Scenario Planning of Kuala Kencana Sub-District Proliferation, Mimika Regency Central Papua Province

Authors

  • Yusi Eva Batubara Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
  • Sulthon Rohmadin Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v3i3.3414

Keywords:

Scenario Planning, Proliferation, Sub-District

Abstract

A sub-district with a Camat as its leader is not an ordinary organization that carries out a certain field of government affairs. But they are responsible for a work area and its contents, namely society and its activities. The Camat's workload is closely related to the size of the area, the number of people served, and their distribution. Kuala Kencana sub-district has an area of 860,74  km2 with a population of 27,774 people, making it one of the most densely populated sub-districts in Mimika Regency. You can imagine how hard the task is, coupled with the relatively limited transportation and communication facilities and infrastructure. As a result, many people are not served properly. One way out is to split the sub-district into two so that the coverage area and population served are smaller. On the other hand, the number of ASN serving them increases. This study uses an exploratory method by operationalizing the concept of scenario planning. The stages are Identify Focal Issue (Focal Concern) or Decision; Identify Key Forces; Identify Driving Forces (change drivers); Identify Uncertaint); Selecting the Scenario Logic; Fleshing Out the Scenario. The research produced three scenarios. The normal scenario for the Proliferation of the Kuala Kencana Sub-district followed PP 17 of 2018 regulations; the above normal scenario for the Proliferation of the Sub-district was carried out with the support of affirmative policies from the Central Government. In the sub-normal scenario, the village/village administrative proliferation is carried out first before the sub-district Proliferation

References

A.P. Youw. (2013). Pemekaran Papua Pintu Kesejahteraan Bagi Semua. Jakarta: Penerbit WADIpress.

Creswell, W. John. (2010). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Gill Ringland. (2002). Scenario in Public Policy. Chichester: Jhon Wiley & sons. ltd.

Kementerian Dalam Negeri Tahun 2022

Kuala Kencana Sub-District, 2020

Mimika Regency in Figure, 2021

Naisaban, Agustinus & Rahmah, Mutia. (2019). Efektivitas Pemekaran Kecamatan Dalam

Meningkatkan Pembangunan Studi Deskriptif Kualitatif di Kecamatan Insana Tengah Kabupaten

Timor Tengah Utara Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. Jurnal Kebijakan Pemerintahan Vol. 2, No. 2,

Desember 2019: 147–158

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2018 Tentang Kecamatan

Rohmadin, Sulthon & Eva, Yusi. (2017). Analisis Kelayakan Pemekaran Kecamatan Tana Righu Kabupaten Sumba Barat Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan, Agustus 2017, Hlm. 109 – 122.

Rohmadin, Sulthon. (2015) Tesis Studi Kemungkinan Penerapan Manajemen Pemasaran di Sektor Pemerintahan Daerah, IPDN.

Schwartz, Petter. (1991). The Art of The Long View. New York.

Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah

Wasistiono, dkk. (2002). Menata Ulang Kelembagaan Kecamatan.

Pusat Kajian Pemerintahan STPDN. Bandung: Penerbit PT Citra Pindo

Wasistiono, Sadu & Rohmadin, Sulthon. (2023). Teori Organisasi Pemerintahan Daerah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Downloads

Published

2023-03-30

How to Cite

Yusi Eva Batubara, & Sulthon Rohmadin. (2023). Scenario Planning of Kuala Kencana Sub-District Proliferation, Mimika Regency Central Papua Province . Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani, 3(3), 637–650. https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v3i3.3414

Issue

Section

Articles