Construction of the Meaning of the Swear Word "Anjing" as a Symbol of Intimacy in Komunitas Pecinta Alam Talegong

Asep Kiki Saepul Akbar; Prahastiwi Utari; Ign. Agung Satyawan

doi:10.55927/jsih.v1i3.1402

Authors

Asep Kiki Saepul Akbar Sebelas Maret University
Prahastiwi Utari Sebelas Maret University
Ign. Agung Satyawan Sebelas Maret University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/jsih.v1i3.1402

Keywords:

Construction of Meaning, Anjing, Symbol of Familiarity

Abstract

This article discusses the change in the meaning of the swear word "Anjing" which is referentially as an insult and refers to the nature of an animal, namely a dog, into a word that is spoken as a sign of intimacy, warmth and closeness among members of an organizational group. This study uses a qualitative approach with the method of observation. Symbolic interaction theory is used to reveal how the word dog is constructed as a symbol of intimacy. The results showed that the word anjing became a symbol of intimacy through high-intensity interaction with the process of interpreting meaning, adjusting and forming institutions in a communal society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aksan, N., Kisac, B., Aydin, M., & Demirbuken, S. (2009). Symbolic interaction theory. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 902–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.160

Aryo, F. (2011). Analisis interaksi simbolik yang membentuk pola komunikasi dinamis pada komunitas pesisir kabupaten jember. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertania, 5(2), 59–71.

Badelah, B., Mahsun, M., & Burhanudin, B. (2019). Tindak Tututr Kesantunan Guru dan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMP Negeri 2 Sakra. Tinjauan Pragmatik. LINGUA, 16(2), 219–134. http://doi.org/10.30957/LINGUA/V1612.604

Burhanudin, S. (2008). Etika Sosial; Asas Moral dalam Kehidupan Manusia. Rineka Cipta.

Engkus, K. (2008). Etnografi Komunikasi; suatu Pengantar dan Contoh Penelitiannya. Widya Padjajaran.

Hutapea, E. (2016). IDENTIFIKASI DIRI MELALUI SIMBOL-SIMBOL KOMUNIKASI (Studi Interaksionisme Simbolik Komunitas Pemakai Narkoba Di DKI Jakarta). Bricolage: Jurnal Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(1), 1– 14.

Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2008). Theories of Human Communication (9th ed.). Salemba Humanika.

Littlejohn, S. W., Foss, K. A., & Oetzel, J. G. (2017). Theories of Humas Communication. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (11th ed., Vol. 53, Issue 9). Wavweand Press, Inc.

Nasrullah, R. (2012). Komunikasi antar Budaya di Era Budaya Siber. Kencana. Nurhapsiah, T. (2019). Komunikasi dalam Hubungan Akrab berdasarkan

Persfektif Manajemen Koordinasi Makna. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Efek, 3, 27–45.

Revita, I., & Fathiya, N. (2020). Bahasa Makian Untuk Fungsi Keakraban di Kalangan “Anak Muda” Minangkabau. LINGUA, 17, 103–114.

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Tehnik Analisis Bahasa. Sanata Dharma University Press.

Wijana, Putu, I. D., & Rohmadi, M. (2006). Sosiolinguistik: Kajiann Teori dan Analisis. Pustaka Pelajar.