Forensic Linguistics: Speech Acts of Defamation on Social Media

Authors

  • Edo Fernando Yogyakarta State University
  • Teguh Setiawan Yogyakarta State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/fjsr.v3i12.12601

Keywords:

Forensic Linguistics, Defamation, Speech Acts

Abstract

Basically, language has been integrated with human life which is used to convey ideas, thoughts, hopes and desires to achieve various interests and functions of each. Linguists also use linguistics as a tool that can help in handling legal cases. The science of language is commonly known as forensic linguistics. Cases that are currently often sticking out are caused by the existence of social media which is used as a means of conveying the contents of the head or a form of self-expression and feelings in the public domain. In this study, an identification of speech acts of defamation in social media will be conducted. This study aims to describe speech acts in defamation cases so as not to have an impact on legal cases. The approaches taken in this study are theoretical and practical. The theoretical approach used is forensic linguistics with the tool of pragmatic analysis study in the form of speech acts. Meanwhile, the practical approach used is in the form of methodological use, namely descriptive qualitative. The analysis of lexical semantics conducted in a forensic linguistic study to prove defamation cases shows that there are data with negative and demeaning meanings; the analysis of grammatical semantics proves that semantics which studies the meaning of phrases, clauses, and sentences, there are data with negative and demeaning meanings. The pragmatic approach shows that expressive elevation speech acts show disappointment

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azis, M. A. (2022). Peningkatan Kemampuan Linguistik Forensik bagi Penyidik Polri melalui Metode Riset Aksi. JURNAL LITBANG POLRI ISSN:, Agustus, 71–83.

Bachari, A. D. (2011). Analisis Pragmatik terhadap Tindak Tutur yang Berdampak Hukum. Jurnal KIMLI, 1–5.

Fatahuddin, F., Iswary, E., & Saleh, F. (2022). Tindak Tutur Asertif Pencemaran Nama Baik Di Sosial Media. Jurnal Idiomatik: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.46918/idiomatik.v5i1.1412

Halid, R. (2022). Tindak Tutur Pelaku Pecemaran Nama Baik Di Media Sosial Kajian Linguistik Forensik. KREDO : Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa Dan Sastra, 5(2), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.24176/kredo.v5i2.6342

Iqbal, M. (n.d.). Implementasi Linguistik Forensik di Ranah Keimigrasian. 596–606.

Olsson, John. (2008). Forensic Linguistics.Continuum

Rosyida, A. K., & Siroj M. B. (2021). Jurnal Sastra Indonesia Strategi, Jenis Tindak Tutur dan Pola Tutur Pencemaran Nama Baik di Media Sosial (Studi Kasus Akun Twitter @digeeembok) Info Artikel Abstrak. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia, 10(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.15294/jsi.v10i2.46672

Subyantoro. (2019). Linguistik Forensik : Sumbangsih Kajian Bahasa dalam Penegakan HUKUM Subyantoro. ADIL INDONESIA JURNAL VOLUME, 1(1), 51–60.

Susanthi, I. (2021). Analisis Pencemaran Nama Baik Dengan Kajian Linguistik Forensik. IJFL (International Journal of Forensic Linguistic, 2(1), 1–3. https://ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/ijfl/article/view/4067

Susanto, S., Nanda, D, S. (2020). Dimensi Analisis Bahasa dalam Linguistik Forensik. IJFL (International Journal of Forensic Linguistic. 1 (1). 17-22. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22225/.2.1.1603.1-6

Turrel, M.T. (2008). “Malcolm Coulthard and Alisom Johnson 2007: An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence”. London and New York: Routledge. 237 pp. ISBN 978-0-415-32023.

Zaman, S. (2020). Analisis Pragmatik Fungsi Tindak Tutur dalam Kasus Ujaran Kebencian. Seminar Internasional Riksa Bahasa XIV, 219–226.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-05

How to Cite

Fernando, E., & Setiawan, T. . (2024). Forensic Linguistics: Speech Acts of Defamation on Social Media. Formosa Journal of Sustainable Research, 3(12), 2543–2554. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjsr.v3i12.12601