Implications of Natural Science Physics Materials and Characteristics of Net Generations for 21st Century Competency Development

Meili Yanti

doi:10.55927/mudima.v2i11.1720

Authors

Meili Yanti Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Sulawesi Barat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v2i11.1720

Keywords:

Net Generations, Physics, 21 Century Skills

Abstract

The changes facing the world are complex and require new competencies to deal with them. The entry of the 21st century forces all parties to seek to develop themselves in order to compete in the international market. Also with Education, especially in Indonesia. This is the view for the teacher, the government and the students themselves. So, the purpose of this article is to provide an explanation of the role characteristics of Net Generations as students faced by teachers and the depth and breadth of KD Curriculum 2013 to 21st century competencies of the learners. The analytical method used is documentation study, by collecting documents about PISA 2015 and Curriculum syllabus 2013. The analysis results show that the depth and extent conducted on KD 3.4 and 4.4 on temperature and heat topics obtained that the material has covered all basic competence demands. But not enough if you want to develop literacy science and technology of learners so less recommended to help improve the competence of the 21st century

References

AlAsmari, T. I. (2015). Instructors’ Perceptions and Barriers of Learner-Centered Instruction in English at the University Level. Journal Higher Education, 38-51.

Ananiadou K, M. C. (2009). 21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Breunig, M. (2017). Experientially Learning and Teaching in a Student-Directed Classroom. Journal of Experiential Education Vol 40, Issue 3, , 213 - 230.

Carneiro. (2007). The big picture: understanding learning and meta-learning challenges. . European Journal of Education, 151-172.

Dewantoro, H. (2017). Kompetensi Guru Abad 21 Sebagai Tuntutan Pembelajaran Guru. Retrieved from Media Pendidikan Indonesia: https://silabus.org/kompetensi-guru-abad-21/

Djelita, R. D. (2015). Pemilihan Dan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Sebagai Tuntutan Profesionalisme. E-Jurnal Dinas Pendidikan Kota Surabaya; Volume 5, 1-8.

Genaro Zavala, H. A. (2017). Innovative Training of In-service Teachers for Active Learning: A Short Teacher Development Course Based on Physics Education Research. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 559-572.

Gijsbers, G. a. (2012). The future of learning: a foresight study on new ways to learn new skills for future jobs. Retrieved from European Foresight Platform (EFP) Brief: http://www.foresight-platform.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/EFP-Brief-No.-222_Future-of-Learning.pdf

Hillary. E Kahn, M. A. (2015). Global Learning Through Difference : Considerations for Teaching, Learning, and the Internationalization of Higher Education. Journal Of Studies in Internal Education Vol 21, Issue 1, 52-64.

Ivanova, S. (2009). The New Generations of Students and the Future of e-Learning in Higher Education. Proceeding of the International Conference on e-Learning and the Knowledge Society. Berlin: Berlin Univercity of Applied Sciences.

Kemkoinfo. (2016). Kajian kelanjutan 5G di Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Litbang SDM.

Litbang. Kemdikbud (2013). Kurikulum 2013 Pergeseran Paradigma belajar abad 21.

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing.

P21. (2008). The Partnership for 21st Century skills. Retrieved from P21 Framework defenitions: www.newtecheork.org

Palfrey, G. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic books.

Patricia Comeaux, R. H. (2017). Students as Scientists: Using Interactive Technologies and Collaborative Inquiry in an Environmental Science Project for Teachers and Their Students. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 235-352.

Punie, R. (2013). The future of learning 2025:developing a vision for change. Journal of Future Learning Vol. 1, 3-17.

Queen, M. (2015). Ready or Not Here Come Gen Z. New York (ONLINE).

Salas- Pilco. (2013). Evolution of the framework for 21st century competencies. Knowledge & Management. An International Journal, Vol. 5, No. 1, ,10 24.

Saripuddin, U. (2015). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Abad 21 Dengan Menggunakan Teknologi Web 2.0.Retrieved from Researchgate:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319702062_Pengembangan_Model_Pembelajaran_Abad_21_Dengan_Menggunakan_Teknologi_Web_20

Springet, R. (2017). 21 century learning and teaching practice. Sydney, Australia: Edu Tech.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Susan L. Jagger, L. D. (2012). Mind the Gap: Looking for Evidence-Based Practice of Science Literacy for All in Science Teaching Journals. Journal of Science and Education, 557-577.

Tan, O.-S. (2003). Problem-Based Learning Innovation: Using Problems to Power Learning in the 21st Century. Singapore: Cengage Learning.

Trilling, B. a. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times,. 978-0-47-055362-6.

UNESCO. (2015). THE FUTURES OF LEARNING. Education Research and Foresight.

Watkins. (2017). Fostering Deep Learning and Critical Thinking Amongst Net Generation Learners. Singapore: Contemporary Research in Technology Education. Contemporary Issues in Technology Education. Springer.

Widi Ardianto, C. S. (2017). PEMBELAJARAN SAINTIFIK BERBANTUAN MEDIA MANIPULATIF UNTUK MEMAHAMKAN KONSEP PENJUMLAHAN DAN PENGURANGAN BILANGAN BULAT. Jurnal Pendidikan ; Teori Penelitian dan Pengembangan, 694-705.