IJAR Indonesian Journal of Advanced Research 2986-0768 Formosa Publisher 10.55927/ijar.v4i8.15158 Performance Index Analysis of Irrigation Areas Using E-PAKSI Software for Sustainable Maintenance in West Java Region Assyabill Bramudya Gusti Department of Civil Engineering, University of Swadaya Gunung Jati, Cirebon, Indonesia bramudyagustii@gmail.com Maulana Rahmat Department of Civil Engineering, University of Swadaya Gunung Jati, Cirebon, Indonesia Mulyono Heri Department of Civil Engineering, University of Swadaya Gunung Jati, Cirebon, Indonesia Winasis Akbar Department of Civil Engineering, University of Swadaya Gunung Jati, Cirebon, Indonesia 21 08 2025 05 07 2025 19 07 2025 21 08 2025 4 8 1857 1876

This study analyzed the performance of the Seuseupan Irrigation Area in Cirebon Regency using the E-PAKSI application. The research employed a descriptive-qualitative method with both primary and secondary data collection. The results revealed a combined main and tertiary irrigation system performance index of 57.62%, which falls into the underperformance category. Water discharge analysis indicated sufficient supply for the rice-rice cropping pattern across the 1,347-hectare service area. However, institutional aspects and personnel were found to be non-compliant with regulations. Furthermore, there was a significant increase in maintenance costs (AKNOP), rising from Rp2.31 billion in 2022 to Rp22.33 billion in 2024. This highlights the critical need for serious attention to the management of irrigation assets and infrastructure in the region.

 Irrigation E-PAKSI Irrigation Performance Index Institutional AKNOP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. INTRODUCTION

Indonesia is a tropical country that experiences two seasons, namely the rainy and dry seasons. This seasonal difference causes the availability of water to be uneven throughout the year, so a good water management system, such as sediments and irrigation networks, is needed to support agricultural needs. Irrigation areas are key in maintaining food security, especially in agricultural areas such as West Java.

However, many irrigation networks have decreased in function due to damage and lack of maintenance. So far, the evaluation of the performance of irrigation areas is done manually and is not integrated, resulting in less accurate decision making. To overcome this, the Ministry of PUPR developed the E-PAKSI application which is to facilitate the number of assets and calculate the performance index of irrigation networks in the field.

Seuseupan irrigation area in Cirebon Regency is one of the important agricultural areas with a service area of approximately 3,897 Hectares which gets water supply from the Cijurei river through the Seuseupan Dam. Despite having great potential, the effectiveness of irrigation in this area has decreased due to lack of maintenance and the absence of data-based performance evaluation.

This research aims to analyze the performance of the Seuseupan irrigation area using the E-PAKSI application, as a basis for formulating a more effective and sustainable maintenance strategy. The results are expected to be a policy recommendation for irrigation management that is adaptive to climate change and supports agricultural improvement.

 LITERATURE REVIEW Irrigation

According to the Minister of Public Works Regulation No.12/PRT/M/2015, it is mentioned about the regulation of exploitation and maintenance of irrigation networks. The purpose is to regulate the management of irrigation networks by the central, provincial and district / city governments so that the operation and maintenance of irrigation networks can run effectively and efficiently in supporting agricultural activities,

Other sources such as the book Irrigation Planning Standards Planning Criteria section 1-6 as an irrigation planning guidebook and Handout Juklak- Juknis Management of Assets and Performance of Irrigation Systems (PAKSI) as a basic guide to complete the author's research. as well as other sources such as Civil Engineering journals.

 E-PAKSI

E-PAKSI is an evaluation method or system used to assess the performance of irrigation networks based on various technical and non-technical parameters. The goal is to determine the extent to which the irrigation system is able to meet irrigation water needs efficiently, sustainably, and in accordance with its planning design.

 Irrigation Operation and Maintenance

According to the Minister of Public Works and Public Housing (PUPR) Regulation on Operation and Maintenance of Irrigation Networks, especially those related to pond irrigation (Permen PUPR No. 16 of 2011 and Permen PUPR No. 21 of 2015), regulates the guidelines, implementation, and community participation in irrigation network management.

Main Contents of PUPR Regulations Related to Operation and Maintenance of Irrigation Networks:

 Operation and Maintenance Guidelines:

This regulation establishes guidelines for the operation and maintenance of irrigation networks, including pond irrigation, which includes:

Operation: Regulation of water irrigation, including the opening and closing of building doors, preparation of cropping plans, air sharing, and monitoring and evaluation.

Maintenance: Efforts to maintain and secure irrigation networks to function properly, including maintenance, repair, prevention, and security.

Community Participation: Involving farmers in the operation and maintenance of irrigation networks, usually through the Association of Water User Farmers (P3A), P3A Association (GP3A), or P3A Inspection (IP3A).

Monitoring and Evaluation: supervising and assessing the implementation of operation and maintenance to ensure its effectiveness.

Institution and Organization: regulates the organizational and institutional structure responsible for operation and maintenance.

Financing: regulates the sources of financing for operation and maintenance activities, which can come from the government, local government, or non-governmental organizations.

 Preparation of an Operation and Maintenance Manual:

This regulation mandates the preparation of an Operation and Maintenance Manual for Pond Irrigation Networks as a reference in the implementation of activities.

 Community Involvement:

This regulation emphasizes the importance of community participation, especially farmers, in irrigation management. The community can play an active role in operation and maintenance, and report any violations.

 Irrigation Network Boundary Line:

This regulation also regulates the boundary line of the irrigation network to maintain the function of the network from surrounding activities.

 Authority:

This regulation explains the authority of the central government, provincial regions, and districts / cities in managing irrigation networks based on the size of the irrigation area,

 Air Supply:

This regulation regulates the use of air for various needs, including basic daily needs and smallholder agriculture, with certain provisions.

 METHODOLOGY

This research uses descriptive-inductive qualitative methods, in solving problems, this research seeks to describe the performance of the irrigation system in depth and explain the relationship between the various aspects studied based on the data, as for the steps of the method used:

Primary and secondary data collection from relevant agencies to complete the research data needs.

Literature study through books and media as a theoretical basis and literature review.

Processing and analysis of the data collected, as well as conclusions and suggestions for the study results.

 Flowchart

Figure 1. Research Flowchart

 Data Collection Method

Primary Data

In this study, the data collected by researchers through several techniques as follows:

Observation

Researchers observed the condition of the building and channel functions of the Seuseupan bending irrigation area. The results of the observation are:

The area irrigated by the Seuseupan Weir is 3,897 Ha.

Documentation

Photographs of bending and existing channels in Seuseupan bending (pictures are in the appendix)

Interview

Researchers conducted unstructured interviews with local PU irrigation employees.

Secondary Data

Secondary data is a research data source obtained by researchers indirectly through intermediary media (obtained and recorded by other parties). (Yuniati, 2021)

In this study, secondary data was obtained from existing data at BBWS CIMANCIS, including

Real Operational Needs Number (AKNOP)

Global Cropping Plan (RTTG)

Seuseupan Dam Irrigation Network Scheme

Seuseupan D.I Field Management Personnel

Seuseupan Weir Building Scheme

 Analysis Techniques

The methods used in the preparation of this scientific work are as follows:

Discharge & Cropping Pattern Analysis

The analysis of discharge and cropping patterns aims to match the availability of irrigation water with crop needs. Discharge is calculated based on hydrological data to determine the potential water supply. The cropping pattern is prepared by considering the amount of discharge, land area, and type of crop so that irrigation runs efficiently and sustainably.

Institutional Analysis

Referring to the Regulation of the Minister of Public Works No. 32/PRT/M/2007 the need for Operation & Maintenance personnel are:

Head of Branch/ Observer/UPTD/Branch Office/Corwil 1 person + 5 staff per 5,000 - 7,500 Ha.

Mantri/ Irrigation Officer: 1 person per 750 - 1,500 Ha.

Weir Operation Officer: 1 person per bending, may add some work for large bending.

Sluice Gate Officer: 1 person per 3-5 tapping buildings and dividing buildings on a channel 2 - 3 km away or 150 - 500 Ha service area

Channel worker/worker: 1 person per 2 - 3 km length of channel

E-PAKSI Application Index Analysis

Table 1. Flowchart of Irrigation System Performance Assessment Especially regarding surface irrigation, the irrigation system performance

assessment activities refer to Permen PUPR No. 12/PRT/M/2015 concerning Exploitation and Maintenance of Irrigation Networks. The purpose of the irrigation system performance assessment activities is as a reference for the Central Government, Provincial Government, Regency / City Government in carrying out irrigation system performance assessment activities. As for tidal swamp and lebak irrigation, it can refer to Permen PUPR No. 11/PRT/M/2015 and Permen PUPR No. 16/PRT/M/2015 or other related regulations.

Furthermore, the purpose of the irrigation system performance assessment activities based on Permen PUPR No. 12 / PRT / 2015 is to determine the condition of irrigation system performance which includes i) physical infrastructure, ii) crop productivity, iii) supporting facilities, iv) personnel organization, v) documentation, and vi) P3A institutional conditions. Related to IKSI can be seen in the Technical Guidelines on IKSI.

 Assessment Weight of Main Irrigation Indicators

Table 2. Assessment Weight of Main Irrigation Indicators

No.

Component

Weight (%)

1.

Physical Infrastructure

5

2.

Planting Productivity

15

3.

Supporting Facilities

10

4.

Personnel Organization

15

5.

Documentation

5

6.

P3A/GP3A/IP3A Institutionalization

10
Tertiary Irrigation Indicator Assessment Weight

Table 3. Weighted Assessment of Tertiary Irrigation Indicators

No.

Component

Weight (%)

1.

Physical Infrastructure

25

2.

Planting Productivity

15

3.

Supporting Facilities

20

4.

Personnel Organization

15

5.

Documentation

5

6.

P3A/GP3A/IP3A Institution

20

Example of Calculation of Existing Condition Value:

 Existing condition value of the lighthouse

(Average 1x60 condition)+ (Average 2x10 condition)+ (Average 3x10 condition)+ (Average 4x20 condition)

= (85x60%)+(85x10%)+(85x10%)+(70x20%) = 82

 AKNOP (Real Needs of Operation and Maintenance)

The Real Cost of Operation and Maintenance (AKNOP) is an estimate of the real costs required to support the operation and maintenance of irrigation networks, based on the results of the inventory of damage to facilities and infrastructure in the field and determined through deliberation (KEPMEN KIMPRASWIL No. 529/KPTS/M/2001).

Irrigation operations include water distribution arrangements, preparation of cropping plans, group system, water distribution, as well as building calibration and data evaluation. While maintenance aims to maintain the function of the irrigation network to remain optimal and sustainable.

The preparation of AKNOP is the basis for an effective and efficient OP (Operation and Maintenance) budgeting system, as stipulated in Permen PU No. 32/PRT/M/2007. Every proposal for OP financing must be based on AKNOP, which is prepared through a direct survey to the field by recording the physical condition of the network in detail. Factors taken into account include the condition of buildings and channels (good, lightly damaged, moderately damaged), channel length, number of personnel, and equipment required.

 RESEARCH RESULT General Description

Seuseupan irrigation area has a functional area of 3,897 Ha and has a jurey main channel and several sub-ducts that irrigate several villages in Cirebon district. The following is the length of the channel in D.I Seuseupan:

Table 4. Seuseupan Irrigation Channel

No.

Channel Name

Channel Length (km)

1

Jurey Main Channel

5.353

2

Sumurkondang Secondary Channel

3.540

3

Karangsuwung Secondary Channel

4.364

4

Nagrak Secondary Channel

9.545

5

Sindang Laut Secondary Channel

6.079

6

Dam Secondary Channel

3.238

7

Getrakmoyan Secondary Channel

0.424

8

Tambelang Secondary Channel

0.996

Here is the channel map and the Seuseupan D.I. Map

Figure 2. Map of Seuseupan Irrigation Canal

Figure 3. Map of Seuseupan Irrigation Area

 Analysis of Discharge and Cropping Pattern

Analysis of discharge and cropping patterns is used to develop an optimal cropping plan based on the availability of irrigation water and crop water requirements. It aims to achieve water use efficiency, minimize crop failure, and increase agricultural productivity. The following are the results and tables of discharge analysis and cropping patterns.

Figure 4. Graph of Maintained Discharge

 Cropping pattern

The following are cropping patterns and discharge requirements in D.I Seuseupan,

Figure 5. Planting pattern

Figure 6. Water Balance Chart

From the results of the analysis of discharge and cropping patterns, it can be concluded that the mainstay discharge is greater than the discharge needs and the cropping pattern used is rice-paddy-crops with a total area planted around 1,347 Ha. Thus the need for water for cropping patterns in the Seuseupan Dam Irrigation Area is sufficient.

 <inline-graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="vertopal_ed467b22ee6046b895daa7e8c2d00cd7/media/image100.jpeg" />Institutional Analysis

Figure 7. Institutionalization

From the results of institutional analysis where there is a lack of workers in D.I Seuseupan, indicating that the institution is not in accordance with the relevant candy.

E-PAKSI Application Index Analysis

Main Irrigation System Performance Index

Table 6. Main Irrigation System Performance Index
Description Weight Final (%) Value Part (%) Condition Index (%)
Existing Maximum
I. PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
1. Main Building 30,06 100 66,8 45
a. Building Body 10,36 100 79,69 13
* Lighthouse 4,16 100 83,2 5
* Wings 0,82 20 82 1
* Weir Floor 0,64 15 85 0,75
* Upstream and downstream cover embankments 0,88 20 85 1
* Bridge (above lighthouse/service) 0,79 20 79 1
* Operation Board 0,21 5 85 0,25
* Measuring Meter 0,45 100 85 0,5
* Safety fence 0,21 5 85 0,25
* Doors and gates are operable 0,21 5 85 0,25
* Retrieval Door 6,2 100 77,5 8
* Weir Drain Door 3,4 50 85 4
2. Carrier Channel 2,8 50 70 4
a. The capacity of each channel is sufficient to carry the maximum required/planned discharge 7,75 100 77,47 10
b. Embankment height is sufficient to avoid overflow at all times during operation 3,98 50 79,7 5
c. All channel improvements have been completed 1,54 20 76,93 2
i. Buildings on the carrier channel 2,22 30 74,11 3
* Regulatory buildings (divider/tapping, divider/tapping) complete and functioning 5,16 100 57,36 9
* Every time and every regulating building on all main and secondary channels 1,2 100 60,07 2
* At each tertiary tapping 0,6 50 60,62 1
d. Discharge measurement can be done according to the DI operation plan 0,6 50 50,52 1
* At the intake building (weir/intake) 1,06 100 42,23 2,5
* At each regulating building (dividing/dividing tapping/tapping) 0 40 0 1
* At each tertiary tapping 0,52 30 69,5 0,75
e. Complementary buildings are functional and complete 0,53 50 71,29 0,75
* On the main channel of the secondary 1,38 100 60,01 2
* In syphon buildings, culverts, bridges, gutters, cross-drains there is no blockage 1,5 40 62,02 0,8
f. All repairs have been completed 0,88 60 75,68 1,2
* Repair of regulating building (dividing/tapping) 1,55 100 61,01 2,5
* Measuring tools, liner scales and water level marks 0,81 50 64,82 1,25
* Operation board 0,25 15 67 0,38
* Ancillary Buildings 0,21 20 42,93 0,5
i. Sewer and its buildings 0,25 15 66,93 0,38
a. All sewers and their structures have been constructed and are listed in the maintenance list and have been repaired and are functional 0 100 0 4
b. No flooding problems 0 30 0 3
i. Driveway/inspection 0 10 0 1
a. The entrance to the main building is in good condition 3,17 100 79,34 4
b. Inspection roads and footpaths along the channel have been repaired 1,7 50 85 2
c. Driveway/channel that is maintained can be reached easily 0,7 25 77,14 1
h. Office, Housing and Warehouse 0,77 25 77,14 1
a. Office is adequate for 3,62 100 72,36 5
* Branches/observers/UPTD/(at the level of PSDA Center/UPT/Cab Pli Kab/Kota) 0,85 50 85 1
* Mantri/Juru (at the level of PSDA Center/UPT/Irrigation Mantri) 0,85 50 85 1
b. Adequate housing for: 0,26 50 52,5 0,5
* Branch/observer/UPTD/(at the level of PSDA Center/UPT/Cab Pli Kab/Kota) 0,52 100 51,8 1
* Mantri/Juru (at the level of PSDA Center/UPT/Irrigation Mantri) 0,26 50 51,1 0,5
c. Warehouse adequate for: 0,26 50 52,5 0,5
* Branch/observer/UPTD office 1,4 100 70 2
* Main building (BD) 0,7 50 70 1
* Scotch beams and other built-up fixtures 0,35 25 70 0,5
II. PLANTING PRODUCTIVITY (previous year)
a. Water demand fulfillment (K factor) 12,83 100 85,32 15
b. Realization of planting area 9 100 100 9
Functional Area (Ha) 1,87 100 46,74 4
III. SUPPORTING FACILITIES
a. O&P equipment 3,64 100 36,4 10
* Basic tools for routine maintenance 1,54 100 33,5 4
* Personnel equipment for operation 1,6 50 30 2
* Heavy equipment for mud removal and heavy maintenance 0,29 12,88 58 0,5
b. Transportation 0,45 37,85 30 1,5
* Branch/observer/UPTD (motorcycle) 0,7 100 35 2
* Mantri/Juru (motorcycle) 0,7 100 35 2
* DPA (motorcycle) 0,25 25 50 0,5
c. Office equipment Branch/observer/UPTD 0,15 25 30 0,5
* Basic office furniture 1 100 50 2
* Office equipment (computer and printer) 0,5 50 50 1
d. Communication equipment 0,5 50 50 1
* Adequate communication network for O&P staff/Juru/UPTD-Balai PSDA-Bag Pd Activities 0,6 100 30 2
IV. PERSONNEL ORGANIZATION
a. O&P organization has been developed with clear boundaries of responsibilities and duties: 9,28 100 62,53 15
* Branch/observer/UPTD 3,18 100 63,6 5
* Mantri/Juru 2,18 40 54 2
* PPA 1,4 40 70 2
* PPA 0,7 20 70 1
b. Personnel 6,2 100 62 10
* Quantity/Number according to needs 2,8 100 62 10
* Branch/observer/UPTD 0,7 25 70 4
* Mantri/Juru 0,7 25 70 1
* PPA 1,4 50 70 2
* 70% Public Employee PPA (if >= 20% isolated part 100%) 0,6 100 30 2
c. All have understood O&P 2,8 100 70 4
* Mantri/Juru 0,7 25 70 1
* PPA 1,4 50 70 2
V. DOCUMENTATION
a. DI data book 2,7 100 54 5
b. Maps and pictures 1,4 100 70 2
* Wall data in the office 1,5 100 43,33 3
* Picture of the journalist 0,5 50 30 1
* Diagrams, building schematics and overview maps 0,5 50 30 1
VI. WATER USER FARMERS ASSOCIATION (GP3A/IP3A)
a. Total village GP3A = 25 Bh 3 100 30 10
b. Number of GP3A = 0 Bh
c. Total IP3A = 0 Bh
Total b+c = 0 Bh
a. GP3A/IP3A has legal entity 0,45 15 30 1,5
b. Institutional condition of GP3A/IP3A 0,15 5 30 0,5
* Developing -100%
* Moderately developed -60%
* Not yet developed -30%
c. GP3A/IP3A meeting with Mantri/observer/UPTD 0,6 20 3 2
* Once every 1/3 month -100%
* Once a month -60%
* Exists Irregularly -40%
* None -0%
d. GP3A/IP3A actively participating in survey/tracking 0,3 10 30 1
e. GP3A/IP3A participation in network repair and natural disaster management 0,6 20 30 2
f. GP3A/IP3A dues are used for network improvements 0,6 20 30 2
g. Participation of GP3A/IP3A in the planning of Water Allocation and Planting System 0,3 10 30 1
TOTAL (1+2+3+4+5+6) 62,6 100

To get the final weight, the existing index value is multiplied by the maximum index value divided by the section value.

Example:

Physical Infrastructure existing condition index value 66.8× Maximum condition index 45 / Value part 100 then,

The final weight of the Physical Infrastructure Performance of the Main Irrigation System is

66,8 × 45

100 = 30,06

Furthermore, the sum of points 1+2+3+4+5+6+7, then the final weight value is 61.61% of 100%.

c. Tertiary Irrigation System Performance Index

Table 7. Performance Index of Tertiary Irrigation System
Description Final Weight (%) Part Value (%) Condition Index (%)
Existing Maximum
I. PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
1 Carrier Channel 10,57 100 42,3 25
1. Shape, Dimension, Elevation, and Capacity of each channel is sufficient 6,81 100 47,2 14
to carry the maximum demand / Plan discharge 3,48 50 49,75 7
2. Embankment height is sufficient to avoid any overflow when during operation. 1,33 20 47,58 2,8
3. Carrier Channel Condition 1,37 20 49,06 2,8
4. Channel Density Level 0,42 10 30 1,4
2. Buildings on the carrier channel 3,97 100 49,57 8
1. Regulatory Building (Tertiary Box/Kwarter) complete and functioning 0,85 100 42,5 2
a. At each sub tertiary and kwarter tapping. 0,85 50 42,5 1
b. Building Density in Tertiary (tertiary, kwarter, supplementary boxes) 0 50 0 1
2. Discharge measurement can be done as per DI operation plan 0,7 100 34,75 2
a. At each control building (Tertiary Box) 0,7 50 69,5 1
b. At each control building (Kwarter Box) 0 50 0 1
3. Complementary Buildings are functional and complete 0,94 100 46,86 2
a. In Tertiary and Sub Tertiary channels 1,36 40 44,88 0,8
b. At the syphon building, (org) culverts, bridges, gutters, cross-drain no blockage occurs 0,49 40 61,67 0,8
c. Farm Road 0 10 0 0,2
d. Meeting House 0,09 5 85 0,1
e. Waste security 0 5 0 0,1
4. Building Condition 1,48 100 74,18 2
a. Improvement of regulating building (Tertiary/Charter Box) 0,56 40 70 0,8
b. Measuring meter, liter scale and water level mark 1,26 15 85 0,3
c. Operation Board 1,26 15 85 0,3
d. Ancillary buildings 1,26 15 52,88 0,3
e. Improvement of farm road, meeting house garbage safety 1,26 15 85 0,3
II. CROP PRODUCTIVITY (Previous year)
1. Fulfillment of water needs at the tapping gate (k factor) 12,69 100 84,62 15
2. Realization of planting area 8,54 100 94,87 9
Functional Area (Ha) 2,22 100 55,62 4
5. Rice Productivity
Average rice productivity (tons/ha) 1,93 100 96,43 2
Existing rice productivity (tons/ha)
Productivity Percentage rice = (b)/(a)x100%
III. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
1. Bobolan (illegal collection) from main, secondary and tertiary channels 6 100 30 20
2. Water Distribution Shifts at Small Discharge Times 3,8 60 50 6
3. Tertiary Channel Clearing 3,2 40 50 4
4. O&P Support Equipment 3,8 60 50 6
5. O&P Support Equipment 3,2 40 50 4
IV. WATER DISTRIBUTION OFFICER/PERSONNEL ORGANIZATION
1. Ulu-ulu / P3A technical officer available 4,5 100 30 15
2. Ulu-ulu / P3A technical officers have been trained 2,8 40 50 6
3. Ulu-ulu / P3A technical officers often communicate with Farmers and Handymen 1,35 50 30 4,5
4. P3A actively conducts network surveys/tracing 1,35 50 30 4,5
V. DOCUMENTATION
1. Tertiary Plots Data Book 1,5 100 30 5
2. Maps and pictures 0,6 40 50 2
VI. WATER USER FARMERS ASSOCIATION (P3A)
A. Number of Village P3A = 75 Bh 6,38 100 31,90 20
1. P3A is already a legal entity 0,63 10 31,54 2
2. P3A Institutional Condition 0,97 15 32,46 3
- Developing -100%
- Moderately developed -60%
- Not yet developed -40%
- Not yet established -0%
3. Ulu Ulu / P3A Village Meeting with Apprentice/Mantri/Agricultural Extension Worker 0,63 10 31,54 2
- Once every 1/2 month -100%
- once a month -60%
- irregularly present -40%
- None -0%
4. P3A actively conducts network surveys/tracing 0,95 15 31,54 3
5. P3A members' participation in network repair and handling of Natural Disasters. 0,95 15 31,54 3
6. P3A member compliance with dues is used for tertiary network management 0,64 10 32,05 2
7. Functional ability and coordination of P3A in cropping planning and water allocation 0,96 15 32,05 3
8. P3A involvement in Monitoring and Evaluation 0,65 10 32,56 2
TOTAL (I to VI) 41,65 100

To get the final weight, the existing index value is multiplied by the maximum index value divided by the section value.

Example:

Physical Infrastructure existing condition index value is 42.3 × Maximum condition index is 25 / Value of the section is 100 then,

The final weight of the performance of Physical Infrastructure of Tertiary Irrigation System is

42,3 × 25

100 = 10,57

Furthermore, the sum of points I+II+III+IV+V, then the final weight value is 41.65% of 100%.

 Combined Irrigation System Performance Index

Table 8. Combined Irrigation System Performance Index
Main Irrigation System Tertiary Irrigation System Total value
No Component Existing Condition Index Weight (80%) No Component Existing Condition Index Weight (20%)
1 Physical Infrastructure 30,06 24,05 1 Physical Infrastructure 10,57 2,11 26,16
2 Planting Productivity 12,83 10,26 2 Planted Productivity 12,69 2,54 12,8
3 Supporting Facilities 3,64 2,91 3 O&P Condition 6 1,2 4,11
4 Personnel Organization 9,38 7,5 4 Water Distribution Officer 4,5 0,9 8,4
5 Documentation 2,7 2,16 5 Documentation 1,5 0,3 2,46
6 P3A/GP3A/IP3A 3 2,4 6 P3A 6,38 1,28 3,68
TOTAL 61,61 49,29 TOTAL 41,65 8,33 57,62

From the results of the analysis of the performance index of the irrigation system using E-PAKSI, the results obtained are 57.62% and based on the assessment of criteria and weights of irrigation system performance assessment with a bobo value of 55-69% is included in the category of poor performance and needs attention.

 Number of Real and Operational Needs (AKNOP)

The following is a comparison of the 3-year AKNOP DI Seuseupan Table 9. Aknop Year 2022 - 2024
NO YEAR OPERATION MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT AMOUNT
1 2022 277.923.000 838.101.660 1.198.959.600 2.314.984.260
2 2023 83.580.600 3.981.181.604 1.812.576.500 5.877.338.000
3 2024 84.546.600 20.434.234.904 1.812.576.500 22.331.358.004

Figure 8. Comparison Chart of Aknop Year 2022 - 2024

Based on the data above, it is known that the maintenance budget increases in 2024, so it can be said that the maintenance budget is not good.

 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Based on data processing and field results using E-PAKSI, the condition of irrigation assets in D.I Seuseupan Cirebon Regency is stated in the 55-69% weight, which is less performance and needs attention. In some aspects such as the main building, the average inspection road is in good to moderately damaged condition. However, the tertiary and secondary channels are severely damaged. The results of the irrigation network performance index assessment at D.I Seuseupan Cirebon Regency using E-PAKSI amounted to 57.62%, indicating that

D.I Seusepan DI Cirebon Regency needs maintenance and rehabilitation, because it is included in the category of Less Performance Needs Attention.

The estimated cost required for rehabilitation or maintenance is the largest in 2024, which is at Rp. 22,331,358,004 there is an increase in maintenance costs, in 2022 it was at Rp. 2,314,984,260 and 2023 was at Rp. 5,877,338,000, the price jumped in 2024 in addition to the increasing volume of damage due also to a fairly high AHSP increase.

 ADVANCED RESEARCH

This study focuses on a limited comparative analysis of several irrigation areas in West Java, leaving key areas for future research:

Enhanced Performance Model Validation: Future work should perform a more comprehensive validation of the E-PAKSI performance model by integrating real-time field data. This includes digitally recorded information on water discharge, sedimentation rates, and physical infrastructure conditions to allow for more accurate model calibration and validation.

Predictive Factor Analysis: Further research is needed to develop a predictive model for future maintenance needs. This analysis should involve integrating E-PAKSI performance data with geospatial data (e.g., satellite imagery, topographic maps, rainfall data) using machine learning techniques. This would help identify the most vulnerable areas and prioritize budget allocation proactively.

Integrated Impact Assessment: Future studies should incorporate environmental (e.g., water use efficiency) and economic analyses (e.g., increased agricultural productivity and farmer profitability) of maintenance interventions. This would provide a more holistic view of the benefits of the proposed maintenance strategies.

 REFERENCES AryantoL. Analysis of Irrigation Network Performance at the Secondary Channel Water Gate of Bekri Irrigation Area, Central Lampung Regency Teknika Sains: Journal of Engineering Science 2019 4 1 25 32 CholikA. SeptyanR. B. WinataH. NurdiyantoN. Analysis of the utilization of Seuseupan Weir water for irrigation in the Seuseupan Irrigation Area (Case study: Seuseupan Weir, Cirebon Regency) Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science 2025 4 4 279 288 Directorate General of Water Resources, Ministry of Public Works and Housing Handout Juklak - Juknis Pengelolaan Aset dan Kinerja Sistem Irigasi (PAKSI) 2019 Ministry of Public Works and Housing Regulation of the Minister of Public Works and Public Housing Number 21/PRT/M/2015 on Guidelines for Changing the Status, Function, and Optimizing the Utilization of Irrigation Assets, Swamps, and Other Irrigation Networks 2015 Jakarta Ministry of Public Works Regulation of the Minister of Public Works Number 16 of 2011 on Guidelines for Operation and Maintenance of Pond Irrigation Networks 2011 Jakarta NorA. S. WahyuniS. PrasetyoriniL. Assessment of Physical Performance Index of Irrigation Network of Bangkok Irrigation Area, Kediri Regency by Using ePAKSI Journal of Technology and Engineering of Water Resources 2022 3 1 137 145 NovatriantoF. AnwarS. PrasetyoA. Performance Analysis of Irrigation Area at Sokawati Dam on Comal River Journal of Construction and Infrastructure 2020 9 1 PermadiR. D. AnwarS. PurnomoS. E. Performance Analysis of Sudikampir Weir Irrigation System in Pekalongan Regency Journal of Construction and Infrastructure 2019 8 3 PratamaA. B. WahyuniS. FidariJ. S. E-PAKSI Journal of Water Resources Technology and Engineering 2022 2 2 376 386 PurbawaG. B. PandawaniN. P. WiswastaI. G. N. A. VipriyantiN. U. Analysis of Irrigation Network Performance of Padangkeling Irrigation Area Based on Epaction in Buleleng Regency Journal of ENMAP (Environment and Mapping) 2022 3 1 1 9 RAKYAT, Ministry of Public Works and Housing of the Republic of Indonesia Regulation of the Minister of Public Works and Housing of the Republic of Indonesia Number 10 of 2021 concerning Guidelines for Construction Safety Management Systems 2021 RestikaP. e-PAKSI-Based Asset Management Priority Determination Model in Way Sekampung Irrigation Region Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Lampung 2023 RetraubunN. JosephC. SoselisaP. Real Needs Operation and Maintenance (AKNOP) of Damage to Upe/Nuruwe Village Beach, West Seram Manumata: Journal of Engineering Science 2020 6 1 24 31 Directorate General of Public Works Irrigation Planning Standards: Irrigation Network Planning Criteria (KP-01) 1986 VishnuA. M. Implementation of the Regulations of the Minister of Public Works and Housing of the Republic of Indonesia Number/PRT/M/The Certificate of Functional Function of Buildings Perspective of Fiqih Siyasah (Study at the Metro City Public Works and Spatial Planning Office) Doctoral dissertation, UIN Raden Intan Lampung 2023