Legal Annotation of Court Decision Number 75 / Pdt.Sus – Ipr / Merek / 2022 / Pn Niaga Jkt.Pst in Administrative Certainty for Famous Brands in Indonesia

Citraresmi Widoretno Putri; Suherman; Yuliana Yuli W; Beniharmoni Harefa; Satino

doi:10.55927/mudima.v3i11.6836

Authors

Citraresmi Widoretno Putri Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta University, Jakarta
Suherman Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta University, Jakarta
Yuliana Yuli W Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta University, Jakarta
Beniharmoni Harefa Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta University, Jakarta
Satino Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta University, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v3i11.6836

Keywords:

Legal Annotation, Administrative, Brand

Abstract

Review of the trademark determination in court decision Number 75/Pdt.Sus-Hki/Merek/ 2022/Pn Niaga Jkt.Pst rejection of the application for the trademark GENHALILINTAR + Painting by Anofial Asmid because it was registered by PT SOKA CIPTA NIAGA on October 23 2017 with a Notification of Rejection Registration of the Mark "GENHALILINTAR + Painting" Agenda Number D002018027834 dated 31 December 2019 by the Directorate General of Intellectual Property and Decision of the Mark Appeal Commission / Defendant Number 375 / KBM / IPR / 2020 dated 8 September 2020. This turns out to be interesting because in Halilintar Anofial Asmid has registered the GENHALILINTAR + Painting brand in several classes, which of course contradicts the arguments in the Notice of Rejection and Decision of the Mark Appeal Commission. This paper uses normative legal research methods. With the conclusion Based on the legal annotation of the Decision that there are problems that occur in granting well-known trademark rights to certain people or civil legal entities, especially if the trademark holder is not the initial initiator of its popularity. In terms of administrative certainty of the GENHALILINTAR + Painting mark, state administrative legal action in trademark disputes can be filed against the decision to delete a registered mark at the initiative of the Minister. If there has not been an administrative Judge's Decision, the first principle is that the registered mark has a stronger position compared to the popular indication of a mark

References

Abdulkadir Muhammad. 2004. Hukum Dan Penelitian Hukum.

Anon. 2022. “Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 75/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2022/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst.”

Diyani, Trini, and Agus Sardjono. 2022. “Analisis Sengketa Dagang Merek Terkenal Antara Tbl Licensing Analisis Sengketa Dagang Merek Terkenal Antara Tbl Licensing Llc Dengan Timberlake Indonesia (Studi Kasus Putusan Llc Dengan Timberlake Indonesia (Studi Kasus Putusan.” Technology and Economics Law Journal 1(2).

Harahap, M. Yahya. 1996. Tinjauan Merek Secara Umum Dan Hukum Merek Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Merek Terkenal Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 1992.

MENTERI HUKUM DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA, and REPUBLIK INDONESIA. 2016. “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis (The Law Number 20 Year 2016 on Trademark and Geographical Indications).” (10):1–54.

Pemerintah Pusat. 2016. “Undang-Undang (UU) Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis.” Jdih Bpk Ri (l):1–51.

Pemerintah RI. 2014. “Undang–Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia (Administrasi pemerintahan):99.

Pujiyono, Pujiyono, Bambang Waluyo, and Reda Manthovani. 2020. “Legal Threats against the Existence of Famous Brands a Study on the Dispute of the Brand Pierre Cardin in Indonesia.” International Journal of Law and Management 63(4):387–95. doi: 10.1108/IJLMA-01-2018-0006.

Putri, Citraresmi Widoretno, Taufiqurrohman Syahuri, and Aji Lukman Ibrahim. 2024. “DARMABAKTI Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Instrumental Norm Approach Pada Pemilih Pemula Sebagai Penegakan Demokrasi Pemilih Pemula Di Ruang Siber Menjelang Pemilu 2024 Di Depok.” 01(2023):113–21.

Setiadi, Wicipto. 2020. “Penundaan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 9(3):427. doi: 10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i3.514.