Analysis of the Use of Sistem Kelola Pembelajaran Based on the Technology Acceptance Model Approach

Authors

  • Febrito David Christian Department of Accounting, Hasanuddin University, Makassar
  • Grace T. Pontoh Department of Accounting, Hasanuddin University, Makassar
  • Hermita Arif Department of Accounting, Hasanuddin University, Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ijis.v2i7.5209

Keywords:

Self Efficacy, Compatibilty, Technology Acceptance Model

Abstract

This research aims to determine the influence of self-efficacy, compatibility, and TAM on the acceptance of SIKOLA among students of the Faculty of Economics and Business at Hasanuddin University. Primary data obtained through a questionnaire with 363 respondents were analyzed with structured equation modeling analysis using IBM SPSS Statistics AMOS 23 software. Results showed that compatibility and ease of use significantly influenced usefulness. Self-efficacy did not affect usefulness, while self-efficacy and compatibility significantly influenced ease of use. Usefulness had a significant effect on actual usage, while ease of use did not impact actual usage. This research highlights that self-efficacy and compatibility are external factors suitable for examining the level of acceptance of the learning management system among users

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adzharuddin, N. (2013). Learning Management System (LMS) among University Students: Does It Work? International Journal of E-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-learning. https: //doi.org/10.7763/ijeeee.2013.v3.233

Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1999). Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies?, Decision Sciences, 30, 361-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy : Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Stanford University, 84(2), 191–215.

Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1993). Bootstrapping goodness of fit measures in structural equation models. In K. A.

Bollen and J. S. Long (Eds.) Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Charness, N. & Boot, W. R. (2015). Technology, Gaming, and Social Networking. In Handbook of the Psychology of Aging: Eighth Edition (pp. 389–407). Elsevier Inc. https: //doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-411469-2.00020-0

Chau, P. Y. K. & Hu, P. J. H. (2001). Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: A model comparison approach. Decision Sciences, 32(4), 699-719. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00978.x

Chuttur, M. (2009). Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions. Working Papers on Information System, vol. 9, no. 37, 2009.

Davis, F. D. (1985). A Technology Acceptance Model For Empirically Testing New End-User Information Sistems: Theory And Results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Karahanna, E. & Agarawal, R. (1998). On The Multidimensional Nature f compatibility beliefs in technology acceptance. Proceeding of the 19th Annual International Conference on Information System.

Mödritscher, F. Andergassen, M. & Neumann, G. (2010). Dependencies between E-learning Usage Patterns and Learning Results. http: //www.wu.ac.at/academicstaff/info/facts/study/anzahl_insge

Nielsen Consumer & Media View. (2016). Gen Z: Konsumen potensial masa depan. Retrieved from https://www.nielsen.com/id/en/press-releases/2016/GEN-Z-KONSUMEN-POTENSIAl-MASA-DEPAN/. accessed Oktober 22, 2022.

Park, S., O’Brien, M. A., Caine, K. E., Rogers, W. A., Fisk, A. D., Ittersum, K. V., Capar, M., & Parsons, L. J. (2006). Acceptance of Computer Technology: Understanding the User and the Organizational Characteristics. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(15), 1478–1482. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605001504

Paulsen, M. B. (2002). Evaluating teaching performance. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2002(114), 5–18. https: //doi.org/10.1002/IR.42

Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65, 101565.

Wong, K.-T., Teo, T., & Russo, S. (2012). Influence of gender and computer teaching efficacy on computer acceptance among Malaysian student teachers: An extended technology acceptance model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.796

Downloads

Published

2023-07-30

How to Cite

Febrito David Christian, Grace T. Pontoh, & Hermita Arif. (2023). Analysis of the Use of Sistem Kelola Pembelajaran Based on the Technology Acceptance Model Approach. International Journal of Integrative Sciences, 2(7), 1057–1068. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijis.v2i7.5209

Issue

Section

Articles