Analysis of the Impact of Monopoly Practices in the Entertainment Sector

Nafis Dwi Kartiko; Samuel Putra  Soegiono

doi:10.55927/esa.v3i2.8405

Authors

Nafis Dwi Kartiko Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Surabaya
Samuel Putra Soegiono Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/esa.v3i2.8405

Keywords:

Monopoly, Entertainment Sector, Business Competition

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the practice of monopoly in the entertainment sector in Indonesia. Specifically, it focuses on the alleged conspiracy between venue owners and sound system equipment rental vendors. This study investigates the extent to which exclusive cooperation can be categorized as a monopoly according to Law No. 5/1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, using the Normative-Dogmatic Juridical method. The text also mentions the prohibition of monopolistic practices and unfair business competition. The focus is on analyzing analysis of existing legal norms, through a deductive approach to identify violations of the law that occur without connecting directly with the social context of society. Research Results: The study indicates that conspiracies in the entertainment industry reflect monopolistic practices that violate legal norms. These practices eliminate market diversity, limit consumer choice, and result in uncompetitive prices and reduced service quality. These findings contribute to the competition law literature by providing a new interpretation of monopolistic practices at a smaller scale and in a more contextualized manner. They also offer input for stakeholders in designing effective regulations to prevent monopolization, support innovation, and protect consumers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adeffian, C., & Apriani, R. (2023). Metode Pendekatan Per Se Illegal And Rule Of Reason Terkait Penegakan Hukum Alternatif Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Shar-E: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Hukum Syariah, 9(2), 97–103.

Epstein, M. J., & Roy, M.-J. (2001). Sustainability in action: Identifying and measuring the key performance drivers. Long Range Planning, 34(5), 585–604.

Garg, A., & Shivam, A. K. (2017). Funding to growing start-ups. Research Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 22–31.

Jemarut, W. (2020). Pendekatan Rule Of Reason Dan Per Se Illegal Dalam Perkara Persaingan Usaha. Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum, 3(2), 377–384.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Kongolo, M. (2010). Job creation versus job shedding and the role of SMEs in economic development. African Journal of Business Management, 4(11), 2288.

Nugroho, S. A. (2014). Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia. Prenada Media.

Pager, S. A., & Priest, E. (2019). Redeeming Globalization Through Unfair Competition Law. Cardozo L. Rev., 41, 2435.

Papilaya, J., & Sinay, M. S. F. R. (2022). Dasar Dasar Ilmu Ekonomi. CV. AZKA PUSTAKA.

Purwatiningsih, S. D. (2021). Marketing Digital Campaign Dalam Membangun Startup Melalui Influencer Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Ekspresi Dan Persepsi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(2), 146–156.

Rizkia, A. A., & Rahmawati, S. (2021). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Anti Monopoli Dan Persaiangan Bisnis Tidak Sehat: Globalisasi Ekonomi, Persaingan Usaha, Dan Pelaku Usaha.(Literature Review Etika). Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan, 2(5), 631–643.

Sekhar, S. C., & Radha, N. (2019). Impact of globalization on msme: prospects, challenges and policy implementation on economic growth. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 3(6), 536–541.

Sudrajat, M. R., & Hanifa, Z. (2023). Persaingan usaha sehat dapat membangun ekosistem bisnis yang berkelanjutan. KARIMAH TAUHID, 2(4), 1041–1048.

Supianto, S. (2013). Pendekatan Per Se Illegal dan Rule Of Reason dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechtens, 2(1), 42–59.

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.

Valaskova, K., Nagy, M., Zabojnik, S., & Lăzăroiu, G. (2022). Industry 4.0 wireless networks and cyber-physical smart manufacturing systems as accelerators of value-added growth in Slovak exports. Mathematics, 10(14), 2452.

Widhiyanti, H. N. (2015). Pendekatan Per Se Illegal dan Rule of Reason Dalam Hukum Persaingan (Perbandingan Indonesia-Malaysia). Arena Hukum, 8(3), 385–410.

Zeithaml, V. A., Lemon, K. N., & Rust, R. T. (2001). Driving customer equity: How customer lifetime value is reshaping corporate strategy. Simon and Schuster.