<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN"
  "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJAR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Indonesian Journal of Advanced Research</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2986-0768</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Formosa Publisher</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.55927/ijar.v4i7.15016</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The Influence of the Work Environment on Organizational Commitment Mediated by Employee Job Satisfaction (A Study at the Badung Branch of the Bali Regional Development Bank)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name>
            <surname>Putri</surname>
            <given-names>Ni Luh Maha Cantika</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>Universitas Udayana, Indonesia</aff>
          <email>mahacantika02@gmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Rahyuda</surname>
            <given-names>Agoes Ganesha</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>Universitas Udayana, Indonesia</aff>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>27</day>
        <month>07</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>11</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd">
          <day>25</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>27</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <volume>4</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>1461</fpage>
      <lpage>1478</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Organizational commitment refers to the emotional bond, loyalty, and sense of obligation an employee feels toward their organization. This study investigates the influence of the work setting on organizational dedication, with job satisfaction serving as a mediating element. The research was carried out at the Bali Regional Development Bank (BPD Bali), Badung Branch, involving 45 employees selected through a census approach. Data were obtained through questionnaires and interviews, then analyzed using Path Analysis and the Sobel Test. The findings reveal that the workplace atmosphere and employee satisfaction both have a beneficial and substantial impact on commitment to the organization. Moreover, the work atmosphere positively influences job satisfaction, which then facilitates the connection between the work atmosphere and commitment to the organization. These results align with social exchange theory, suggesting that improving the workplace atmosphere and employee satisfaction may lead to greater commitment among staff.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Organizational Commitment</kwd>
        <kwd>Work Environment</kwd>
        <kwd>Job Satisfaction</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <permissions>
        <license>
          <ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
          <license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
    </article-meta>
  </front>

  <body>

<sec>
  <title>INTRODUCTION</title>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>Organizational commitment refers to an individual's emotional
    bond, loyalty, and sense of duty toward their organization. This
    research explores the influence of the workplace setting on employee
    commitment to the organization, with job satisfaction serving as a
    mediating variable. The study was conducted at the Badung Branch of
    the Bali Regional Development Bank (BPD Bali), involving 45
    employees selected via a census method, Data were gathered using
    questionnaires and interviews, while the analysis utilized Path
    Analysis and the Sobel Test. The results indicate that both the
    workplace atmosphere and employee satisfaction significantly and
    positively impact organizational commitment. Moreover, the work
    environment also positively influences job satisfaction, which
    subsequently mediates its effect on organizational commitment. These
    findings are consistent with social exchange theory, emphasizing the
    role of a supportive work environment and job satisfaction in
    strengthening employee commitment to the organization.</p>
    <p>Organizational commitment is a psychological perspective that
    illustrates the bond between employees and their organization,
    marked by feelings of attachment, loyalty, and responsibility toward
    their workplace (Sentana &amp; Surya, 2017). This commitment is
    generally divided into three components: affective commitment, which
    involves emotional closeness to the organization; continuance
    commitment, which stems from evaluating the costs and benefits of
    staying; and normative commitment, which is driven by a moral sense
    of obligation to remain (Priharti &amp; Marjati, 2022). However,
    based on the results of initial interviews with several employees of
    BPD Bali Badung Branch, it was found that there was a tendency to
    weak commitment, such as reluctance to declare one's identity as an
    employee on social media, often arriving late, and easily moving to
    another company for material gains.</p>
    <p>One of the key factors influencing the level of organizational
    commitment is the work environment. A conducive work environment
    encompasses not only physical elements such as lighting,
    ventilation, and workplace facilities (Afandi, 2018), but also
    psychological and social aspects, including leadership style,
    interpersonal relationships among employees, and a fair and humane
    organizational system. When employees feel valued, supported, and
    acknowledged by their organization, they are more likely to develop
    a stronger sense of attachment and commitment. Conversely, a rigid,
    unfriendly, and burdensome work environment can lower employee
    loyalty and motivation. The social exchange theory developed by Blau
    (1964) explains that a positive reciprocal relationship between
    employees and the organization will increase commitment to the
    company (Widhari, 2021).</p>
    <p>In addition to the work environment, job satisfaction is also an
    important variable that contributes to increasing organizational
    commitment. Employees who feel satisfied with their work, both in
    terms of social relationships, compensation, and self-development
    opportunities, will be more likely to stay and make the best
    contribution (Mahalaksmi &amp; Suwandana, 2024). Several previous
    studies have shown that job satisfaction can act as a mediating
    variable between the work environment and organizational
    commitment</p>
    <p>(Djastuti, 2018; Govinda &amp; Mujiati, 2022). However, there is
    still a research gap, Several studies have indicated a detrimental
    effect of the work environment on commitment (Melati, 2022;
    Rumoning, 2018), which opens up space for further research.</p>
    <p>Based on empirical observations and findings from previous
    research, organizational commitment at BPD Bali Badung Branch
    remains a relevant issue worthy of further investigation,
    specifically regarding the impact of the workplace and employee
    contentment. Consequently, this research intends to examine how the
    work setting influences organizational commitment, utilizing job
    satisfaction as a mediating variable. The outcomes of this research
    are expected to contribute theoretically to the advancement of human
    resource management studies and offer practical recommendations for
    BPD Bali’s management in enhancing employee loyalty and
    performance.</p>
  </disp-quote>
</sec>





<sec>
  <title>THEORETICAL REVIEW</title>
  <sec id="social-exchange-theory-social-exchange-theory">
    <title>Social Exchange Theory (Social Exchange Theory)</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>This research is based on the theory of social exchange put
      forward by George C. Homans (1961) and developed by Blau (1964).
      This theory states that the relationship between employees and the
      organization is formed through exchanges that are reciprocal, both
      intrinsically and extrinsically. If employees feel that the
      organization treats them fairly—for example, through a supportive
      work environment and recognition of hard work—they tend to
      reciprocate with a higher commitment to the organization (Widhari,
      2021). Employees will consider the return received compared to the
      contribution made; imbalance will cause dissatisfaction and lower
      commitment (Suryawan, 2021).</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="organizational-commitment">
    <title>Organizational Commitment</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Organizational commitment is an employee's psychological
      attitude that reflects attachment, loyalty, and desire to remain
      part of the organization (Gunawan &amp; Ardana, 2020). This
      commitment is divided into three main dimensions:</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <list list-type="order">
      <list-item>
        <p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>Emotional Attachment to the Organization, known as
            Affective Commitment (Burhannudin, 2019).</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p>
      </list-item>
      <list-item>
        <p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>Continuance Commitment, which is a rational consideration
            of the risk of leaving the organization.</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p>
      </list-item>
      <list-item>
        <p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>Normative Commitment, which is a sense of moral
            obligation to remain in the organization.</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p>
      </list-item>
      <list-item>
        <p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>This commitment is influenced by employees' perceptions
            of fairness, organizational support, and the work
            environment (Sunaris et al., 2022; Susilo, 2019).</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p>
      </list-item>
    </list>
  </sec>
  <sec id="work-environment">
    <title>Work Environment</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The work environment encompasses both tangible and intangible
      aspects that influence employee performance and comfort (Ahmad et
      al., 2023; Almeida et al., 2019). A supportive work environment
      will facilitate employee productivity, loyalty, and job
      satisfaction (Irma &amp; Yusuf, 2020). Work</p>
      <p>environment indicators according to Andriani (2023) include
      cooperation, availability of work facilities, and work atmosphere.
      Previous research has also stated that a clean, safe, and
      supportive work environment can increase organizational commitment
      (Suryaputra, 2023; Madjidu et al., 2022).</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="job-satisfaction">
    <title>Job Satisfaction</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Job satisfaction signifies an employee's favorable perception
      of their work, which is reflected through enthusiasm, loyalty, and
      overall performance (Nancy Yusnita et al., 2023). Indicators of
      job satisfaction according to Nabawi (2019) include salary, the
      job itself, co-workers, superiors, promotions, and the work
      environment. Employees who are satisfied with their jobs tend to
      be more loyal and exhibit extra-role work behaviors such as
      Organizational Citizenship Behavior (Meutia &amp; Narpati, 2021).
      Job satisfaction not only increases productivity, but also
      strengthens commitment to the organization.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
</sec>







<sec>
  <title>METHODOLOGY</title>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>A census method, data were collected through questionnaires and
    supported by interviews. This research employs a quantitative method
    with a causal framework to examine how the work environment impacts
    organizational commitment, while job satisfaction serves as a
    mediating factor. Carried out at the Badung Branch of the Bali
    Regional Development Bank, the study included all 45 employees as
    participants, chosen using a census approach. Data were gathered
    using questionnaires and complemented by interviews.</p>
    <p>The study examined three variables: the work environment (X), job
    satisfaction (M), and organizational commitment (Y). A five-point
    Likert scale was used as the research instrument, which had been
    tested for validity and reliability. Data analysis was conducted
    using path analysis to identify both direct and indirect
    relationships among the variables. The Sobel Test was utilized to
    evaluate the significance of the mediating effect. Additionally,
    classical assumption tests such as normality, multicollinearity, and
    heteroscedasticity were performed to confirm the model’s validity
    and reliability.</p>
  </disp-quote>
</sec>





<sec>
  <title>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</title>
  <sec id="company-overview">
    <title>Company Overview</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p><italic>General History</italic></p>
      <p>Bank Pembangunan Daerah Bali is a financial institution owned
      by the Provincial Government of Bali, established on June 5, 1962,
      based on Notarial Deed Number 131 by Ida Bagus Ketut Rurus.
      Following the issuance of Law Number 13 of 1962 concerning the
      Principles of Regional Development Banks, the bank's establishment
      was later adjusted through Regional Regulation Number
      6/DPR.DGR/1965, officially incorporating it as a Regional Company.
      To enhance performance and expand its business scope, the bank's
      legal status was converted into a Limited Liability Company (PT)
      in 2004, in accordance with Deed Number 7 dated May 12, 2004,
      which was subsequently ratified by the Minister of Justice and
      Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia. The</p>
      <p>adjustment was made again following Law Number 40 of 2007
      through Deed Number 25 of 2008.</p>
      <p>In addition to the change in legal form, BPD Bali also
      underwent a transformation in its operational status, namely from
      a commercial bank to a foreign exchange commercial bank in 2004.
      This change was followed by an increase in the company's
      authorized capital from IDR 75 billion to IDR 1 trillion in 2004,
      and then increased again to IDR 4 trillion based on the resolution
      of the 2015 General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS). This change
      reflects BPD Bali's readiness to expand services and
      competitiveness in the national banking industry, as well as show
      the company's commitment to strengthening its financial structure
      and supporting sustainable regional development.</p>
      <p>This research was carried out at the BPD Bali Branch Office
      located on Jalan Raya Kuta No. 1, Kuta District, Badung Regency,
      Bali. This branch has a strategic role in reaching customers in
      areas with dense economic and tourism activities. With a total of
      47 employees, this branch serves as a relevant subject of research
      to explore the dynamics of the work environment, job satisfaction,
      and organizational commitment, which are the central focus of this
      study.</p>
      <p><italic>Organizational Structure</italic></p>
      <p>Bali Regional Development Bank is a financial institution owned
      by the Bali Provincial Government that has undergone several legal
      status transformations to support its continued growth. These
      changes align with the bank’s vision and mission to deliver the
      highest quality of service to its customers. Badung Branch
      operations are carried out by employees in accordance with the
      applicable organizational responsibilities and structure.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_4395f470b01e4cf8a677d5394253ed16/media/image3.png" />
      <p>Figure 1. Organizational Structure</p>
      <p><italic>Source : BPD Bali General Sector Badung Branch, 2025</italic></p>
    <disp-quote>
      <p><italic>Respondent Characteristics</italic></p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>This study was conducted on 45 employees of the Bali Regional
      Development Bank Badung Branch. Respondents' characteristics
      included age, gender, last education, and length of service, as
      presented in Table 1.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 1. Respondent Characteristics</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 1. Respondent Characteristics</label>
      <caption>
        <title>Source : attachment 6, data processed in 2025</title>
      </caption>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left">Characteristics</th>
            <th align="left">Clarification</th>
            <th align="right">Number (people)</th>
            <th align="right">Percentage (%)</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" rowspan="4">Age</td>
            <td align="left">26-30 Years</td>
            <td align="right">11</td>
            <td align="right">24.4</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">31-35 Years</td>
            <td align="right">18</td>
            <td align="right">40.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">36-40 Years</td>
            <td align="right">7</td>
            <td align="right">15.6</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">&gt; 40 years old</td>
            <td align="right">9</td>
            <td align="right">20.0</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" colspan="2">Sum</td>
            <td align="right">45</td>
            <td align="right">100</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" rowspan="2">Gender</td>
            <td align="left">Man</td>
            <td align="right">24</td>
            <td align="right">53.3</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">Woman</td>
            <td align="right">21</td>
            <td align="right">46.7</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" colspan="2">Sum</td>
            <td align="right">45</td>
            <td align="right">100</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" rowspan="3">Final Education</td>
            <td align="left">High School/Vocational School</td>
            <td align="right">21</td>
            <td align="right">46.7</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">S1</td>
            <td align="right">23</td>
            <td align="right">51.1</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">S2</td>
            <td align="right">1</td>
            <td align="right">2.2</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" colspan="2">Sum</td>
            <td align="right">45</td>
            <td align="right">100</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" rowspan="3">Tenure</td>
            <td align="left">1-10 Years</td>
            <td align="right">30</td>
            <td align="right">66.7</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">11-20 Years</td>
            <td align="right">14</td>
            <td align="right">31.1</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">&gt; 20 Years</td>
            <td align="right">1</td>
            <td align="right">2.2</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" colspan="2">Sum</td>
            <td align="right">45</td>
            <td align="right">100</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Based on the data on respondent characteristics, most employees
      at the Bali Regional Development Bank Badung Branch are aged
      between 31 and 35 years, with a total of 18 individuals (40.0%),
      followed by 11 people (24.4%) aged 26-30 years, 9 people over 40
      years old (20.0%), and 36-40 years old as many as 7 people
      (15.6%). In terms of gender, respondents were dominated by men as
      many as 24 people (53.3%), while women amounted to 21 people
      (46.7%).</p>
      <p>In terms of education, most of the respondents had a S1
      education as many as 23 people (51.1%), followed by 21 high
      school/vocational school graduates (46.7%), and only 1 person
      (2.2%) had a S2 education. Based on the working period,
      respondents who had a working period of 1–10 years dominated as
      many as 30 people (66.7%), followed by 11–20 years as many as 14
      people (31.1%), and more than 20 years as many as 1 person (2.2%).
      This data shows that the majority of respondents are employees of
      productive age, highly educated, and have relatively new work
      experience.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p><italic>Description of Research Variables</italic></p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Descriptive statistical analysis is used to describe or
      describe the data of research results without making
      generalizations (Sugiyono, 2019:206). In this study, measurements
      were carried out using a five-point Likert scale, which was given
      to respondents to assess indicators in each research variable. The
      score obtained is then calculated to determine the mean value,
      which is used as</p>
      <p>the basis for categorizing the respondent's level of assessment
      of each measured indicator.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
    <measurement-interval>
      <calculation>
        <formula>(5 - 1) / 5</formula>
        <value>0.80</value>
      </calculation>
      <description>
        The measurement criteria used, namely:
      </description>
    </measurement-interval>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 2. Variable Description Criteria</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 2. Variable Description Criteria</label>
      <caption>
        <title>Source : Data processed, 2025</title>
      </caption>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left" rowspan="2">Average Score</th>
            <th align="center" colspan="3">Criterion</th>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th align="left">Organizational commitment</th>
            <th align="left">Work environment</th>
            <th align="left">Job satisfaction</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">1,00 - 1,80</td>
            <td align="left">Very Low</td>
            <td align="left">Very Bad</td>
            <td align="left">Very Low</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">1,81 - 2,60</td>
            <td align="left">Low</td>
            <td align="left">Bad</td>
            <td align="left">Low</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">2,61 - 3,40</td>
            <td align="left">Enough</td>
            <td align="left">Enough</td>
            <td align="left">Enough</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">3,41 - 4,20</td>
            <td align="left">Tall</td>
            <td align="left">Good</td>
            <td align="left">Tall</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">4,21 - 5,00</td>
            <td align="left">Very High</td>
            <td align="left">Excellent</td>
            <td align="left">Very High</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The organizational commitment variable is symbolized by Y and
      measured using 3 statements that are responded to using 5 points
      of the Likert Scale. Based on the results of respondents’ answers
      regarding the organizational commitment variable, the distribution
      of responses can be summarized as follows:</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 3. Description of Respondents' Responses to Organizational Commitments</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 3. Description of Respondents' Responses to Organizational Commitments</label>
      <caption>
        <title>Source: Appendix 7, 2025</title>
      </caption>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left" rowspan="2">No</th>
            <th align="left" rowspan="2">Statement</th>
            <th align="center" colspan="5">Respondent's Answer (orang)</th>
            <th align="center" rowspan="2">Sum</th>
            <th align="center" rowspan="2">Average</th>
            <th align="left" rowspan="2">Criterion</th>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th align="center">1</th>
            <th align="center">2</th>
            <th align="center">3</th>
            <th align="center">4</th>
            <th align="center">5</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">1</td>
            <td align="left">I feel emotionally attached to the company</td>
            <td align="center">1</td>
            <td align="center">16</td>
            <td align="center">13</td>
            <td align="center">11</td>
            <td align="center">4</td>
            <td align="center">136</td>
            <td align="center">3,02</td>
            <td align="left">Enough</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">2</td>
            <td align="left">I feel like I have little choice if I leave the company</td>
            <td align="center">1</td>
            <td align="center">10</td>
            <td align="center">11</td>
            <td align="center">13</td>
            <td align="center">10</td>
            <td align="center">156</td>
            <td align="center">3,47</td>
            <td align="left">Tall</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">3</td>
            <td align="left">I will not leave this company because I still have obligations</td>
            <td align="center">1</td>
            <td align="center">8</td>
            <td align="center">14</td>
            <td align="center">12</td>
            <td align="center">10</td>
            <td align="center">157</td>
            <td align="center">3,49</td>
            <td align="left">Tall</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" colspan="7">Average Total Organizational Commitment</td>
            <td align="center"></td>
            <td align="center">3,33</td>
            <td align="left">Enough</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>According to Table 3, the average score for respondents’ views
      on the organizational commitment variable was 3.33, labeled as
      “sufficient.” This indicates that employees at the Bali Regional
      Development Bank Badung Branch have a moderate level of
      organizational commitment, implying that, on average, they do not
      show a notably strong feeling of loyalty to the organization. The
      details of the statements with the highest and lowest average
      values are as follows:</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <list list-type="order">
      <list-item>
        <p>The statement with the lowest average score was &quot;I feel
        emotionally attached to the company&quot; of 3.02 (fair
        category). This shows that in general employees have not fully
        felt emotional closeness to the organization.</p>
      </list-item>
      <list-item>
        <p>The statement with the highest average score is &quot;I will
        not leave this company because I still have obligations&quot; of
        3.49 (high category). This means that most employees feel a
        moral responsibility to stay employed by the company.</p>
      </list-item>
    </list>
    <disp-quote>
      <p><italic>Descriptive Variables Work Environment</italic></p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>In this study, the work environment variable acts as the
      independent variable (X) and is assessed with three statement
      items utilizing a five-point Likert scale. Based on the results of
      respondents' responses to statements on this variable, the
      proportion of answers that reflect employees' perception of the
      working environment conditions at the Bali Regional Development
      Bank Badung Branch was obtained. The details of the results of
      respondents' perceptions are presented in the following
      explanation.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 1. Description of Respondents' Responses to the Work Environment</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 1. Description of Respondents' Responses to the Work Environment</label>
      <caption>
        <title>Source: Appendix 7, 2025</title>
      </caption>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left" rowspan="2">No</th>
            <th align="left" rowspan="2">Statement</th>
            <th align="center" colspan="2">Respondent's Answer (orang)</th>
            <th align="center" rowspan="2">Sum</th>
            <th align="center" rowspan="2">Average</th>
            <th align="left" rowspan="2">Criterion</th>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th align="center">5</th>
            <th align="center">6</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">1</td>
            <td align="left">I work together to complement each other and help in completing the work</td>
            <td align="center">5</td>
            <td align="center">6</td>
            <td align="center">135</td>
            <td align="center">3,00</td>
            <td align="left">Enough</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">2</td>
            <td align="left">The company provides the availability of facilities and infrastructure to support the work.</td>
            <td align="center">0</td>
            <td align="center">0</td>
            <td align="center">149</td>
            <td align="center">3,31</td>
            <td align="left">Enough</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">3</td>
            <td align="left">I feel that the atmosphere in the company is comfortable, excited and the closeness between the company's employees runs harmoniously</td>
            <td align="center">0</td>
            <td align="center">6</td>
            <td align="center">161</td>
            <td align="center">3,58</td>
            <td align="left">Good</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left" colspan="5">Average Total Working Environment</td>
            <td align="center">3,30</td>
            <td align="left">Enough</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
  <list list-type="order">
    <list-item>
      <p>The statement with the lowest average score is &quot;I work
      together to complement each other and help in completing the
      work&quot; with a score of</p>
    </list-item>
  </list>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>3.00 (fair category). This shows that the spirit of cooperation
    between employees is still not optimal.</p>
  </disp-quote>
  <list list-type="order">
    <list-item>
      <label>2.</label>
      <p>The statement with the highest average score was &quot;I feel
      that the atmosphere in the company is comfortable, excited, and
      the closeness between employees is harmonious&quot; with a score
      of 3.58 (good category). This means that employees feel a socially
      and emotionally supportive work atmosphere in the company
      environment.</p>
    </list-item>
  </list>
  <disp-quote>
    <p><italic>Descriptive Variables Job Satisfaction</italic></p>
  </disp-quote>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>The job satisfaction variable, represented by M, is measured
    using six statement items, each assessed through a five-point Likert
    scale. Based on the respondents’ answers regarding the job
    satisfaction variable, the distribution of responses can be detailed
    as follows:</p>
  </disp-quote>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>Table 2. Description of Respondents' Answers to Job Satisfaction</p>
  </disp-quote>
  <table-wrap>
    <label>Table 2. Description of Respondents' Answers to Job Satisfaction</label>
    <caption>
      <title>Sumber: Lampiran 7, 2025</title>
    </caption>
    <table>
      <thead>
        <tr>
          <th align="left" rowspan="2">No</th>
          <th align="left" rowspan="2">Statement</th>
          <th align="center" colspan="3">Respondent's Answer (orang)</th>
          <th align="center" rowspan="2">Sum</th>
          <th align="center" rowspan="2">Average</th>
          <th align="left" rowspan="2">Criterion</th>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <th align="center"></th>
          <th align="center"></th>
          <th align="center"></th>
        </tr>
      </thead>
      <tbody>
        <tr>
          <td align="left">1</td>
          <td align="left">I am satisfied that the amount of salary obtained is appropriate and fair</td>
          <td align="center">6</td>
          <td align="center"></td>
          <td align="center"></td>
          <td align="center">134</td>
          <td align="center">2,98</td>
          <td align="left">Enough</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td align="left">2</td>
          <td align="left">I feel satisfied with the work given according to my ability</td>
          <td align="center">1</td>
          <td align="center">1</td>
          <td align="center">3</td>
          <td align="center">159</td>
          <td align="center">3,53</td>
          <td align="left">Tall</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td align="left">3</td>
          <td align="left">I have a good cooperative relationship with colleagues</td>
          <td align="center">5</td>
          <td align="center">0</td>
          <td align="center">0</td>
          <td align="center">153</td>
          <td align="center">3,40</td>
          <td align="left">Enough</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td align="left">4</td>
          <td align="left">My boss has always been supportive of me</td>
          <td align="center">2</td>
          <td align="center">0</td>
          <td align="center"></td>
          <td align="center">142</td>
          <td align="center">3,16</td>
          <td align="left">Enough</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td align="left">5</td>
          <td align="left">I feel satisfied with the opportunities presented for promotional opportunities</td>
          <td align="center">0</td>
          <td align="center">4</td>
          <td align="center"></td>
          <td align="center">136</td>
          <td align="center">3,02</td>
          <td align="left">Enough</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td align="left">6</td>
          <td align="left">I feel satisfied with the work environment provided both physical and non-physical</td>
          <td align="center">9</td>
          <td align="center">0</td>
          <td align="center"></td>
          <td align="center">149</td>
          <td align="center">3,31</td>
          <td align="left">Enough</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td align="left" colspan="6">Average Total Job Satisfaction</td>
          <td align="center">3,23</td>
          <td align="left">Enough</td>
        </tr>
      </tbody>
    </table>
  </table-wrap>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>Based on Table 5, respondents’ perceptions of the job
    satisfaction variable yielded a total average score of 3.23, which
    falls into the “sufficient” category. This suggests that employees
    at the Bali Regional Development Bank Badung Branch experience a
    moderate level of job satisfaction in performing their duties. The
    statements with the highest and lowest average scores are explained
    as follows:</p>
  </disp-quote>
  <list list-type="order">
    <list-item>
      <p>The statement with the lowest average score is &quot;I am
      satisfied with the amount of salary earned is appropriate and
      fair&quot; with a score of 2.98 (fair category). This shows that
      most employees are not completely satisfied with the amount and
      fairness of the salary received.</p>
    </list-item>
    <list-item>
      <p>The statement with the highest average score is &quot;I feel
      satisfied with the work given according to ability&quot; with a
      score of 3.53 (high category). This means that the majority of
      employees feel that the work they do is in accordance with their
      respective capacities and competencies.</p>
    </list-item>
  </list>
  <sec id="inferential-analysis-results">
    <title>Inferential Analysis Results</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Inferential statistics are used to analyze sample data and
      generalize them to the population (Sugiyono, 2017:233). This study
      uses path analysis, classical assumption test, and Sobel test as
      inferential statistical techniques.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>\
      <p><italic>Path Analysis Results</italic></p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Pathway analysis was employed to examine the relationships
      between the work environment (X), job satisfaction (M), and
      organizational commitment (Y), with the prerequisite that
      fundamental statistical assumptions were satisfied.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 6. Results of Path Analysis in Sub-Structural 1</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 6. Results of Path Analysis in Sub-Structural 1</label>
      <caption>
        <title>Source: Appendix 8, 2025</title>
        <p>R<sup>2</sup> : 0,299</p>
      </caption>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left" rowspan="2">Model</th>
            <th align="center" colspan="2">Unstandardized Coefficients</th>
            <th align="center" rowspan="2">Standardized Coefficients Beta</th>
            <th align="center" rowspan="2">t</th>
            <th align="center" rowspan="2">Sig.</th>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th align="center">B</th>
            <th align="center">Std. Error</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">(Constant)</td>
            <td align="center">9,642</td>
            <td align="center">2,383</td>
            <td align="center"></td>
            <td align="center">4,047</td>
            <td align="center">0,000</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">Work environment</td>
            <td align="center">0,987</td>
            <td align="center">0,230</td>
            <td align="center">0,547</td>
            <td align="center">4,282</td>
            <td align="center">0,000</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>From this hypothesis, two sub-structures of the equation are
      formulated:</p>
      <mediation-model>
        <sub-structure id="1">
          <equation>M = β₂X + e₁</equation>
          <description>Sub-structure 1: The effect of X on the mediator M</description>
        </sub-structure>
        <sub-structure id="2">
          <equation>Y = β₁X + β₃M + e₂</equation>
          <description>Sub-structure 2: The effect of X and M on the outcome Y</description>
        </sub-structure>
      </mediation-model>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The data analysis utilized SPSS 25.0 for Windows, and the
      outcomes are shown in Table 6. This application was applied to
      assess the effects of the work environment and job satisfaction on
      organizational commitment.</p>
      <p>The results of the Second Sub-Structural calculation are
      presented in Table 7.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p></p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 7. Results of Path Analysis in Sub-Structural 2</label>
      <caption>
        <title>Source: Appendix 8, 2025</title>
        <p>R<sup>2</sup> : 0,536</p>
      </caption>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left" rowspan="2">Model</th>
            <th align="center" colspan="2">Unstandardized Coefficients</th>
            <th align="center" rowspan="2">Standardized Coefficients Beta</th>
            <th align="center" rowspan="2">t</th>
            <th align="center" rowspan="2">Sig.</th>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th align="center">B</th>
            <th align="center">Std. Error</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">(Constant)</td>
            <td align="center">1.992</td>
            <td align="center">1.184</td>
            <td align="center"></td>
            <td align="center">1.682</td>
            <td align="center">0.100</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">Work environment</td>
            <td align="center">0.300</td>
            <td align="center">0.116</td>
            <td align="center">0.323</td>
            <td align="center">2.577</td>
            <td align="center">0.014</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">Job satisfaction</td>
            <td align="center">0.259</td>
            <td align="center">0.064</td>
            <td align="center">0.504</td>
            <td align="center">4.013</td>
            <td align="center">0.000</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Based on the results of the path analysis, Sub-Structural
      equation 2 was obtained as follows:</p>
      <p>The equation Y = 0.323X + 0.504M + e₂ demonstrates that both
      the work environment (X) and job satisfaction (M) positively
      affect organizational commitment (Y). A coefficient of 0.323
      indicates that a better work environment enhances organizational
      commitment, while a coefficient of 0.504 signifies that greater
      job satisfaction also leads to stronger employee commitment.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <list list-type="order">
      <list-item>
        <p>Direct impact: work environment on organizational commitment
        was 0.323; work environment to job satisfaction was 0.547; job
        satisfaction to organizational commitment stood at 0.504.</p>
      </list-item>
      <list-item>
        <p>Indirect influence: work environment on organizational
        commitment through job satisfaction of 0.276 (0.547 ×
        0.504).</p>
      </list-item>
      <list-item>
        <p>Total influence: by 0.599, a combination of direct and
        indirect influences.</p>
      </list-item>
    </list>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Additionally, The coefficient of determination (R²m) of 0.675
      shows that 67.5% of the variation in organizational commitment is
      explained by the work environment and job satisfaction, while the
      remaining 32.5% is due to other factors not covered in this
      study.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="summarizing-and-summing-up">
    <title>Summarizing and Summing Up</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Based on the above calculations, the direct, indirect, and
      total influences of each variable in the model can be summarized
      and presented systematically in Table 8.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 8. Direct Influences, Indirect Influences of the Work Environment, on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <table-wrap>
      <label>Table 8. Direct Influences, Indirect Influences of the Work Environment, on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment.</label>
      <caption>
        <title>Source: Appendix 8, 2025</title>
      </caption>
      <table>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left" rowspan="2">Influence of variables</th>
            <th align="center" rowspan="2">Direct influence</th>
            <th align="center">Indirect influence</th>
            <th align="center" rowspan="2">Total Impact</th>
            <th align="center" rowspan="2">Std. Error</th>
            <th align="center" rowspan="2">Itself.</th>
            <th align="left" rowspan="2">Result</th>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th align="center">through M</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">X→Y</td>
            <td align="center">0.323</td>
            <td align="center">0.276</td>
            <td align="center">0.599</td>
            <td align="center">0.116</td>
            <td align="center">0.014</td>
            <td align="left">Significant</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">X→M</td>
            <td align="center">0.547</td>
            <td align="center"></td>
            <td align="center">0.547</td>
            <td align="center">0.230</td>
            <td align="center">0.000</td>
            <td align="left">Significant</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">M→Y</td>
            <td align="center">0.504</td>
            <td align="center"></td>
            <td align="center">0.504</td>
            <td align="center">0.064</td>
            <td align="center">0.000</td>
            <td align="left">Significant</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Table 8 summarizes the results of the path analysis which
      includes the direct and indirect influences, as well as error
      values in Sub-Structures 1 and 2. The brief explanation of each
      path is as follows:</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <list list-type="order">
      <list-item>
        <p>The work environment on organizational commitment has a
        direct influence of 0.323 with a significance of 0.014.</p>
      </list-item>
      <list-item>
        <p>The work environment on job satisfaction showed a direct
        influence of</p>
      </list-item>
    </list>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>0.547 with a significance of 0.000.</p>
    </disp-quote>
    <list list-type="order">
      <list-item>
        <label>3.</label>
        <p>Job satisfaction with organizational commitment showed a
        direct influence of 0.504 with a significance of 0.000.</p>
      </list-item>
    </list>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The influence of the work environment on organizational
      commitment through job satisfaction included a direct effect of
      0.323, an indirect effect of 0.276, and a total effect of
      0.599.</p>
      <p>The influence of the work environment on organizational
      commitment, with the mediation of job satisfaction, showed a
      direct influence of 0.323 and an indirect influence of 0.276, so
      that the total influence produced was 0.599.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
</sec>






<sec>
  <title>DISCUSSION</title>
  <disp-quote>
    <p><italic>The Influence of the Work Environment on Organizational
    Commitment</italic></p>
    <p>The study results indicate that the work environment positively
    and significantly affects the organizational commitment of employees
    at the Bali Regional Development Bank Badung Branch. A pleasant,
    supportive, and harmonious atmosphere among coworkers has been shown
    to strengthen employees' attachment to the organization. These
    findings support the core idea of Social Exchange Theory, which
    suggests that when employees are treated fairly and receive support
    from the organization, they respond with greater loyalty and
    commitment.</p>
    <p>These findings also align with previous studies by Brox Arsenio
    (2023), Nursia et al. (2023), and Ahakwa et al. (2021), which
    concluded that a supportive work environment positively influences
    organizational commitment.</p>
  </disp-quote>
  <sec id="the-influence-of-the-work-environment-on-job-satisfaction">
    <title>The Influence of the Work Environment on Job
    Satisfaction</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The work environment has also been shown to positively and
      significantly influence job satisfaction. Employees who experience
      comfort, support from colleagues, and sufficient workplace
      facilities tend to feel more</p>
      <p>satisfied in performing their responsibilities. The more
      favorable the work environment, the greater the level of job
      satisfaction employees experience. These results are in line with
      the studies of Khairunisa et al. (2024), Kusumadewi et al. (2018),
      and Jasmine &amp; Endalmen (2020), which found that a work
      environment that is supportive both physically and psychologically
      has a positive effect on job satisfaction.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="the-effect-of-job-satisfaction-on-organizational-commitment">
    <title>The Effect of Job Satisfaction on Organizational
    Commitment</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Job satisfaction has a direct, positive, and significant impact
      on organizational commitment.Employees who are content with their
      work— covering elements such as job fit, recognition, and
      interpersonal relationships— are more likely to demonstrate
      stronger commitment to the organization. These findings are
      consistent with studies by Mahalaksmi &amp; Suwandana (2024),
      Nurkama (2023), and Martini &amp; Susanto (2021), which confirm
      that job satisfaction is a key factor in enhancing organizational
      commitment.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="the-role-of-job-satisfaction-in-mediating-the-influence-of-the-work-environment-on-organizational-commitment">
    <title>The Role of Job Satisfaction in Mediating the Influence of
    the Work Environment on Organizational Commitment</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>Job satisfaction is identified as a partial mediator in the
      relationship between the work environment and organizational
      commitment. A conducive work environment enhances job
      satisfaction, which in turn fosters greater organizational
      commitment. This mediating effect is validated by the Sobel Test
      and the VAF Test, where the VAF score of 46.08% confirms partial
      mediation. These findings are consistent with research by Vigazi
      &amp; Rino (2023), Fahlefi (2023), and Anton et al. (2023), all of
      which emphasize the crucial role of job satisfaction in
      reinforcing the influence of the work environment on
      organizational commitment.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="the-influence-of-the-work-environment-on-employee-job-satisfaction-at-the-bali-regional-development-bank-badung-branch">
    <title>The Influence of the Work Environment on Employee Job
    Satisfaction at the Bali Regional Development Bank, Badung
    Branch</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The results of the second hypothesis test show that the work
      environment has a positive and significant effect on employee job
      satisfaction at the Bali Regional Development Bank, Badung Branch.
      This means that the more conducive the work environment is
      perceived by employees, the greater their level of job
      satisfaction, and conversely, a less favorable environment
      corresponds to lower satisfaction. Therefore, the second
      hypothesis is supported. The work environment comprises both
      physical and non-physical components within the organization. This
      study reveals that employees working in a positive, comfortable,
      enthusiastic, and harmonious setting, accompanied by sufficient
      facilities and infrastructure, tend to experience greater job
      satisfaction.</p>
      <p>In relation to Social Exchange Theory, a good work environment
      is perceived as a form of organizational concern for employees. In
      return, employees demonstrate positive attitudes in the form of
      increased job satisfaction because they feel their needs are met
      fairly and humanely. This finding is supported by research by
      Khairunisa et al. (2024), Nurazyka &amp;</p>
      <p>Mubarok (2024), Mukson &amp; Rosima (2022), Manik &amp; Yunior
      (2021), Prasetiyo et al. (2020), Endalmen (2020), and Yuliantini
      &amp; Reza (2020) which states that a conducive and harmonious
      work environment significantly increases employee job
      satisfaction.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="the-influence-of-job-satisfaction-on-employee-organizational-commitment-at-the-bali-regional-development-bank-badung-branch">
    <title>The Influence of Job Satisfaction on Employee Organizational
    Commitment at the Bali Regional Development Bank, Badung
    Branch</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The findings from the third hypothesis test indicate that job
      satisfaction positively and significantly affects organizational
      commitment among employees at the Bali Regional Development Bank,
      Badung Branch. This implies that greater job satisfaction leads to
      higher organizational commitment, while lower satisfaction
      corresponds with reduced commitment. Thus, the third hypothesis is
      supported. Job satisfaction reflects a favorable emotional
      response toward work, and this study finds that employees whose
      jobs align with their skills tend to develop a stronger bond with
      the organization and are less inclined to leave due to a sense of
      duty and attachment.</p>
      <p>In relation to Social Exchange Theory, when employees feel
      treated fairly, experience job satisfaction, and feel
      psychologically and professionally supported, they will
      reciprocate with positive attitudes, such as increased
      organizational commitment. This theory also emphasizes the
      importance of trust and norms of reciprocity, where job
      satisfaction fosters loyalty because employees believe the
      organization has good intentions for their well-being. These
      findings are consistent with studies by Mahalaksmi &amp; Suwandana
      (2024), Nurkama (2023), Nickita (2022), Nahita &amp; Saragih
      (2021), and Martini &amp; Susanto (2021), all of which demonstrate
      that job satisfaction positively and significantly influences
      employee organizational commitment.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  <sec id="the-influence-of-the-work-environment-on-organizational-commitment-with-job-satisfaction-as-a-mediator-for-employees-at-the-bali-regional-development-bank-badung-branch">
    <title>The Influence of the Work Environment on Organizational
    Commitment with Job Satisfaction as a Mediator for Employees at the
    Bali Regional Development Bank, Badung Branch</title>
    <disp-quote>
      <p>The results of the fourth hypothesis test reveal that the work
      environment has a significant impact on organizational commitment,
      with job satisfaction serving as a partial mediator. This implies
      that the work environment influences organizational commitment
      both directly and indirectly through enhanced job satisfaction. As
      such, the fourth hypothesis is confirmed. A supportive and
      positive work environment—characterized by comfort, enthusiasm,
      harmonious relationships among employees, and adequate
      facilities—leads to increased job satisfaction. Employees who are
      satisfied are more inclined to remain with the organization out of
      a sense of loyalty and attachment.</p>
      <p>Social Exchange Theory explains that the relationship between
      employees and organizations is based on reciprocal interactions,
      involving not only material rewards but also emotional and social
      exchanges. A supportive work environment is viewed as an
      organizational investment, which employees respond to with higher
      satisfaction and stronger commitment to the organization. These
      conclusions are reinforced by research from Vigazi and Rino
      (2023), Risyani and Rino (2023), Fahlefi (2023), Anton et al.
      (2023), Kartini</p>
      <p>and Bagus (2021), Martini and Nugroho (2021), as well as Krisna
      and Adnyani (2021), all of them concluded that job satisfaction
      serves as a significant mediating factor in the relationship
      between the work environment and organizational commitment.</p>
    </disp-quote>
  </sec>
  </sec>
</sec>





<sec>
  <title>CONCLUSION</title>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>The research findings allow for the following deductions to be
    made.</p>
  </disp-quote>
  <list list-type="order">
    <list-item>
      <p specific-use="wrapper">
        <disp-quote>
          <p>At the Bali Regional Development Bank, Badung Branch,
          employee organizational commitment is positively and
          significantly impacted by the work environment.</p>
        </disp-quote>
      </p>
    </list-item>
    <list-item>
      <p specific-use="wrapper">
        <disp-quote>
          <p>At the Bali Regional Development Bank, Badung Branch, the
          work environment has a favorable and considerable impact on
          employees' job satisfaction.</p>
        </disp-quote>
      </p>
    </list-item>
    <list-item>
      <p specific-use="wrapper">
        <disp-quote>
          <p>At the Bali Regional Development Bank, Badung Branch,
          employee organizational commitment is positively and
          significantly impacted by job satisfaction.</p>
        </disp-quote>
      </p>
    </list-item>
    <list-item>
      <p specific-use="wrapper">
        <disp-quote>
          <p>At the Bali Regional Development Bank, Badung Branch, job
          satisfaction acts as a partial mediator in the relationship
          between organizational commitment and the work
          environment.</p>
        </disp-quote>
      </p>
    </list-item>
  </list>
</sec>



<sec>
  <title>RECOMMENDATION</title>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>For the Leaders of the Bali Regional Development Bank, Badung
    Branch:</p>
  </disp-quote>
  <list list-type="alpha-lower">
    <list-item>
      <p specific-use="wrapper">
        <disp-quote>
          <p>Work environment: The lowest-ranking statement was &quot;I
          work together to complement each other and help each other in
          completing work.&quot; Leaders are expected to be role models
          in creating mutually supportive cooperation to create a
          conducive work environment, increase employee satisfaction,
          and increase employee commitment.</p>
        </disp-quote>
      </p>
    </list-item>
    <list-item>
      <p specific-use="wrapper">
        <disp-quote>
          <p>Job satisfaction: The lowest-ranking statement was &quot;I
          feel satisfied that the salary I receive is appropriate and
          fair.&quot; Leaders are advised to adjust salaries to workload
          and provide incentives for additional work to make employees
          feel appreciated and more loyal.</p>
        </disp-quote>
      </p>
    </list-item>
    <list-item>
      <p specific-use="wrapper">
        <disp-quote>
          <p>Organizational commitment: The lowest-ranking statement was
          &quot;I feel emotionally attached to the company.&quot;
          Leaders need to foster emotional attachment through attention
          to employee well-being, open communication, and recognition
          for employee contributions.</p>
        </disp-quote>
      </p>
    </list-item>
    <list-item>
      <p specific-use="wrapper">
        <disp-quote>
          <p>The mediating role of job satisfaction: Because job
          satisfaction mediates the relationship between the work
          environment and organizational commitment, leaders need to
          improve aspects that shape job satisfaction, such as fair
          compensation, interpersonal relationships, and career
          development opportunities.</p>
        </disp-quote>
      </p>
    </list-item>
  </list>
</sec>




<sec>
  <title>FURTHER STUDY</title>
  <disp-quote>
    <p>It is recommended to add other variables such as job stress,
    workload, motivation, work-life balance, and leadership style.
    Research should also be expanded to other branches or different
    agencies so that the results are more general and applicable.</p>
  </disp-quote>
</sec>








<sec>
<title>REFERENCES</title>
<ref-list>

<ref id="ref1">
  <element-citation publication-type="book">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Afandi</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Manajemen sumber daya manusia: Teori, konsep, dan indikator</article-title>
    <source>Zanafa Publishing</source>
    <year>2018</year>
    <comment>Riau</comment>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref2">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Ahmad</surname><given-names>S. H. T.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Arilaha</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Soleman</surname><given-names>M. M.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Peran kepuasan kerja dalam memediasi pengaruh budaya organisasi dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Manajemen Sinergi</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <volume>11</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>39</fpage>
    <lpage>61</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref3">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Ahakwa</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Agba Tackie</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Afotey Odai</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Dartey</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>The effects of job autonomy, organizational learning, and work environment on organizational commitment of public sector employees in the Ashanti Region of Ghana</article-title>
    <source>International Journal of Scientific Research and Management</source>
    <year>2021</year>
    <volume>9</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>2099</fpage>
    <lpage>2110</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref4">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Almeida</surname><given-names>V. A. de</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Arif</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Tridayanti</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>The effect of leadership style and work environment on employee performance of BNCTL Branch Banks (Banco Nacional De Comercio De Timor-Leste)</article-title>
    <source>International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Development</source>
    <year>2019</year>
    <volume>3</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref5">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Andriani</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Disman</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Ahman</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Santoso</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Empirical effects of work environment, job satisfaction and work engagement on turnover intention in hospitality industry</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis dan Manajemen</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <volume>9</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>129</fpage>
    <lpage>140</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref6">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Anton</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Karo-karo</surname><given-names>A. P.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Widjaja</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Rezeki</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Martinus</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Analisis lingkungan kerja dan budaya organisasi terhadap komitmen organisasional dengan kepuasan kerja sebagai variabel intervening</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <fpage>191</fpage>
    <lpage>198</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref7">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Brox Arsenio</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh budaya organisasi dan lingkungan kerja terhadap komitmen organisasi melalui kepuasan kerja di PT Solusindo Kreasi Jayatech</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Ilmiah</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <volume>1</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref8">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Burhannudin</surname><given-names>M. Z.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Muhammad</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh disiplin kerja, lingkungan kerja, dan komitmen organisasional terhadap kinerja karyawan</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Maksipreneur</source>
    <year>2019</year>
    <volume>8</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>191</fpage>
    <lpage>206</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref9">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Djastuti</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Analisis pengaruh lingkungan kerja dan budaya organisasi terhadap komitmen organisasional dengan kepuasan kerja sebagai variabel intervening</article-title>
    <source>Diponegoro Journal of Management</source>
    <year>2018</year>
    <volume>7</volume>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <fpage>1</fpage>
    <lpage>14</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref10">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Govinda</surname><given-names>I. W. R.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Mujiati</surname><given-names>N. W.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Peran kepuasan kerja dalam memediasi pengaruh kompensasi terhadap kinerja karyawan UD. Windhu Sari, Gianyar</article-title>
    <source>E-Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Udayana</source>
    <year>2022</year>
    <volume>11</volume>
    <issue>7</issue>
    <fpage>1297</fpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref11">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Gunawan</surname><given-names>I. K. A. P.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Ardana</surname><given-names>I. K.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh job insecurity, budaya organisasi, dan lingkungan kerja terhadap komitmen organisasional</article-title>
    <source>E-Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Udayana</source>
    <year>2020</year>
    <volume>9</volume>
    <issue>5</issue>
    <fpage>1858</fpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref12">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Irma</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Yusuf</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh lingkungan kerja terhadap kepuasan kerja pegawai</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Manajemen</source>
    <year>2020</year>
    <volume>12</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>253</fpage>
    <lpage>258</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref13">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Jasmine</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Endalmen</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh lingkungan kerja terhadap kepuasan kerja dengan motivasi sebagai mediasi</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Manajerial dan Kewirausahaan</source>
    <year>2020</year>
    <volume>2</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>450</fpage>
    <lpage>460</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref14">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Krisna</surname><given-names>G. A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Adnyani</surname><given-names>I. G. A. D.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Kepuasan kerja memediasi pengaruh person-organization fit terhadap komitmen organisasional</article-title>
    <source>E-Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Udayana</source>
    <year>2021</year>
    <volume>10</volume>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <fpage>250</fpage>
    <lpage>269</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref15">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Mahalaksmi</surname><given-names>N. K. C.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Suwandana</surname><given-names>I. G. M.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>The role of job satisfaction in mediating the influence of the work environment on organizational commitment</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Sosial dan Sains</source>
    <year>2024</year>
    <volume>4</volume>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <fpage>208</fpage>
    <lpage>217</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref16">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Madjidu</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Usu</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Yakup</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Analisis lingkungan kerja, budaya organisasi dan semangat kerja dan pengaruhnya terhadap produktivitas kerja pegawai</article-title>
    <source>JESYA (Jurnal Ekonomi dan Ekonomi Syariah)</source>
    <year>2022</year>
    <volume>5</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>444</fpage>
    <lpage>462</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref17">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Martini</surname><given-names>N. N. P.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Susanto</surname><given-names>N. E.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Dampak kompensasi dan lingkungan kerja terhadap komitmen organisasional melalui kepuasan kerja tenaga kebersihan di Universitas Jember</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Indonesia</source>
    <year>2021</year>
    <volume>7</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>34</fpage>
    <lpage>40</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref18">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Meutia</surname><given-names>K. I.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Narpati</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Kontribusi beban kerja dan insentif terhadap kepuasan kerja karyawan</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Forkamma</source>
    <year>2021</year>
    <volume>5</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>42</fpage>
    <lpage>52</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref19">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Yusnita</surname><given-names>N. N.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Sahda</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Irawan</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>The role of job satisfaction on the effect of work environment to the performance of manufacturing company employees</article-title>
    <source>International Journal of Administration, Business &amp; Organization</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <volume>4</volume>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <fpage>9</fpage>
    <lpage>23</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref20">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Nabawi</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh lingkungan kerja, kepuasan kerja dan beban kerja terhadap kinerja pegawai</article-title>
    <source>Maneggio: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Manajemen</source>
    <year>2019</year>
    <volume>2</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>170</fpage>
    <lpage>183</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref21">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Nurkama</surname><given-names>A. H.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh kepuasan kerja terhadap komitmen organisasional pada karyawan kantor pusat PT Hartadinata Abadi Tbk</article-title>
    <source>Cakrawala Repositori IMWI</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <volume>6</volume>
    <issue>6</issue>
    <fpage>2445</fpage>
    <lpage>2453</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref22">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Bala</surname><given-names>T. S. P. N.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Dipoatmodjo</surname><given-names>A. M. A.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Musa</surname><given-names>C. I.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Haeruddin</surname><given-names>M. I. M.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh lingkungan kerja terhadap komitmen organisasional pegawai kantor Badan Kepegawaian dan Pengembangan SDM Kabupaten Luwu Utara</article-title>
    <source>Optimal: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <volume>3</volume>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <fpage>65</fpage>
    <lpage>72</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref23">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Priharti</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Marjati</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Komitmen organisasi dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Manajemen dan Perbankan (JUMPA)</source>
    <year>2022</year>
    <volume>9</volume>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <fpage>45</fpage>
    <lpage>59</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref24">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Rumoning</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh lingkungan kerja, disiplin kerja dan stres kerja terhadap komitmen organisasi dalam meningkatkan kinerja perawat</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis</source>
    <year>2018</year>
    <volume>6</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>958</fpage>
    <lpage>967</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref25">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Sentana</surname><given-names>I. K. A. D.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Surya</surname><given-names>I. B. K.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh kepuasan kerja dan komitmen organisasional terhadap turnover intention</article-title>
    <source>E-Jurnal Manajemen Unud</source>
    <year>2017</year>
    <volume>6</volume>
    <issue>10</issue>
    <fpage>5232</fpage>
    <lpage>5261</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref26">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Sunaris</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Wahyoedi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Tecoalu</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Effects of organizational commitment and organizational justice on organizational citizenship behavior with job satisfaction as a mediation</article-title>
    <source>International Journal of Science, Technology &amp; Management</source>
    <year>2022</year>
    <volume>3</volume>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <fpage>630</fpage>
    <lpage>640</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref27">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Susilo</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Satrya</surname><given-names>I. G. B. H.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh kepuasan kerja terhadap turnover intention yang dimediasi oleh komitmen organisasional</article-title>
    <source>E-Jurnal Manajemen</source>
    <year>2019</year>
    <volume>8</volume>
    <issue>6</issue>
    <fpage>3700</fpage>
    <lpage>3729</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref28">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Suryaputra</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Impact analysis of work environment mediated by job satisfaction on employee performance</article-title>
    <source>International Journal of Current Science Research and Review</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <volume>6</volume>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <fpage>2612</fpage>
    <lpage>2631</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref29">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Vigazi</surname><given-names>N. D.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Rino</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Pengaruh perceived organizational support terhadap komitmen organisasional dengan kepuasan kerja sebagai variabel mediasi</article-title>
    <source>Jurnal Salingka Nagari</source>
    <year>2023</year>
    <volume>2</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>501</fpage>
    <lpage>509</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="ref30">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name><surname>Widhari</surname><given-names>N. L. P. P.</given-names></name>
      <name><surname>Ardana</surname><given-names>I. K.</given-names></name>
    </person-group>
    <article-title>Komitmen organisasional memediasi pengaruh persepsi dukungan organisasi terhadap retensi karyawan</article-title>
    <source>E-Jurnal Manajemen</source>
    <year>2021</year>
    <volume>10</volume>
    <issue>9</issue>
    <fpage>887</fpage>
    <lpage>906</lpage>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

</ref-list>
</sec>
</body>
</article>
