Potential of Bayan Indigenous Peoples in Obtaining Customary Forest Management Rights in North Lombok Regency

Kornelia Webliana  B; Wihelmus Jemarut; Andi Chairil Ichsan; Dwi Sukma Rini; Niechi Valentino; Hairil Anwar; Diah Permatasari; Andrie Ridzki Prasetyo

doi:10.55927/mudima.v4i8.9634

Authors

Kornelia Webliana B Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mataram
Wihelmus Jemarut Department of Law, Institute of Hinduism Gde Pudja Mataram
Andi Chairil Ichsan Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mataram
Dwi Sukma Rini Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mataram
Niechi Valentino Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mataram
Hairil Anwar Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mataram
Diah Permatasari Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mataram
Andrie Ridzki Prasetyo Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v4i8.9634

Keywords:

Bayan Village, Customary Forest, Indigenous Peoples

Abstract

In Bayan Village, West Nusa Tenggara, there are four customary forest areas that have the potential to be developed through the Customary Forest scheme. This scheme is part of the Social Forestry Program which provides access and forest management rights to indigenous communities. The four forests are currently being managed by the indigenous peoples but have not yet been granted the status of customary forest. The aim of this study is to evaluate the potential of the Bayan indigenous community to acquire forest management rights under the Customary Forest scheme. The research employed a normative-empirical approach. The results indicate that the Bayan indigenous peoples meets all the criteria in the Government Regulation No. 23 of 2021 on the Implementation of Forestry and the Ministry of Environment and Forestry Regulation No. 9 of 2021 on Social Forestry Management. The Bayan indigenous peoples is eligible to be designated as a Customary Law Community by the Regent of North Lombok and to obtain Customary Forest management rights from the Ministry of Environment and Forestry. This potential is supported by two factors: (1) the potential for forest and tourism development; and (2) the potential for well-maintained local wisdom.

References

A. Rahman and Arba, “Eksistensi Pranata Lokal dalam Pengelolaan Hutan Adat di Desa Bayan Kabupaten Lombok Utara,” J. Risal. Kenotariatan, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 46, 2020.

A. Y. Firdaus, “Panduan Praktis Penerapan Kebijakan Perhutanan Sosial -Kerangka Pencepatan Reformasi Tenurial Hutan,” vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2020.

B. Purwantari, “Mengatasi Konflik Terkait Hutan dan Masyarakat Adat,” BRWA, 2019.

D. Winarwan, “Kebijakan Pengelolaan Hutan, Kemiskinan Struktural Dan Perlawanan Masyarakat,” J. Kawistara, vol. 1, no. 3, 2011, doi: 10.22146/kawistara.3922.

Direktorat Jenderal Perhutanan Sosial Dan Kemitraan Lingkungan Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kehutanan, “No Title,” 2023.

E. Jayadi and S. Soemarno, “Analisis Transformasi Awig-Awig Dalam Pengelolaan Hutan Adat (Studi Kasus Pada Komunitas Wetu Telu Di Daerah Bayan, Lombok Utara) (Analysis of Awig-Awig Transformation in Customary Forest Management (Case Study of the Wetu Telu Community in the Bayan Area,” Indones. Green Technol. J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 2014.

Ernawati and E. Baharudin, “Dinamika Masyarakat Adat dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan di Indonesia,” Huk. dan Keadilan, vol. 6, no. September, pp. 53–67, 2019.

K. L. H. dan Kehutanan, “OCEHAN (Obrolan Cerita Hutan dan Lingkungan): Perhutanan Sosial,” 2023.

Muhajir, “Profil Desa Bayan Tahun 2020.”

N. W. Rasti, “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Hak Masyarakat Adat dalam Pengelolaan Hutan Adat dan Hutan Kemasyarakatan,” Lombok Post, p. 9, Sep. 2013.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, “Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 2021 Tentang Pengelolaan Perhutanan Sosial,” Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 6(11), 951–952., pp. 1–268, 2021.

Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Nomor 83 Tahun 2016 tentang Perhutanan Sosial.

S. A. N., “Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Ungkap Rumitnya Masalah Hutan Indonesia.”

S. S. Rangkuti, Hukum Lingkungan dan Kebijaksanaan Lingkungan Hidup, Keempat. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, 2012.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeth, 2012.

T. M. Agusti, I. N. Nurjaya, and I. Kuswahyono, “Implementasi Regulasi Perhutanan Sosial yang Berkemanfaatan bagi Masyarakat Sekitar Hutan,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 300, 2020, doi: 10.17977/um019v4i2p300-309.

W. Jemarut, K. Webliana B, A. Chairil Ichsan, D. I. Gusti, and A. Andriani, “Juridical Study on Social Forestry Before and After Job Creation Law,” Tadulako Law Rev., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2023, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.fakum.untad.ac.id/index.php/TLR

Wihelmus Jemarut, K. W. B, and D. P. Sari, “Kajian Yuridis Tentang Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam Program Perhutanan Sosial,” WIDYA KERTA J. Huk. Agama Hindu, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 123–136, 2023.

Y. A. Damanhuri, “Pemenuhan Hak Konstitusional untuk Warga Negara Indonesia melalui Program Perhutanan Sosial,” Dharmasisya, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1655–1668, 2021.

Y. Arizona, “Perkembangan konstitusionalitas Penguasaan negara atas sumber Daya alam Dalam Putusan mahkamah konstitusi,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 257, 2016, doi: 10.31078/jk833