Problems Resulting from Filing an Effort for Judicial Review of the Cancellation of a Bankruptcy Decision which was preceded by an Application for Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (Analysis of Supreme Court Decision No. 96 PK/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2014)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/fjas.v2i11.6834Keywords:
PKPU, Bankruptcy, Judicial ReviewAbstract
The method used in writing this thesis is a normative juridical research method. The nature of this research is prescriptive, using data collection techniques, namely library research and interview guides to complete secondary data. The results of the research found that legal certainty regarding the cancellation of a bankruptcy decision which was preceded by a PKPU application caused legal uncertainty because it was in conflict with the Bankruptcy Law and SEMA Number 4 of 2014. The Supreme Court's decision gave rise to legal consequences, namely the resolution of the case took longer because it was not certain when the case would end. , cases are piling up at the Supreme Court, with legal action being filed, the costs of the proceedings will become more expensive
Downloads
References
Antonius Sidik Maryono, dkk, “Quo Vadis Esensi Lembaga PKPU Pasca-Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 23/PUU-XIX/2021”, Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, Vol. 3 No. 4 (April 2022), hlm. hlm. 260.
Ediwarman, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2016), hlm. 68-69.
Fockema Andrea, Kamus Istilah Hukum (Jakarta: Bina Cipta, 1983), hlm. 24.
M. Usrin, “Analisis Yuridis Asas Peradilan Sederhana Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana”, Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Palembang, Vol. 16 No. 1 (Januari 2018), hlm. 61.
Maya Hildawati Ilham, “Kajian Atas Asas Peradilan Cepat, Sederhana, Dan Biaya Ringan Terhadap Pemenuhan Hak Pencari Keadilan (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 246 K/Pid/2017)”, Jurnal Verstek, Vol. 7 No. 3, hlm. 213.
Muhammad Pasca Zakky, “Penyimpangan Bentuk Upaya Hukum Terhadap Putusan Pailit Akibat PKPU Gagal”, Jurnal Notaire, Vol. 2 No. 1 (Februari 2019), hlm. 50.
Munir Fuady, Pengantar Hukum Bisnis (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2001), hlm. 82.
Ni Made Nardi dan Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan, “Relevansi Penggunaan Model Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepailitan”, Jurnal Kertha Patrika, Vol. 41 No. 2 (Agustus 2019), hlm. 116.
Putusan MA No. 96 PK/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2014, hlm. 1.
Putusan MA Nomor 156 PK/Pdt.Sus/2012, hlm. 1.
Rahayu Hartini, Hukum Kepailitan (Malang: UMM Press, 2007), hlm. 190.
Tata Wijayanta, “Asas Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Putusan Kepailitan Pengadilan Niaga”, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 14 No. 2 (Mei 2014), hlm. 219.
Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU, LN No. 131 Tahun 2004, TLN No. 4443, Pasal 1.
Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU, LN No. 131 Tahun 2004, TLN No. 4443, Pasal 222 Ayat (1).
Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU, LN No. 131 Tahun 2005, TLN No. 4443, Pasal 257.
Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU, LN No. 131 Tahun 2005,
Waldi Nopriansyah, Hukum Bisnis Di Indonesia (Jakarta: Kencana, 2019), hlm. 191.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Intan Nurjannah Lase, Sunarmi Sunarmi, Budiman Ginting, Dedi Harianto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.png)
