Comparison of Judge's Decisions Regarding the Crime of Murder
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/modern.v3i3.9200Keywords:
Judge, Comparison, Judge's DecisionAbstract
The judge's considerations are one of the most important aspects in determining the realization of the value of a judge's decision which contains justice and legal certainty, besides that it also contains benefits for the parties concerned so that the judge's considerations must be addressed carefully, well and carefully. The formulation of the problem in this research is, How does the Judge's Decision Compare with the Crime of Murder? This research uses normative juridical legal research methods. The data collection technique is based on the type of approach in this paper, namely the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. Analyzed using descriptive methods. The results of the research show that the comparison of the judge's decision regarding the crime of murder from the three decisions can be seen from two aspects, juridical and non-juridical. Apart from that, the judge has the authority to update the law and find the law, so that the judge is able to see the weight of the crime and the suitability of the evidence. decide decisions that make each decision different, with the same type of crime, but a different panel of judges. This is what makes this research interesting compared to others
Downloads
References
Adami Chazawi, Stelsel Pidana, Tindak Pidana, Teori-teori Pemidanaan dan Batas Berlakunya Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada,2010.
Hamzah, Andi, 1996, KUHP dan KUHAP, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Kansil, 1989, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Keputusan Bersama Ketua Mahkamah Agung RI Dan Ketua Komisi Yudisial RI 047/KMA/SKB/IV/2009-02/SKB/P.KY/IV/2009
Kitab Undang- Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)
Kitab Undang- Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)
Lamintang, 1997, Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana I, Citra Aditya Bakti.
Mahrus Ali, 2011, Dasar Dasar Hukum Pidana, Ctk. Pertama, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Moeljanto, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, bumi aksara: Yogyakarta, 1985.
Moeljatno, 1993, Azas-Azas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Mukti Arto, Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2004.
Prasetyo, Teguh, 2016, Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. 1986, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Cetakan Keempat, Eresco, Bandung.
R. Soesilo, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana serta Komentar-Komentar Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal, Penerbit Politeia, Jakarta, 1985.
Rusli, Muhammad, 2007, Hukum Acara Pidana Konteporer, Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Samosir, djisman, dkk., Tindak Pidana Tertentu Di Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Nuansa Aulia, 2020.
Sudarsono, Kamus Hukum, Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta, 2007. Sudarto, Hukum dan Hukum Pidana, Bandung, Alumni, 1986.
Sudikno Mertokusumo. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2001.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 49 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Umum
Wirjono Prodjodikoro,1986, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Cetakan Keempat, Eresco: Bandung.
Zainal Abidin, Hukum Pidana 1, Sinar Grafik, Jakarta cetakan kedua 2007. Zainudin Ali, Hukum Pidana Islam, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Deny Susilo Guterres, Deddy R. CH. Manafe, Rosalind Angel Fanggi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
