Position of Electronic Agreements (E-Contract) in Emaster Online Arisan as Evidence in Civil Procedure Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v5i1.13593Keywords:
Electronic Agreements, E-Contracts, Online Arisan, Civil Procedure Law, UU ITE, Legal ValidityAbstract
In the digital era, the internet has significantly transformed various aspects of life, including financial systems and social interactions. One notable change is the shift from traditional face-to-face arisan (a rotating savings and credit association) to online arisan facilitated through social media platforms and electronic banking. This study examines the legal validity of electronic agreements (e-contracts) in online arisan, focusing on the case of Emaster Online Arisan as evidence in civil procedure law, particularly in Decision No. 41/Pdt.G/2021/PN Pwd. The research employs a normative legal approach, analyzing the Indonesian Civil Code, Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (UU ITE), and relevant case law. The findings indicate that online arisan agreements, even if not formally documented, are legally binding as long as they meet the requirements stipulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, which includes the agreement of the parties, legal capacity, a specific object, and a lawful cause. The study concludes that electronic agreements are recognized and protected under Indonesian law, and the court's decision in the Emaster case underscores the principle of pacta sunt servanda, ensuring that parties must fulfill their contractual obligations
References
Adonara, Firman Floranta. “Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Sebagai Amanat Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 2 (2015): 227.
Arifin, Mifta. “Membangun Konsep Ideal Penerapan Asas Itikad Baik Dalam Perjanjian.” Journal Ius Constituendum 5, no. 1 (2020): 68.
Destra, G. (2021). Legalitas Perjanjian Arisan Online Ditinjau Dari Pasal 1320 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. [Skripsi]. Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Surabaya.
Pribadi, Maria Gita Kartikasari, & Sri Maharani MTVM. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anggota Arisan Online Yang Dirugikan Oleh Owner Arisan Online Akibat Wanprestasi (Studi Kasus: Arisan Online Opslot Arisanco).” Jurnal Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir 2, no. 1 (2022): 77.
Rifai, Achmad. Kesalahan Hakim Dalam Penerapan Hukum Pada Putusan Menciderai Keadilan Masyarakat. Makassar: Nas Media Pustaka, 2020.
Santoso, Lukman. Aspek Hukum Perjanjian. Yogyakarta: Penebar Media Pustaka, 2019.
Wardani, Mutia Rahma, dkk. “Perlindungan Konsumen dalam Transaksi Elektronik Melalui Instagram.” Jurnal Notarius 13, no. 2 (2020): 849-852
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ade Rizki Saputra, Mira Gunati, Ryan Faisal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.