Legal Protection for Contract Work Service Providers Due to Contractor Default in Road Paving Construction Services Contracts Based on Law Number 2 of 2017 Concerning Construction Services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/ijba.v5i4.15202Keywords:
Legal protection, Default, Contract ServicesAbstract
Contract service providers are often in a weak position in the implementation of construction service contracts, especially when the main contractor commits a breach of contract, such as through work delays or work that does not meet specifications. Therefore, this study aims to examine the forms of legal protection for contract service providers who suffer losses due to contractor default and examine the legal remedies that can be taken by these service providers. The research method used is a normative juridical approach with qualitative analysis techniques of laws and regulations, legal doctrine, and a case study of the Dolok Sanggul Siborong-borong asphalting project. The results show that legal protection for contract service providers can be carried out preventively through detailed contract agreements, performance guarantees, and business certification. As for repressive protection, protection is provided through efforts to summons, lawsuits for breach of contract, contract termination, and reporting to supervisory institutions. In the context of work delays, service providers can also take litigative and non-litigative routes such as mediation, arbitration, and court. Therefore, it is important for contract service providers to fully understand the contents of the contract and legal procedures to protect their rights fairly and proportionally.
Downloads
References
Book
Ade Maman Suherman, 2005, Aspek Hukum Dalam Ekonomi Global, Edisi Revisi, Cetakan Kedua, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor.
FITRA Sumut. Laporan Pemantauan Proyek Jalan Nasional Lintas Doloksanggul–Siborongborong, 2025.
Purwosusilo, 2017, Aspek Hukum Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa, Edisi Pertama, Cetakan Pertama, Kencana Prenada Media, Jakarta.
R. Subekti. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: PT. Arga Printing, 2007.
JOURNAL
Chen, Y. (2022). Contract Law in Construction Projects: A Comparative Study. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 11(2), 145-160.
Lubis, M. R. (2020). Kontrak Konstruksi dan Permasalahannya dalam Praktik. Jurnal Hukum Responsif, 8(3), 302-318.
Mulyani, D. (2021). Kedudukan Hukum Penyedia Jasa dalam Proyek Pemerintah. Jurnal Justitia, 13(2), 200-215.
Oktaviani, S. (2019). Konstruksi Wanprestasi dan Penyelesaiannya. Jurnal Yurisprudensi, 6(2), 102-119.
Prasetyo, Y. H. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Konstruksi di Indonesia: Studi terhadap UU Jasa Konstruksi. Jurnal Yuridika, 38(2), 150-169.
Sari, A. D. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Konstruksi. Jurnal IUS, 10(1), 45-60.
Silalahi, F. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Sub Kontraktor dalam Pelaksanaan Proyek Konstruksi. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 51(2), 200-215.
Widodo, B. (2020). Risiko Wanprestasi Dalam Kontrak Konstruksi: Analisis Yuridis. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 9(1), 89-102.
Yusuf, R. (2019). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Kontraktor dalam Proyek Pemerintah. Jurnal Konstitusi dan Hukum, 4(1), 77-88.
LEGISLATION
KUHPerdata (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata).
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Jasa Konstruksi.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rico Altito Deanova Sidebang, Roida Nababan, Besty Habeahan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







































