<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.2 20190208//EN"
                  "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
  xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.2" article-type="other">
  <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2827-8259</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Digital (MINISTAL)</journal-title>
                <abbrev-journal-title>Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Digital (MINISTAL)</abbrev-journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">2827-8259</issn>
            <issn pub-type="ppub">2827-8259</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>Formosa Publisher</publisher-name>
                <publisher-loc>Jl. Sutomo Ujung No.28 D, Durian, Kecamatan Medan Timur, Kota Medan, Sumatera Utara 20235, Indonesia.</publisher-loc>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.55927/ministal.v4i3.15201</article-id>
            <article-categories/>

            <title-group>
                <article-title>The Role of Leadership Style, Organizational Culture, and Work-Life Balance in Increasing Organizational Commitment in Millennial Employees</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <given-names>Anandita</given-names>
                        <surname>Nirvananda</surname>
                    </name>
                </contrib>

                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <given-names>Hermin</given-names>
                        <surname>Endratno</surname>
                    </name>
                    <address>
                        <email>herminendratno@ump.ac.id</email>
                    </address>
                    <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor-1"/>
                </contrib>
                
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <given-names>Hengky</given-names>
                        <surname>Widhiandono</surname>
                    </name>
                </contrib>

                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <given-names>Maulida Nurul</given-names>
                        <surname>Innayah</surname>
                    </name>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <author-notes>
                <corresp id="cor-1">
                    <bold>Corresponding author: Hermin Endratno</bold>
                    Email:<email>herminendratno@ump.ac.id</email>
                </corresp>
            </author-notes>
            <pub-date-not-available/>
            <volume>4</volume>
            <issue>3</issue>
            <issue-title>The Role of Leadership Style, Organizational Culture, and Work-Life Balance in Increasing Organizational Commitment in Millennial Employees</issue-title>
            <fpage></fpage>
            <lpage></lpage>
            <history>
                <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-7-17">
                    <day>17</day>
                    <month>7</month>
                    <year>2025</year>
                </date>
                <date date-type="rev-recd" iso-8601-date="2025-7-31">
                    <day>31</day>
                    <month>7</month>
                    <year>2025</year>
                </date>
                <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-8-29">
                    <day>29</day>
                    <month>8</month>
                    <year>2025</year>
                </date>
            </history>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright© 2025 Formosa Publisher</copyright-statement>
                <copyright-holder>Formosa Publisher</copyright-holder>
                <license>
                    <ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
                    <license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
                </license>
            </permissions>
            <self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.formosapublisher.org/index.php/ministal" xlink:title="The Role of Leadership Style, Organizational Culture, and Work-Life Balance in Increasing Organizational Commitment in Millennial Employees">The Role of Leadership Style, Organizational Culture, and Work-Life Balance in Increasing Organizational Commitment in Millennial Employees</self-uri>
            <abstract>
                <p>This study aims to analyze the influence of 
                leadership style, organizational culture, and 
                work-life balance on millennial employee 
                organizational commitment using a purposive 
                sampling approach to 115 respondents in 
                Purwokerto. This research uses SEM-PLS analysis 
                on the SmartPLS 4.0 application with Social 
                Exchange Theory as the basis for the relationship 
                approach between variables. The research 
                findings show that the three independent 
                variables, namely leadership style, organizational 
                culture, and work-life balance, have a positive and 
                significant  effect  on  organizational  commitment. 
                With the Social Exchange Theory approach, these 
                findings suggest that when organizations provide 
                support  through  supportive  leadership,  positive 
                work  culture,  and  work-life  balance,  millennial 
                employees will respond by increasing 
                commitment to the organization.</p>
            </abstract>
            <kwd-group>
                <kwd>Leadership Style</kwd>
                <kwd>Organizational Culture</kwd>
                <kwd>Work-Life Balance</kwd>
                <kwd>Organizational Commitment</kwd>
            </kwd-group>
            <custom-meta-group>
                <custom-meta>
                    <meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name>
                    <meta-value>
                        <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://jatseditor.com" xlink:title="JATS Editor">JATS Editor</ext-link>
                    </meta-value>
                </custom-meta>
                <custom-meta>
                    <meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name>
                    <meta-value>2025</meta-value>
                </custom-meta>
            </custom-meta-group>
        </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="introduction">
      <title>INTRODUCTION</title>
        <p>Human resources (HR) is one of the most important factors that
    are inseparable in a company (Nurjanah et al., 2020). Human resourch
    is a crucial element for companies because the success or
    effectiveness of a company depends on the quality and performance of
    its human resources (Sara et al., 2023). The quality of human
    resources can be a determining factor in company performance
    supported by the contribution of its workforce (Fitri &amp;
    Endratno, 2021). Therefore, it is important for companies to manage
    employees as human resources properly and wisely.</p>
        <p>Understanding generational differences is critical to managing
    challenges related to differences in employees' attitudes and
    preferences towards their managers as well as HR practices within
    the organization (Ali et al., 2024). One group that is of major
    concern in today's workforce is the millennial generation, a
    generation born between the 1980s and mid-1990s (Leuhery, 2024).
    Millennials who work in various organizations have significant and
    strategic positions (Indrayani et al., 2024). The Deloitte
    Millennial Survey shows that millennial employees have a high
    turnover rate, reflecting their low commitment to the organization
    (Tugade &amp; Arcinas, 2023). The importance of understanding the
    attitudes of millennials drives the need for research into the
    unique characteristics of this generation (Sakdiyakorn et al.,
    2021).</p>
        <p>Every company expects employees to have high commitment (Denni,
    2022). Less than optimal levels of commitment to the organization
    can be seen in high absenteeism, low participation in organizational
    activities, and inconsistent work performance (Adinata &amp;
    Yunianto, 2024). Some employees will feel less enthusiastic in
    completing tasks. This requires serious attention, as employee
    commitment is key to maintaining operational stability and achieving
    organizational goals (Chaidir et al., 2023). This condition is also
    reflected in a number of private companies in Purwokerto, where
    there are still problems related to the low loyalty and active
    participation of employees in supporting the sustainability of the
    organization. Therefore, private employees in this region were
    chosen as research subjects to further examine the factors that
    influence organizational commitment, especially in the millennial
    generation.</p>
        <p>Based on the results of interviews with researchers, especially
    among millennial generation employees, who are respondents in this
    study, there are indications that they have relatively low
    organizational commitment. This is in line with research by Tugade
    &amp; Arcinas (2023) which states that millennials tend to have
    lower job loyalty and are more open to new job opportunities than
    previous generations. This condition is caused by several factors,
    one of which is their high attention to the organizational culture
    in the company. Work cultures that are considered too rigid,
    hierarchical, or not inclusive make them feel uncomfortable and not
    emotionally attached to the organization. In addition, millennials
    strongly consider their role as social individuals outside of work,
    so if work takes up too much personal time or does not support life
    balance, they tend to be less loyal to the organization.</p>
        <p>Organizational commitment reflects the relationship between an
    organization and its members and influences the decision to remain
    in the organization (Aras et al., 2022). Organizational commitment
    contributes greatly to the achievement of company goals and
    objectives (Widyanti et al., 2020). Highly committed employees will
    carry out tasks with deep involvement (Aida et al., 2024).</p>
        <p>Leadership style is one of the factors in increasing
    organizational commitment (Atika et al., 2022). Leadership style is
    a leader's pattern of behavior that reflects his or her ability to
    lead (Masriani et al., 2021). Leadership style reflects a leader's
    ability to give full attention to employees by motivating them and
    increasing organizational commitment through delegation,
    responsibility, and employee empowerment (Musa &amp; Yuliza, 2022).
    Employees tend to be more committed to the organization when they
    have trust in the leader (Kawiana et al., 2021).</p>
        <p>Previous research from Atika et al. (2022), Izati &amp; Munawaroh
    (2025), Kawiana et al. (2021), Masriani et al. (2021), and Musa
    &amp; Yuliza (2022) stated that leadership style has a positive and
    significant effect on organizational commitment.</p>
        <p>The selection of an appropriate leadership style can have a
    significant impact on the commitment of members in an organization
    (Masriani et al., 2021). However, there is research from Widayani et
    al. (2022) which states that leadership style has no effect on
    organizational commitment.</p>
        <p>In addition to leadership style, organizational culture is one of
    the focuses in increasing organizational commitment (Izati &amp;
    Munawaroh, 2025). Organizational culture is a system of beliefs and
    values developed by an organization, which plays a role in guiding
    the behavior of its members (Musa &amp; Yuliza, 2022). Understanding
    organizational culture is important because of the diversity of
    employee cultures, so companies need to have a culture that is able
    to direct workers towards company goals and retain professional
    employees (Daslim et al., 2023).</p>
        <p>Previous research from Daslim et al. (2023), Izati &amp;
    Munawaroh (2025), Musa &amp; Yuliza (2022), Nugraha (2023), and
    Siswadi et al. (2023). When the corporate culture created is
    conducive and comfortable, organizational commitment in employees
    will increase (Nugraha, 2023). On the other hand, there is research
    from Hidayat et al. (2024) and Jazilah (2023) which states that
    organizational commitment is not influenced by organizational
    culture.</p>
        <p>Today's work demands make it difficult for people to balance
    work- related and non-work-related activities or work-life balance
    (Badrianto &amp; Ekhsan, 2021). Work-life balance (WLB) is defined
    as the ability of individuals to maintain a balance between the
    demands of work and their personal and family relationships, in
    order to minimize interference or conflict in personal life and
    improve performance in carrying out roles at work and personal life
    (Aras et al., 2022). Companies need to ensure effective
    implementation of WLB if they want employees to be fully committed
    to their work (Alfianto &amp; Hadi, 2024). When the company
    successfully implements WLB optimally, employees will feel attached
    to the company (Putri &amp; Frianto, 2023). Therefore, WLB is an
    important factor that can increase organizational commitment.</p>
        <p>Previous research from Abebe &amp; Assemie (2023), Alfianto &amp;
    Hadi (2024), Aras et al. (2022), Badrianto &amp; Ekhsan (2021), dan
    Putri &amp; Frianto (2023) explains that WLB has a significant and
    positive impact on organizational commitment. By feeling valued,
    less stressed, and more satisfied, employees will be more committed
    to the organization. However, there is research from Juanda &amp;
    Efendi (2024) and Nugrawati &amp; Prasetya (2021) which states that
    WLB has no impact on organizational commitment.</p>
        <p>The gap in research results and the lack of literature on
    organizational commitment in millennial employees are the focus of
    this research. Therefore, this study aims to examine the factors
    that influence the increase in millennial employee organizational
    commitment such as leadership style, organizational culture, and
    work-life balance so that it can add insight into the literature in
    managing millennial employees in the company by making Social
    Exchange Theory as a reference basis for how the relationship
    between variables in this study is formed. This research is a
    development of research by Masriani et al. (2021) which states that
    organizational commitment can be increased through leadership style.
    By adding the variables of organizational culture and work-life
    balance, this research is expected to broaden insights into how
    organizational commitment, especially millennial employees, can be
    improved. In addition, this research also makes an empirical
    contribution to the development of human resource management
    literature, especially in understanding the dynamics of millennial
    generation behavior in the workplace through the Social Exchange
    Theory approach.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="literature-review">
      <title>LITERATURE REVIEW</title>
      <sec id="social-exchange-theory">
        <title>Social Exchange Theory</title>
          <p>Social Exchange Theory (SET) highlights the properties that
      arise in interpersonal relationships and social interactions
      (Blau, 1967). SET explains that there is an exchange relationship
      between individuals, where employees will provide reciprocity in
      the form of their perceptions and performance in accordance with
      the treatment received from the organization (Liaquat &amp;
      Mehmood, 2017). SETs emphasize that interdependent interactions
      occur based on specific actions, which ultimately result in a
      relationship with high potency (Liaquat &amp; Mehmood, 2017).</p>
          <p>Support from good supervisors and the culture developed by the
      organization can foster employee perceptions of their careers, so
      as to improve performance as well as employee commitment (Leonardi
      &amp; Panggabean, 2021). In addition, WLB is one of the factors
      that influence organizational commitment when observed from the
      perspective of SET (Aida et al., 2024). On this basis, it can be
      said that when employees feel that the organization cares about
      their welfare and has good leadership, the organization can get
      reciprocity in the form of positive attitudes from employees.</p>
          <p>SET states that employees will feel more satisfied and show
      higher commitment if the organization provides support and
      attention to their lives (Allen, 2001). This results in an
      understanding that the relationship between employees and the
      organization is based on reciprocal aspects, where the mutually giving nature of this relationship can determine employee behavior towards their organization (Liaquat &amp;
      Mehmood, 2017).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="organizational-commitment">
        <title>Organizational Commitment</title>
          <p>Commitment is an attitude that describes an employee's loyalty
      to the organization and the ongoing stage in which organizational
      participants show their concern for the continuity and prosperity
      of the organization (Luthans, 2011). Organizational commitment is
      the level of trust in which an employee sides with an organization
      and its goals and intends to maintain membership in the
      organization, and reflects a loyal attitude towards the
      organization (Nurjanah et al., 2020). In addition, organizational
      commitment is also defined as an attitude that describes a
      person's loyalty to the organization and shows his concern for the
      sustainability of the organization (Surya &amp; Riana, 2023).
      According to Raharjo et al. (2023), Organizational commitment
      describes the extent to which employees have a psychological
      attachment to their work.</p>
          <p>Organizational commitment is measured using Meyer &amp; Allen
      (1991) Three-Component Model of Commitment which includes
      continuance, normative, dan affective (Luthans, 2011). Affective
      commitment refers to an employee's emotional attachment, sense of
      identification, and involvement with the organization (Meyer &amp;
      Allen, 1991). This commitment is reflected when employees feel
      part of the organization. Continuance commitment refers to
      employees' awareness of the costs or consequences that must be
      borne if they leave the organization (Meyer &amp; Allen, 1991).
      Finally, normative commitment describes an employee's feeling of
      obligation to remain with the organization (Meyer &amp; Allen,
      1991).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="leadership-style">
        <title>Leadership Style</title>
          <p>Leadership is the ability to influence individuals or groups to
      have the willingness to work effectively and efficiently in
      achieving certain goals in accordance with the situation at hand
      (Atika et al., 2022). While leadership style is a pattern of
      behavior applied by a person when trying to influence the actions
      or attitudes of others (Masriani et al., 2021). Leaders who are
      able to empower and develop employee potential can improve
      organizational performance, commitment, and profits (Kawiana et
      al., 2021). Leadership style is measured using indicators from
      Bass's Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) which includes
      eight dimensions of leadership style (Den Hartog et al.,
      1997).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="organizational-culture">
        <title>Organizational Culture</title>
          <p>Organizational culture is a pattern of thinking, feeling, and
      response that develops within the organization or its parts (Musa
      &amp; Yuliza, 2022). Organizational culture is important because
      it determines how members achieve the goals that have been set
      (Izati &amp; Munawaroh, 2025). Organizational culture is also
      defined as a set of values and norms adopted and obeyed by
      employees, which plays a role in uniting perceptions of the
      company's vision and mission (Nugraha, 2023). Organizational
      culture can be measured using indicators from Lee &amp; Choi
      (2003) which includes collaboration, trust, and learning.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="work-life-balance">
        <title>Work-Life Balance</title>
          <p>Work-life balance (WLB) is the achievement of harmony through a
      balanced relationship between work, health, happiness, leisure,
      and family life (Abebe &amp; Assemie, 2023). WLB is a work pattern
      in which employees are able to maintain a balance between
      professional responsibilities in the company and other obligations
      in personal life (Putri &amp; Frianto, 2023). Optimal WLB can
      encourage employees to stay in the organization (Badrianto &amp;
      Ekhsan, 2021). According to Parkes &amp; Langford (2008), WLB is
      measured using four indicators including work-life balance,
      fulfillment of responsibilities, social life and engagement, and
      support and flexible work policies.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="leadership-style-and-organizational-commitment">
        <title>Leadership Style and Organizational Commitment</title>
          <p>Leadership style reflects a leader's ability to give full
      attention to employees by motivating them and increasing
      organizational commitment through delegation, responsibility, and
      employee empowerment (Musa &amp; Yuliza, 2022). The selection of
      an appropriate leadership style can have a significant impact on
      the commitment of members in an organization (Masriani et al.,
      2021).</p>
          <p>From the Social Exchange Theory (SET) perspective, when
      employees feel that their leaders provide support, trust, and
      recognition, they will reciprocate by showing loyalty and
      commitment to the organization (Leonardi &amp; Panggabean, 2021).
      Previous research from Atika et al. (2022), Izati &amp; Munawaroh
      (2025), Kawiana et al. (2021), Masriani et al. (2021), dan Musa
      &amp; Yuliza (2022) stated that a good leadership style can
      significantly increase organizational commitment. Employees who
      have trust in company leaders tend to be more committed to the
      organization (Kawiana et al., 2021).</p>
          <p>H1: Leadership style has a significant and positive effect on
      Organizational Commitment</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="organizational-culture-and-organizational-commitment">
        <title>Organizational Culture and Organizational Commitment</title>
          <p>Organizational commitment can be formed because it is
      influenced by various factors, including organizational culture
      (Nugraha, 2023). Organizational culture has a major influence on
      employee behavior in the workplace because it is formed from the
      value system adopted by employees (Izati &amp; Munawaroh, 2025).
      If the corporate culture that is formed is conducive and
      comfortable for employees, then commitment to the organization
      from employees will increase, so that it can support the
      achievement of company goals (Nugraha, 2023).</p>
          <p>In the Social Exchange Theory perspective, a positive
      organizational culture provides a sense of security, appreciation,
      and self-development opportunities that encourage employees to
      reciprocate with high commitment to the organization (Liaquat
      &amp; Mehmood, 2017). Previous research from Daslim et al. (2023),
      Izati &amp; Munawaroh (2025), Musa &amp; Yuliza (2022), Nugraha
      (2023), and Siswadi et al. (2023) found that organizational
      culture has a positive and significant effect on organizational
      commitment. A good organizational culture that can make employees
      comfortable will increase their organizational commitment (Daslim
      et al., 2023).</p>
          <p>H2: Organizational Culture has a significant and positive
      effect on Organizational Commitment</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="work-life-balance-and-organizational-commitment">
        <title>Work-Life Balance and Organizational Commitment</title>
          <p>An increasingly competitive environment demands a balance
      between personal life and work or work-life balance (Putri &amp;
      Frianto, 2023). Companies need to ensure effective implementation
      of WLB if they want employees to be fully committed to their work
      (Alfianto &amp; Hadi, 2024). When employees are able to balance
      their work and personal lives, it increases their commitment (Aras
      et al., 2022). On the other hand, when work-life balance is
      achieved, employees tend to be more focused, feel positive, and
      avoid stress, which in turn increases their dedication to work
      (Badrianto &amp; Ekhsan, 2021).</p>
          <p>In the Social Exchange Theory perspective, organizational
      attention to employees' work-life balance, such as through
      flexible work policies or social support, is perceived as
      fulfilling expectations that encourage employees to reciprocate
      with increased commitment to the organization (Aida et al., 2024).
      Previous research from Abebe &amp; Assemie (2023), Alfianto &amp;
      Hadi (2024), Aras et al. (2022), Badrianto &amp; Ekhsan (2021),
      and Putri &amp; Frianto (2023) explains that WLB has a significant
      and positive impact on organizational commitment. Having a good
      WLB policy and system is essential for supporting work and
      personal life, and increasing employees' organizational commitment
      (Abebe &amp; Assemie, 2023). By feeling valued in the fulfillment
      of work-life balance, employees will be more committed to the
      organization.</p>
          <p>H3: Work-Life Balance has a significant and positive effect on
      Organizational Commitment.</p>
        <fig id="figure-hyumg5">
            <label>Figure 1. Conceptual Framework</label>
            <graphic xlink:href="East_Asian_Journal_of_Multidisciplinary_Research_EAJMR-4-8-3651-g1.png" mimetype="image"
                mime-subtype="png">
                <alt-text>Image</alt-text>
            </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Figure 1. Conceptual Framework</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="methodology">
      <title>METHODOLOGY</title>
        <p>This research is quantitative research. Data was collected
    through questionnaires collected from millennial employees at
    several companies in Purwokerto. Organizational commitment can be
    measured using Meyer &amp; Allen (1991) Three-Component Model of
    Commitment which includes continuance, normative, dan affective.
    Leadership style is measured using Bass’s Multifactor Leadership
    Questionnire (MLQ) which includes eight dimensions of leadership
    style (Den Hartog et al., 1997). Meanwhile, organizational culture
    is measured using measurements from Lee &amp; Choi (2003) which
    includes collaboration, trust, and learning. Finally, WLB is
    measured using four indicators from Parkes &amp; Langford (2008)
    which includes work-life balance, fulfillment of responsibilities,
    social life and involvement, as well as support and flexible work
    policies. The Likert scale is used for measurement, which utilizes
    indicators or dimensions of the variables presented in the form of statements on the
    questionnaire (Sugiyono, 2019).</p>
        <p>This study uses a non-probability sampling method, which is a
    sampling method where each part or member of the population has an
    unequal probability of being selected as a sample by applying a
    purposive sampling approach. Purposive sampling is a sampling
    technique with certain considerations (Sugiyono, 2019). In this
    context, researchers consider only millennial employees aged 25-30
    years with more than one year of work experience as many as 115
    employees who are sampled in this study.</p>
        <p>The data was analyzed using PLS-SEM through the SmartPLS 4
    application. This technique was chosen because it is able to provide
    a direct analysis of the relationship between variables while
    allowing path testing (Hair et al., 2017). The analysis was
    conducted in two main stages: measurement model evaluation (outer
    model) and structural model evaluation (inner model). Convergent
    validity was tested based on factor loading values (&gt; 0.7) and
    Average Variance Extracted (AVE &gt; 0.5) values, while discriminant
    validity was tested using cross- loading values and Fornell-Larcker
    criteria. Indicator reliability was measured through Cronbach's
    alpha and Composite Reliability, with a threshold value of &gt;0.7 as a good reliability indicator (Hair et al., 2017).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="research-results">
      <title>RESEARCH RESULTS</title>
      <sec id="demographic-analysis-of-respondents">
        <title>Demographic Analysis of Respondents</title>
          <p>The first analysis in this study is the demographic analysis listed in Table 1. The demographic analysis aims to provide additional information to future researchers.</p>
        <p>Table 1. Respondent Identity Profile</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1. Respondent Identity Profile</label>
          <caption>
            <title></title>
          </caption>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>Category</th>
                <th>Total</th>
                <th>%</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="3"><bold>Gender</bold></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Male</td>
                <td>88</td>
                <td>76,5</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Female</td>
                <td>27</td>
                <td>23,5</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="3"><bold>Age</bold></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>25–30 tahun</td>
                <td>115</td>
                <td>100</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="3"><bold>Marriage Status</bold></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Married</td>
                <td>48</td>
                <td>41,7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Unmarried</td>
                <td>67</td>
                <td>58,3</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="3"><bold>Education</bold></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>SLTA/SMA</td>
                <td>13</td>
                <td>11,3</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>D3</td>
                <td>19</td>
                <td>16,5</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>D4</td>
                <td>18</td>
                <td>15,7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>S1</td>
                <td>51</td>
                <td>44,3</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>S2</td>
                <td>14</td>
                <td>12,2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="3"><bold>Length of Service</bold></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>1–5 years</td>
                <td>104</td>
                <td>90,4</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>6–10 years</td>
                <td>11</td>
                <td>9,6</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="3"><bold>Section/Division</bold></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Dev-Ops</td>
                <td>15</td>
                <td>13,0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Marketing</td>
                <td>9</td>
                <td>7,8</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Finance</td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>5,2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Data Science</td>
                <td>11</td>
                <td>9,6</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Operations</td>
                <td>7</td>
                <td>6,1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Quality Assurance</td>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>8,7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Product Management</td>
                <td>14</td>
                <td>12,2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Human Resources</td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>10,4</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Development</td>
                <td>9</td>
                <td>7,8</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Design</td>
                <td>8</td>
                <td>7,0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Other</td>
                <td>14</td>
                <td>12,2</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
          <p>The demographic analysis of respondents in Table 1 shows that
      the majority of respondents were male (76.5%), with an age group
      of 25 to 30 years (millennials). The majority of respondents also
      had work experience between 1 to 5 years (90.4%), indicating that
      respondents with greater experience were more involved in the
      study.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="measurement-model-analysis-outer-model">
        <title>Measurement Model Analysis (Outer Model)</title>
          <p>The first measurement model analysis carried out is the loading
      factor analysis as one of the requirements for convergent
      validity. Convergent validity will be achieved with a loading
      factor value&gt; 0.7 and AVE&gt; 0.5 (Hair et al., 2017).</p>
          <p>Table 2. Convergent Validity &amp; Reliability</p>
          <table-wrap id="t2" position="float">
            <label>Table 2. Convergent Validity &amp; Reliability</label>
            <caption>
              <title></title>
            </caption>
            <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
              <thead>
                <tr>
                  <th>Items</th>
                  <th>Loading Factor</th>
                  <th>CA</th>
                  <th>CR</th>
                  <th>AVE</th>
                </tr>
              </thead>
              <tbody>
                <tr>
                  <td><bold>Organizational Commitment (Y)</bold></td>
                  <td></td><td>0.977</td><td>0.978</td><td>0.651</td>
                </tr>
                <tr><td>(KO1) I would love to spend the rest of my career in this organization/company</td><td>0.838</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO2) I enjoy discussing the organization/company with people outside the organization/company</td><td>0.842</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO3) I feel that the problems of this organization/company are my own</td><td>0.800</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO4) I don't feel easily associated with other organizations/companies</td><td>0.801</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO5) I feel like a “family member” in this organization/company</td><td>0.848</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO6) I feel “emotionally attached” to this organization/company</td><td>0.802</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO7) This organization/company means a lot to me personally</td><td>0.841</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO8) I feel very attached to this organization/company</td><td>0.779</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO9) I felt that leaving this job would pose a great risk to my career</td><td>0.809</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO10) It is very difficult for me to leave the current organization/company, even if I wanted to</td><td>0.838</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO11) Too many things in my life will be disrupted if I decide to leave this organization/company</td><td>0.825</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO12) It is too expensive for me to leave this organization/company</td><td>0.799</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO13) Staying in an organization/company today is a matter of needs and wants</td><td>0.772</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO14) I felt I had little choice in considering leaving the organization</td><td>0.799</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO15) A serious consequence of leaving this organization/company is the lack of available alternatives</td><td>0.759</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO16) One of the main reasons I continue to work for this organization is that leaving would require significant personal sacrifice</td><td>0.825</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO17) I think people today change organizations/companies too often</td><td>0.780</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO18) I believe that one should always be loyal to their organization/company</td><td>0.839</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO19) To me, moving from one organization to another seemed unethical</td><td>0.833</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO20) I feel a moral obligation to stay with this organization/company</td><td>0.788</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO21) If I got another offer for a better job elsewhere, I would not feel right about leaving this organization/company</td><td>0.765</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO22) I learned to believe in the value of staying loyal to an organization</td><td>0.771</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO23) Things get better when people stay with one organization/company for most of their career</td><td>0.804</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(KO24) I stayed with the organization because I felt it was the right thing to do</td><td>0.731</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>

                <tr>
                  <td><bold>Leadership Style (X1)</bold> (Efthymiopoulos &amp; Goula, 2024)</td>
                  <td></td><td>0.970</td><td>0.972</td><td>0.637</td>
                </tr>
                <tr><td>(GK1) My leader makes others feel good to be around</td><td>0.787</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(GK2) My leader often uses encouraging words and gives clear directions</td><td>0.811</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(GK3) My leader encourages me to think creatively and find innovative solutions</td><td>0.799</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(GK4) My leader actively provides guidance and advice tailored to my potential and career goals</td><td>0.816</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(GK5) I have full confidence in my leader</td><td>0.821</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(GK6) My leader is able to provide encouragement and motivation that makes me feel enthusiastic at work</td><td>0.780</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(GK7) My leader gives me new ways to look at problems at work</td><td>0.760</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(GK8) My leader tells employees how they should do their jobs</td><td>0.907</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(GK9) I feel proud of my leader</td><td>0.733</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(GK10) My leader helps me find meaning in my work</td><td>0.774</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(GK11) My leader always opens a discussion room to analyze problems</td><td>0.835</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(GK12) My leader understands my personal and professional needs</td><td>0.782</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(GK13) The leader told me what to do if I wanted to get the award</td><td>0.818</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(GK14) I felt satisfied and not harassed by my leader if I follow the agreed work standards</td><td>0.829</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(GK15) I receive recognition or rewards from leaders when I achieve set goals</td><td>0.765</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(GK16) As long as the work is going well, the leader does not try to change anything</td><td>0.725</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(GK17) Leaders highlight the benefits or rewards I can get for my achievements</td><td>0.865</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(GK18) Leaders set standards that I must understand to do my job</td><td>0.680</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(GK19) I was left to work in the same way as before with no changes if they were not needed</td><td>0.711</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(GK20) Leaders tend to let me work at my own pace without much intervention</td><td>0.733</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(GK21) The leader only expects me to complete tasks that are absolutely necessary</td><td>0.731</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>

                <tr>
                  <td><bold>Organizational Culture (X2)</bold> (Dhingra et al., 2024)</td>
                  <td></td><td>0.935</td><td>0.949</td><td>0.756</td>
                </tr>
                <tr><td>(BO1) I am satisfied with the level of collaboration within the organization</td><td>0.868</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(BO2) My colleagues and I have a willingness to collaborate across units in the organization</td><td>0.836</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(BO3) I have confidence in my coworkers’ ability to perform their duties</td><td>0.886</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(BO4) I have confidence that my colleagues are acting in accordance with organizational goals</td><td>0.875</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(BO5) The company provides various formal training programs to improve my performance in carrying out my duties</td><td>0.890</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(BO6) The company encourages me to attend seminars, symposiums and other similar activities</td><td>0.825</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>

                <tr>
                  <td><bold>Work-Life Balance (X3)</bold> (Lam et al., 2021)</td>
                  <td></td><td>0.944</td><td>0.952</td><td>0.690</td>
                </tr>
                <tr><td>(WLB1) I feel like I am an asset to the company or my employer</td><td>0.892</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(WLB2) My boss has never made any complaints against me</td><td>0.834</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(WLB3) I am considered a role model by my subordinates or coworkers</td><td>0.898</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(WLB4) My coworkers are happy with the way I interact with them</td><td>0.868</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(WLB5) The way I provide services to customers makes them satisfied</td><td>0.868</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(WLB6) I can balance the time with the time I have for family and personal activities</td><td>0.867</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(WLB7) I feel that I can fulfill my role both at work and at home effectively</td><td>0.833</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(WLB8) I am able to fulfill my work responsibilities without compromising my personal obligations</td><td>0.775</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
                <tr><td>(WLB9) I can still make time to socialize with friends and family outside of work hours</td><td>0.820</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
              </tbody>
            </table>
          </table-wrap>
          <p>The results in Table 2 show a loading factor &lt;0.70 on item
      GK20 so it is necessary to reconstruct by removing items from the
      model. From the results of the loading factor output after
      reconstruction, all items of each variable&gt; 0.70 so that it can
      be one of the requirements for testing convergent validity. In
      addition, all Composite Reliability (CR) and Cronbach's alpha (CA)
      values are &gt; 0.70 (Hair et al., 2017), shows good reliability
      for each variable.</p>
        <p>Table 3. Discriminant Validity: Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio</p>
        <table-wrap>
          <label>Table 3. Discriminant Validity: Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio</label>
          <table>
            <colgroup>
              <col width="38%" />
              <col width="17%" />
              <col width="14%" />
              <col width="14%" />
              <col width="17%" />
            </colgroup>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>Variables</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>OC</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>LS</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>OC</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>WLB</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Organizational</p>
                      <p>Culture</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Leadership Style</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,599</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Organizational</p>
                      <p>Commitment</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,624</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,554</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Work-Life Balance</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,514</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,420</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>0,490</td>
                <td></td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
          <p>Furthermore, the discriminant validity analysis using the
      Heterotrait- Monotrait Ratio (HTMT) in Table 3 shows that all HTMT
      values are below the 0.90 threshold, which indicates that each construct in the
      model has a clear distinction from each other (Hair et al.,
      2017).</p>
        <p>Table 4. Discriminant Validity: Fornell-Larcker</p>
        <table-wrap>
          <label>Table 4. Discriminant Validity: Fornell-Larcker</label>
          <table>
            <colgroup>
              <col width="38%" />
              <col width="17%" />
              <col width="14%" />
              <col width="14%" />
              <col width="17%" />
            </colgroup>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>Variables</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>OC</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>LS</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>OC</bold>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>WLB</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Organizational</p>
                      <p>Culture</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>0,870</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Leadership Style</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,575</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>0,798</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td></td>
                <td></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Organizational</p>
                      <p>Commitment</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,610</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,559</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0,807</bold>
                </td>
                <td></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Work-Life Balance</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,486</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,409</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>0,486</td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>0,830</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
          <p>Finally, Table 4 shows that the Fornell-Larcker criterion is
      well met, which is characterized by the square root value of AVE
      on the diagonal being higher than the other values for each
      variable (Hair et al., 2017). Therefore, discriminant validity in
      the model can be stated to have been fulfilled.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="structural-model-analysis-inner-model">
        <title>Structural Model Analysis (Inner Model)</title>
          <p>Evaluation of the structural model aims to analyze the
      relationship between constructs, assess the significance value,
      and determine the R-square value of the research model. The first
      stage of the inner model is model test or model fit.</p>
          <p>Table 5. Model Test (Model Fit)</p>
          <table-wrap id="t5" position="float">
            <label>Table 5. Model Test (Model Fit)</label>
            <caption>
              <title></title>
            </caption>
            <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
              <thead>
                <tr>
                  <th>Model</th>
                  <th>Saturated Model</th>
                  <th>Estimated Model</th>
                </tr>
              </thead>
              <tbody>
                <tr>
                  <td>SRMR</td>
                  <td>0.081</td>
                  <td>0.081</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>NFI</td>
                  <td>0.501</td>
                  <td>0.501</td>
                </tr>
              </tbody>
            </table>
          </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec>
          <p>The Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) value &lt;0.1
      indicates that the model structure is considered suitable. While
      the Normal Fit Index (NFI) shows the suitability of the model in
      the study with a value of 0 - 1 where the closer to 1, the better
      or the more suitable the model built (Hair et al., 2017).</p>
        <p>Table 6. R-Square</p>
        <table-wrap id="t6" position="float">
          <label>Table 6. R-Square</label>
          <caption>
            <title></title>
          </caption>
          <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>Variables</th>
                <th>R-Square</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Organizational Commitment</td>
                <td>0.468</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>

      <sec>
          <p>The R-square assessment in Table 6 shows good results. The
      R-square value of 0.468 for organizational commitment indicates
      that 46.8% of the variation in this variable can be explained by
      the independent variables, the rest is influenced by other factors
      outside the study (Hair et al., 2017).</p>
        <p>Table 7. Hypothesis Test</p>
        <table-wrap>
          <label>Table 7. Hypothesis Test</label>
          <table>
            <colgroup>
              <col width="27%" />
              <col width="24%" />
              <col width="15%" />
              <col width="14%" />
              <col width="20%" />
            </colgroup>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>Hypothesis</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>Path</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                  <p>
                    <bold>Coefficients (β)</bold>
                  </p>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>
                        <bold>T</bold>
                      </p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                  <p>
                    <bold>Statistic</bold>
                  </p>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <p>
                    <bold>P</bold>
                  </p>
                  <p>
                    <bold>Values</bold>
                  </p>
                </th>
                <th>
                  <bold>Conclusion</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>LS → OC H1</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,272</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>2,267</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,012</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Retrieved</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>OC → OC H2</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,355</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>3,285</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,001</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Retrieved</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>WLB → OC H3</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,202</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>2,018</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>0,022</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <p specific-use="wrapper">
                    <disp-quote>
                      <p>Retrieved</p>
                    </disp-quote>
                  </p>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
          <p>The last stage in SEM-PLS analysis is hypothesis testing.
      Hypothesis testing assumes the influence of independent variables
      on the dependent variable if the T statistical value&gt; 1.960 and
      the P value is less than 0.05. The test results in Table 7 show
      that all variable relationships have positive path coefficients
      (β) and all hypotheses are accepted.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="discussion">
      <title>DISCUSSION</title>
      <sec id="effect-of-leadership-style-on-organizational-commitment">
        <title>Effect of Leadership Style on Organizational Commitment</title>
          <p>The results showed that leadership style has a positive and
      significant effect on organizational commitment in millennial
      employees. Leaders who are able to provide clear direction, show
      concern, and involve employees in decision making will create a
      sense of value and emotional attachment to the organization.
      Effective leadership styles, such as transformational or
      participative styles, motivate employees to be more engaged and feel a sense of
      responsibility towards company goals, thus increasing their
      commitment to the organization.</p>
          <p>From the perspective of Social Exchange Theory (SET), the
      relationship between leadership style and organizational
      commitment can be understood as a form of reciprocal relationship.
      When employees feel that their leaders provide support, trust, and
      recognition, they will reciprocate by showing loyalty and
      commitment to the organization. This give-and-take attitude
      creates a positive work climate, where employees feel an important
      part of the organization. This finding is in line with previous
      research conducted by Atika et al. (2022), Izati &amp; Munawaroh
      (2025), Kawiana et al. (2021), Masriani et al. (2021), dan Musa
      &amp; Yuliza (2022), which states that the right leadership style
      can significantly increase organizational commitment. The
      implication of this finding is that it is important for
      organizations to develop supportive and participative leadership
      styles to strengthen organizational commitment, especially among
      millennial employees who tend to value engagement and respectful
      working relationships.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="effect-of-organizational-culture-on-organizational-commitment">
        <title>Effect of Organizational Culture on Organizational Commitment</title>
          <p>The results showed that organizational culture has a positive
      and significant effect on organizational commitment. A strong and
      positive organizational culture, characterized by the values of
      cooperation, trust, openness, and respect will be able to create a
      comfortable and supportive work environment. In such a situation,
      employees feel more emotionally attached to the organization and
      have a higher drive to remain part of the company. An inclusive
      and consistent culture also helps unify employees' perceptions of
      the organization's vision and mission, thereby strengthening their
      commitment.</p>
          <p>When viewed through the perspective of Social Exchange Theory,
      a positive organizational culture provides stimulus in the form of
      security, appreciation, and self-development opportunities to
      employees. In response to this positive treatment, employees will
      give back in the form of high commitment to the organization. This
      reciprocal relationship is a strong foundation in building long-
      term bonds between employees and the company. This finding is in
      line with research by Daslim et al. (2023), Izati &amp; Munawaroh
      (2025), Musa &amp; Yuliza (2022), Nugraha (2023), and Siswadi et
      al. (2023) which shows that organizational culture has a positive
      and significant influence on increasing employee commitment. The
      implication of this finding is that organizations need to build
      and maintain a work culture that is inclusive, collaborative, and
      oriented towards shared values to increase employee loyalty and
      attachment to the company.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="effect-of-work-life-balance-on-organizational-commitment">
        <title>Effect of Work-Life Balance on Organizational Commitment</title>
          <p>The results showed that work-life balance has a positive and
      significant effect on organizational commitment. Employees who are
      able to balance the demands of work and personal life tend to feel
      more satisfied, more focused at work, and have lower stress
      levels. In this condition, employees feel comfortable in carrying
      out their role in the organization without having to sacrifice
      important aspects of their personal life. This supportive
      situation will encourage employees' loyalty and emotional
      attachment to the company, thus strengthening their commitment to
      keep contributing in the long run.</p>
          <p>If examined through the perspective of Social Exchange Theory,
      organizations that pay attention to employee work-life balance are
      considered to have met employee expectations in reciprocal
      relationships. When employees feel that the organization cares
      about their well-being, for example through flexible work policies
      or social support, they will respond by increasing their
      commitment to the organization. This result is consistent with the
      findings of Abebe &amp; Assemie (2023), Alfianto &amp; Hadi
      (2024), Aras et al. (2022), Badrianto &amp; Ekhsan (2021), dan
      Putri &amp; Frianto (2023) which states that work-life balance has
      a significant influence in increasing organizational commitment,
      especially among millennial generation employees who highly value
      the balance between work and personal life. The implication of
      this finding is that companies need to design and implement
      policies that support work-life balance, such as work time
      flexibility and support for employees' personal needs, in order to
      increase organizational loyalty and commitment, especially among
      the millennial generation.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="conclusions-and-recommendations">
      <title>CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS</title>
        <p>The results of this study indicate that leadership style,
    organizational culture, and work-life balance have a positive and
    significant effect on millennial employees' organizational
    commitment. An inclusive and supportive leadership style, an
    organizational culture that is collaborative and trusted by
    employees, and a balance between work and personal life are proven
    to increase employees' loyalty and emotional attachment to the
    organization. These findings reinforce the concept that managerial
    strategies and a supportive work environment are key in building
    organizational commitment, especially in millennials who have a
    tendency of high job mobility.</p>
        <p>From the Social Exchange Theory point of view, this result
    confirms that when organizations provide attention, appreciation,
    and support to their employees, either through a leadership style
    that values contributions, a trusting organizational culture, or
    policies that support life balance, employees will reciprocate with
    higher commitment to the company. Based on the results of
    descriptive analysis, in the organizational commitment variable, the
    lowest value indicates that some employees still consider leaving
    the organization if they get a better job offer. Therefore, it is
    important for companies to strengthen employees' emotional bonds and
    sense of belonging to the organization, for example through career
    development, direct involvement in decision making, or long-term
    rewards. On the leadership style variable, the statement with the
    lowest mean value indicates that some leaders still tend to be
    oriented towards minimal task completion. For this reason, it is
    recommended that leaders be more proactive in providing constructive
    challenges, building open communication, and encouraging the
    development of employee potential. Furthermore, in the
    organizational culture variable, low values are seen in the aspects
    of collaboration and trust in colleagues. This indicates the need
    for increased cross- team cooperation and the establishment of a
    culture of mutual trust, which can be realized through team
    activities, cross-departmental training, and the establishment of a
    culture of trust.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="advanced-research">
      <title>ADVANCED RESEARCH</title>
        <p>This study has several limitations, including the limited
    research area that only covers companies in the Purwokerto area and
    the use of quantitative methods that do not capture the deep
    dynamics of employee perceptions. Future research is expected to
    expand the coverage area and use a qualitative or mixed approach to
    dig deeper into the factors that influence organizational
    commitment. In addition, adding mediating variables such as job
    satisfaction or employee engagement is also recommended in order to
    provide a more comprehensive picture of the factors that influence
    organizational commitment in millennial employees.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>

      <ref id="R1">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Abebe</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Assemie</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2023</year>
      <article-title>Quality of Work Life and Organizational Commitment of The Academic Staff in Ethiopian Universities</article-title>
      <source>Heliyon</source>
      <volume>9</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15139</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R2">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Adinata</surname><given-names>R. S.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Yunianto</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2024</year>
      <article-title>Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Transaksional, Motivasi Kerja dan Komitmen Organisasional Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan</article-title>
      <source>Jesya</source>
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>1499</fpage>
      <lpage>1510</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36778/jesya.v7i2.1559</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R3">
    <element-citation publication-type="confproc">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Aida</surname><given-names>E. J.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Putri</surname><given-names>I. P.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Triandani</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Lahamid</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2024</year>
      <article-title>Work-Life Balance on Performance with Organizational Commitment As an Intervening Variable</article-title>
      <source>Proceeding International Conference on Economic and Social Sciences</source>
      <volume>2</volume>
      <fpage>281</fpage>
      <lpage>291</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.46799/ijssr.v4i03.685</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R4">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Alfianto</surname><given-names>R. S.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Hadi</surname><given-names>H. K.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2024</year>
      <article-title>Pengaruh Work-Life Balance terhadap Komitmen Organisasi melalui Kepuasan Kerja</article-title>
      <source>Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen</source>
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>707</fpage>
      <lpage>719</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26740/jim.v12n3.p707-719</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R5">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Qiu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2024</year>
      <article-title>Examination of HRM practices in relation to the retention of Chinese Gen Z employees</article-title>
      <source>Humanities &amp; Social Sciences Communications</source>
      <volume>11</volume>
      <issue>24</issue>
      <fpage>1</fpage>
      <lpage>12</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1057/s41599-023-02472-6</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R6">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Allen</surname><given-names>T. D.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2001</year>
      <article-title>Family-Supportive Work Environments: The Role of Organizational Perceptions</article-title>
      <source>Journal of Vocational Behavior</source>
      <volume>58</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>414</fpage>
      <lpage>435</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/jvbe.2000.1774</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R7">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Aras</surname><given-names>R. A.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Rahmadani</surname><given-names>A. R.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Nurkhalifa</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Rahmiani</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2022</year>
      <article-title>Job Stress Impact on Nurse’s Organizational Commitment and The Role of Work Life Balance</article-title>
      <source>Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis</source>
      <volume>9</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>204</fpage>
      <lpage>214</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.33096/jmb.v9i1.136</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R8">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Atika</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Tavip</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Ayu</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Mustafa</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2022</year>
      <article-title>Work Discipline, Leadership, and Job Satisfaction on Organizational Commitment and Teacher Performance of State Junior High School in Bangko District, Rokal Hilir Regency</article-title>
      <source>Journal of Applied Business and Technology</source>
      <volume>3</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>251</fpage>
      <lpage>262</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.35145/jabt.v3i3.109</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R9">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Badrianto</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Ekhsan</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2021</year>
      <article-title>Pengaruh Work-life Balance terhadap Kinerja Karyawan yang di Mediasi Komitmen Organisasi</article-title>
      <source>Jesya (Jurnal Ekonomi &amp; Ekonomi Syariah)</source>
      <volume>4</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>952</fpage>
      <lpage>962</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36778/jesya.v4i2.460</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R10">
    <element-citation publication-type="book">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Blau</surname><given-names>P. M.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>1967</year>
      <source>Exchange and Power in Social Life</source>
      <publisher-name>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</publisher-name>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4324/9780203792643</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R11">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Chaidir</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Haerofiatna</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Kania</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Wahyudi</surname></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2023</year>
      <article-title>Peran Mediasi Komitmen Afektif pada Persepsi Dukungan Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Karyawan</article-title>
      <source>MBR (Management and Business Review)</source>
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>30</fpage>
      <lpage>45</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21067/mbr.v7i1.8723</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R12">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Daslim</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Syawaluddin</surname></name>
        <name><surname>Okta</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Goh</surname><given-names>T. S.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2023</year>
      <article-title>Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Pada PT. Tahta Sukses Abadi Medan</article-title>
      <source>Jesya</source>
      <volume>6</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>136</fpage>
      <lpage>146</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36778/jesya.v6i1.893</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R13">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Den Hartog</surname><given-names>D. N.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Van Muijen</surname><given-names>J. J.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Koopman</surname><given-names>P. L.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>1997</year>
      <article-title>Transactional versus Transformational Leadership: An Analysis of The MLQ</article-title>
      <source>Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology</source>
      <volume>70</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>19</fpage>
      <lpage>34</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00628.x</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R14">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Denni</surname></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2022</year>
      <article-title>Pengaruh Komunikasi, Kepuasan Kerja dan Pengembangan Karir Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi pada PT. Tigaraksa Satria</article-title>
      <source>Management Studies and Entrepreneurship Journal</source>
      <volume>3</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <fpage>3378</fpage>
      <lpage>3389</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37385/msej.v3i6.1129</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R15">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Fitri</surname><given-names>I. K.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Endratno</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2021</year>
      <article-title>Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasi dan Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan dengan Organizational Citizenship Behavior sebagai Variabel Intervening: Studi pada Karyawan Hotel Bahari, Kabupaten Tegal</article-title>
      <source>Derivatif: Jurnal Manajemen</source>
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>276</fpage>
      <lpage>293</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24127/jm.v15i2.663</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R16">
    <element-citation publication-type="book">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Hair</surname><given-names>J. F.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Hult</surname><given-names>G. T. M.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Ringle</surname><given-names>C. M.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Sarstedt</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2017</year>
      <article-title>A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)</article-title>
      <publisher-name>SAGE Publications, Inc.</publisher-name>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R17">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Hidayat</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Hermawan</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Berliyanti</surname><given-names>D. O.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2024</year>
      <article-title>The Influence of Organizational Culture, Transformational Leadership on Organizational Citizenship Behaviors, and Organizational Commitment through Employee Engagement</article-title>
      <source>Indonesian Journal of Education and Social Sciences</source>
      <volume>3</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>100</fpage>
      <lpage>120</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.56916/ijess.v3i2.635</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R18">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Indrayani</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Nurhatisyah</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Damsar</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Wibisono</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2024</year>
      <article-title>How Does Millennial Employee Job Satisfaction affect Performance?</article-title>
      <source>Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning</source>
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>22</fpage>
      <lpage>40</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/HESWBL-01-2023-0004</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R19">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Izati</surname><given-names>S. S. N.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Munawaroh</surname></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2025</year>
      <article-title>Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Karyawan</article-title>
      <source>Jurnal Riset Manajemen Dan Ekonomi</source>
      <volume>3</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>276</fpage>
      <lpage>283</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29244/jmo.v8i3.22447</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R20">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Jazilah</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2023</year>
      <article-title>Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi melalui Motivasi Kerja</article-title>
      <source>Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen</source>
      <volume>11</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>445</fpage>
      <lpage>457</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26740/jim.v11n2.p445-457</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R21">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Juanda</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Efendi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2024</year>
      <article-title>Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Pengembangan Karir, dan Work-Life Balance terhadap Employee Engagement melalui Komitmen Organisasi sebagai Variabel Intervening pada Karyawan Generasi Milenial di PT Nindya Karya</article-title>
      <source>COSTING: Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting</source>
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>1686</fpage>
      <lpage>1708</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31539/costing.v7i5.11933</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R22">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Kawiana</surname><given-names>I. G. P.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Dewi</surname><given-names>L. K. C.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Hartati</surname><given-names>P. S.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Setini</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Asih</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2021</year>
      <article-title>Effects of Leadership and Psychological Climate on Organizational Commitment in the Digitization Era</article-title>
      <source>Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business</source>
      <volume>8</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>1051</fpage>
      <lpage>1062</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no1.1051</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R23">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2003</year>
      <article-title>Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: As Integrative View and Empirical Examination</article-title>
      <source>Journal of Management Information Systems</source>
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>179</fpage>
      <lpage>228</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01969720701601148</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R24">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Leonardi</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Panggabean</surname><given-names>H. R. G.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2021</year>
      <article-title>Pengaruh Persepsi Peluang Karier terhadap Keinginan Berhenti Kerja Karyawan yang Dimediasi oleh Komitmen Organisasi</article-title>
      <source>Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat</source>
      <volume>8</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>227</fpage>
      <lpage>246</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24854/jpu123</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R25">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Leuhery</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2024</year>
      <article-title>The Role of Employee Engagement among Millennial Workers on Job Satisfaction and Its Influence on Organizational Commitment: A Study of Manufacturing Companies in Ambon, Indonesia</article-title>
      <source>Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences</source>
      <volume>6</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>1251</fpage>
      <lpage>1259</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37275/oaijss.v6i7.197</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R26">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Liaquat</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Mehmood</surname><given-names>K. M.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2017</year>
      <article-title>Organization Citizenship Behavior: Notion of Social Exchange Theory</article-title>
      <source>Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies</source>
      <volume>3</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>209</fpage>
      <lpage>216</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26710/jbsee.v3i2.137</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R27">
    <element-citation publication-type="book">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Luthans</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2011</year>
      <source>Organizational Behavior: An Evidence-Based Approach</source>
      <edition>12th ed.</edition>
      <publisher-name>McGraw-Hill/Irwin</publisher-name>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R28">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Masriani</surname></name>
        <name><surname>Syarifudin</surname></name>
        <name><surname>Sain</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Hasnawati</surname></name>
        <name><surname>Mardiah</surname></name>
        <name><surname>Munawarah</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Bashori</surname></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2021</year>
      <article-title>Analisis Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi di Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Provinsi Riau</article-title>
      <source>Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam</source>
      <volume>10</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>363</fpage>
      <lpage>377</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.30868/ei.v10i02.1256</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R29">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Meyer</surname><given-names>J. P.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Allen</surname><given-names>N. J.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>1991</year>
      <article-title>A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment</article-title>
      <source>Human Resource Management Review</source>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>61</fpage>
      <lpage>89</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R30">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Musa</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Yuliza</surname></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2022</year>
      <article-title>Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dengan Komitmen Organisasi sebagai Variabel Intervening pada Komisi Pemilihan Umum Provinsi Sumatera Selatan</article-title>
      <source>Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Global Masa Kini</source>
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>84</fpage>
      <lpage>91</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36982/jiegmk.v13i2.2544</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R31">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Nugraha</surname><given-names>E. S.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2023</year>
      <article-title>Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi dan Kompensasi terhadap Komitmen Organisasi melalui Motivasi Kerja</article-title>
      <source>Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen</source>
      <volume>11</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>623</fpage>
      <lpage>638</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26740/jim.vn.p623-638</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R32">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Nugrawati</surname><given-names>R. D.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Prasetya</surname><given-names>B. E. A.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2021</year>
      <article-title>Hubungan antara Work-Life Balance dengan Komitmen Organisasi pada Karyawan Perempuan yang Sudah Menikah di PT. X</article-title>
      <source>Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains</source>
      <volume>2</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>447</fpage>
      <lpage>459</lpage>
      <ext-link ext-link-type="uri">http://jiss.publikasiindonesia.id/</ext-link>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R33">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Nurjanah</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Pebianti</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Handaru</surname><given-names>A. W.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2020</year>
      <article-title>The Influence of Transformational Leadership, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitments on Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) in The Inspectorate General of The Ministry of Education and Culture</article-title>
      <source>Cogent Business and Management</source>
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>1</fpage>
      <lpage>12</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/23311975.2020.1793521</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R34">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Parkes</surname><given-names>L. P.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Langford</surname><given-names>P. H.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2008</year>
      <article-title>Work-Life Balance or Work-Life Alignment?</article-title>
      <source>Journal of Management &amp; Organization</source>
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>267</fpage>
      <lpage>284</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5172/jmo.837.14.3.267</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R35">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Putri</surname><given-names>S. W.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Frianto</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2023</year>
      <article-title>Pengaruh Work Life Balance terhadap Kinerja Karyawan melalui Komitmen Organisasi</article-title>
      <source>Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen</source>
      <volume>11</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>293</fpage>
      <lpage>305</lpage>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R36">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Raharjo</surname><given-names>S. B.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Masahere</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Widodo</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2023</year>
      <article-title>Komitmen Organisasi sebagai Strategi Peningkatan Kinerja dan Loyalitas Karyawan: Studi Tinjauan Literatur</article-title>
      <source>Jurnal Entrepreneurship Bisnis Manajemen Akuntansi (E-BISMA)</source>
      <volume>4</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>143</fpage>
      <lpage>156</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37631/ebisma.v4i1.930</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R37">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Sakdiyakorn</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Golubovskaya</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Solnet</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2021</year>
      <article-title>Understanding Generation Z through Collective Consciousness: Impacts for Hospitality Work and Employment</article-title>
      <source>International Journal of Hospitality Management</source>
      <volume>94</volume>
      <fpage>1</fpage>
      <lpage>13</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102822</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R38">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Sara</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Niha</surname><given-names>S. S.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Manafe</surname><given-names>H. A.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2023</year>
      <article-title>Pengaruh Kepuasan Kerja dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) melalui Loyalitas Karyawan sebagai Variabel Mediasi (Suatu Kajian Studi Literatur Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia)</article-title>
      <source>Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan</source>
      <volume>4</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>403</fpage>
      <lpage>411</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.38035/jmpis.v4i1.1416</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R39">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Siswadi</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Jufrizen</surname></name>
        <name><surname>Saripuddin</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Farisi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Sari</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2023</year>
      <article-title>Organizational Culture and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Role of Learning Organizations and Organizational Commitment</article-title>
      <source>Jurnal Riset Bisnis Dan Manajemen</source>
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>73</fpage>
      <lpage>82</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23969/jrbm.v16i1.7184</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R40">
    <element-citation publication-type="book">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Sugiyono</surname></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2019</year>
      <source>Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&amp;D</source>
      <publisher-name>Alfabeta</publisher-name>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R41">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Surya</surname><given-names>I. B. K.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Riana</surname><given-names>I. G.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2023</year>
      <article-title>Peran Kepuasan Kerja Memediasi Work Life Balance dengan Komitmen Organisasional Generasi Milenial pada Hotel Non-Bintang</article-title>
      <source>JSEH (Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Dan Humaniora)</source>
      <volume>9</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>1</fpage>
      <lpage>6</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29303/jseh.v9i1.150</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R42">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Tugade</surname><given-names>G. Y. G.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Arcinas</surname><given-names>M. M.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2023</year>
      <article-title>Employees Work Engagement: Correlations with Employee Personal Characteristics, Organizational Commitment and Workplace Happiness</article-title>
      <source>International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research</source>
      <volume>4</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>136</fpage>
      <lpage>155</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11594/ijmaber.04.01.14</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R43">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Widayani</surname><given-names>N. M. Y.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Supartha</surname><given-names>I. W. G.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Wibawa</surname><given-names>I. M. A.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Surya</surname><given-names>I. B. K.</given-names></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2022</year>
      <article-title>Influence of Sad Warnaning Rajaniti’s Leadership and Employees’ Work Culture on Organizational Commitment</article-title>
      <source>International Journal of Professional Business Review</source>
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>1</fpage>
      <lpage>20</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i4.e570</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>

  <ref id="R44">
    <element-citation publication-type="journal">
      <person-group person-group-type="author">
        <name><surname>Widyanti</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Anhar</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
        <name><surname>Basuki</surname></name>
      </person-group>
      <year>2020</year>
      <article-title>Pengaruh Pengembangan Karir terhadap Komitmen Organisasi</article-title>
      <source>Al-Ulum Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora</source>
      <volume>6</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>105</fpage>
      <lpage>114</lpage>
      <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31602/alsh.v6i2.3669</pub-id>
    </element-citation>
  </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
