Grammatical Relations of German and Indonesian language in Criminal Texts Der Spiegel and Kompas

Sahat Taruli Siahaan; Mulyadi Mulyadi

doi:10.55927/jldl.v3i2.10570

Authors

Sahat Taruli Siahaan Universitas HKBP Nommensen
Mulyadi Mulyadi Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/jldl.v3i2.10570

Keywords:

Grammatical Relations, Criminal Text, Der Spiegel, Kompas

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the types of grammatical relations that appear in Germany in the German criminal text Der Spiegel and Indonesian in the Indonesian criminal text Kompas. The data in this study are 127 clauses in German and 90 clauses in Indonesia. The data sources in this study are 3 German crime texts in the German (online) magazine Der Spiegel and 3 Indonesia newspapers Kompas in the May 2024 issue. The research design used is Qualitative Descriptive. Data collection was carried out using critical reading and note-taking techniques. Meanwhile, the approach used in this study is the Typology approach of Comrie (1981) and Farrel (2005). The results of this study show that there are: (1) 4 types of grammatical relations, namely Nominative with 13 findings (10%), Nominative-Acoussative with 48 findings (38%), Active language with 44 findings (35%) and Passive language with 22 findings (17%) appear as types of grammatical relations that occur in German in the online criminal text Der Spiegel; (2) 4 types of grammatical relations found in Indonesian criminal texts in Kompas, that is Nominative with 7 findings (8%), Nominative-Accusative with 38 findings (42%), Active language with 32 findings (36%) and Passive language with 13 findings (14%); (3) the Nominative-Accusative grammatical relationship type with 48 findings (38%) is the dominant one found in the German criminal text in the May 2024 edition of Der Spiegel online; and (4) the Nominative-Accusative grammatical relationship type with 38 findings (42%) is the most dominant in the Indonesian crime text in the May 2024 issue of the Kompas newspaper.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arfianty, Rani dan Mulyadi. 2023. Kontrasifitas Konstruksi Ergatifitas Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Jepang: Kajian Tipologi. Kiryoku: Jurnal Studi Kejepangan, 7(2), 8-10; 13-14.

Artawa, Ketut dan Purnawati, Ketut Widya. 2020. Pemarkahan Diatesis Bahasa Indonesia: Kajian Tipologi Linguistik. Mozaik Humaniora, 20(1), 21-36.

Babby, Leonard H. 2009. The Syntax of Argument Structure. Cambridge University Press.

Babenko, N. 2022. On the processes of some grammatical resources specialization in modern German language.

Bril, Isabelle. 2022. Lexical Restrictions on Grammatical Relations in Voice Constructions (Northern AMIS). HAL Open Science.

Chiaka Taoka. 2000. Aspect and Argumen Structure in Japanese. Disertasi. Tokyo: Department of Linguistics University of Manchester.

Claassen, S.A. 2019. Typology of grammatical relations: Explanations in the typology of grammatical relations and alignment systems. RU:TS Student Linguistics Journal.

Delia Bentley. 2016. Split intransitivity. The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages book.

Dixon, R.M.W dan Aikhenvaid, Alexandra Y. (2002). Word: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. USA: Cambridge University Press.

Fauzi, Mohd. dan Mulyadi. 2020. Struktur Argumen Bahasa Melayu Dialek Akit. https://journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/jib/article/view/3705

Fernandez, Reyneldis B. 2019. Kalimat Sederhana dengan Unsur Pembentuk Predikat Verba pada Bahasa Melayu Larantuka. Jurnal Deskripsi Bahasa, 2(1).

Goddard, C dan Wierzbicka, A. 2019. Cognitive Semantics, Linguistic Typology and Grammatical Polysemy: “Possession” and the English Genitive.

G. Ramchand & C. Reiss (eds.), The oxford handbook of linguistic Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hawkins, John. 1986. A Comparative Typology of English and German: Unifying the Contrasts. Routledge.

Hawkins, J. 2018. Word-external properties in a typology of Modern English: a comparison with German.

Heine, Bernd and Narrog, Heiko. ___. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford.

Hilal, Andika Nur. 2015. Relasi Gramatikal dalam Novel Laskar Pelangi Karya Andrea Hirata. Universitas Negeri Jakarta: Skripsi.

James, Baker. 2016. cambridge occasional papers in linguistics,Split intransitivity in English, Volume 9, Article 1: 1–34, University of Cambridge COPi L.

Muhammad, Ramzia Yuns dan Ameen, Wuria Ahmed. 2023. Grammatical Relations Hierarchy in English. Spring, 8(1).

Müller, Stefan. 2020. Grammatical theory: from transformational grammar to constraint-based approach. Fourth revised and extended edition. Berlin: Language Science Press.

Ningrum, Dwi Kurnia Surya dan Suryani, Siti. 2023. Subordinative Construction of Tamiang Malay Language: Syntactic Typology Study. International Journal Linguistics of Sumatera and Malay, 31 December 2023.

Putri, R, Jufrizal dan Yudi, M. 2020. Relasi Gramatikal Bahasa Indonesia dalam Surat Kabar Republika. NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 7(1).

Schwabe, Kerstin. 2020. A Typology of German Polar Clause Embedding Predicates, a Uniform Represe

Seran, Melkianus Yufri, Nahak, Maria Magdalena Namok, dan Nalenan, Joni Soleman. (2021) Struktur Argumen Klausa Verbal Bahasa Bunaq.

Sheehan, M. to appear. Parameterising ergativity: an inherent case approach. In J. Coon, D.assam&L.Travis(eds.), Theoxford handbook of ergativity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1976. ―The Grammar of Causative Constructions: A Conspectus‖. Syntax and Semantics: The Grammar of Causative Constructions. New York: Academic Press.

Siahaan, Sahat Taruli, “A Textual Function Analysis of Criminal Text in Der Spiegel Online 2022,” in Jurnal Scientia, 11(1), 7-16, 2022.

Simanjuntak, Tarida Alvina dan Mulyadi. 2019. Grammatical Roles and Relations of Batak Toba Language: Typology Study. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences (IJELS).

Sinaga, Lara Desma dan Mulyadi. 2023. Grammatical Alliance and Pivot System of Batak Simalungun Language: A Syntactic Typology Study. LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra, 28 Januari 2023.

Soares, Antonio C. 2016. Verba bervalensi satu, dua dan tiga pada Bahasa Makasar. Universitas Udayana.

Suparmin. 2018. Relasi Gramatikal. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pertemuan Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia (PIBSI) 40, Pekalongan: 26-27 September 2018.

Szabó, Erzsébet, Stranovská, Eva dan Ficzere, Anikó. 2023. Cognitive Levels of Pragmalinguistic Typology and German Text Comprehension. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 28 September 2023.

Verhaar, J. W. M. 1978. “Some Notes on The Verbal Passive in Indonesian.” NUSA, Linguistic Studies of Indonesian and other Languages in Indonesia 19:11-19.

________. 1984. “The Categorial Systems in Contemporary Indonesian: Verbs.” Dalam Towards a Description of Contemporary Indonesian: Prelimanary Studies Part I. Nusa, Linguistic Studies of Indonesian and Other Languages in Indonesia, disunting oleh Bambang Kaswanti Purwa.

Verhaar, J. W. M. 1988. “Syntactic Ergativity in Contemporary Indonesian” dalam MacGinn, R. (ed.). Studies in Austronesian Linguistics. Hal.: 347-384. Athens: Ohio University.

Verhaar, J. W. M. 1977. “Pengantar Linguistik”. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Voeltz, F.K. Erhard. 2005. Studies in African Linguistic Typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publising.