Determination of Age of Majority In Liability Juvenile Crime in Indonesian Criminal Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/ijsmr.v1i11.7038Keywords:
Age Determination, Liability, Juvenile CrimeAbstract
In juvenile criminal cases, the age limit of children is of great importance, since this obligation to determine whether a suspect belongs to the category of children or not is related to the criminal liability of children. In discussing the extent to which a person can meaningfully be prosecuted as a child, it appears that many laws are inconsistent in their boundaries because they are motivated by the goals of each law. itself. In order to examine the purpose of this study, the purpose of this study is to examine the regulations for determining the age of consent for criminal responsibility of children in the current Indonesian criminal law. This research method uses normative legal research methods, a legal approach, a conceptual approach, a comparative approach and a case approach. The results of this study show that from the minimum age at which children can become important as adults, any legal act of a legal entity can become possible once they reach this legal capacity of adulthood. Aspects of legal protection in determining the age of consent in Indonesian criminal law are related to the criminal liability of children. The measure of a species' ability to assume responsibility can be derived from several factors, ranging from the age to the psychology of the perpetrator. After examining the facts, one can come to the conclusion that the age limit for adulthood, which is pluralism, may lead to ambiguity in determining when a person is declared of adulthood and held responsible for the crimes committed by him becomes
Downloads
References
Ali, M, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana, Raja Grafindo, Jakarta, 2011
Barda Nawawi Arief, Kebijakan Legisatif Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan dengan Pidana Penjara, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 2000, hlm. 38
Hidaya, B, Pemidanaan Anak diBawah Umur, Alumni, Bandung, 2010.
Lihat Konsideran Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak
Lihat Penjelasan Pasal 4 Ayat 1 UU Pengadilan Anak
Lihat Penjelasan Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 1997 tentang Pengadilan Anak
Maidin Gultom, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak, Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2006, hal 84.
Naskah Akademik RUU Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, hlm. 7-9
Pangemanan, J. B. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia, Lex Et Societatis, III(1), (2015).
Rainma Rivardy Rexy Runtuwene, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Suatu Perkembangan Tindak Pidana, Jurnal Lex et Societatis, Vol. V/No. 2/Mar-Apr/2017
Rapat Panja Komisi III DPR RUU tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, Kamis 17 November 2011, hal 21.
Rasetyo, T, Hukum Pidana, Raja Grafindo, Jakarta, 2012.
Risalah Rapat Dengar Pendapat RUU Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Selasa 18 Oktober 2011, hal 6.
Risalah Rapat Dengar Pendapat Umum Panja RUU Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dengan Unicef Representative dalam acara menerima masukan terkait dengan RUU tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Selasa 21 Februari 2012, hal 3.
Risalah Rapat Dengar Pendapat Umum Panja RUU tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak tanggal Selasa, 21 Februari 2012.
Risalah Rapat Dengar Pendapat Umum Panja RUU tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak tanggal Selasa, 21 Februari 2012.
Risalah Rapat Kerja Pansus Rancangan Undang-Undang Peradilan Anak, 27 September 1996, hal 38.
Risalah Rapat Kerja Pansus Rancangan Undang-Undang Peradilan Anak, Rabu, 9 Oktober 1996, hal 4.
Risalah Rapat Panja Komisi III DPR RI tanggal Rabu, 21 Maret 2012
Risalah Rapat Panja Komisi III DPR RI tanggal Selasa, 14 Februari 2012
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Umar Dinata, Sukamto Satoto, Usman, Erdianto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

















