Alleged Violation of Article 29 of Law Number 5 of 1999 Jo. Article 5 Government Regulation Number 57 of 2010 Regarding Late Notification of Takeover (Acquisition) of Asian Trails Holding Ltd. Shares. By Travel Circle International (Mauritius) Ltd. Decision: 22/Kppu-M/2020

Mira  Gunati; Tri Agus Haryono; Mijan; Yogi Angistya Tamara; Edi  Santoso

doi:10.55927/fjsr.v3i5.9112

Authors

Mira Gunati Universitas Laglangbuana Bandung
Tri Agus Haryono Universitas Laglangbuana Bandung
Mijan Universitas Laglangbuana Bandung
Yogi Angistya Tamara Universitas Laglangbuana Bandung
Edi Santoso Universitas Laglangbuana Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/fjsr.v3i5.9112

Keywords:

Mergers and Acquisitions, Business Competition, Tourism, Law Enforcement, Regulatory Compliance

Abstract

Delay in notification of takeover of shares of Asian Trails Holding Ltd. (ATHL) by Travel Circle International (Mauritius) Ltd. (TCI) to the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) triggering fines and raising concerns about business competition practices and fairness in the Asian tourism market. This article analyzes the factors that cause notification delays, their implications for the market, and the steps needed to prevent the recurrence of similar cases. The analysis results show that delays are caused by a combination of factors, including misunderstanding of regulations, transaction complexity, lack of internal understanding, and less than optimal communication with KPPU. This delay has the potential to trigger regulatory violations, competitive disruption, uncertainty and injustice, which can have a negative impact on consumers, business actors and the economy as a whole. Therefore, joint efforts are needed from relevant authorities, business actors and civil society to strengthen business competition law enforcement, increase regulatory awareness and build a transparent, accountable and fair tourism market ecosystem

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bahriyah, E. N., & Afif, A. S. (2021). Partisipasi Masyarakat dan Penerapan PKPU No. 6 Tahun 2020 menuju Pilkada Serentak 2020 pada Masa Pandemi Covid19. KOMUNIKOLOGI: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi, 18(01).

Choirul Rizki, S. (2020). Menakar Perbedaan Opini Dalam Agenda Pelaksanaan Kontestasi Pilkada Serentak Di Tengah Covid-19. Jurnal Ilmiah Muqoddimah: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 4(2).

Devika, M., Mulyono, G. P., & Nahuddin, Y. E. (2020, December). Penegakan Protokol Kesehatan dalam Penyelenggaraan Pilkada Serentak di Tengah Pandemi Covid I9. In Proceeding of Conference on Law and Social Studies (pp. 1-15).

Nusantara, B. G. (2022). Politik Hukum Penyelenggaraan Pilkada Serentak Tahun 2024 (Potret Perdebatan Partai Politik Di Parlemen) (Bachelor's thesis, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta).

Ristyawati, A. (2020). Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Pilkada Serentak 2020 Pada Masa Pandemi Darurat Covid-19 Di Indonesia. Crepido, 2(2), 85-96.

Syafruddin, S., & Hasanah, S. (2022). Analisis Dampak Penyelenggaraan Pilkada Serentak Tahun 2024. Journal of Government and Politics (JGOP), 4(2), 252-269.