Review of the Disparity of Judges' Decisions in Cases Narcotics Abuse

Vicki Dwi Purnomo; Aida Dewi

doi:10.55927/ijems.v1i3.4616

Authors

Vicki Dwi Purnomo Widya Mataram University, Yogyakarta
Aida Dewi Widya Mataram University, Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ijems.v1i3.4616

Keywords:

Lawsuits, Criminal, Disparity

Abstract

Criminal disparity is unequal sentencing which is dangerous in nature compared to without a clear justification. Judge's decision in juvenile criminal cases, in practice there is a disparity in sentencing. Therefore, the issue of sentencing is not only important for judges and the judicial process, but also for the legal process as a whole, especially in terms of law enforcement. Where in this case raises different criminal penalties among the children of the perpetrators of these crimes. Decision disparity cannot be separated from the judge's discretion to impose a sentence in a criminal case. a case. The approach to be used is a Juridical Sociological approach

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adam Chazawi. 2005, Lesson Law Criminal 1. PT King Grafindo Homeland. Jakarta, page 82

A. Fuad Usfa, Introduction to Criminal Law, (Malang: UMM Press, 2004), p.145.

Fuad Tohari, Hadith Ahkam, Study Hadiths Law Criminal Islam hudud, qishash, And Ta'zir , _ _ deepublish, yogyakarta, 2018, p.10.

H. Zainuddin Ali, Criminal Law Islam, Sinar Graphics, Jakarta, 2007, p.60.

Fragrant Nasution, Islam reviewed From Various aspect, UI press, Jakarta, 1984, p. 7.

set Fatwas Assembly Cleric Indonesia since 1975, Publisher Erlangga, Jakarta, 2011, p.594

Jimmy Asshidiqie, Renewal of Indonesian Criminal Law, (Bandung: Space, 1995) Page 136.

Juliana Lisa FR And Middle Sutrisna W, 2013, DRUGS, Psychotropic and Disturbance soul, Noah Medika, Yogyakarta, page 1

Lamintang, Law Penittensier Indonesian, (Jakarta: Sinar graphics, 2010), p. 76.

Leden Marpaung, Principles-Theory-Practice Law criminal, Ray Graphics. Jakarta, 2005, p. 2.

Mahrus Ali, Basics Law criminal, Ray graphics, Jakarta, 2011, p. 101.

Makhrus Munajat, Deconstruction Law Criminal Islamic, Logung Son, yogyakarta, 2004, p.2.

Moeljatno, Principle – Principle Law criminal, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2009, p 56 Moeljatno, Principles Law Criminal, Rineka Create, Jakarta, 2008, p. 78.

Muladi & Barda Nawawi Arief, Criminal theories and policies, Prints fourth, Bandung: 2010, p. 54

Muladi and Barda Nawawi Arief, Criminal Theories and Policies, Ed.I, Cet.3, Bandung: Alumni, 2005, p.56.

Salim Bazemool, Taufik Damas, Muhammad Arifyanto, Mustafa Al ' Adawi, Fiqh al-Akhlaqwa al - Mu'amalatbaina al-Mu ' mininTerj, PT Alma ' arif, Jakarta, 2005, p. 502.

Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, Principles Individualization Criminal in Law Criminal Islam and renewal Law Criminal Indonesian, Body University Publishers Diponegoro, Semarang, 2013.p.101.

Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, Comparison Law Criminal from Perspective Religious Law System, 2nd Edition, (Semarang: Unissula Pres, July 2013), Page 55.

Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, The Urgency of Material Criminal Law Reform Indonesia Based on the Values of the One and Only God, Journal renewal Law, Volumes 1 No.1 January-April 2014

Sudarsono, Ethics Islam About Delinquency Teen, Rineka Copyright, Jakarta, 1990, p.91.

Wow az-Zuhaili, Fiqh Islam Waadilatuhu, ter. Abdul Hayyie al- Kattani, et al, vol 7, Echoes Human, Jakarta p. 460

Chapter 27 Constitution Base Country Republic Indonesia Year 1945.

Paragraph IV Opening Invite – Invite Base 1945 about Objective Country Indonesia