Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Umum dalam Metodologi Penelitian: Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/jiph.v1i2.937Keywords:
Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Umum, Metodologi PenelitianAbstract
Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui teknik sampling umum dalam metode penelitian berdasarkan beberapa artikel internasional bereputasi. Untuk memenuhi tujuan tersebut, peneliti melakukan penelitian di tiga jurnal yang membahas tentang teknik pengambilan sampel. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah jenis penelitian kepustakaan dengan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif, dengan menggunakan metode analisis isi. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketiga artikel tersebut membahas dan menjelaskan teknik sampling umum dalam metodologi penelitian. Secara khusus perbedaannya terletak pada penjelasan poin-poin penting pemahaman atau beberapa tahapan yang dapat dilalui dalam teknik sampling. Selain itu juga, masing-masing isi naskah ke-3 artikel menjelaskan kelebihan dan kekrungan dari masing-masing teknik samping berhubungan dengan bias dari keterwakilan populasi dari teknik sampling yang dipilih. Sementara satu naskah lebih jelas dilengkapi dengan alternatif solusi mengurangi bahkan meningkatkan keterwakilan populasi atas sampel yang ambil dengan metode yang dipilih.
Downloads
References
Ackoff, R. (1953). The design of social research. chicago: Universidad de Chicago. AMERICAN.
Bartlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19, 43–50.
Brewerton, P. M., & Millward, L. J. (2001). Organizational research methods: A guide for students and researchers. Sage.
Brown, G. H. (1947). A Comparison of Sampling Methods. Journal of Marketing, 11(4), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224294701100401
Christensen, L. B., Johnson, B., Turner, L. A., & Christensen, L. B. (2011). Research methods, design, and analysis.
Cohen, G. L., Aronson, J., & Steele, C. M. (2000). When Beliefs Yield to Evidence: Reducing Biased Evaluation by Affirming the Self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1151–1164. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002611011
Delice, A. (2010). The Sampling Issues in Quantitative Research. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10(4), 2001–2018.
Fowler Jr, F. J. (2013). Survey research methods. Sage publications.
Groves, R. M., Fowler Jr, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2011). Survey methodology. John Wiley & Sons.
Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44(2), 174–199.
Henn, M., Weinstein, M., & Foard, N. (2005). A short introduction to social research. Sage.
Hibberts, M., Burke Johnson, R., & Hudson, K. (2012). Common Survey Sampling Techniques BT - Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences (L. Gideon (ed.); pp. 53–74). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3876-2_5
Johnson, P., & Gill, J. (2010). Research methods for managers. Research Methods for Managers, 1–288.
Knoke, D., & Kalleberg, A. L. (1994). Job training in US organizations. American Sociological Review, 537–546.
Kotrlik, J., & Higgins, C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43.
Kou, D., Ma, H., Bishop, E. J., Zhan, S., & Chokshi, H. P. (2011). Sampling Considerations BT - Sample Preparation of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Challenges and Strategies for Sample Preparation and Extraction (B. Nickerson (ed.); pp. 21–39). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9631-2_2
Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.
Lindstrom, L. E., & Benz, M. R. (2002). Phases of career development: Case studies of young women with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69(1), 67–83.
Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage publications.
Nguyen, P. (2005). Public opinion polls, chicken soup and sample size. Teaching Statistics, 27(3), 89–92.
Otzen, T., & Manterola, C. (2017). Sampling techniques on a population study. Int. J. Morphol, 35(1), 227–232.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
Sharma, G. (2017). Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International Journal of Applied Research, 3(7), 749–752.
Singh, A. S., & Masuku, M. B. (2014). Sampling techniques & determination of sample size in applied statistics research: An overview. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 2(11), 1–22.
Singlton, R. A., & & Straits, B. C. (2010). Approaches to social research (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Som, R. K. (1995). Practical sampling techniques. CRC press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482273465
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling methods in research methodology; how to choose a sampling technique for research. How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research (April 10, 2016).
Wilson, J. (2014). Essentials of business research: A guide to doing your research project. Essentials of Business Research, 1–376. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5018032
Zikmund, W. G. (2000). Business research methods, Dryden. Harcourt) Fort Worth, Orlando.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Deri Firmansyah; Dede
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.