The Realization of Strong Diplomacy Towards Indonesia Golden 2045 in the North Natuna Sea Conflict using Force Planning Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/fjas.v3i8.10371Keywords:
Diplomacy, Indonesia's Golden, Force Planning ApproachAbstract
The South China Sea has become a battleground for major powers' hegemonic struggles. Indonesia, due to China's claim over the North Natuna Sea, is involved in the conflict, utilizing a force planning approach. The historical and strategic values have made the South China Sea a region of complex conflicts involving global hegemony. The research used a qualitative descriptive method. Indonesia's response includes capability-based planning through law enforcement, scenario-based planning with naval base construction, and threats-based planning through military buildup in the North Natuna Sea. This escalating conflict in the South China Sea is pulling Indonesia further into the vortex, necessitating strategic steps through a force planning approach to protect its sovereignty and interests.
Downloads
References
Dewi Fortuna Anwar, "Geopolitik Laut Natuna Utara dan Upaya Penegakan Hukum di Kawasan Asia Tenggara", Jurnal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, Vol.15, No.2, Tahun 2019.
Fransisco Rosarian dan Aseanty Pahlevi. “Diklaim Cina, Natuna Dikawal TNI”, Koran Tempo, 30 Januari 2013.
Jill Steans and Llyoid Pettiford. 2001. International Relations: Perspectives and Themes. Harlow: Longman, Pearson.
Kaplan, R. S., & Mikes, A. (2012). Mengelola risiko: Kerangka kerja baru. Tinjauan Bisnis Harvard, 90(6), 49-60.
Martin Sieff, “South China Sea Name Dispute over Spratly and Paracel Islands Reveals Deeper Conflict”, Asia Pacific Defense Forum, 13 September 2012, accessed 7 June 2020.
Mohamad Ikmal B.I, "Operasi Laut Natuna, Penyelesaian Sengketa Laut China Selatan, dan Implikasinya Terhadap Hubungan Bilateral Indonesia-China", Jurnal Kawistara, Vol.9, No.3, Tahun 2019.
Morgenthau, Hans J. (1948). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. McGraw-Hill.
Nainggolan, Poltak Partogi. "The South China Sea Conflict and Its Implications for the Region". Accessed on December 31 2023 at 15.42 WIB.
Noor, W., & Sunindijo, R. Y. (2006). Capability‐Based Planning: A Method for Connecting Strategic Plan to Action Plan. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(1), 14-24.
Pramono, Agung dkk. 2020. Materi Pokok Bidang Studi Pertahanan dan Keamanan. Jakarta: Lembaga Ketahanan Nasional Republik Indonesia. “Kenali UNCLOS, Dasar Hukum Internasional untuk Kedaulatan Indonesia di Natuna”, diakses di https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5e16f5b67589c/kenali-unclos-dasar-hukum-internasional-untuk-kedaulatan-indonesia-di-natuna/, pada tanggal 31 Desember 2023, pukul 18.23 WIB. “ASEAN dan Isu Laut Cina Selatan”. Diakses di http://lipi.go.id/risetunggulan/single/asean-dan-isu-laut-china-selatan/14, pada tanggal 31 Desember 2023, pukul 18.41 WIB.
Rifki Irsyad, "Strategi Diplomasi Indonesia dalam Penyelesaian Konflik di Laut Natuna Utara", Jurnal Manajemen Informasi dan Danau Kita, Vol.6, No.1, Tahun 2017. “Riwayat Konflik China-Indonesia di Laut Natuna”, diakses di https://www.kompas.co/read/2020/01/04/150845465/riwayat-konflik-chinaindonesia-di-laut-natuna?page=3, pada tanggal 31 Desember 2023, pukul 16.07 WIB.
Saragih, Hendra Maujana. 2018. Indonesian Defense Diplomacy in the South China Sea Conflict. Journal of Political Science and Communication, Volume VII (1), June 2018.
Schoemaker, P. J. (1995). Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 25.
Sherif, M. (1967). Group conflict and cohesiveness: A study of a housing project. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nurfaizah Azhari Daniela, Tasdik Mustika Alam, Lukman Yudho Prakoso, Sri Patmi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
