Sexual Exploitation in Child Trafficking (Case Study Decision Number 29/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Tim and 311/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Pol)

Marisa  Kurnianingsih; Irwinda Mutiara  Saputri; Hartanto; Muchamad  Iksan

doi:10.55927/mudima.v4i4.8912

Authors

Marisa Kurnianingsih Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Irwinda Mutiara Saputri Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Hartanto Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Muchamad Iksan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v4i4.8912

Keywords:

Exploitation, Sexual, Trafficking, Children

Abstract

The purpose of writing this article is to explain the judge's considerations in deciding the practice of sexual exploitation in the crime of child trafficking based on court decision number 29/Pid.sus/2019/PN.Tim and Decision Number 311/Pid.sus/ 2021/PN.Pol. This decision provides a clear picture of the continued practice of trafficking children for sexual exploitation in Indonesia. The practice of trafficking children for sexual exploitation occurs because the victims are still minors so their minds are not yet perfect in making decisions and following up on what they have experienced. This is what exploiters take advantage of. The facts revealed at trial are of course the basis for judges in examining and deciding exploitation cases. Writing this article uses a normative juridical approach with a descriptive type where the author will explain the legal basis relating to sexual exploitation and the judge's considerations in Decision Number 29/Pid.Sus/2019/PN. Team and Decision Number 311/Pid.Sus/2021/PN. Pol. In the results and discussion, it is known that the government has issued several regulations that can be used to provide repressive legal protection for children, including Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection. Decision Number 29/Pid.Sus/2019/PN. Team and Decision Number 311/Pid.Sus/2021/PN. The police also use the Child Protection Law to examine and decide cases of sexual exploitation in child trafficking

References

Benuf K, Azhar M. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Gema Keadilan. 2020;7(1):24.

Friatna I. Perlindungan Anak dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Qanun Aceh Nomor 11 Tahun 2008. Gend Equal Int J Child Gend Stud. 2019;5(2):57.

Jiwantara FA. Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Tentang Tindak Pidana Pornografi Yang Melibatkan Anak Sebagai Korban. Mataram: Guepedia; 2020.

Karana KP. Data Survei Baru: Hingga 56 Persen Insiden Ekploitasi Seksual Dan Pelakuan Yang Salah Terhadap Anak Indonesia Di Dunia Maya Tidak Diungkap Dan Dilaporkan [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/indonesia/id/siaran-pers/data-survei-baru-hingga-56-persen-insiden-eksploitasi-seksual-dan-perlakuan-yang-salah

Nopsiamti EF, Rakhmawati D. Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Dilakukan Bersama-sama. PAMPAS J Crim Law. 2023;4(2):190.

Purwanti SH. Kekerasan Pada Anak & Wanita Perspektif Imu Kedokteran Forensik. Jakarta Timur: Rayyana Komunikasindo; 2017.

Rahmawati D, dkk. Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana. Widya yuridika J Huk. 2021;4(1):210.

Rahmawati SN. Tindak Pidana Human Trafficking Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam. J Lab Syariah dan Huk. 2023;4(3):267.

Ramadhan M. Metode Penelitian. Surabaya: Cipta Media Nusantara (CNM; 2021.

Sumirat IR. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perempuan dan Anak Korban Kejahatan Perdagangan Manusia. Vol. 6. 2020. p. 27.

Tussaripah HM. Upaya Mengantisipasi Perdagangan Manusia Ditinjau Menurut Anti-Trafficking In Persons Act, 2007 dan Hukum Islami. Al-Hikmah J Agama dan Ilmu Pengetah. 2021;18(1):2.

Yuniantoro F. Eksploitasi Seksual Sebagai Bnetuk Kejahatan Kesusilaan dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Justitia J Huk. 2018;2(1):122.