Efforts to Improve Students' Cognitive Learning Outcomes by Using Demonstration Methods in Fiqh Subjects on Hajj Subjects (Classroom Action Research on Class V Students of MI Al Istiqomah Katapang Bandung District)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/ijis.v4i1.13480Keywords:
Demonstration Method, Fiqh, Hajj, Islamic Education, Cognitive Learning OutcomesAbstract
This study seeks to enhance students' cognitive learning outcomes in Fiqh subjects focused on Hajj through the implementation of the demonstration method. In Indonesia, the education system continues to grapple with challenges, particularly regarding teaching methods that often lack variety. This research emphasizes the effectiveness of the demonstration method in Fiqh education, especially in relation to Hajj, with the goal of fostering a deeper understanding among students. The findings indicate that this method not only boosts student engagement but also reinforces conceptual comprehension and improves overall learning outcomes. Adopting a holistic approach, the study aims to cultivate insightful, empathetic, and socially responsible individuals capable of making meaningful contributions to society. Results indicate a progressive increase in student understanding of Hajj Fiqh throughout the cycles of learning facilitated by the demonstration method
Downloads
References
Ajani, O. A. (2024). Enhancing Pre-Service Teacher Education: Crafting a Technology-Responsive Curriculum for Modern Classrooms and Adaptive Learners. Research in Educational Policy and Management, 6(2), 209–229.
Barnes, L. B., Christensen, C. R., & Hansen, A. J. (1994). Teaching and the case method: Text, cases, and readings. Harvard Business Press.
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (2013). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Routledge.
Cooper, P., & McIntyre, D. (1996). Effective teaching and learning: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251–19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116
Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2015). School and community influences on human development. In Developmental science (pp. 645–728). Psychology Press.
Heagney, J. (2016). Fundamentals of project management. Amacom.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235–266.
Jungnickel, P. W., Kelley, K. W., Hammer, D. P., Haines, S. T., & Marlowe, K. F. (2009). Addressing competencies for the future in the professional curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73(8).
Katz, M. (2004). The Ḥajj and the Study of Islamic Ritual. Studia Islamica, 98/99, 95–129.
Kemmis, S. (1980). Action Research in Retrospect and Prospect.
Kemmis, S. (1993). THE DEFINITION AND CHARACTER OF ACTION RESEARCH. Educational Research: Volume One: Current Issues, 1, 177.
Mertler, C. A. (2009). Action research: Teachers as researchers in the classroom. Sage.
Messick, B., & Powers, D. S. (1996). Islamic Legal Interpretation. Muftis and Their.
Moslimany, R., Otaibi, A., & Shaikh, F. (2024). Designing a holistic curriculum: Challenges and opportunities in islamic education. Journal on Islamic Studies, 1(1), 52–73.
Nasir, M., Rijal, M. K., Primarni, A., Lima, L., & Prastawa, S. (2024). Philosophical Foundations of Holistic Education in the 21st Century. International Journal of Educational Narratives, 2(6), 471–482.
Norman, N. A., & Ruhullah, M. E. (2024). EXPLORING THE ETHICAL DIMENSIONS OF FIQH: THE ROLE OF THE SOUL IN ACHIEVING MAQASID AL-SHARI’AH. Al-Shajarah: Journal of the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC), 29(1), 47–77.
Orlich, D. C., Harder, R. J., Callahan, R. C., Trevisan, M. S. T., & Brown, A. H. (2010). Teaching strategies: A guide to effective instruction. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Otero, V., Peressini, D., Meymaris, K. A., Ford, P., Garvin, T., Harlow, D., Reidel, M., Waite, B., & Mears, C. (2005). Integrating technology into teacher education: A critical framework for implementing reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(1), 8–23.
Paniagua, A., & Istance, D. (2018). Teachers as designers of learning environments. Educational Research and Innovation, 17–42.
Plass, J. L., & Pawar, S. (2020). Toward a taxonomy of adaptivity for learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 275–300.
Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 700.
Sáez Bondía, M. J., & Cortés Gracia, A. L. (2022). Action research in education: a set of case studies? Educational Action Research, 30(5), 850–864.
Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 615–631.
Tschannen‐Moran, M., Uline, C., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Mackley, T. (2000). Creating smarter schools through collaboration. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(3), 247–272.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rizqi Faturahman, Muhammad Sofian Hadi, Aldi Surizkika

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.