Tinjauan Hukum Pelaksanaan Gadai Kebun Cengkeh di Desa Diule Kecamatan Tolitoli Utara Kabupaten Tolitoli
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/fjsr.v1i3.957Keywords:
implementation of clove garden pawning, and efforts to overcome lossesAbstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the mechanism of implementation of the clove garden pawn and the legal consequences for the owner of the upper clove garden which was pawned in Diule Village, North Tolitoli District, Tolitoli Regency. Research data were collected through interviews and observations, analyzed using descriptive analytical techniques with an inductive mindset. The results of the study concluded that the practice of pawning clove gardens that occurred in Diule Village was seen to be very detrimental to the clove garden owners, because of the urgency of the need for money, the applicant pawned his clove garden so that they were bound to loan sharks who acted as money lenders. This research is a field research where data collection is done by interviewing informants. In addition, the author also conducts document study research through data and books related to the research topic. Furthermore, the data obtained were analyzed qualitatively and presented descriptively. Based on the analysis, the authors conclude several things, including: 1. The form and process of the implementation of the clove garden pawn in Diule Village, North Tolitoli District, Tolitoli Regency still uses a long-standing habit of pawning clove gardens orally without any time limit for redemption. mortgaged land. 2. Efforts to overcome losses, namely the provisions in article 7 paragraph (1) of Law no. 56 Prp 1960 which obliges the pawnbroker to return the pawned land to the pawnee one month after the crops are harvested, without any ransom.
Downloads
References
Boedi Harsono, Hukum Agraria Indonesia, (Jakarta: Djambatan, 2007),
Febry Syarif Hidayatullah. Kajian Yuridis Gadai Tanah Pertanian Menurut UU No.5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan - Peraturan Dasar Pokok Agraria (UUPA). Laporan Hasil Penelitian. Jember. Fakultas Hukum. Universitas Jember. 2013
Frieda Husni Hasbullah, Hukum kebendaan perdata: hak-hak yang memberi jaminan, jilid II,(Jakarta : Ind HiII Co, 2005)
H.F.A Vollmar, 1978, Hukum Benda, Tarsito, Bandung,
Hilman Hadikusuma. Hukum Perjanjian Adat Bandung. Citra Aditya Bakti 1994
Imam Sudiyat. Hukum Adat Sketsa Adat. Jakarta 2015
Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto Achmad, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Empiris & Normatif, Pustaka Pelajar 2010
Salim HS, Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia, Ed. 1, Jakarta : PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2007
Siadari Ray Pratama “ Pengertian Gadai Tanah Menurut Hukum Adat dan Menurut Undang-Undang Pokok Agararia”, Uzon.com, 12 Februari 2012.
Soerjono Soekamto, Hukum Adat Indonesia, Cetakan Kedua PT. Raja Grafindo Persasta, Jakarta, 1983,
Soerjono Soekanto, pengantar penelitian hukum (Jakarta : Ui pres, 1986)
Subekti dan Tjitrosudibio ,Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek). : Pradnya Paramita 2008,
Syamsul Bahri Dt. Saripado, Hukum Agraria Indonesia Dulu dan Kini II, Padang 1987
Syamsul Bahri Dt. Saripado, Hukum Agraria Indonesia Dulu dan Kini II, Padang .1987
Ter Haar Bzn, Asas-asas dan Susunan Hukum Adat, (Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1981),
Urip Santoso, Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah, Prenadamedia Group, cetakan ke 1 agustus 2015.
Yudi Setiawan, Instrumen Hukum Campuran Dalam Konsolidasi Tanah (Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2009)
Zainudin Ali, Hukum Gadai Syariah, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ahmad Malontu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


























