Information Dispute Mediation Communication Model (Case Study of Information Dispute Mediation by the Information Commission of South Kalimantan Province)

Muhari; Kholil; Jamalullail; Dewi Widowati

doi:10.55927/mudima.v3i3.2461

Authors

Muhari Doctoral Program of Communication Science, Sahid University
Kholil Doctoral Program of Communication Science, Sahid University
Jamalullail Doctoral Program of Communication Science, Sahid University
Dewi Widowati Doctoral Program of Communication Science, Sahid University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v3i3.2461

Keywords:

Mediation, Communication Model, South Kalimantan Provincial Information Commission

Abstract

The existence of the Information Commission as mandated by Law Number 14 of 2008 concerning Public Information Disclosure provides an opportunity for the entire community to be able to access public information from public agencies/institutions. Unfortunately, there are still many parties who have not understand regarding the disclosure of this information so that information disputes arise. It is in this context that the Information Commission plays a role in bridging the resolution of the information conflict, either through mediation or non-litigation adjudication. This study raises the case of mediation of information disputes handled by the South Kalimantan Provincial Information Commission in the 2014-2018 period. This research seeks to answer how the communication model applied by the Information Commission of South Kalimantan Province and how the strategy was carried out in the mediation session. For this reason, this study uses the theory of relationship communication or personal communication, mediation, with qualitative methods and then uses an interpretive paradigm. As for data collection techniques through observation and interviews with informants. The results show that the model used by the South Kalimantan Provincial Information Commission is: 1) Psychological and Cultural Communication; 2) Two Way Communication and Separate Communication; and 3) Communication of Information is Human Rights

References

Akbar, N. (209). Interview with Commissioner of Information Commission for South Kalimantan Province, Najmi Akbar.

Akhrizal, & Saleh, R. (2018). Mediation Communication Analysis in Resolving Public Information Disputes at the Aceh Information Commission Session. Unsyiah FISIP Student Scientific Journal, 3(1), 255–265.

Folberg, J., & Taylor, A. (1984). Mediation: A Comprehensive Guide to Resolving Conflicts without Litigation. Jossey-Bass Inc Pub.

Aaron, T. (2016). Several Constraints in the Implementation of the Duties and Functions of the South Kalimantan Provincial Information Commission. As Siyasah, 1(1), 1–11.

Aaron, T. (2019). Interview with Commissioner of Information Commission for South Kalimantan Province, Tamliha Harun.

Harun, T., & Jumarianto. (2022). Implementation of Public Information Dispute Mediation at the Information Commission of South Kalimantan Province. As Siyasah, 7(2), 69–77.

Haryanto, S., & Sukarna, K. (2017). The Role of the Public Information Commission in the Execution Process of Decisions on Information Disputes with Permanent Legal Force in the Review of Law No. 14 of 2008 concerning Public Information Disclosure. IUS Constituendum, 2(1), 96–108.

Helmi, RF (2019). Settlement of Public Information Disputes at the Information Commission of West Sumatra Province. Journal of Education on Social Science, 3(1), 61–78.

South Kalimantan Provincial Information Commission. (2019). South Kalimantan Province Information Dispute Report.

Maslow, AH (1954). Motivation and Personality. Harper and Brothers Publishers.

Matsumoto, D. (2010). Introduction. In D. Matsumoto (Ed.), APA handbook of interpersonal communication. Walter de Gruyter & Co; American Psychological Association.

Moore, CW (2003). The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict. A Willey Imprint.

Rani, S. (2019). Interview with Commissioner of Information Commission for South Kalimantan Province, Samsul Rani.

Law Number 14 of 2008 Concerning Public Information Disclosure, (2008) (testimony of the Republic of Indonesia).

Sri Martina, U., Nasution, B., & Suyanto. (2020). Communication Strategy for the Commissioner of the Riau Province Information Commission in Resolving Information Dispute Cases. Journal of Communication Studies, 9(1), 412–431.

Sugiyono. (2019). Quantitative Research Methods, Qualitative and R&D. Alphabet.

Yanti, H. (2022). Implementation of Public Information Dispute Resolution at the Information Commission of Jambi Province. Face of the Law, 6(2), 453. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v6i2.1085

Yusron, A. (2018a). Performance Analysis of Information Dispute Resolution at the Regional Information Commission of Cirebon Regency. JIKE, 2(1), 113–129.

Yusron, A. (2018b). Public Information Disputes: Submission and Resolution. Sos Filkom, 12(1), 61–70.