<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.2 20190208//EN"
                  "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
  xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.2" article-type="other">
  <front>
      <journal-meta>
            <journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2808-0718</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Indonesian Journal of Business Analytics (IJBA)</journal-title>
                <abbrev-journal-title>Indonesian Journal of Business Analytics (IJBA)</abbrev-journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">2808-0718</issn>
            <issn pub-type="ppub">2808-0718</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>Formosa Publisher</publisher-name>
                <publisher-loc>Jl. Sutomo Ujung No.28 D, Durian, Kecamatan Medan Timur, Kota Medan, Sumatera Utara 20235, Indonesia.</publisher-loc>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.55927/ijba.v5i4.15287</article-id>
            <article-categories/>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>The Influence of IT, Regulation, and SDG on the Quality of LSK Operations through BPI</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <given-names>Desita</given-names>
                        <surname>Budiharsanti</surname>
                    </name>
                    <address>
                        <email>desitabudi@gmail.com</email>
                    </address>
                    <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor-0"/>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <given-names>Tukhas Shilul</given-names>
                        <surname>Imaroh</surname>
                    </name>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <author-notes>
                <corresp id="cor-0">
                    <bold>Corresponding author: Desita Budiharsanti</bold>
                    Email:<email>desitabudi@gmail.com</email>
                </corresp>
            </author-notes>
            <pub-date-not-available/>
            <volume>5</volume>
            <issue>4</issue>
            <issue-title>The Influence of IT, Regulation, and SDG on the Quality of LSK Operations through BPI</issue-title>
            <fpage>3281</fpage>
            <lpage>3296</lpage>
            <history>
                <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-6-21">
                    <day>21</day>
                    <month>6</month>
                    <year>2025</year>
                </date>
                <date date-type="rev-recd" iso-8601-date="2025-7-23">
                    <day>23</day>
                    <month>7</month>
                    <year>2025</year>
                </date>
                <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-8-22">
                    <day>22</day>
                    <month>8</month>
                    <year>2025</year>
                </date>
            </history>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright© 2025 Formosa Publisher</copyright-statement>
                <copyright-holder>Formosa Publisher</copyright-holder>
                <license>
                    <ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
                    <license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
                </license>
            </permissions>
            <self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.formosapublisher.org/index.php/ijba" xlink:title="The Influence of IT, Regulation, and SDG on the Quality of LSK Operations through BPI">The Influence of IT, Regulation, and SDG on the Quality of LSK Operations through BPI</self-uri>
            <abstract>
                <p>This study aims to examine the influence of 
                Information Technology Implementation, 
                Regulatory Compliance, and Commitment to 
                Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) on 
                Operational Quality, with a particular focus on the 
                mediating  role  of  Business  Process  Improvement 
                (BPI). The research is motivated by the operational 
                inefficiencies observed in certification bodies amid 
                increasing  demands  for  digitalization,  regulatory 
                adherence, and sustainability integration. A 
                quantitative approach was adopted, utilizing 
                Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling 
                (PLS-SEM)  for  data  analysis.  Data  were  collected 
                through a structured survey distributed to internal 
                stakeholders at PT XYZ, a certification 
                organization,  and  analyzed  using  SmartPLS  4.0. 
                The findings reveal that all three independent 
                variables—information technology 
                implementation,  regulatory  compliance,  and  SDG 
                commitment—positively and significantly 
                influence  operational  quality.  Moreover,  Business 
                Process Improvement is found to partially mediate 
                the relationship between each independent 
                variable and operational quality. These results 
                reinforce the theoretical perspective that 
                technology, compliance, and sustainability 
                initiatives  yield  optimal  impact  when  translated 
                into  systematic  process  improvement  efforts.  It  is 
                recommended that organizations not only invest in 
                digital  systems  and  regulatory  alignment  but  also 
                redesign internal processes to holistically meet 
                performance, efficiency, and sustainability goals.</p>
            </abstract>
            <kwd-group>
                <kwd>Information Technology</kwd>
                <kwd>Regulatory Compliance</kwd>
                <kwd>Sustainable Development Goals</kwd>
                <kwd>Business Process Improvement</kwd>
                <kwd>Operational Quality</kwd>
                <kwd>PLS-SEM</kwd>
            </kwd-group>
            <custom-meta-group>
                <custom-meta>
                    <meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name>
                    <meta-value>
                        <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://jatseditor.com" xlink:title="JATS Editor">JATS Editor</ext-link>
                    </meta-value>
                </custom-meta>
                <custom-meta>
                    <meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name>
                    <meta-value>2025</meta-value>
                </custom-meta>
            </custom-meta-group>
      </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="introduction">
      <title>INTRODUCTION</title>
      <p>The rapid development of the electricity sector increasingly
  demands professional competence and standardized operational quality,
  especially in institutions responsible for certification and skills
  development. The Competency Certification Institute (LSK) for
  electrical engineering personnel has an important role in ensuring
  that human resources in this field meet national and international
  standards. In this context, operational quality is influenced by
  various organizational, regulatory, and technological factors. The
  implementation of Information Technology (IT) can improve process
  efficiency, transparency, and traceability. Compliance with
  regulations ensures that operations remain aligned with legal and
  safety standards, while commitment to the Sustainable Development
  Goals (SDGs) reflects the organization's alignment with the global
  sustainability agenda. However, these factors often require effective
  process management mechanisms to have a significant impact on
  operational outcomes. Business Process Improvement (BPI) offers a
  structured approach to optimizing workflows, reducing waste, and
  achieving performance excellence.</p>
      <p>Previous research has addressed the relationship between IT
  adoption and operational performance, highlighting its role in process
  automation, decision- making accuracy, and service improvement.
  Studies on regulatory compliance affirm its contribution to
  operational consistency and risk mitigation, while research on
  organizational commitment to the SDGs shows its positive influence on
  long-term sustainability and social responsibility. In addition, BPI
  is recognized as a driver in aligning organizational processes with
  strategic goals, technology integration, and regulatory compliance.
  Nonetheless, most previous studies have examined these factors in
  isolation—whether focusing on technology adoption, regulatory
  frameworks, or sustainability initiatives— without integrating them
  into a holistic operational improvement model. Few studies have
  specifically examined the role of BPI mediation in translating these
  factors into a real improvement in operational quality, especially in
  LSK electrical engineering personnel.</p>
      <p>This research seeks to overcome these limitations by integrating IT
  implementation, regulatory compliance, and commitment to the SDGs in
  one research framework, with BPI as a mediating variable to improve
  operational quality. This study fills the literature gap by applying
  this model to the context of PT XYZ's electrical engineering LSK,
  which is still rarely studied empirically. Therefore, this study aims
  to analyze the influence of IT implementation, regulatory compliance,
  and commitment to the SDGs on operational quality through BPI as a
  mediating factor. The objectives of this study are: (1) evaluating the
  influence of each factor on operational quality, (2) examining the
  role of BPI mediation, and (3) providing recommendations to improve
  operational quality in LSK of electrical engineering personnel.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="method">
      <title>METHOD</title>
      <p>This study uses a quantitative causal design with an explanatory
  approach to examine the cause-and-effect relationship between
  independent variables, namely Information Technology Implementation,
  Regulatory Compliance, and Commitment to SDGs, to the dependent
  variable of Operational Quality, and Business Process Improvement
  (BPI) as the mediating variable.</p>
      <p>The research population is all personnel involved in the
  certification process at the PT XYZ Electrical Engineering Personnel
  Competency Certification Institute, including assessors,
  administrative staff, quality management, and implementing
  technicians. Samples were taken using purposive sampling based on
  criteria: active in the certification process for at least one year,
  have roles related to certification operations, and willing to fill
  out a complete questionnaire. The number of samples was adjusted to
  the needs of PLS-SEM analysis, which was a minimum of 60 to 120
  respondents.</p>
      <p>Data collection was carried out through a closed questionnaire
  based on a 5- point Likert scale, which was distributed online using
  Google Form. In addition to primary data, secondary data such as
  internal audit reports and customer satisfaction surveys are also
  collected as a complement.</p>
      <p>Data analysis used the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation
  Modeling (PLS-SEM) method with the help of SmartPLS software to test
  the direct relationship and mediation between variables. The analysis
  began with descriptive statistics to see the characteristics of the
  data, followed by testing the validity and reliability of the
  indicators, as well as testing the structural model through R-square
  values, effect size, predictive relevance, and significance of
  relationship paths (t-statistics).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="result-and-discussion">
      <title>RESULT AND DISCUSSION</title>
      <sec id="respondent-characteristics">
        <title>Respondent Characteristics</title>
        <p>This study involved 120 respondents who had filled out a complete
    questionnaire. Table 1 shows the profile of respondents by age,
    length of service, and job title.</p>
        <p>Table 1. Respondent Characteristics</p>
        <table-wrap id="t1" position="float">
          <label>Table 1. Respondent Characteristics</label>
          <caption>
            <title>Source: Survey data, 2025</title>
          </caption>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>Characteristics</th>
                <th>Category</th>
                <th>Frequency</th>
                <th>Percentage (%)</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <!-- Age -->
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="4">Age</td>
                <td>21–30 years</td>
                <td>18</td>
                <td>15,0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>31–40 years</td>
                <td>28</td>
                <td>23,3</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>41–50 years</td>
                <td>54</td>
                <td>45,0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>&gt;50 years</td>
                <td>20</td>
                <td>16,7</td>
              </tr>

              <!-- Tenure -->
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="5">Tenure</td>
                <td>1 years</td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>10,0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>2 years</td>
                <td>20</td>
                <td>16,7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>3 years</td>
                <td>26</td>
                <td>21,7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>4 years</td>
                <td>24</td>
                <td>20,0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>5 years</td>
                <td>38</td>
                <td>31,6</td>
              </tr>

              <!-- Position -->
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="6">Position</td>
                <td>Adviser</td>
                <td>48</td>
                <td>40,0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Operational Staff</td>
                <td>22</td>
                <td>18,3</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Technical Person in Charge</td>
                <td>16</td>
                <td>13,3</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Administration</td>
                <td>14</td>
                <td>11,7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Finance/Accounting</td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>10,0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>IT Division</td>
                <td>8</td>
                <td>6,7</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <table-wrap-foot>
            <p>Source: Survey data, 2025</p>
          </table-wrap-foot>
        </table-wrap>
          <p>
            <italic>Source: Survey data, 2025</italic>
          </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="descriptive-analysis-of-variables">
        <title>Descriptive Analysis of Variables</title>
        <p>The research measures five key variables: Technology
    Implementation, Regulatory Compliance, SDG Commitment, Business
    Process Improvement, and Operational Quality. Descriptive statistics
    in the form of averages and standard deviations for each indicator
    are presented in Table 2 to Table 4.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="table-2.-descriptive-statistics-of-technology-implementation-and-regulatory-compliance">
        <p>Table 2. Descriptive Statistics of Technology Implementation and Regulatory Compliance</p>
        <table-wrap>
          <label>Table 2. Descriptive Statistics of Technology Implementation and Regulatory Compliance</label>
          <table>
            <colgroup>
              <col width="12%" />
              <col width="71%" />
              <col width="11%" />
              <col width="7%" />
            </colgroup>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>
                  <bold>Indicator</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>Statement</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>Average</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>Std. Dev.</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>X1.1</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Easy access to information trough the system</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>4,03</td>
                <td>0,92</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>X1.2</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Digitized services and integrated with SOP</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>3,92</td>
                <td>0,92</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>X1.3</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>The system is capable of storing and tracking
                document revisions</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>3,97</td>
                <td>0,94</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>X2.1</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Annual picking test according to the guidelines and
                competencies of certified personnel</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>3,97</td>
                <td>0,97</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>X2.2</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Routine training related to quality regulation is
                carried out</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>3,94</td>
                <td>0,90</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
          <p>
            <italic>Source: Survey data, 2025</italic>
          </p>
        <p>The results show that respondents generally agree with the ease
    of access to information and integration of digital services, in
    accordance with the findings of Lee &amp; Chen (2021) which
    emphasizes digitalization as a factor for increasing operational
    efficiency. Compliance with regulations is also quite good, in line
    with the concept of regulatory compliance according to Johnson
    (2018).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="table-3.-descriptive-statistics-on-sdg-commitments-and-business-process-improvement">
        <p>Table 3. Descriptive Statistics on SDG Commitments and Business Process Improvement</p>
        <table-wrap id="t3" position="float">
          <label>Table 3. Descriptive Statistics on SDG Commitments and Business Process Improvement</label>
          <caption>
            <title>Source: Survey data, 2025</title>
          </caption>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>Indicator</th>
                <th>Statement</th>
                <th>Average</th>
                <th>Std. Dev.</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>X3.1</td>
                <td>Commitment to developing a sustainable quality system</td>
                <td>4,01</td>
                <td>0,94</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>X3.2</td>
                <td>Transparent and accountable certification process</td>
                <td>3,96</td>
                <td>0,91</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Z1</td>
                <td>The work process is regularly reviewed and adjusted</td>
                <td>4,01</td>
                <td>0,89</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Z2</td>
                <td>Competency test improvements based on audits and feedback</td>
                <td>4,32</td>
                <td>0,78</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <table-wrap-foot>
            <p>Source: Survey data, 2025</p>
          </table-wrap-foot>
        </table-wrap>
          <p>
            <italic>Source: Survey data, 2025</italic>
          </p>
        <p>The highest score on the competency test improvement indicator
    (4.32) reflects a culture of continuous improvement according to the
    principle of total quality management (Deming, 1986).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="table-4.-descriptive-statistics-of-operational-quality">
        <p>Table 4. Descriptive Statistics of Operational Quality</p>
        <table-wrap>
          <label>Table 4. Descriptive Statistics of Operational Quality</label>
          <table>
            <colgroup>
              <col width="13%" />
              <col width="65%" />
              <col width="12%" />
              <col width="11%" />
            </colgroup>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>
                  <bold>Indicator</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>Statement</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>Average</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>Std. Dev.</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Y1</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Service according to quality standards and time</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>4,41</td>
                <td>0,78</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Y2</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Customer satisfaction survey results are used for
                service improvement</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>3,79</td>
                <td>0,91</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Y3</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Customers are believed to be satisfied with the
                certification process</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>4,21</td>
                <td>0,81</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
          <p>
            <italic>Sumber: Data survei, 2025</italic>
          </p>
        <p>The high quality of service (4.41) indicates the seriousness of
    the institution in meeting service standards, supporting the
    findings of Garcia et al. (2020). However, the use of survey results
    for improvement still needs to be improved, in line with the
    importance of customer feedback in service quality management (Brown
    &amp; Taylor, 2017).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="pls-sem-test-results-uji-outer-model">
        <title>PLS-SEM Test Results Uji Outer Model</title>
        <p>The outer model tests the direct relationship between the latent
    construct and the indicator that measures it. Testing the validity
    and reliability of the instrument is carried out as a first
    step.</p>
        <p>Convergent Validity is tested through outer loading and Average
    Variance Extracted (AVE) values. According to Hair et al. (2021),
    the indicator is valid if the outer loading value is &gt; 0.70 and
    AVE &gt; 0.50.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="table-5.-outer-loading-test-results">
        <p>Table 5. Outer Loading Test Results</p>
        <table-wrap id="t5" position="float">
          <label>Table 5. Outer Loading Test Results</label>
          <caption>
            <title></title>
          </caption>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>Variabel</th>
                <th>Indicator</th>
                <th>Outer Loading</th>
                <th>Result</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <!-- IT Implementation -->
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="3">IT Implementation</td>
                <td>X1_1</td>
                <td>0,937</td>
                <td>Valid</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>X1_2</td>
                <td>0,923</td>
                <td>Valid</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>X1_3</td>
                <td>0,897</td>
                <td>Valid</td>
              </tr>

              <!-- Regulatory Compliance -->
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Regulatory Compliance</td>
                <td>X2_2</td>
                <td>0,943</td>
                <td>Valid</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>X2_3</td>
                <td>0,952</td>
                <td>Valid</td>
              </tr>

              <!-- SDG Commitment -->
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">SDG Commitment</td>
                <td>X3_1</td>
                <td>0,932</td>
                <td>Valid</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>X3_2</td>
                <td>0,931</td>
                <td>Valid</td>
              </tr>

              <!-- Y Indicators -->
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="3"></td>
                <td>Y1</td>
                <td>0,891</td>
                <td>Valid</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Y2</td>
                <td>0,837</td>
                <td>Valid</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Y3</td>
                <td>0,858</td>
                <td>Valid</td>
              </tr>

              <!-- Business Process Improvement -->
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Business Process Improvement</td>
                <td>Z2</td>
                <td>0,926</td>
                <td>Valid</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Z3</td>
                <td>0,923</td>
                <td>Valid</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The results showed that all indicators had an outer loading above
    0.70, indicating good convergent validity and the ability of the
    indicator to accurately represent constructs.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="table-6.-average-variance-extracted-ave-test-results">
        <p>Table 6. Average Variance Extracted (AVE) Test Results</p>
        <table-wrap>
          <label>Table 6. Average Variance Extracted (AVE) Test Results</label>
          <table>
            <colgroup>
              <col width="58%" />
              <col width="11%" />
              <col width="32%" />
            </colgroup>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>
                  <bold>Variabel</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>AVE</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>Validity Results</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Business Process Improvement</td>
                <td>0,855</td>
                <td>Valid</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>IT Implementation</td>
                <td>0,845</td>
                <td>Valid</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Regulatory Compliance</td>
                <td>0,898</td>
                <td>Valid</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>SDG Commitment</td>
                <td>0,868</td>
                <td>Valid</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Operational Quality</td>
                <td>0,744</td>
                <td>Valid</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>All constructs have an AVE &gt; 0.50, so the convergent validity
    is strongly met. Discriminant Validity was tested using the
    Fornell-Larcker and Heterotrait- Monotrait Ratio (HTMT) methods.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="table-7.-fornell-larcker-criterion-results">
        <p>Table 7. Fornell-Larcker Criterion Results</p>
        <table-wrap>
          <label>Table 7. Fornell-Larcker Criterion Results</label>
          <table>
            <colgroup>
              <col width="40%" />
              <col width="7%" />
              <col width="7%" />
              <col width="17%" />
              <col width="18%" />
              <col width="11%" />
            </colgroup>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>
                  <bold>Variabel</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>BPI</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>IT</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>Compliance</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>Commitment</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>Quality</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Business Process Improvement</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,925</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>IT Implementation</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,623</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,919</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Regulatory Compliance</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,606</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,434</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,948</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>SDG Commitment</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,636</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,536</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,530</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,932</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Operational Quality</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,728</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,633</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,686</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,688</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>0,862</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The diagonal value (square root of the AVE) is higher than the
    correlation between variables, indicating that the discriminant
    validity is met.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="tabel-8.-heterotrait-monotrait-ratio-results-htmt">
        <p>Tabel 8. Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio Results (HTMT)</p>
        <table-wrap>
          <label>Tabel 8. Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio Results (HTMT)</label>
          <table>
            <colgroup>
              <col width="45%" />
              <col width="8%" />
              <col width="8%" />
              <col width="19%" />
              <col width="20%" />
            </colgroup>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>
                  <bold>Variabel</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>BPI</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>IT</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>Compliance</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>Commitment</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Business Process Improvement</td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>IT Implementation</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,715</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Regulatory Compliance</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,705</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>0,483</td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>SDG Commitment</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,758</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>0,612</td>
                <td>0,609</td>
                <td></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Operational Quality</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,878</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>0,731</td>
                <td>0,800</td>
                <td>0,821</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>All HTMT values were below 0.90, indicating no discriminant
    validity issues. Reliability was tested using Cronbach's Alpha and
    Composite Reliability (rho_A).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="table-9.-reliability-test-results">
        <p>Table 9. Reliability Test Results</p>
        <table-wrap>
          <label>Table 9. Reliability Test Results</label>
          <table>
            <colgroup>
              <col width="47%" />
              <col width="29%" />
              <col width="11%" />
              <col width="13%" />
            </colgroup>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>
                  <bold>Variabel</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>Cronbach’s Alpha</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>rho_A</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>Results</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Business Process Improvement</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,830</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,831</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>Reliabel</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>IT Implementation</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,908</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,912</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>Reliabel</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Regulatory Compliance</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,887</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,891</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>Reliabel</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>SDG Commitment</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,848</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,848</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>Reliabel</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Operational Quality</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,827</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,828</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>Reliabel</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>All variables had a reliability value of &gt; 0.70, indicating
    good internal consistency.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="uji-inner-model">
        <title>Uji Inner Model</title>
        <p>Internal model evaluation was carried out to determine the
    strength of the relationship between constructs and model prediction
    capabilities.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="table-10.-r-square-test-results">
        <p>Table 10. R Square Test Results</p>
        <table-wrap>
          <label>Table 10. R Square Test Results</label>
          <table>
            <colgroup>
              <col width="55%" />
              <col width="18%" />
              <col width="28%" />
            </colgroup>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>
                  <bold>Variabel</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>R Square</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>Interpretations</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Business Process Improvement</td>
                <td>0,58</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Moderat</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Operational Quality</td>
                <td>0,70</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Moderat</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The R² value indicates that the model is able to explain the
    variance of the dependent variables quite well.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="table-11.-f-square-test-results">
        <p>Table 11. f Square Test Results</p>
        <table-wrap>
          <label>Table 11. f Square Test Results</label>
          <table>
            <colgroup>
              <col width="70%" />
              <col width="8%" />
              <col width="22%" />
            </colgroup>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>
                  <bold>Relationship</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>f²</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>Interpretation</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>IT Implementation → BPI</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,178</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Keep</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Regulatory Compliance→ BPI</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,153</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Keep</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>SDG Commitment→ BPI</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,127</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Small</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Implementasi IT → Operational Quality</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,083</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Small</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Regulatory Compliance → Operational Quality</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,192</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Keep</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>SDG Commitment → Operational Quality</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,115</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Small</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>BPI → Operational Quality</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,086</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Small</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Most of the effects are in the small to medium category,
    especially IT implementation and regulatory compliance for business
    process improvement.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="table-12.-q-square-test-results">
        <p>Table 12. Q Square Test Results</p>
        <table-wrap>
          <label>Table 12. Q Square Test Results</label>
          <table>
            <colgroup>
              <col width="56%" />
              <col width="19%" />
              <col width="25%" />
            </colgroup>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>
                  <bold>Variabel</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>Q Square</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>Interpreation</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Business Process Improvement</td>
                <td>0,484</td>
                <td>Strong</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Operational Quality</td>
                <td>0,504</td>
                <td>Strong</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
          <p>A Q² value of &gt; 0 indicates that the model has good predictive ability.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="table-13.-vif-test-results">
        <p>Table 13. VIF Test Results</p>
        <table-wrap>
          <label>Table 13. VIF Test Results</label>
          <table>
            <colgroup>
              <col width="49%" />
              <col width="16%" />
              <col width="7%" />
              <col width="29%" />
            </colgroup>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>
                  <bold>Variabel</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>Indicator</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>VIF</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>Results</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>IT Implementation</td>
                <td>X1_1</td>
                <td>3,66</td>
                <td>Collinearity-free</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td></td>
                <td>X1_2</td>
                <td>3,11</td>
                <td>Collinearity-free</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td></td>
                <td>X1_3</td>
                <td>2,64</td>
                <td>Collinearity-free</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Regulatory Compliance</td>
                <td>X2_1</td>
                <td>2,73</td>
                <td>Collinearity-free</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td></td>
                <td>X2_2</td>
                <td>2,73</td>
                <td>Collinearity-free</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>SDG Commitment</td>
                <td>X3_1</td>
                <td>2,19</td>
                <td>Collinearity-free</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td></td>
                <td>X3_2</td>
                <td>2,19</td>
                <td>Bebas kolinearitas</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Operational Quality</td>
                <td>Y1</td>
                <td>2,24</td>
                <td>Collinearity-free</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td></td>
                <td>Y2</td>
                <td>1,73</td>
                <td>Collinearity-free</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td></td>
                <td>Y3</td>
                <td>1,91</td>
                <td>Collinearity-free</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Business Process Improvement</td>
                <td>Z2</td>
                <td>2,02</td>
                <td>Collinearity-free</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td></td>
                <td>Z3</td>
                <td>2,02</td>
                <td>Collinearity-free</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>A VIF value below 5 indicates no multicollinearity problem.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="table-14.-model-fit-test-results-srmr">
        <p>Table 14. Model Fit Test Results (SRMR)</p>
        <table-wrap>
          <label>Table 14. Model Fit Test Results (SRMR)</label>
          <table>
            <colgroup>
              <col width="70%" />
              <col width="30%" />
            </colgroup>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>
                  <bold>Model</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>SRMR</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Saturated Model</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,047</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Estimated Model</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,047</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The SRMR value &lt; 0.08 indicates a fit model with the data.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="uji-hypothesis">
        <title>Uji Hypothesis</title>
        <p>Hypothesis testing in this study uses the bootstrapping method,
    which is a resampling technique to estimate the significance of the
    relationship between variables in a structural model. The test
    criteria were a t-statistical value &gt; 1.65 and a p-value &lt;
    0.05 at a significance level of 5% (Hair et al., 2021).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="direct-contact-test-results">
        <title>Direct Contact Test Results</title>
          <p>
            <bold>Table 15. Direct Contact Test Results</bold>
          </p>
        <table-wrap id="t15" position="float">
          <label>Table 15. Direct Contact Test Results</label>
          <caption>
            <title></title>
          </caption>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>Hipotesis</th>
                <th>Direct Connection</th>
                <th>Original Sample (O)</th>
                <th>t Statistik</th>
                <th>p Value</th>
                <th>Results</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>H1</td>
                <td>IT Implementation → Business Process Improvement</td>
                <td>0,331</td>
                <td>4,628</td>
                <td>0,000</td>
                <td>Accepted</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>H2</td>
                <td>Regulatory Compliance → Business Process Improvement</td>
                <td>0,305</td>
                <td>4,209</td>
                <td>0,000</td>
                <td>Accepted</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>H3</td>
                <td>SDG Commitment → Business Process Improvement</td>
                <td>0,297</td>
                <td>4,063</td>
                <td>0,000</td>
                <td>Accepted</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>H4</td>
                <td>IT Implementation → Operational Quality</td>
                <td>0,208</td>
                <td>3,520</td>
                <td>0,000</td>
                <td>Accepted</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>H5</td>
                <td>Regulatory Compliance → Operational Quality</td>
                <td>0,311</td>
                <td>4,266</td>
                <td>0,000</td>
                <td>Accepted</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>H6</td>
                <td>SDG Commitment → Operational Quality</td>
                <td>0,254</td>
                <td>3,691</td>
                <td>0,000</td>
                <td>Accepted</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>H7</td>
                <td>Business Process Improvement → Operational Quality</td>
                <td>0,248</td>
                <td>3,345</td>
                <td>0,000</td>
                <td>Accepted</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The test results showed that the entire direct relationship
    between variables had a statistically significant influence. The
    implementation of Information Technology, Regulatory Compliance, and
    Commitment to the SDGs have a positive and significant effect on
    Business Process Improvement with a t- statistical value of &gt; 4
    and a p-value of &lt; 0.001. These three variables also have a
    significant direct effect on Operational Quality. In addition,
    Business Process Improvement has a positive and significant
    influence on Operational Quality. Thus, all hypotheses related to
    direct relationships are accepted.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="indirect-relationship-test-results-mediation">
        <title>Indirect Relationship Test Results (Mediation)</title>
          <p>
            <bold>Table 16. Indirect Relationship Test Results</bold>
          </p>
        <table-wrap>
          <label>Table 16. Indirect Relationship Test Results</label>
          <table>
            <colgroup>
              <col width="16%" />
              <col width="25%" />
              <col width="13%" />
              <col width="11%" />
              <col width="8%" />
              <col width="12%" />
              <col width="15%" />
            </colgroup>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>
                  <bold>Mediasi Hypothesis</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>Indirect Relationships</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>Original Sample (O)</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>t Statistik</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>p Value</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>Results</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>Types of Mediation</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>H8</td>
                <td>
                  <p>IIT Implementation</p>
                  <p>→ BPI →</p>
                  <p>Operational Quality</p>
                </td>
                <td>0,082</td>
                <td>2,673</td>
                <td>0,004</td>
                <td>Accepted</td>
                <td>Partial</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>H9</td>
                <td>
                  <p>Regulatory Compliance → BPI</p>
                  <p>→ Operational Quality</p>
                </td>
                <td>0,076</td>
                <td>2,619</td>
                <td>0,004</td>
                <td>Accepted</td>
                <td>Partial</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>H10</td>
                <td>
                  <p>SDG Commitment</p>
                  <p>→ BPI →</p>
                  <p>Operational Quality</p>
                </td>
                <td>0,074</td>
                <td>2,456</td>
                <td>0,007</td>
                <td>Accepted</td>
                <td>Partial</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The results of the indirect relationship test show that Business
    Process Improvement significantly mediates the influence of IT
    Implementation, Regulatory Compliance, and SDG Commitment on
    Operational Quality. The t- statistical value of all mediations
    above 2.4 with a p-value &lt; 0.01, indicates significant partial
    mediation. This means that business process improvement is an
    important mechanism in strengthening the influence of the three
    exogenous variables on operational quality.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="discussion-of-research-results">
      <title>DISCUSSION OF RESEARCH RESULTS</title>
      <sec id="the-influence-of-it-implementation-on-business-process-improvement">
        <title>The Influence of IT Implementation on Business Process
    Improvement</title>
        <p>The results of the analysis showed that the Implementation of
    Information Technology (IT) had a positive and significant influence
    on Business Process Improvement (BPI), with a coefficient of 0.331
    and a t-statistic of 4.628 (p &lt; 0.001). The more optimal the
    application of IT in the institution, the higher the effectiveness
    of improving the business processes that are carried out.</p>
        <p>These findings reinforce the view that IT is not just an
    administrative tool, but plays a role as a strategic enabler in
    business process transformation (Davenport &amp; Short, 2019). In
    line with the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) from Davis (1989),
    the perception of the ease and usability of technology increases
    system adoption, accelerates digitalization and simplification of
    workflows.</p>
        <p>In the context of certification bodies such as PT XYZ, the
    implementation of ERP, online forms, and cloud-based data management
    increases the efficiency of processes from registration, competency
    tests, to reporting. This support is in accordance with DeLone &amp;
    McLean (2003) who emphasized the importance of information system
    quality in supporting real-time control, integration between units,
    and reduction of manual errors.</p>
        <p>In addition, the study of Al-Wahid et al. (2024) found that IT
    investments significantly improve surveillance effectiveness and
    operational efficiency through metadata and integrated information
    systems. Thus, IT encourages institutions to be more agile,
    digitalized, and adaptive in improving service quality.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="the-effect-of-regulatory-compliance-on-business-process-improvement">
        <title>The Effect of Regulatory Compliance on Business Process
    Improvement</title>
        <p>Compliance with regulations had a significant effect on BPI with
    a coefficient of 0.305 and a t-statistic of 4.209 (p &lt; 0.001).
    This shows that compliance with quality regulations—internal audits,
    periodic training, and certification standards—contributes directly
    to the effectiveness of business process improvement.</p>
        <p>These findings affirm the compliance-driven quality improvement
    approach (Parker &amp; Nielsen, 2011). Regulations such as ISO
    9001:2015 and the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources
    Regulation No. 6 of 2021 are not just administrative guidelines, but
    a framework for documented, measurable, and continuous
    improvement-oriented processes.</p>
        <p>Regulations provide a formal structure in the form of audits,
    documentation, and quality control that encourages systematic
    evaluation (Tajuddin et al., 2020). Compliant organizations tend to
    redesign processes according to regulatory rules, improving process
    alignment and structural efficiency.</p>
        <p>The support of the study Gunawan et al. (2021) confirms that
    adaptive regulation and discipline accelerate the adoption of
    process improvement practices. At PT XYZ, the gap between regulation
    and real practice triggers a thorough evaluation, making regulatory
    compliance the main trigger for BPI.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="the-influence-of-sdg-commitment-on-business-process-improvement">
        <title>The Influence of SDG Commitment on Business Process
    Improvement</title>
        <p>Commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) had a
    significant positive effect on BPI (coefficient of 0.297,
    t-statistic 4.063, p &lt; 0.001). This supports the framework of the
    Triple Bottom Line (Elkington, 1997), that organizations that pay
    attention to economic, social, and environmental aspects are
    encouraged to carry out internal reforms for the sake of long-term
    sustainability.</p>
        <p>The integration of SDG principles into strategies encourages
    organizations to redesign processes to be inclusive, transparent,
    and efficient (Lozano et al., 2019). The implementation of the SDGs
    encourages the use of environmentally friendly technology,
    digitization of services, and performance evaluation based on
    sustainability indicators.</p>
        <p>At PT XYZ, the digitalization of customer surveys and external
    quality reporting initiatives reflect the SDG commitments. These
    findings are consistent with Moldavska &amp; Welo (2019), which
    suggests organizations with a high sustainability commitment are
    more likely to implement systemically innovative and efficient
    processes.</p>
        <p>Thus, the integration of SDG values strengthens the
    implementation of BPI in realizing adaptive and long-term oriented
    business processes.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="the-influence-of-it-implementation-on-operational-quality">
        <title>The Influence of IT Implementation on Operational
    Quality</title>
        <p>IT implementation has a significant positive effect on
    operational quality (coefficient 0.208, t-statistic 3.520, p &lt;
    0.001). These findings support the Information System Success Model
    DeLone &amp; McLean (2003), which states that information system
    quality and user satisfaction are key to improving operational
    performance.</p>
        <p>At PT XYZ, ERP, cloud storage, and digital forms reduce
    processing time, reduce manual errors, and improve service speed and
    accuracy.</p>
        <p>IT acts as a catalyst for work system improvement through data
    integration, automation, and real-time monitoring, in line with the
    findings of Toni et al. (2020) and Tian et al. (2021). A good IT
    infrastructure allows for the elimination of redundant processes and
    the creation of lean operations, improving service quality.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="the-effect-of-regulatory-compliance-on-operational-quality">
        <title>The Effect of Regulatory Compliance on Operational
    Quality</title>
        <p>Compliance with regulations had a significant positive effect on
    operational quality (coefficient 0.311, t-statistic 4.266, p &lt;
    0.001). This strengthens the regulatory compliance framework as a
    driver of organizational quality systems (OECD, 2020; Parker &amp;
    Nielsen, 2011).</p>
        <p>Regulations such as ISO 9001:2015 and the Minister of Energy and
    Mineral Resources Regulation No. 6 of 2021 are structural references
    for standard, documented, and measurable work processes. Risk-based
    internal audits, document controls, and training strengthen
    operational consistency and service quality (Abdelrahim &amp;
    Al-Malkawi, 2022).</p>
        <p>At PT XYZ, improving compliance through ISO audits and
    digitization of quality documents improves service quality on an
    ongoing basis. Tajuddin et al.</p>
        <p>(2020) affirm that strategic compliance reduces operational
    errors and increases efficiency.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="the-influence-of-sdg-commitment-on-operational-quality">
        <title>The Influence of SDG Commitment on Operational
    Quality</title>
        <p>SDG commitment has a significant positive effect on operational
    quality (coefficient of 0.254, t-statistic 3.691, p &lt; 0.001).
    This is in line with the Triple Bottom Line principle (Elkington,
    1997) that organizations that balance economic, social, and
    environmental aspects create efficient, accountable, and sustainable
    work processes.</p>
        <p>The SDG commitment encourages process digitalization, energy
    efficiency, stakeholder participation, and transparent reporting.
    The studies of Lozano (2019) and Moldavska &amp; Welo (2019) show
    that the adoption of sustainability principles improves service
    performance and organizational responsiveness.</p>
        <p>At PT XYZ, digital surveys and cloud-based forms strengthen the
    traceability and speed of services, supported by a study by Guarini
    et al. (2022) that emphasizes the role of SDGs in efficient and
    accountable public management.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="the-effect-of-business-process-improvement-on-operational-quality">
        <title>The Effect of Business Process Improvement on Operational
    Quality</title>
        <p>Business Process Improvement (BPI) had a significant positive
    effect on operational quality (coefficient of 0.248, t-statistic of
    3.345, p &lt; 0.001). This is consistent with Slack &amp; Lewis'
    (2008) process-based quality management theory, that operational
    quality is the output of efficient and consistent internal
    processes.</p>
        <p>BPI includes bottleneck identification, procedure simplification,
    technology integration, and performance evaluation, which are
    relevant to address the problems of audit delays, documentation
    errors, and reporting inefficiencies at PT XYZ. Hananta &amp;
    Susyanti (2024) show that BPI improves punctuality, yield accuracy,
    and user satisfaction.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="the-effect-of-business-process-improvement-mediation-on-the-relationship-between-it-implementation-and-operational-quality">
        <title>The Effect of Business Process Improvement Mediation on the
    Relationship between IT Implementation and Operational
    Quality</title>
        <p>BPI mediated the influence of IT Implementation on operational
    quality significantly (indirect effect 0.082, t-statistic 2.673, p
    0.004), indicating partial mediation. IT has a direct impact on
    service quality and also strengthens its influence through business
    process improvement.</p>
        <p>This is in accordance with the literature that IT is optimal when
    supported by BPI (Davenport &amp; Short, 2019; Zhu et al., 2021).
    BPI remaps workflows, eliminates redundancy, and aligns IT with
    efficient process needs.</p>
        <p>The study by Al-Wahid et al. (2024) emphasizes the optimal
    integration of information systems when accompanied by strengthening
    business processes. At PT XYZ, technologies such as ERP and cloud
    storage improve accuracy and efficiency, reinforced by BPI which
    ensures the use of structured and consistent technology.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="the-effect-of-business-process-improvement-mediation-on-the-relationship-between-regulatory-compliance-and-operational-quality">
        <title>The Effect of Business Process Improvement Mediation on the
    Relationship between Regulatory Compliance and Operational
    Quality</title>
        <p>BPI mediated the effect of regulatory compliance on operational
    quality significantly (indirect effect 0.076, t-statistic 2.619, p
    0.004), strengthening the effect of regulation through efficient and
    integrated work processes.</p>
        <p>Regulations such as ISO 9001:2015 and the Minister of Energy and
    Mineral Resources Regulation No. 6 of 2021 provide a documentation
    and audit framework that encourages SOPs and strengthens
    accountability (Abdelrahim &amp; Al-Malkawi, 2022). Compliance
    directly impacts service quality, and BPI optimizes it through
    digitization of SOPs, elimination of duplicate processes, and
    technology-based quality systems (Parker &amp; Nielsen, 2011).</p>
        <p>The study of Alshahrani &amp; Husain (2023) and Bakhtiar et al.
    (2023) confirms that consistent ISO procedures and a strong quality
    culture improve operational quality and efficiency.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="the-effect-of-business-process-improvement-mediation-on-the-relationship-between-sdg-commitment-and-operational-quality">
        <title>The Effect of Business Process Improvement Mediation on the
    Relationship between SDG Commitment and Operational Quality</title>
        <p>BPI mediated the influence of SDG Commitments on operational
    quality significantly (indirect effect 0.074, t-statistic 2.456, p
    0.007). Organizations with a strong commitment to the SDGs transform
    business processes that improve service quality.</p>
        <p>The SDG commitment promotes energy efficiency, transparency, and
    accountable governance, which directly improves operational quality.
    Through BPI, sustainability values translate into more streamlined
    and digitized processes, such as digitization of forms and
    participatory quality evaluation.</p>
        <p>The study by Guarini et al. (2022) supports the finding that SDG
    integration strengthens the legitimacy, accountability, and
    efficiency of public services. Thus, BPI becomes a strategic
    instrument that actualizes the SDG value in real and measurable
    operational excellence</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="conclusion">
      <title>CONCLUSION</title>
      <p>This study reveals that the application of information technology,
  regulatory compliance, and commitment to the Sustainable Development
  Goals (SDG) significantly affect the improvement of business processes
  and operational quality in certification bodies. The application of
  digital technology not only increases efficiency and accuracy, but
  also becomes a key driver in the adaptive and sustainable
  transformation of business processes. Regulatory compliance provides a
  robust framework for maintaining quality standards and operational
  consistency. Meanwhile, the orientation towards sustainability through
  the SDGs encourages institutions to carry out internal reforms that
  are more responsible and transparent. Business process improvement
  plays an important role as a link between these factors and improving
  operational quality, confirming that systematic and continuous
  improvement is the key to the success of the organization in the face
  of increasingly high demands for service quality.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="acknowledgment">
      <title>ACKNOWLEDGMENT</title>
      <p>The author would like to express his deepest gratitude to all
  parties who have helped and supported this research. Special
  appreciation was conveyed to Mrs. Dr. Tukhas Shilul Imaroh, MM, as the
  Supervisor who has provided very meaningful guidance, direction, and
  scientific support.</p>
      <p>Thank you also to the institution or sponsor party who has provided
  financial support so that this research can be carried out properly.
  The author also thanks the leadership and staff at the PT XYZ
  Certification Body for providing permission, time, and access for data
  collection. Not to forget, thanks are extended to the proofreading
  team and typists who helped in the refinement of the manuscript as
  well as friends who provided moral and technical support during the
  research process. Lastly, the author really appreciates the support
  and prayers of his beloved family who always give him endless
  encouragement. Hopefully all this help and support will get the best
  reply from God Almighty.</p>
    </sec>
</body>
<back>
  <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>

      <ref id="R1">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Abdelrahim</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Al-Malkawi</surname><given-names>H.-A. N.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2022</year>
      <article-title>The influential factors of internal audit effectiveness: A conceptual model</article-title>
      <source>International Journal of Financial Studies</source>
      <volume>10</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>Article 71</fpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijfs10030071</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R2">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Alshahrani</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Husain</surname><given-names>K. S.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2023</year>
      <article-title>The effectiveness of the implementation of ISO 9001 on SMEs performance: the case of an emerging economy</article-title>
      <source>International Journal of Quality &amp; Reliability Management</source>
      <volume>41</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>84</fpage>
      <lpage>106</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/IJQRM-08-2022-0233</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R3">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Al-Wahid</surname><given-names>S. A.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Mohammad</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Islam</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Faisal</surname><given-names>M. H.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Rana</surname><given-names>M. S.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2024</year>
      <article-title>Evaluation of information technology implementation for business goal improvement under process functionality in economic development</article-title>
      <source>Journal of Data Analysis and Information Processing</source>
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>Article 17</fpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jdaip.2024.122017</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R4">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Bakhtiar</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Nugraha</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Suliantoro</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Pujotomo</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2023</year>
      <article-title>The effect of quality management system (ISO 9001) on operational performance of various organizations in Indonesia</article-title>
      <source>Cogent Business &amp; Management</source>
      <volume>10</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>2203304</fpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/23311975.2023.2203304</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R5">
    <element-citation publication-type="book">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Elkington</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>1997</year>
      <source>Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of twenty-first century business</source>
      <publisher-name>Capstone</publisher-name>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R6">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Gunawan</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Syahputra</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Pramono</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2021</year>
      <article-title>Regulatory flexibility and operational quality in government institutions</article-title>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R7">
    <element-citation publication-type="book">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Hair</surname><given-names>J. F.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Hult</surname><given-names>G. T. M.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Ringle</surname><given-names>C. M.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Sarstedt</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2021</year>
      <source>A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)</source>
      <edition>3rd ed.</edition>
      <publisher-name>SAGE Publications</publisher-name>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R8">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Lozano</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2019</year>
      <article-title>Sustainable business models: Providing a more holistic perspective</article-title>
      <source>Business Strategy and the Environment</source>
      <volume>27</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>1159</fpage>
      <lpage>1166</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/bse.2059</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R9">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Moldavska</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Welo</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2019</year>
      <article-title>A holistic approach to corporate sustainability assessment: Incorporating sustainable development goals into sustainable manufacturing performance evaluation</article-title>
      <source>Journal of Manufacturing Systems</source>
      <volume>50</volume>
      <fpage>53</fpage>
      <lpage>68</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.11.004</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R10">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Parker</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Nielsen</surname><given-names>V. L.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2011</year>
      <article-title>Deterrence and the impact of calculative thinking on business compliance with competition and consumer regulation</article-title>
      <source>The Antitrust Bulletin</source>
      <volume>56</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>377</fpage>
      <lpage>426</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0003603X1105600207</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R11">
  <element-citation publication-type="book">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name>
        <surname>Slack</surname>
        <given-names>N.</given-names>
      </name>
      <name>
        <surname>Lewis</surname>
        <given-names>M.</given-names>
      </name>
    </person-group>
    <year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year>
    <source>Operations Strategy</source>
    <edition>2nd ed.</edition>
    <publisher-name>Financial Times Prentice Hall</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Harlow, UK</publisher-loc>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="R12">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name>
        <surname>Tarigan</surname>
        <given-names>Z. J. H.</given-names>
      </name>
      <name>
        <surname>Siagian</surname>
        <given-names>H.</given-names>
      </name>
      <name>
        <surname>Sebayang</surname>
        <given-names>P.</given-names>
      </name>
    </person-group>
    <year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year>
    <article-title>The impact of implementing enterprise resources planning (ERP) project on firm performance and organizational citizenship behavior as a moderating</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Project Management</source>
    <volume>5</volume>
    <fpage>227</fpage>
    <lpage>236</lpage>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5267/j.jpm.2020.8.001</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="R13">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name>
        <surname>Tian</surname>
        <given-names>M.</given-names>
      </name>
      <name>
        <surname>Chen</surname>
        <given-names>Y.</given-names>
      </name>
      <name>
        <surname>Tian</surname>
        <given-names>G.</given-names>
      </name>
      <name>
        <surname>Huang</surname>
        <given-names>W.</given-names>
      </name>
      <name>
        <surname>Hu</surname>
        <given-names>C.</given-names>
      </name>
    </person-group>
    <year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year>
    <article-title>The role of digital transformation practices in the operations improvement in manufacturing firms: A practice-based view</article-title>
    <source>International Journal of Production Economics</source>
    <volume>262</volume>
    <elocation-id>108776</elocation-id>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108776</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>

<ref id="R14">
  <element-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">
      <name>
        <surname>Toni</surname>
        <given-names>A. A.</given-names>
      </name>
      <name>
        <surname>Husain</surname>
        <given-names>K. S. M.</given-names>
      </name>
      <name>
        <surname>Yaqub</surname>
        <given-names>M. Z.</given-names>
      </name>
    </person-group>
    <year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year>
    <article-title>The effect of Information Technology Implementation on retail manufacturer's operational performance: A moderated serial mediation model</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management</source>
    <volume>10</volume>
    <issue>12s</issue>
    <elocation-id>Article 1853</elocation-id>
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.52783/jisem.v10i12s.1853</pub-id>
  </element-citation>
</ref>
    </ref-list>
</back>
</article>
