
  within the lyrical discourse of Perfect by Simple Plan. This study
  seeks to elucidate the linguistic strategies that uphold coherence and
  facilitate listener comprehension in popular music.</p>
</sec>







<sec>
  <title>METHODOLOGY</title>
  <p>This research employed a qualitative descriptive approach,
  supported by a quantitative framework based on Givón’s model of topic
  continuity, to analyze the cohesion and referential structure in the
  song “Perfect” by Simple Plan. The study was designed as a discourse
  analysis, focusing on how anaphoric references contribute to the
  overall coherence and emotional tone of the lyrics. The method
  combined qualitative interpretation with quantitative measurement of
  referential distance (JR), potential interference (PI), and topic
  continuity (TC), as proposed by Givón (1983).</p>
  <p>The object of the research was the lyrical text of “Perfect”,
  chosen purposively for its rich use of pronouns and emotional
  narrative structure. The song was selected based on its thematic
  relevance—centered on interpersonal conflict and emotional
  expression—which made it a suitable case for examining how cohesion
  operates in emotionally driven discourse. No human participants were
  involved in this study, as the focus was solely on textual analysis.
  The selection of this single text was guided by its popularity,
  accessibility, and the presence of a clear narrative structure that
  allowed for referential tracking.</p>
  <p>The data used in the study consisted of all clauses within the song
  lyrics that contained or implied anaphoric references. These included
  zero anaphora, definite pronouns, third-person pronouns, and
  possessive pronouns. The primary instrument for data collection was a
  close reading of the lyrics, supported by a manual coding process.
  Each clause containing anaphoric reference was extracted, numbered,
  and classified according to the type of reference and its
  corresponding referential reconstruction.</p>
  <p>The data collection process involved segmenting the lyrics into
  clauses and identifying the referents within and across those clauses.
  Referential distance (JR) was calculated by counting how many clauses
  intervened between the initial mention of a referent and its
  subsequent anaphoric use. Potential interference (PI) was determined
  by assessing how many competing referents were active at the time of
  the reference, and topic continuity (TC) was measured by tracking how
  long a referent remained a focus in the text.</p>
  <p>To ensure the credibility of the method and findings, the analysis
  followed the structured procedures outlined in Givón’s model, which
  has been widely accepted in discourse studies. The use of clause-level
  analysis and transparent</p>
  <p>coding enhances the replicability of the study. In addition, the
  interpretation was cross-checked with the linguistic context of the
  song to maintain accuracy in referent identification. The integration
  of quantitative measures with qualitative insights allowed the study
  to move beyond surface-level observations and provide an in-depth,
  systematic understanding of how cohesion is maintained in a personal
  and emotional text.</p>
</sec>





<sec>
  <title>RESEARCH RESULT</title>
  <sec id="zero-anaphora">
    <title>Zero Anaphora</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 1. Zero Anaphora and Their Referential
      Reconstructions</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
        <label>Table 1. Zero Anaphora and Their Referential Reconstructions</label>
        <alternatives>
            <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
                <thead>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">No</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">Clause Number</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">Zero Anaphora</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">Referential Reconstruction</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="3"></td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">JR</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">PI</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">TC</td>
                    </tr>
                </thead>
                <tbody>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">Ø</td>
                        <td align="left">You (Father)</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">4</td>
                        <td align="center">Ø</td>
                        <td align="left">You (Father)</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">0</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">3</td>
                        <td align="center">14</td>
                        <td align="center">Ø</td>
                        <td align="left">I (Speaker)</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">4</td>
                        <td align="center">31</td>
                        <td align="center">Ø</td>
                        <td align="left">I (Speaker)</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">0</td>
                    </tr>
                </tbody>
                <tfoot>
                    <tr>
                        <td colspan="4">Total: JR = 4 | PI = 6 | TC = 3</td>
                        <td colspan="3"></td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td colspan="4">Mean: JR = 1.00 | PI = 1.50 | TC = 0.75</td>
                        <td colspan="3"></td>
                    </tr>
                </tfoot>
            </table>
        </alternatives>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Zero anaphora occurs when the subject is omitted but still
    understood. In &quot;Perfect,&quot; this technique is used in
    emotionally charged lines like “∅ Think back” or “∅ Can’t pretend.”
    The mean JR (1.00) shows these references are very close to their
    antecedents, only one clause away, which helps maintain smooth
    cohesion. A low TC (0.75) indicates that these references are used
    briefly, often to express spontaneous thoughts or commands. This
    adds intimacy and immediacy, mirroring how people speak when
    emotional.</p>
  </sec>
  <sec id="definite-pronouns">
    <title>Definite Pronouns</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 2. Definite Pronouns</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
        <label>Table 2. Definite Pronouns</label>
        <alternatives>
            <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
                <thead>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">No</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">Clause Number</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">Pronoun</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">Referential Reconstruction</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">JR</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">PI</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">TC</td>
                    </tr>
                </thead>
                <tbody>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">me</td>
                        <td align="left">Speaker</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">0</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">3</td>
                        <td align="center">me</td>
                        <td align="left">Speaker</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">3</td>
                        <td align="center">5</td>
                        <td align="center">I</td>
                        <td align="left">Speaker</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">0</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">4</td>
                        <td align="center">6</td>
                        <td align="center">you</td>
                        <td align="left">Father</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">0</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">5</td>
                        <td align="center">7</td>
                        <td align="center">I</td>
                        <td align="left">Speaker</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">6</td>
                        <td align="center">8</td>
                        <td align="center">I</td>
                        <td align="left">Speaker</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">0</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">7</td>
                        <td align="center">9</td>
                        <td align="center">it</td>
                        <td align="left">Situation/Pain</td>
                        <td align="center">20</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">0</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">8</td>
                        <td align="center">10</td>
                        <td align="center">you</td>
                        <td align="left">Father</td>
                        <td align="center">4</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">0</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">9</td>
                        <td align="center">11</td>
                        <td align="center">I</td>
                        <td align="left">Speaker</td>
                        <td align="center">3</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">5</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">10</td>
                        <td align="center">13</td>
                        <td align="center">I</td>
                        <td align="left">Speaker</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">4</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">11</td>
                        <td align="center">14</td>
                        <td align="center">you</td>
                        <td align="left">Father</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">12</td>
                        <td align="center">15</td>
                        <td align="center">I'm</td>
                        <td align="left">Speaker</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">3</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">13</td>
                        <td align="center">17</td>
                        <td align="center">I</td>
                        <td align="left">Speaker</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">0</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">14</td>
                        <td align="center">18</td>
                        <td align="center">you</td>
                        <td align="left">Father</td>
                        <td align="center">3</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">0</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">15</td>
                        <td align="center">21</td>
                        <td align="center">we</td>
                        <td align="left">Father &amp; Speaker</td>
                        <td align="center">20</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">0</td>
                    </tr>
                </tbody>
                <tfoot>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="left" colspan="7">Total: JR = 84 | PI = 30 | TC = 16</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="left" colspan="7">Mean: JR = 5.6 | PI = 2.00 | TC = 1.07</td>
                    </tr>
                </tfoot>
            </table>
        </alternatives>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Definite pronouns like &quot;I,&quot; &quot;you,&quot; and
    &quot;we&quot; dominate the song. The high JR (5.6) shows that
    pronouns often refer to earlier parts of the text, especially in
    repeated lines (like &quot;I can't be perfect&quot;). PI (2.00) is
    moderate, meaning multiple subjects might be active, but the
    speaker–father relationship keeps meaning clear. The relatively low
    TC (1.07) suggests that the referents (especially &quot;you&quot;)
    appear frequently but shift quickly, mirroring the changing emotions
    in the song, from blame to sorrow to apology.</p>
  </sec>
  <sec id="indefinite-pronoun">
    <title>Indefinite Pronoun</title>
    <p>There are no indefinite pronouns (like &quot;someone,&quot;
    &quot;anything,&quot; or &quot;nobody&quot;) in the song. This makes
    sense because the lyrics are deeply personal and specific, focused
    entirely on the speaker's emotional relationship with their father.
    This absence reinforces the directness and specificity of the
    confrontation.</p>
  </sec>
  <sec id="third-person-pronouns">
    <title>Third-Person Pronouns</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 4. Third-Person Pronouns</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
        <label>Table 4. Third-Person Pronouns</label>
        <alternatives>
            <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
                <thead>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">No</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">Clause Number</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">Pronoun</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">Referential Reconstruction</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">JR</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">PI</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">TC</td>
                    </tr>
                </thead>
                <tbody>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">9</td>
                        <td align="center">it</td>
                        <td align="left">Pain/Situation</td>
                        <td align="center">20</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">0</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">28</td>
                        <td align="center">it</td>
                        <td align="left">Relationship</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">3</td>
                        <td align="center">38</td>
                        <td align="center">it</td>
                        <td align="left">Difficulty</td>
                        <td align="center">9</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">0</td>
                    </tr>
                </tbody>
                <tfoot>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="left" colspan="7">Total: JR = 30 | PI = 6 | TC = 1</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="left" colspan="7">Mean: JR = 10.00 | PI = 2.00 | TC = 0.33</td>
                    </tr>
                </tfoot>
            </table>
        </alternatives>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>The song rarely uses third-person pronouns like “it.” When used,
    “it” refers to abstract ideas like pain or emotional struggles. The
    high JR (10.0) reflects how far apart the original topic and its
    mention might be, which can lead to weaker cohesion. However, this
    also mirrors the distance or disconnection the speaker feels. The
    low TC (0.33) suggests these references are not sustained but appear
    for quick emotional effect.</p>
  </sec>
  <sec id="possessive-pronouns">
    <title>Possessive Pronouns</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 5. Possessive Pronouns</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
        <label>Table 5. Possessive Pronouns</label>
        <alternatives>
            <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
                <thead>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">No</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">Clause Number</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">Possessive Pronoun</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">Referential Reconstruction</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">JR</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">PI</td>
                        <td align="center" valign="middle">TC</td>
                    </tr>
                </thead>
                <tbody>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">me</td>
                        <td align="left">Speaker</td>
                        <td align="center">20</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">0</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">3</td>
                        <td align="center">me</td>
                        <td align="left">Speaker</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">3</td>
                        <td align="center">13</td>
                        <td align="center">you</td>
                        <td align="left">Father</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">4</td>
                        <td align="center">24</td>
                        <td align="center">my</td>
                        <td align="left">Speaker</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">2</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="center">5</td>
                        <td align="center">38</td>
                        <td align="center">your</td>
                        <td align="left">Father</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                        <td align="center">1</td>
                    </tr>
                </tbody>
                <tfoot>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="left" colspan="7">Total: JR = 26 | PI = 8 | TC = 5</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                        <td align="left" colspan="7">Mean: JR = 5.20 | PI = 1.60 | TC = 1.00</td>
                    </tr>
                </tfoot>
            </table>
        </alternatives>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Possessive pronouns like “my” and “your” emphasize emotional
    ownership and personal connection. In this song, they underline the
    conflict “my hero,” “your back,” and express feelings of loss and
    disappointment. The moderate JR (5.20) means referents are not
    always right next to the pronouns, but listeners still understand
    the meaning due to the clear emotional context. The low PI (1.60)
    suggests minimal confusion, and TC (1.00) shows that these
    references are used for specific lines, not extended sequences.</p>
  </sec>
</sec>






<sec>
  <title>DISCUSSION</title>
    <p>The findings of this study indicate that the song “Perfect” by
    Simple Plan utilizes a range of anaphoric references that contribute
    significantly to the text’s cohesion and emotional resonance. The
    analysis based on Givón’s model revealed a dominant use of definite
    pronouns, primarily first and second person (&quot;I&quot; and
    &quot;you&quot;), accompanied by a smaller but meaningful use of
    zero anaphora, third-person pronouns, and possessive pronouns. No
    indefinite pronouns were found in the song, emphasizing its personal
    and specific communicative focus.</p>
    <p>Definite pronouns demonstrated the highest frequency of
    occurrence, reflecting a continuous emotional dialogue between the
    speaker and the father figure. The average referential distance (JR)
    for these pronouns was relatively moderate at 5.6, while the topic
    continuity (TC) was low at 1.07, indicating that while the referents
    reappear frequently, they do so in emotionally fragmented contexts.
    This pattern is consistent with the lyrical structure of the song,
    which foregrounds shifting emotional states over extended thematic
    development.</p>
    <p>Zero anaphora appeared in imperative and emotionally charged
    clauses such as “∅ Think back” and “∅ Can’t pretend.” These omitted
    but understood subjects contribute to the immediacy and
    conversational tone of the lyrics. The referential distance for zero
    anaphora was consistently low (JR = 1.00), suggesting that referents
    are introduced and then immediately omitted in subsequent clauses
    without loss of coherence. This supports Givón’s (1983) assertion
    that discourse with low referential distance typically signals high
    topical continuity and speaker involvement.</p>
    <p>The absence of indefinite pronouns aligns with the intensely
    personal nature of the song. Rather than referring to abstract or
    generalized entities, the lyrics focus entirely on the speaker’s
    individual experience and his strained relationship with a specific
    other person, his father. This confirms that the linguistic choices
    in the song serve to reinforce the specificity and intimacy of the
    emotional message.</p>
    <p>The third-person pronoun “it” is used sparingly, and only in
    reference to abstract concepts such as emotional pain or the
    relationship breakdown itself (e.g., “It hurts,” “It’s too late”).
    These instances exhibit higher referential distance (mean JR =
    10.00) and very low topic continuity (TC = 0.33), indicating that
    third- person references are not central to the narrative but are
    used for momentary emotional emphasis.</p>
    <p>Possessive pronouns such as “my” and “your” further highlight the
    emotional stakes of the discourse. References like “my hero” and
    “your back” encapsulate deeply personal meanings that shape the
    speaker’s identity and emotional memory. The average topic
    continuity for these references was 1.00, and the referential
    distance was low, supporting the argument that these pronouns help
    sustain topical focus in emotionally expressive clauses.</p>
    <p>When compared to previous studies, this research both aligns with
    and expands upon earlier findings. Siregar et al. (2019), who
    examined topic continuity in a health article using Givón’s
    framework, found medium referential distance and topic persistence,
    with low potential interference. These results are partly echoed in
    the present study, particularly regarding the low potential
    interference, but differ in the area of topic persistence, which is
    lower in the song. This contrast is likely due to genre differences:
    whereas news articles aim for clarity and continuity across
    information units, lyrics prioritize emotive expression, often
    leading to rapid topical shifts.</p>
    <p>Wahyu (2022) approached topic continuity through thematic
    progression in a news text and reported a high TDI (Thematic
    Development Index) score, suggesting structured thematic chains
    across the discourse. In contrast, “Perfect” relies less on
    structured thematic development and more on repetitive emotional
    motifs, which is reflected in its lower TC values. Thus, while Wahyu
    emphasizes logical textual movement, this study demonstrates
    cohesion through the emotional repetition of pronouns and
    referents.</p>
    <p>Erna et al. (2024), in their study of the Rejang song “Anak
    Kunang,” focused on language functions such as emotive, directive,
    and referential functions. Although the theoretical basis differs,
    both Erna’s and the current study reveal that song lyrics carry a
    communicative load that extends beyond aesthetic expression. The
    present study complements Erna et al. by quantitatively measuring
    how cohesion is achieved through referential forms, especially in
    contexts of emotional communication.</p>
    <p>The novelty of this study lies in its application of Givón’s
    quantitative model to a contemporary English pop song. While Givón’s
    model has been extensively used in academic or journalistic texts,
    its application to emotionally expressive and less formally
    structured discourse such as music lyrics is rare. This analysis
    offers an original contribution by demonstrating that discourse
    cohesion, referential management, and topic continuity are equally
    applicable and insightful in stylistic and popular cultural
    texts.</p>
    <p>The significance of the study rests in its ability to bridge
    linguistic theory with popular music discourse. It underscores how
    anaphoric reference contributes not only to grammatical cohesion but
    also to emotional depth and narrative voice in music. This work is
    particularly valuable for scholars in stylistics, discourse
    analysis, and applied linguistics who seek to understand how
    linguistic features operate in non-academic genres.</p>
    <p>Furthermore, the findings contribute to the ongoing discourse in
    applied stylistics and language education. The song can serve as
    authentic material in the classroom for demonstrating pronoun use,
    cohesion, and emotional expression,</p>
    <p>particularly for learners studying narrative structure, stylistic
    devices, or interpersonal communication through text.</p>
    <p>Nevertheless, the study is not without limitations. First, it is
    restricted to a single text, which limits the generalizability of
    the findings. Secondly, the analysis is confined to pronoun-based
    reference; other cohesion strategies such as conjunction, lexical
    reiteration, and substitution were not examined. Additionally, the
    emotional and performative dimensions of the song, which may
    influence referent interpretation, are not accounted for in this
    textual analysis.</p>
    <p>Future research could address these limitations by analyzing a
    larger corpus of song lyrics across genres or artists, exploring
    multimodal elements such as sound and visuals, or combining this
    referential analysis with critical discourse approaches. Such
    studies would further enrich the understanding of how referential
    systems shape meaning, emotion, and identity in music and popular
    discourse.</p>
</sec>





<sec>
  <title>CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION</title>
    <p>This study aimed to examine referential cohesion and topic
    continuity in the song “Perfect” by Simple Plan using Givón’s
    quantitative model. The focus was on how different types of
    anaphoric references, zero anaphora, definite pronouns, third-person
    pronouns, possessive pronouns, and the absence of indefinite
    pronouns, contribute to the song’s coherence and emotional
    structure.</p>
    <p>The findings show that definite pronouns “I” and “you” dominate
    the lyrics, reflecting a direct and emotional interaction between
    the speaker and the father figure. Zero anaphora adds a natural,
    spoken quality to the lyrics, while possessive and third-person
    pronouns reinforce emotional ownership and abstract references. The
    absence of indefinite pronouns emphasizes the personal nature of the
    discourse. Low referential distance and moderate potential
    interference indicate strong cohesion despite the speaker’s shifting
    emotional tone.</p>
    <p>These results demonstrate that Givón’s model can effectively
    analyze non- traditional texts like song lyrics, offering new
    insights into how language expresses emotion and identity. The study
    is useful for discourse analysts, stylistics researchers, and
    language educators, particularly those exploring cohesion in
    creative texts.</p>
</sec>




<sec>
  <title>ADVANCED RESEARCH</title>
    <p>The research is limited by its focus on a single song and on
    pronoun-based references only. Future studies should explore a
    larger set of lyrics across genres and integrate other cohesive
    devices and multimodal features to build on these findings.</p>
    <p>In essence, this study shows that emotional cohesion in song
    lyrics is achieved through strategic referential choices, offering a
    deeper understanding of how language works in expressive, personal
    texts.</p>
</sec>








<sec>
  <title>REFERENCES</title>
    <ref-list>

      <ref id="ref1">
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Chaer</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Pengantar semantik Bahasa Indonesia</article-title>
          <source>Rineka Cipta</source>
          <year>2009</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref2">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Deborah</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Deborah</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>E</surname><given-names>H. H.</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Critical discourse analysis</article-title>
          <source>Blackwell Publisher</source>
          <year>2001</year>
          <comment>https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003107774-17</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref3">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Erna</surname></name>
            <name><surname>Zasrianita</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Wediasti</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Analisis Fungsi Bahasa Dalam Lirik Lagu Daerah Rejang “Anak Kunang” Karya Idil / Widison</article-title>
          <source>JKIP: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan</source>
          <year>2024</year>
          <volume>5</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>545</fpage>
          <lpage>554</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref4">
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Halliday</surname><given-names>M. A. K.</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Matthiessen</surname><given-names>C. M. I. M.</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>An Introduction to Functional Grammar</article-title>
          <source>Routledge</source>
          <year>2004</year>
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          <lpage>22</lpage>
          <comment>https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394207305.ch1</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref5">
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Halliday</surname><given-names>M. A. K.</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Webster</surname><given-names>J. J.</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>On language and linguistics</article-title>
          <source>Continuum International Publishing Group</source>
          <year>2003</year>
          <comment>https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(84)90003-X</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref6">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Hutajulu</surname><given-names>W. C.</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Butarbutar</surname><given-names>O. P.</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Situmorang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Torong</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Situmeang</surname><given-names>V. S.</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Herman</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Examining the Discourse Analysis on the Song Lyric Entitled “Heal the World” By Michael Jackson</article-title>
          <source>Jurnal Scientia</source>
          <year>2023</year>
          <volume>12</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <comment>http://infor.seaninstitute.org/index.php</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref7">
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Matthiessen</surname><given-names>C. M. I. M.</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Teruya</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Lam</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Key Terms in Systematic Functional Linguistics</article-title>
          <source>Continuum International Publishing Group</source>
          <year>2010</year>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref8">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Moya Guijarro</surname><given-names>A. J.</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>The continuity of topics in journal and travel texts</article-title>
          <source>Functions of Language</source>
          <year>2006</year>
          <volume>13</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>37</fpage>
          <lpage>76</lpage>
          <comment>https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.13.1.03moy</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref9">
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Paul</surname><given-names>G. J.</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Michael</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis</article-title>
          <source>The Routledge Taylor &amp; Francis Group</source>
          <year>2012</year>
          <comment>https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809068-15</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref10">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Siregar</surname><given-names>U. D.</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Lubis</surname><given-names>I. S.</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Deliana</surname></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Kesinambungan Topik dalam Teks Eksakta</article-title>
          <source>Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia</source>
          <year>2019</year>
          <volume>7</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <fpage>187</fpage>
          <comment>https://doi.org/10.30659/j.7.2.187-198</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref11">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Talmy</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study</article-title>
          <source>Language</source>
          <year>1987</year>
          <volume>63</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>160</fpage>
          <comment>https://doi.org/10.2307/415396</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref12">
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Van Dijk</surname><given-names>T. A.</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach</article-title>
          <source>Cambridge University Press</source>
          <year>2008</year>
          <comment>https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481499</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref13">
        <element-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Van Dijk</surname><given-names>Teun A.</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Walter</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Strategies of Discourse Comprehension</article-title>
          <source>Language</source>
          <year>1986</year>
          <volume>62</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>664</fpage>
          <comment>https://doi.org/10.2307/415483</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref14">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Wahyu</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Keberterusan Topik dalam Berita Skyscraper of Waste Greater Jakarta Drowning in Mountains of Trash</article-title>
          <source>Local Wisdom, Social, and Arts Series</source>
          <year>2022</year>
          <volume>5</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <comment>https://doi.org/10.32734/lwsa.v5i2.1376</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref15">
        <element-citation publication-type="web">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Wikipedia contributors</surname></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Perfect (Simple Plan song)</article-title>
          <source>Wikipedia</source>
          <year>2025</year>
          <comment>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_(Simple_Plan_song)</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

      <ref id="ref16">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Zein</surname><given-names>T. T.</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Prayogo</surname></name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Analysis of Topic Continuity in Malay Folklore Batu Batangkup</article-title>
          <source>Jurnal Bahasa</source>
          <year>2022</year>
          <volume>22</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <fpage>251</fpage>
          <lpage>272</lpage>
          <comment>https://doi.org/10.37052/jb22(2)no4</comment>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>

    </ref-list>
</sec>
</body>
</article>
