Alleged Violation of Article 22 of Law Number 5 of 1999 Concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and/or Unfair Business Competition (Law Number 5 of 1999) Regarding the Procurement of Rehabilitation and Renovation Packages for School Facilities and Infrastructure in Indragiri Hilir Regency 1 and 2 APBN for the 2019 Fiscal Year. Decision: 36/KPPU-I/2020

Hodijatussolihah; Haikal  Mubarak; Ahmad  Fatoni; Thariq  Muslim; Munib; Edi  Santoso; Edi  Santoso

doi:10.55927/fjsr.v3i7.10896

Authors

Hodijatussolihah Mahasiswa Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana Universitas Laglangbuana Bandung
Haikal Mubarak Universitas Laglangbuana Bandung
Ahmad Fatoni
Thariq Muslim Universitas Laglangbuana Bandung
Munib Universitas Laglangbuana Bandung
Edi Santoso Universitas Laglangbuana Bandung
Edi Santoso Universitas Laglangbuana Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/fjsr.v3i7.10896

Keywords:

Violation of Article 22, Unfair Business Competition, Collusion, Government Procurement of Goods/Services, School Rehabilitation

Abstract

This study investigates a case of violation of Article 22 of Law Number 5 of 1999 related to the procurement of rehabilitation and renovation packages for school facilities and infrastructure in Indragiri Hilir Regency. Using a qualitative approach, this study analyzes the motives and factors that led to the conspiracy between PT Adhikarya Teknik Perkasa (Reported Party I), PT Kalber Reksa Abadi (Reported Party II), and the 14.1 Selection Working Group (Pokja) (Reported Party III) in the tender process. The results of the study reveal that economic factors, lack of supervision, and low penalties for violations are the main drivers of the conspiracy. In addition, the involvement of Reported Party III in designing and organizing the tender results shows weaknesses in the supervision and law enforcement system. This study provides important insights for efforts to prevent and overcome violations in government procurement of goods/services in the future

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fauzi, A. (2021). Pengawasan Praktek Monopoli Sebagai Bentuk Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(2), 396-405.

Lubis, D. (2023). Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Terkait Penguasaan atas Jasa Operator Kargo dan Pos (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 208 K/Pdt-Sus-KPPU/2018). Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA, 5(2), 77-90.

Pertiwi, N., & Burhan, A. A. (2023). Efektifitas Penerapan Program Kepatuhan Persaingan Usaha Dalam Pencegahan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Journal of Studia Legalia, 4(01), 72-87.

Rachmadi Usman, S. H. (2022). Hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Sirait, R. A. M. (2020). Larangan Tindakan Persekongkolan Dalam Tender Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Tanjungpura Law Journal, 4(2), 178-190.

Sumarab, M. (2021). Sengketa Persaingan Usaha Dalam Kegiatan Perdagangan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor. 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Lex Privatum, 9(6).

Wijaya, T. (2020). Hukum Anti Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Keadaban, 2(1), 22-35.