Creativity and Innovation in Philosophy Learning: A Literature Study

Otto Mart  Andreas; Danny Philipe  Bukidz

doi:10.55927/ijar.v2i4.3783

Authors

Otto Mart Andreas UPH Kampus Medan
Danny Philipe Bukidz UPH Kampus Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ijar.v2i4.3783

Abstract

This research is a literature study that aims to dig up information related to creativity and innovation in teaching philosophy. Philosophy is a scientific discipline that requires critical and creative thinking, but teaching philosophy often feels monotonous and boring for some students. Therefore, this research wants to find various creative and innovative strategies that can be applied in teaching philosophy to make it more attractive and motivating for students. The method used in this research is literature study by collecting and analyzing various journal articles, books, and information sources related to creativity and innovation in teaching philosophy. The results of this study are expected to contribute to the development of more creative and innovative philosophy teaching strategies and to motivate students to learn philosophy better.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25.

Biddiscombe, M. F., & Usmani, O. S. (2018). Is there room for further innovation in inhaled therapy for airways disease? Breathe, 14(3), 216–224.

Didaktik, N. (2009). Creativity in the Philosophy Class . Concrete Research Creativity in the Philosophy Class . Concrete Research Dr .

Monica Diaconu Babe ş -Bolyai-University Cluj-Napoca Preliminary statements The preoccupation for creativity in the Dialogical Praxis contex. https://doi.org/10.25656/01

Entwistle, N. J. (2013). Styles of learning and teaching: An integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers and lecturers. Routledge.

Feldhaus, L., Primavera, J., & Kleibl, A. (2018). Design Thinking und Schule–Das Handbuch für den Schulalltag. HOPP Foundation for Computer Literacy & Informatics GGmbH (Hrsg.), Design Thinking Und Schule. Das Handbuch Für Den Schulalltag. Weinheim.

Furinghetti, F., & Pehkonen, E. (2002). Rethinking characterizations of beliefs. Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education?, 39–57.

Hennessy, S., & Davies, M. (2019). Teacher professional development to support classroom dialogue: Challenges and promises. In The Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education (pp. 238–253). Routledge.

Hochstetter, G. (2022). The Significance of Creativity for Teaching Philosophy. Journal of Didactics of Philosophy, 6(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.46586/jdph.2022.9702

Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (2019). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press.

Kenett, Y., Baker, B., Hills, T., Hart, Y., & Beaty, R. (2021). Creative foraging: examining relations between foraging styles, semantic memory structure, and creative thinking. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 43(43).

Kozbelt, A. (2019). Evolutionary approaches to creativity. The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, 109–131.

Lee, D. (2018). Design thinking in the classroom: Easy-to-use teaching tools to foster creativity, encourage innovation and unleash potential in every student. Simon and Schuster.

Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2008). Teachers’ views on factors affecting effective integration of information technology in the classroom: Developmental scenery. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2), 233–263.

Mardiana, M., Isa, Y., & Ningsih, S. (2020). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Interaktif pada Mata Kuliah Filsafat Pendidikan. JKTP: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 3(2), 138–148. https://doi.org/10.17977/um038v3i22020p138

Muhlisin, M. (2021). Inovasi Metode Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah Filsafat Pendidikan Islam Menggunakan Metode PAINEM. Ijmus, 2(2), 12–21. http://ijmus.muhammadiyahsalatiga.org/index.php/ijmus/article/view/28

Nopiyanto, Y. E., & Raibowo, S. (2020). Penerapan model pembelajaran Jigsaw untuk meningkatkan motivasi dan hasil belajar mahasiswa penjas pada mata kuliah filsafat penjas dan olahraga. Journal Of Sport Education (JOPE), 2(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.31258/jope.2.2.61-69

Seymour-Walsh, A. E. (2019). Theory of Learning BT - Foundations for Paramedic Education (A. E. Seymour-Walsh (ed.); pp. 11–30). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26792-6_2

Starko, A. J. (2013). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight. Routledge.

Suyitno, H., & Rochmad, R. (2015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Filsafat Matematika melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD dengan Strategi Berbasis Kompetensi dan Konservasi. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 6(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v6i2.4981

Westwood, R., & Low, D. R. (2003). The multicultural muse: Culture, creativity and innovation. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3(2), 235–259.

Widyawati, S. (2017). PENERAPAN METODE BELAJAR PEMETAAN PIKIRAN (MIND MAP) PADA MATAKULIAH FILSAFAT ILMU DI JURUSAN SENI TARI FAKULTAS SENI PERTUNJUKAN ISI SURAKARTA.

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112.